Policy

judge-orders-musk-and-doge-to-delete-personal-data-taken-from-social-security

Judge orders Musk and DOGE to delete personal data taken from Social Security

doge, elon musk, Policy, Trump / /

The lawsuit was filed by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; the Alliance for Retired Americans; and American Federation of Teachers. “Never before has a group of unelected, unappointed, and unvetted individuals—contradictorily described as White House employees, employees of either existing or putative agencies (multiple and many), and undefined ‘advisors’—sought or gained access to such sensitive information from across the federal government,” the lawsuit said.

A temporary restraining order preserves the status quo until a preliminary injunction hearing can be held, although the legal standards for granting a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction are essentially the same, Hollander wrote. A temporary restraining order lasts 14 days by default but can be extended.

“In my view, plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits as to their claim that the access to records provided by SSA to the DOGE Team does not fall within the need-to-know exception to the Privacy Act. Therefore, the access violates both the Privacy Act and the APA,” Hollander wrote.

The SSA has meanwhile been hit with DOGE-fueled budget cuts affecting its operations.

The order

The order says the SSA must cut off DOGE’s access. Musk, Gleason, and all other DOGE team members and affiliates “shall disgorge and delete all non-anonymized PII [personally identifiable information] data in their possession or under their control, provided from or obtained, directly or indirectly, from any SSA system of record to which they have or have had access, directly or indirectly, since January 20, 2025,” it says.

The DOGE defendants are also prohibited “from installing any software on SSA devices, information systems, or systems of record, and shall remove any software that they previously installed since January 20, 2025, or which has been installed on their behalf,” and are prohibited “from accessing, altering, or disclosing any SSA computer or software code.”

The SSA is allowed to provide DOGE with redacted or anonymized records, and may provide “access to discrete, particularized, and non-anonymized data, in accordance with the Privacy Act” under certain conditions. “SSA must first obtain from the DOGE Team member, in writing, and subject to possible review by the Court, a detailed explanation as to the need for the record and why, for said particular and discrete record, an anonymized or redacted record is not suitable for the specified use,” the order said. “The general and conclusory explanation that the information is needed to search for fraud or waste is not sufficient to establish need.”

Judge orders Musk and DOGE to delete personal data taken from Social Security Read More »

after-“glitter-bomb,”-cops-arrested-former-cop-who-criticized-current-cops-online

After “glitter bomb,” cops arrested former cop who criticized current cops online

facebook, Orland park, police, Policy / /

The police claimed that “the fraudulent Facebook pages posted comments on Village of Orland Park social media sites while also soliciting friend requests from Orland Park Police employees and other citizens, portraying the likeness of Deputy Chief of Police Brian West”—and said that this was both Disorderly Conduct and False Personation, both misdemeanors.

West got permission from his boss to launch a criminal investigation, which soon turned into search warrants that surfaced a name: retired Orland Park sergeant Ken Kovac, who had left the department in 2019 after two decades of service. Kovac was charged, and he surrendered himself at the Orland Park Police Department on April 7, 2024.

The police then issued their press release, letting their community know that West had witnessed “demeaning comments in reference to his supervisory position within the department from Kovac’s posts on social media”—which doesn’t sound like any sort of crime. They also wanted to let concerned citizens know that West “epitomizes the principles of public service” and that “Deputy Chief West’s apprehensions were treated with the utmost seriousness and underwent a thorough investigation.”

Okay.

Despite the “utmost seriousness” of this Very Serious Investigation, a judge wasn’t having any of it. In January 2025, Cook County Judge Mohammad Ahmad threw out both the charges against Kovac.

Kovac, of course, was thrilled. His lawyer told a local Patch reporter, “These charges never should have been brought. Ken Kovac made a Facebook account that poked fun at the Deputy Chief of the Orland Park Police Department. The Deputy Chief didn’t like it and tried to use the criminal legal system to get even.”

