Europe

broadcom-says-“many”-vmware-perpetual-licenses-got-support-extensions

Broadcom says “many” VMware perpetual licenses got support extensions

Conveniently timed blog post —

Broadcom reportedly accused of changing VMware licensing and support conditions.

The logo of American cloud computing and virtualization technology company VMware is seen at the Mobile World Congress (MWC), the telecom industry's biggest annual gathering, in Barcelona on March 2, 2023.

Broadcom CEO Hock Tan this week publicized some concessions aimed at helping customers and partners ease into VMware’s recent business model changes. Tan reiterated that the controversial changes, like the end of perpetual licensing, aren’t going away. But amid questioning from antitrust officials in the European Union (EU), Tan announced that the company has already given support extensions for some VMware perpetual license holders.

Broadcom closed its $69 billion VMware acquisition in November. One of its first moves was ending VMware perpetual license sales in favor of subscriptions. Since December, Broadcom also hasn’t sold Support and Subscription renewals for VMware perpetual licenses.

In a blog post on Monday, Tan admitted that this shift requires “a change in the timing of customers’ expenditures and the balance of those expenditures between capital and operating spending.” As a result, Broadcom has “given support extensions to many customers who came up for renewal while these changes were rolling out.” Tan didn’t specify how Broadcom determined who is eligible for an extension or for how long. However, the executive’s blog is the first time Broadcom has announced such extensions and opens the door to more extension requests.

Tan also announced free access to zero-day security patches for supported versions of vSphere to “ensure that customers whose maintenance and support contracts have expired and choose to not continue on one of our subscription offerings are able to use perpetual licenses in a safe and secure fashion.” Tan said other VMware offerings would also receive this concession but didn’t say which or when.

Antitrust concerns in the EU

The news follows Broadcom being questioned by EU antitrust regulators. In late March, MLex said that a European Commission spokesperson had contacted Broadcom for questioning because the commission “received information suggesting that Broadcom is changing the conditions of VMware’s software licensing and support.” Reuters confirmed the news on Monday, the same day Tan posted his blog. Tan didn’t specify if his blog post was related to the EU probing. Broadcom moving VMware to a subscription model was one of the allegations that led to EU officials’ probe, MLex said last month. It’s unclear what, if anything, will follow the questioning.

Tan said this week that VMware’s plan to move to a subscription model started in 2018 (he previously said the plans started to “accelerate in 2019”) before Broadcom’s acquisition. He has argued that the transition ultimately occurred later than most competitors.

The Commission previously approved Broadcom’s VMware purchase in July after a separate antitrust investigation.

However, various European trade groups, including Beltug, a Belgian CIO trade group, and the CIO Platform Nederland association for CIOs and CDOs, wrote a letter (PDF) to the European Commission on March 28, requesting that the Commission “take appropriate action” against Broadcom, which it accused of implementing VMware business practices that resulted in “steeply increased prices,” “non-fulfillment of previous contractual agreements,” and Broadcom “refusing to maintain security conditions for perpetual licenses.”

Partner worries

VMware channel partners and customers have also criticized Broadcom’s VMware for seemingly having less interest in doing business with smaller businesses. The company previously announced that it is killing the VMware Cloud Services Provider (CSP) partner program. The Palo Alto-headquartered firm originally said that CSPs may be invited to the Broadcom Expert Advantage Partner Program. However, reported minimum core requirements seemed to outprice small firms; in February, some small managed service providers claimed that the price of doing VMware business would increase tenfold under the new structure.

Small CSPs will be able to white-label offerings from larger CSPs that qualified for Broadcom’s Premier or Pinnacle partner program tiers as of April 30, when VMware’s CSP partner program shutters. But in the meantime, Broadcom “will continue existing operations” small CSPs “under modified monthly billing arrangements until the white-label offers are available,” Tan said, adding that the move is about ensuring that “there is continuity of service for this smaller partner group.”

However, some channel partners accessing VMware offerings through larger partners remain worried about the future. CRN spoke with an anonymous channel partner selling VMware through Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), which said that more than half of its VMware customers “have reached out to say they are concerned and they want to be aware of alternatives.”

Another unnamed HPE partner told CRN that Broadcom’s perceived prioritization of “the “bigger, more profitable customers, is sensible but “leaves a lot of people in the lurch.”

Broadcom didn’t respond to Ars’ request for comment.

Broadcom says “many” VMware perpetual licenses got support extensions Read More »

broadcom-execs-say-vmware-price,-subscription-complaints-are-unwarranted 

Broadcom execs say VMware price, subscription complaints are unwarranted 

Broadcom’s defense —

Industry groups aren’t giving up hope for government intervention.

vmware by Broadcom logo

Broadcom has made controversial changes to VMware since closing its acquisition of the virtualization brand in late November. Broadcom executives are trying to convince VMware customers and partners that they’ll eventually see the subscription-fueled light. But discontent remains, as illustrated by industry groups continuing to urge regulators to rein-in what they claim are unfair business practices.

Since Broadcom announced that it would no longer sell perpetual VMware licenses as of December 2023, there have been complaints about rising costs associated with this model. In March, a VMware User Group Town Hall saw attendees complaining of price jumps of up to 600 percent, The Register reported. Small managed service providers that had worked with VMware have reported seeing the price of business rising tenfold, per a February ServeTheHome report.

Broadcom execs defend subscription model

However, Sylvain Cazard, president of Broadcom Software for Asia-Pacific, reportedly told The Register that complaints about higher prices are unwarranted since customers using at least two components of VMware’s flagship Cloud Foundation will end up paying less and because the new pricing includes support, which VMware didn’t include before.

The Register reported that Cazard, as well as Paul Turner, VP of product management at VMware, and Prashanth Shenoy, VP of product and technical marketing for the Cloud, Infrastructure, Platforms, and Solutions group at VMware, all agreed that people who think moving to subscriptions is unfair aren’t considering that VMware waited longer than many in the industry to implement the model.

This is an argument Broadcom has made before. Broadcom CEO and President Hock Tan called subscription-only licensing “the industry standard” in a March blog post defending VMware’s changes.

Pushing for government intervention

Despite Broadcom execs’ efforts to convince people that its changes are reasonable and will eventually end up financially benefitting stakeholders, there’s still effort from industry groups to get federal regulators involved with how Broadcom is running VMware.

As reported by Dutch IT magazine Computable on Friday, representatives from Beltug, a Belgian CIO trade group; Le Cigref, a French network of companies interested in digital technology; the CIO Platform Nederland association for CIOs and CDOs; and VOICE e.V., a German association for IT decisionmakers, sent a letter [PDF] to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Commissioner Thierry Breton on Thursday to “strongly condemn” Broadcom’s businesses practices and ask the commission to take action.

The letter complains of “sudden changes in policy and practices” that Broadcom issued to VMware that the authors claim led to: “steeply increased prices; non-fulfillment of previous contractual agreements; disallowing reselling of licenses; refusing to maintain security conditions for perpetual licenses; (re)bundling of licenses, leading to higher costs; a shake up of the ecosystem of VMware resellers and partners”; and “a loss of knowledge.”

The letter reads, in part:

In the context of the VMware takeover and the change in business strategy, Broadcom’s contempt and brutality towards its customers are unprecedented in the recent history of the digital economy in Europe. In view of its scale and Broadcom’s impact, this case cannot be left exclusively to competition law technicians.

The letter also discusses concerns about Broadcom driving business to the public cloud with negative consequences for the European economy.

“This will further strengthen the position and power of the hyperscalers, which will have a profound impact on the entire market,” the letter says.

It’s worth noting that this group has written letters to the commission before and that the commission approved Broadcom’s VMware acquisition in July 2023 after an antitrust probe. However, Broadcom was recently contacted by antitrust authorities in Europe regarding claims that it was changing VMware software licensing and support conditions, MLex reported on Wednesday.