Orland Park was not backing down, however, blaming prosecutors for the loss. “Despite compelling evidence in the case, the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office was unable to secure a prosecution, failing in its responsibility to protect Deputy Chief West as a victim of these malicious acts,” the village manager told Patch. “The Village of Orland Park is deeply disappointed by this outcome and stands unwavering in its support of former Deputy Chief West.”

The drama took its most recent, entirely predictable, turn this week when Kovac sued the officials who had arrested him. He told the Chicago Sun-Times that he had been embarrassed about being fingerprinted and processed “at the police department that I was previously employed at by people that I used to work with and for.”

Orland Park told the paper that it “stands by its actions and those of its employees and remains confident that they were appropriate and fully compliant with the law.”

After “glitter bomb,” cops arrested former cop who criticized current cops online Read More »

fcc-chairman-brendan-carr-starts-granting-telecom-lobby’s-wish-list

FCC chairman Brendan Carr starts granting telecom lobby’s wish list

brendan carr, FCC, Policy / /

In July 2024, AT&T became the first carrier to apply for a technology transition discontinuance “under the Adequate Replacement Test relying on the applicant’s own replacement service,” the order said. “AT&T indicated in this application that it was relying on a totality of the circumstances showing to establish the adequacy of its replacement service, but also committed to the performance testing methodology and parameters established in the 2016 Technology Transitions Order Technical Appendix.” This “delay[ed] the filing of its discontinuance application for several months,” the FCC said.

Harold Feld, senior VP of consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge, said the FCC clarification that carriers don’t need to perform testing, “combined with elimination of most of the remaining notice requirements, means that you don’t have to worry about actually proving anything. Just say ‘totality of the circumstances’ and by the time anyone who cares finds out, the application will be granted.”

“The one positive thing is that some states (such as California) still have carrier of last resort rules to protect consumers,” Feld told Ars. “In some states, at least, consumers will not suddenly find themselves cut off from 911 or other important services.”

Telco lobby loves FCC moves

The bureau separately approved a petition for a waiver filed last month by USTelecom, a lobby group that represents telcos such as AT&T, Verizon, and CenturyLink (aka Lumen). The group sought a waiver of a requirement that replacement voice services be offered on a stand-alone basis instead of only in a bundle with broadband.

While bundles cost more than single services for consumers who only want phone access, USTelecom said that “inefficiencies of offering stand-alone voice can raise costs for consumers and reduce capital available for investment and innovation.”

The FCC said granting the waiver will allow providers “to retire copper networks, not only in cases where replacement voice services are available on a stand-alone basis, but in cases where those services are available on a bundled basis.” The waiver is approved for two years and can be extended.

USTelecom President and CEO Jonathan Spalter praised the FCC actions in a statement. “Broadband providers appreciate Chairman Carr’s laser focus on cutting through red tape and outdated mindsets to accelerate the work of connecting all Americans,” Spalter said.

Just like Carr’s statement, Spalter did not use the word “fiber” when discussing replacements for copper service. He said vaguely that “today’s decision marks a significant step forward in transitioning outdated copper telephone lines to next-generation networks that better meet the needs of American consumers,” and “will help turbocharge investment in advanced broadband infrastructure, sustain and grow a skilled broadband workforce, bring countless new choices and services to more families and communities, and fuel our innovation economy.”

FCC chairman Brendan Carr starts granting telecom lobby’s wish list Read More »

cybertrucks’-faulty-trim-prompts-biggest-recall-yet,-stokes-tesla-investor-panic

Cybertrucks’ faulty trim prompts biggest recall yet, stokes Tesla investor panic

Cybertruck, elon musk, NHTSA recall, Policy, recall, Tesla / /

Every Tesla Cybertruck ever sold is being recalled so Tesla can fix an exterior panel that could potentially come unglued and detach while driving.