Regardless of whether a government body steps in, longtime VMware users and partners are reconsidering whether the company’s vision aligns with their own businesses. Meanwhile, rivals are pushing hard to capitalize on the disruption happening at VMware.

Cloud Foundation updates

Broadcom has a couple of big updates planned for VMware’s Cloud Foundation that, execs told The Register, will help people understand the value of the new VMware.

In July, Broadcom plans to update Cloud Foundation so that a single license key can be used for all components. The update is also supposed to heighten OAuth support as the company seeks to bring single sign-on to all VMware products and add a VMware NSX overlay. Turner told The Register that the changes are examples of how Broadcom is trying to make VMware Cloud Foundation easier to implement than before Broadcom took over.

In the first half of 2025, VMware plans to release the VCF 9 update, which will be “the fullest expression of Broadcom’s vision for product integration,” Shenoy told The Register. Turner claimed that because of the update, users with multiple VMware products would no longer need individual silos for discrete storage.

Broadcom execs say VMware price, subscription complaints are unwarranted  Read More »

apple-backtracks,-reinstates-epic-games’-ios-developer-account-in-europe

Apple backtracks, reinstates Epic Games’ iOS developer account in Europe

Never mind —

After EU began investigation, Apple repaves path for Fortnite on European iOS.

Artist's conception of Epic Games celebrating their impending return to iOS in Europe.

Enlarge / Artist’s conception of Epic Games celebrating their impending return to iOS in Europe.

Epic Games

Apple has agreed to reinstate Epic Game’s Swedish iOS developer account just days after Epic publicized Apple’s decision to rescind that account. The move once again paves the way for Epic’s plans to release a sideloadable version of the Epic Games Store and Fortnite on iOS devices in Europe.

“Following conversations with Epic, they have committed to follow the rules, including our DMA policies,” Apple said in a statement provided to Ars Technica. “As a result, Epic Sweden AB has been permitted to re-sign the developer agreement and accepted into the Apple Developer Program.”

Apple’s new statement is in stark contrast to its position earlier this week when it cited “Epic’s egregious breach of its contractual obligations to Apple” as a reason why it couldn’t trust Epic’s commitments to stand by any new developer agreement. In correspondence with Epic shared by the Fortnite maker Wednesday, Apple executive Phil Schiller put an even finer point on it:

Your colorful criticism of our [Digital Markets Act] compliance plan, coupled with Epic’s past practice of intentionally violating contractual provisions with which it disagrees, strongly suggest that Epic Sweden does not intend to follow the rules… Developers who are unable or unwilling to keep their promises can’t continue to participate in the Developer Program.

A new regulatory world

Apple’s quick turnaround comes just a day after the European Commission said it was opening an investigation into Apple’s conduct under the new Digital Markets Act and other potentially applicable European regulations. That investigation could have entailed hefty fines of up to “10 percent of the company’s total worldwide turnover” if Apple was found to be in violation.

“We have the DMA coming into compliance [Thursday], so the demand of compliance is… listen, you need to be able to carry another app store, for instance, and you cannot put in place a fee structure that sort of disables the benefits of the DMA for all the market participants,” European Commission Executive Vice President Margrethe Vestager told Bloomberg TV Tuesday.

In an update on its official blog, Epic linked Apple’s decision to “public backlash for retaliation” and said the whole affair “sends a strong signal to developers that the European Commission will act swiftly to enforce the Digital Markets Act and hold gatekeepers accountable. We are moving forward as planned to launch the Epic Games Store and bring Fortnite back to iOS in Europe. Onward!”

In a social media post celebrating Apple’s move, Epic CEO Tim Sweeney said that “the DMA just had its first major victory” and called the move “a big win for European rule of law, for the European Commission, and for the freedom of developers worldwide to speak up.”

Apple’s apparent retreat on the issue preempts what would have likely been a lengthy legal and public relations battle between the two corporate giants, much like the one resulting from Epic’s 2020 decision to violate Apple’s developer agreement by adding third-party payment options to Fortnite on iOS. But that battle, which played out primarily in a series of US courts, differed in many particulars from the new conflict that was developing under the new enforcement regime surrounding Europe’s DMA rules.

Epic said last month that it plans to launch the Epic Games Store on iOS sometime in 2024.

Apple backtracks, reinstates Epic Games’ iOS developer account in Europe Read More »

eu-declares-aim-to-become-‘quantum-valley’-of-the-world

EU declares aim to become ‘quantum valley’ of the world

Q-day (the day when quantum computers will successfully actually break the internet) may be some time away yet. However, that does not mean that companies — and states — shouldn’t hop on the qubit bandwagon now so as not to be left behind in the race for a technology that could potentially alter how we think about life, the Universe, and well… everything. 

Spurred on by a discourse that more and more revolves around the concept of “digital sovereignty,” 11 EU member states this week signed the European Declaration on Quantum Technologies. 

The signatories have agreed to align, coordinate, engage, support, monitor, and all those other international collaboration verbs, on various parts of the budding quantum technology ecosystem. They include France, Belgium, Croatia, Greece, Finland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Malta, Estonia, and Spain. However, the coalition is still missing some quantum frontrunners, such as the Netherlands, Ireland, and Germany, who reportedly opted out due to the short time frame

Ultimate aim: to create a globally competitive quantum ecosystem

“Quantum computing, simulation, communication, and sensing and metrology, are all emerging fields of global strategic importance that will bring about a change of paradigm in technological capacities,” the declaration begins. 

The <3 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

It further states that the bloc’s innovators and industry have not yet sufficiently mobilised to take full advantage of this potential as much as in other regions of the world. As such, it stresses the importance of building domestic R&D capacities for quantum technologies, as well as producing devices and systems based on them. 

In addition, it needs to invest in the whole quantum stack — from hardware to software and applications and standards, so as to safeguard “strategic assets, interests, autonomy, and security.”  

“The ultimate aim is to create a globally competitive ecosystem that can support a wide range of scientific and industrial applications, identify the industrial sectors where quantum technologies will have high economic and societal impact, and foster quantum innovation in small and large companies alike, from promising startups and scaleups to major industrial players — in short, to become the ‘quantum valley’ of the world,” the declaration reads.  

Thierry Breton, whose time as Commissioner for the Internal Market has been marked by a big tech regulation crusade, has declared quantum one of his “favourite subjects.” We can expect to see even more of a push towards greater collaboration across the bloc, should he land the top job of Commission President next year.

Potentially, Breton could get more member states on board to coordinate on a more detailed bloc-wide quantum strategy. With quantum engineering talent notoriously difficult to come by, this could indeed be key to keeping Europe from getting left behind in yet another key technology race.

EU declares aim to become ‘quantum valley’ of the world Read More »

‘quantum-first’-microscope-could-solve-chip-inspection-roadblock

‘Quantum-first’ microscope could solve chip inspection roadblock

Oh, the wonderful and mind-twisting world of quantum mechanics. However, in order to harness the magic-like potential of bending qubits to one’s will, there is a whole lot of nitty gritty engineering that needs to occur. 

The quantum revolution will not happen unless an entire ecosystem comes together, each part reaching the highest potential of its own expertise. 

And plenty of that development is happening in the Netherlands. Just today, Dutch startup QuantaMap announced it had secured €1.4mn in funding for its quality assurance tech for the production of quantum computer chips.



Quantum chips are not like regular computer chips, on many different levels (let’s set operating principles and data processing aside for now). One of these is that when they do not work like they should, there is not really any way of finding out why, and what has failed. This is to a great extent because it is so difficult to measure properties of the quantum chips without disturbing the qubits in the process. 

QuantaMap, based in Leiden, the Netherlands, has developed what it calls a “quantum-first” microscope that will allow both quantum researchers and chip manufacturers to closely inspect every chip and improve quality. 