If the “panel separates from the vehicle while in drive, it could create a road hazard for following motorists and increase their risk of injury or a collision,” Tesla explained in a safety recall report submitted Tuesday to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Tesla initially became aware of the issue in January and launched a study of the problem as more complaints came in, the report said. By March, social media complaints were getting louder as Tesla wrapped up its probe, concluding that a voluntary recall was necessary.

The recall affects any 2024 or 2025 Cybertruck manufactured between November 13, 2023, to February 27, 2025, the report said. According to Reuters, this represents “a vast majority of the Cybertruck vehicles on the road, based on analyst estimates.” Potentially more than 46,000 vehicles could require the fix, Tesla said, while conservatively estimating that only 1 percent of cars are likely defective.

Cybertruck drivers unsure if their vehicle needs the fix can look out for warning signs, like “a detectable noise inside the cabin” or visible signs the panel is detaching, Tesla said.

Anyone whose car is covered by the recall can get the fix at no charge, Tesla said. The repair both replaces the adhesive used for the panel with one that’s more durable and reinforces the attachment “with a stud welded to the stainless panel with a nut clamping the steel panel to the vehicle structure,” Tesla said.

Starting tomorrow, all new Cybertrucks that Tesla produces will have this fix, Tesla said, while any vehicles that Tesla currently possesses will be retrofitted before delivery to any customers.

Tesla is currently notifying dealers about the recall, then plans to start reaching out to customers with recall notices on May 19. Any Cybertruck owners interested in pursuing repairs now can call NHTSA’s Vehicle Safety Hotline at 888-327-4236 (TTY 888-275-9171) or go to nhtsa.gov, the agency said.

Investors panicked by Tesla’s “brand tornado crisis moment”

Last year, Tesla had several rounds of recalls, notifying drivers of widely varied problems, from software issues to faulty accelerator pedals or inverters. As recalls have been announced, Cybertruck sales have seemingly slumped, as Tesla obscured the true figures by lumping numbers in with sales of Model X and Model S, MotorTrend reported. This new recall is the first glimpse industry analysts have had of total Cybertruck sales, MotorTrend noted, and compared to other popular trucks, Cybertruck sales overall appear remarkably stunted.

Cybertrucks’ faulty trim prompts biggest recall yet, stokes Tesla investor panic Read More »

dad-demands-openai-delete-chatgpt’s-false-claim-that-he-murdered-his-kids

Dad demands OpenAI delete ChatGPT’s false claim that he murdered his kids

chatbot, chatgpt, European Union, gdpr, General Data Protection Regulation, hallucinations, Norway, noyb, openai, Policy / /

Currently, ChatGPT does not repeat these horrible false claims about Holmen in outputs. A more recent update apparently fixed the issue, as “ChatGPT now also searches the Internet for information about people, when it is asked who they are,” Noyb said. But because OpenAI had previously argued that it cannot correct information—it can only block information—the fake child murderer story is likely still included in ChatGPT’s internal data. And unless Holmen can correct it, that’s a violation of the GDPR, Noyb claims.

“While the damage done may be more limited if false personal data is not shared, the GDPR applies to internal data just as much as to shared data,” Noyb says.

OpenAI may not be able to easily delete the data

Holmen isn’t the only ChatGPT user who has worried that the chatbot’s hallucinations might ruin lives. Months after ChatGPT launched in late 2022, an Australian mayor threatened to sue for defamation after the chatbot falsely claimed he went to prison. Around the same time, ChatGPT linked a real law professor to a fake sexual harassment scandal, The Washington Post reported. A few months later, a radio host sued OpenAI over ChatGPT outputs describing fake embezzlement charges.

In some cases, OpenAI filtered the model to avoid generating harmful outputs but likely didn’t delete the false information from the training data, Noyb suggested. But filtering outputs and throwing up disclaimers aren’t enough to prevent reputational harm, Noyb data protection lawyer, Kleanthi Sardeli, alleged.