What sets its technology apart, the startup says, is a combination of cryogenic scanning technology with quantum sensors, both specifically designed for quantum applications. 

“We are convinced that our technology will be instrumental for making good on the promises of quantum computing, enabling the societal advances that quantum technology can deliver,” said QuantaMap co-founder Johannes Jobst.

QuantaMap was founded in November 2022 by Jobst, Kaveh Lahabi, Milan Allan, and Jimi de Haan. The funding round includes investment from QDNL Participations, a fund that will invest €15mn into early-stage Dutch quantum computing startups in the coming years. 

Ton van ‘t Noordende, the fund’s managing director, said that QuantaMap’s unique combination of cryogenic scanning-probe microscopy and custom quantum sensors would solve the crucial challenge of producing reliable quantum chips. 

Published

Back to top

‘Quantum-first’ microscope could solve chip inspection roadblock Read More »

mistral-ai-nears-$2b-valuation-—-less-than-12-months-after-founding

Mistral AI nears $2B valuation — less than 12 months after founding

European contributions might have been a little late to join the generative AI investment party, but that does not mean they will not end up rivalling some of the earlier North American frontrunners. According to people familiar with the matter, Mistral AI, the French genAI seed-funding sensation, is just about to conclude the raising of about €450mn from investors. 

Unlike Germany’s Aleph Alpha who just raised a similar sum, most investors come from beyond the confines of the continent. The round is led by Silicon Valley VC firm Andreessen Horowitz, and also includes backing from Nvidia and Salesforce. 

Sources close to the deal told Bloomberg that Andreessen Horowitz would invest €200mn in funding, whereas Nvidia and Salesforce would be down for €120mn in convertible debt, although this was still subject to change. If it goes through, this would value the Paris-based startup at nearly $2bn — less than a year after it was founded. 

Mistral AI was one of the few European AI companies to participate in the UK’s AI Safety Summit held at Bletchley Park last month. The generative AI startup released its first large language model (LLM), Mistral 7B, under the open source Apache 2.0 licence in September. 

Targeting dev space with smaller size LLMs

The key thing that sets Mistral apart is that it is specifically building smaller models that target the developer space. Speaking at the SLUSH conference in Helsinki last week, co-founder and CEO Arthur Mensch said this was exactly what separates the philosophy of the company from its competitors.

“You can start with a very big model with hundreds of billions of parameters — maybe it’s going to solve your task. But you could actually have something which is a hundred times smaller,” Mensch stated. “And when you make a production application that targets a lot of users, you want to make choices that lower the latency, lower the costs, and leverage the actual populated data that you may have. And this is something that I think is not the topic of our competitors — they’re really targeting multi-usage, very large models.”



Mensch, who previously worked for Google DeepMind, added that this approach would also allow for strong differentiation through proprietary data, a key factor for actors to survive in the mature application market space. 

Mistral AI and the reported investors have all declined to comment on the potential proceedings.

Published

Back to top

Mistral AI nears $2B valuation — less than 12 months after founding Read More »

climate-tech-gets-70%-of-‘built-world’-vc-investment,-report-finds

Climate tech gets 70% of ‘built world’ VC investment, report finds

We have all seen the gloomy headlines over the past week. VC funding for European tech startups will have dropped by a whopping $45bn in 2023. However, some sectors, such as build world climate tech are faring… less horribly than others. 

Specifically, a new report by sustainability investor A/O released today has found that despite the global downturn, climate tech is attracting as much as 70% of built world VC investment — up from around only 20% five years ago. In addition, investment in early stage rounds in European startups in the sector has, for the first time, exceeded that in North America. 

The built world includes anything that is human-made and created to adapt the natural environment into a habitable and usable area for the purpose of living, working, and playing. This includes architecture and parks, and covers everything from road infrastructure to building construction and operations. Nearly 40% of global greenhouse gas emissions come from buildings — a number that is set to double by 2050 if left unchecked. 