“Adding a disclaimer that you do not comply with the law does not make the law go away,” Sardeli said. “AI companies can also not just ‘hide’ false information from users while they internally still process false information. AI companies should stop acting as if the GDPR does not apply to them, when it clearly does. If hallucinations are not stopped, people can easily suffer reputational damage.”

Dad demands OpenAI delete ChatGPT’s false claim that he murdered his kids Read More »

us-tries-to-keep-doge-and-musk-work-secret-in-appeal-of-court-ordered-discovery

US tries to keep DOGE and Musk work secret in appeal of court-ordered discovery

doge, musk trump, Policy, President Donald Trump, us doge service / /

The petition argues that discovery is unnecessary to assess the plaintiff states’ claims. “Plaintiffs allege a violation of the Appointments Clause and USDS’s statutory authority on the theory that USDS and Mr. Musk are directing decision-making by agency officeholders,” it said. “Those claims present pure questions of law that can be resolved—and rejected—on the basis of plaintiffs’ complaint. In particular, precedent establishes that the Appointments Clause turns on proper appointment of officeholders; it is not concerned with the de facto influence over those who hold office.”

States: Discovery can confirm Musk’s role at DOGE

The states’ lawsuit alleged that “President Trump has delegated virtually unchecked authority to Mr. Musk without proper legal authorization from Congress and without meaningful supervision of his activities. As a result, he has transformed a minor position that was formerly responsible for managing government websites into a designated agent of chaos without limitation and in violation of the separation of powers.”

States argued that discovery “may confirm what investigative reporting has already indicated: Defendants Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (‘DOGE’) are directing actions within federal agencies that have profoundly harmed the States and will continue to harm them.”

Amy Gleason, the person the White House claims is running DOGE instead of Musk, has reportedly been working simultaneously at the Department of Health and Human Services since last month.

“Defendants assert that Mr. Musk is merely an advisor to the President, with no authority to direct agency action and no role at DOGE,” the states’ filing said. “The public record refutes that implausible assertion. But only Defendants possess the documents and information that Plaintiffs need to confirm public reporting and identify which agencies Defendants will target next so Plaintiffs can seek preliminary relief and mitigate further harm.”

“Notably, Plaintiffs seek no emails, text messages, or other electronic communications at this stage, meaning Defendants will not need to sort through such exchanges for relevance or possible privilege,” the states said. “The documents that Plaintiffs do seek—planning, implementation, and organizational documents—are readily available to Defendants and do not implicate the same privilege concerns.”

Discovery related to DOGE and Musk’s conduct

Chutkan wrote that the plaintiffs’ “document requests and interrogatories generally concern DOGE’s and Musk’s conduct in four areas: (1) eliminating or reducing the size of federal agencies; (2) terminating or placing federal employees on leave; (3) cancelling, freezing, or pausing federal contracts, grants, or other federal funding; and (4) obtaining access, using, or making changes to federal databases or data management systems.”

US tries to keep DOGE and Musk work secret in appeal of court-ordered discovery Read More »

furious-at-the-fcc,-arkansas-jail-cancels-inmate-phone-calls-rather-than-lower-rates

Furious at the FCC, Arkansas jail cancels inmate phone calls rather than lower rates

FCC, jail, phone calls, Policy / /

If “the Federal Communications Commission reverses their adverse regulations,” Montgomery said, “the Baxter County Sheriff’s Office will revisit the feasibility of reimplementing the inmate phone system.”

One might expect this view to generate some sympathy in the MAGA-fied halls of FCC HQ. But the Commission’s two Republicans actually voted in favor of the rate control order last year. Current FCC Chair Brendan Carr even agreed that inmate phone calls in American prisons were often “excessive” and that the private operators behind these systems represented a “market failure.” He then voted for straight-up, old-school price caps.

In fact, Carr went on to offer a robust defense of inmate calling, saying: “[I often] heard from families who experienced firsthand the difficulties of maintaining contact with their incarcerated loved ones. I also heard from formerly incarcerated individuals who underscored the decline in mental and emotional health that can result from a lack of external communications. Beyond that, studies have repeatedly shown that increased communication between incarcerated people and their families, friends, and other outside resources helps reduce recidivism rates.”

So Montgomery may not get this decision reversed easily. (On the other hand, Carr did just launch a “Delete! Delete! Delete!” initiative focused on cutting regulations, so who knows.)

Baxter County claims that the FCC decision means that phone services are no longer “feasible.” In 2018, however, when Baxter County wanted to expand its jail and didn’t have the cash, officials found a way to make it feasible by asking voters to approve a 1-cent sales tax collected between April and September of that year. (You can even watch a time-lapse video of the jail expansion being built.) Feasibility, it turns out, is often in the eye of the beholder.

Montgomery did say that he would add some additional in-person visiting hours at the jail to compensate for the lack of phone calls, and last week his office posted the new schedule. But as positive as in-person contact can be, in a busy world it is still nice to have the option of a reasonably priced phone call—you know, the kind that’s “feasible” to offer at most other jails in the US.

Furious at the FCC, Arkansas jail cancels inmate phone calls rather than lower rates Read More »

fcc-to-get-republican-majority-and-plans-to-“delete”-as-many-rules-as-possible

FCC to get Republican majority and plans to “delete” as many rules as possible

fcc geoffrey starks, Policy / /

By contrast, then-President Joe Biden waited nine months to choose a Democratic nominee in 2021. His first nominee, Gigi Sohn, wasn’t confirmed despite Democrats having control of the Senate at the time. The Biden-era FCC didn’t gain a Democratic majority until Gomez was confirmed in September 2023.

Carr would have a 2-1 majority upon Starks’ departure assuming there is no Senate vote on Trusty’s nomination before then. US law prevents either party from obtaining an FCC supermajority. “The maximum number of commissioners who may be members of the same political party shall be a number equal to the least number of commissioners which constitutes a majority of the full membership of the Commission,” the law says.

Democratic leaders can be expected to recommend a replacement for Starks’ seat. The president nominates all FCC commissioners, but Trump has previously followed the tradition of using recommendations made by Democrats when nominating members from the opposing party.

The Senate sometimes pairs votes on nominations so that one Democrat and one Republican are added to the FCC at the same time. There’s no guarantee that Republicans will wait for a Democratic nominee.

“I think the Republicans will move ahead as quickly as possible with Trusty. While she could be paired with a Democrat, and in different times, would have been, I think in today’s climate, they are more likely to move ahead without a pair,” New Street Research Policy Advisor Blair Levin told Ars.

Schumer reportedly urged Starks to stay awhile

Starks would have been a possible candidate for FCC chair if Kamala Harris had won the presidency and if Rosenworcel decided not to serve a second term as chair.

Carr issued a statement praising Starks for “an impressive legacy of accomplishments in public service.” Gomez said that Starks’ “expertise on national security issues and his deep understanding of the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau have been instrumental in advancing the agency’s mission,” and that he “demonstrated unwavering commitment to protecting consumers and strengthening our communications networks.”

Starks’ departure has been anticipated since shortly after Trump’s election win. In December, Schumer reportedly urged Starks to stay at the FCC for awhile to delay the Republicans gaining a majority.

There might be another Republican seat to fill sometime after Trusty’s nomination receives a Senate vote. Carr’s fellow Republican on the commission, Nathan Simington, “has also wanted to depart to take on different work,” a Bloomberg report said.

FCC to get Republican majority and plans to “delete” as many rules as possible Read More »

google-inks-$32-billion-deal-to-buy-security-firm-wiz-even-as-doj-seeks-breakup

Google inks $32 billion deal to buy security firm Wiz even as DOJ seeks breakup

Google, google wiz, Policy / /

“While a tough regulatory climate in 2024 had hampered such large-scale deals, Wall Street is optimistic that a shift in antitrust policies under US President Donald Trump could reignite dealmaking momentum,” Reuters wrote today.