According to the report by A/O, the largest European built world VC firm, the trend has been driven by the energy crisis along with mounting pressures from regulators to decarbonise the real estate and construction industries. 

The <3 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Indeed, while total venture capital funding has dropped by over 30% in the first half of 2023, and climate tech overall lost 40%, built world climate tech only saw a 13% decrease in funding. 

“The built world is not immune to the wider macroeconomic challenges in the tech and startup world in 2023,” Gregory Dewerpe, Managing Partner at London-based A/O commented. “However, climate themes have proven more resilient relative to the wider venture market, and within the built world specifically, we have observed both a more muted downturn and faster recovery.”

Meanwhile, not all themes throughout the sector fared equally well. While retrofit installers, grid storage, infrastructure monitoring, and renewable energy procurement continue to see the most investment, areas such as water efficiency and heat pump technology remain significantly underfunded. 

The report also found that for the first time Europe and North America now see the same dollars invested for early stage built world climate tech. Germany and the UK grew significantly (+73% and +27% respectively), while the US contracted (-32%). Indeed, the top three cities for dollars invested were all European — London, Berlin, and Munich. 

“It’s great to see Europe’s ecosystem continue to grow with early-stage investment in Europe on par with North America for the first time, showcasing that some of the most exciting innovation is coming out of the continent,” Dewerpe continued. 

On a more sombre note, later-stage rounds have suffered the most with total investment volumes and median deal size dropping -53%.

Climate tech gets 70% of ‘built world’ VC investment, report finds Read More »

tree-planting-search-engine-ecosia-launches-‘green’-ai-chatbot

Tree-planting search engine Ecosia launches ‘green’ AI chatbot

With COP28 underway in Dubai making it again glaringly obvious just how little lawmakers are prepared to bend for the sake of future generations of Earthlings, the release of the first “green filter” generative AI search chatbot could not have been more timely. 

Berlin-based Ecosia, the world’s largest not-for-profit search engine, hopes the launch of its new product will assist users in making better choices for the planet, and further differentiate its offerings from the “monolithic giants” of internet search. 

Powered by OpenAI’s API, Ecosia’s chatbot has a “green answers” option. This triggers a layered green persona that will provide users with more sustainable results and answers. Say, suggest train rides over air travel.

GenAI + DMA = search market disruption?

Ecosia, which uses the ad revenue from its site (read, all its profits) to plant trees across the globe, is among the first independent search engines to roll out its own GenAI-powered chatbot. When speaking to TNW last month, Ecosia founder and CEO Christian Kroll stated how important it was for small independent players to stay up to date with the technology. 

Further, he highlighted the opportunities generative AI could present in terms of disrupting the status quo in the internet search market. “I think there is potential for us to innovate as well — and maybe even leapfrog some of the established players,” he said. 

Upon the launch of the company’s “green chatbot,” Kroll today added that the past year had introduced more change to the internet search landscape than the previous 14 combined (Ecosia was founded in 2009). “Generative AI has the potential to revolutionise the search market — no longer does it cost hundreds of billions to develop best-in-class search technologies,” he said, adding that Ecosia was targeting a “global increase in search engine market share.” 

Something else that could potentially disrupt the market is the coming into play of the EU Digital Markets Act. From March 2024 onwards, consumers will no longer be “encouraged” to use default apps on their devices (say Safari web browser on an iPhone, or Google Maps on an Android device). This may come to include offering users a “choice screen” when setting up a device, which would invite them to select which browsers, search engines, and virtual assistants to install, rather than defaulting to the preferences of Apple and Android. Ecosia says it is “pushing hard” for this provision.

Green chatbot powered by clean energy

Many companies pay lip service to sustainability. Ecosia actually puts its money where its mouth is. A few years ago, its founder turned Ecosia into a steward-owned company. This means that no shares can be sold at a profit or owned by people outside of the company. In addition, no profits can be taken out of the company — as previously mentioned, all profits go to Ecosia’s tree-planting endeavours. 