Google reportedly agreed to a $3.2 billion breakup fee that would be paid to Wiz if the deal collapses. A Financial Times report said the breakup fee is unusually large as it represents 10 percent of the total deal value, instead of the typical 2 or 3 percent. The large breakup fee “shows how technology companies are still bracing themselves for pushback from antitrust regulators, even under President Donald Trump and his new Federal Trade Commission chair Andrew Ferguson,” the article said.

Wiz co-founder and CEO Assaf Rappaport wrote today that although the plan is for Wiz to become part of Google Cloud, the companies both believe that “Wiz needs to remain a multicloud platform… We will still work closely with our great partners at AWS, Azure, Oracle, and across the entire industry.”

Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian wrote that Wiz’s platform would fill a gap in Google’s security offerings. Google products already “help customers detect and respond to attackers through both SaaS-based services and cybersecurity consulting,” but Wiz is different because it “connects to all major clouds and code environments to help prevent incidents from happening in the first place,” he wrote.

“Wiz’s solution rapidly scans the customer’s environment, constructing a comprehensive graph of code, cloud resources, services, and applications—along with the connections between them,” Kurian wrote. “It identifies potential attack paths, prioritizes the most critical risks based on their impact, and empowers enterprise developers to secure applications before deployment. It also helps security teams collaborate with developers to remediate risks in code or detect and block ongoing attacks.”

Google inks $32 billion deal to buy security firm Wiz even as DOJ seeks breakup Read More »

trump-plan-to-fund-musk’s-starlink-over-fiber-called-“betrayal”-of-rural-us

Trump plan to fund Musk’s Starlink over fiber called “betrayal” of rural US

BEAD program, elon musk, Policy, starlink, trump administration / /

“Some states are on the 1-yard line”

Republicans criticized the Biden administration for not yet distributing grant money, but the NTIA said in November that it had approved initial funding plans submitted by every state and territory. Feinman said the change in direction will delay grant distribution.

“Some states are on the 1-yard line. A bunch are on the 5-yard line. More will be getting there every week,” he wrote. “These more-sweeping changes will only cause delays. The administration could fix the problems with the program via waiver and avoid slowdowns.”

The program is on pause, even if the new government leaders don’t admit it, according to Feinman. “The administration wants to make changes, but doesn’t want to be seen slowing things down. They can’t have both. States will have to be advised that they should either slow down or stop doing subgrantee selection,” he wrote.

Delaware, Louisiana, and Nevada had their final proposals approved by the NTIA in January, a few days before Trump’s inauguration. “Shovels could already be in the ground in three states, and they could be in the ground in half the country by the summer without the proposed changes to project selection,” Feinman wrote.

The three states with approved final proposals are now “in limbo,” he wrote. “This makes no sense—these states are ready to go, and they got the job done on time, on budget, and have plans that achieve universal coverage,” his email said. “If the administration cares about getting shovels in the ground, states with approved Final Proposals should move forward, ASAP.”

Other states that were nearing the final stage are also in limbo, Feinman wrote. “No decision has been made about how much of the existing progress the 30 states who are already performing subgrantee selection should be allowed to keep,” he wrote. “The administration simply cannot say whether the time, taxpayer funds, and private capital that were spent on those processes will be wasted and how much states will have to re-do.”

Trump plan to fund Musk’s Starlink over fiber called “betrayal” of rural US Read More »

uk-online-safety-law-musk-hates-kicks-in-today,-and-so-far,-trump-can’t-stop-it

UK online safety law Musk hates kicks in today, and so far, Trump can’t stop it

content moderation, Donald Trump, elon musk, online safety act, Policy, tariffs, Twitter, united kingdom, X / /

Enforcement of a first-of-its-kind United Kingdom law that Elon Musk wants Donald Trump to gut kicked in today, with potentially huge penalties possibly imminent for any Big Tech companies deemed non-compliant.

UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) forces tech companies to detect and remove dangerous online content, threatening fines of up to 10 percent of global turnover. In extreme cases, widely used platforms like Musk’s X could be shut down or executives even jailed if UK online safety regulator Ofcom determines there has been a particularly egregious violation.

Critics call it a censorship bill, listing over 130 “priority” offenses across 17 categories detailing what content platforms must remove. The list includes illegal content connected to terrorism, child sexual exploitation, human trafficking, illegal drugs, animal welfare, and other crimes. But it also broadly restricts content in legally gray areas, like posts considered “extreme pornography,” harassment, or controlling behavior.

Matthew Lesh, a public policy fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs, told The Telegraph that “the idea that Elon Musk, or any social media executive, could be jailed for failing to remove enough content should send chills down the spine of anyone who cares about free speech.”

Musk has publicly signaled that he expects Trump to intervene, saying, “Thank goodness Donald Trump will be president just in time,” regarding the OSA’s enforcement starting in March, The Telegraph reported last month. The X owner has been battling UK regulators since last summer after resisting requests from the UK government to remove misinformation during riots considered the “worst unrest in England for more than a decade,” The Financial Times reported.

According to Musk, X was refusing to censor UK users. Attacking the OSA, Musk falsely claimed Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government was “releasing convicted pedophiles in order to imprison people for social media posts,” FT reported. Such a post, if seen as spreading misinformation potentially inciting violence, could be banned under the OSA, the FT suggested.

Trump’s UK deal may disappoint Musk

Musk hopes that Trump will strike a deal with the UK government to potentially water down the OSA.

UK online safety law Musk hates kicks in today, and so far, Trump can’t stop it Read More »

google-joins-openai-in-pushing-feds-to-codify-ai-training-as-fair-use

Google joins OpenAI in pushing feds to codify AI training as fair use

AI, AI regulation, Google, Policy, US government / /

Google’s position on AI regulation: Trust us, bro

If there was any doubt about Google’s commitment to move fast and break things, its new policy position should put that to rest. “For too long, AI policymaking has paid disproportionate attention to the risks,” the document says.

Google urges the US to invest in AI not only with money but with business-friendly legislation. The company joins the growing chorus of AI firms calling for federal legislation that clarifies how they can operate. It points to the difficulty of complying with a “patchwork” of state-level laws that impose restrictions on AI development and use. If you want to know what keeps Google’s policy wonks up at night, look no further than the vetoed SB-1047 bill in California, which would have enforced AI safety measures.

AI ethics or AI Law concept. Developing AI codes of ethics. Compliance, regulation, standard , business policy and responsibility for guarding against unintended bias in machine learning algorithms.

Credit: Parradee Kietsirikul

According to Google, a national AI framework that supports innovation is necessary to push the boundaries of what artificial intelligence can do. Taking a page from the gun lobby, Google opposes attempts to hold the creators of AI liable for the way those models are used. Generative AI systems are non-deterministic, making it impossible to fully predict their output. Google wants clearly defined responsibilities for AI developers, deployers, and end users—it would, however, clearly prefer most of those responsibilities fall on others. “In many instances, the original developer of an AI model has little to no visibility or control over how it is being used by a deployer and may not interact with end users,” the company says.

There are efforts underway in some countries that would implement stringent regulations that force companies like Google to make their tools more transparent. For example, the EU’s AI Act would require AI firms to publish an overview of training data and possible risks associated with their products. Google believes this would force the disclosure of trade secrets that would allow foreign adversaries to more easily duplicate its work, mirroring concerns that OpenAI expressed in its policy proposal.

Google wants the government to push back on these efforts at the diplomatic level. The company would like to be able to release AI products around the world, and the best way to ensure it has that option is to promote light-touch regulation that “reflects US values and approaches.” That is, Google’s values and approaches.

Google joins OpenAI in pushing feds to codify AI training as fair use Read More »