“It [tree planting] is one of the most effective measures we can take to fight the climate crisis. But unfortunately, it’s often not done properly. So that’s why it also gets a lot of criticism,” Kroll told TNW. 

“We’re trying to define the standards of what good tree planting means. So first of all, you count the trees that survived, not just the ones that you have planted — then you also have to check on them.” This, we should add, falls under the purview of Ecosia’s Chief Tree Planting Officer. To date, the community has planted over 187,000,000 trees and counting. 

In addition, Ecosia’s search engine is powered by solar energy — accounting for 200% of the carbon emitted from the server usage and broader operations. 

LLMs and CO2 are still an undisclosed relationship

You may ask how adding generative AI to a search function is compatible with an environmental agenda. After all, Google’s use of generative AI alone could use as much energy as a small-ish country

Ecosia admits that it does not yet have “oversight of the carbon emissions created by LLM-based genAI functions,” since OpenAI does not openly share this information. However, initial testing indicates that the new GenAI function will increase CO2 emissions by 5%, Ecosia said, for which it will increase investment in solar power, regenerative agriculture, and other nature-based solutions. 

Environmental credentials aside, a search engine still has to perform when it comes to its core function. “For us to compete against monolithic giants that have a 99% market share, we have to offer our users a product they’ll want to use day in, day out,” Michael Metcalf, chief product officer at Ecosia, shared. “That means not only offering a positive impact on climate action, but a best-in-class search engine that can go head-to-head with the likes of Bing and Google.” 

Metcalf added that user testing had shown very positive feedback on the company’s sustainability-minded AI chatbot. “We’re going to market with generative AI products before peers precisely because we want to grow: Grow our user base, grow our profits, and then grow our positive climate impact — which is mission critical for our warming planet.”

Tree-planting search engine Ecosia launches ‘green’ AI chatbot Read More »

silo-ai-releases-checkpoint-on-mission-to-democratise-llms

Silo AI releases checkpoint on mission to democratise LLMs

A year has passed since OpenAI unleashed ChatGPT on the world and popularised terms like foundational model, LLM, and GenAI. However, the promised benefits of generative AI technology are still much more likely to be derived by those who speak English, over other languages. 

There are over 7,000 languages in the world. Yet, most large language models (LLMs) work far more effectively in English. Naturally, this threatens to amplify language bias when it comes to access to knowledge, research, innovation — and competitive advantage for businesses. 

In November, Finland’s Silo AI released its multilingual open European LLM Poro 34B developed in collaboration with the University of Turku. Poro, which means reindeer in Finnish, has been trained on Europe’s most powerful supercomputer LUMI in Kajani, Finland. (Interestingly, LUMI runs on AMD architecture, as opposed to all-the-rage LLM-training Nvidia.) 

Along with Poro 1, the company unveiled a research checkpoint program that will release checkpoints as the model completes (the first three points were announced with the model last month). 

Now, the company, through its branch SiloGen, has trained more than 50% of the model and has just published the next two checkpoints in the program. With these five checkpoints now complete, Poro 34B has shown best-in-class performance for low-resource languages like Finnish (compared to Llama, Mistral, FinGPT, etc) — without compromising performance in English. 

Research Fellow Sampo Pyysalo from TurkuNLP says that they expect to have trained the model fully within the next few weeks. As the next step, the model will add support for other Nordic languages, including Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, and Icelandic. 

“It’s imperative for Europe’s digital sovereignty to have access to language models aligned with European values, culture and languages. We’re proud to see that Poro shows best-in-class performance on a low-resource language like Finnish,” Silo AI’s co-founder and CEO, Peter Sarlin, told TNW. “In line with the intent to cover all European languages, it’s a natural step to start with an extension to the Nordic languages.” 

Furthermore, SiloGen has commenced training Poro 2. Through a partnership with non-profit LAION (Large-scale Artificial Intelligence Open Network), it will add multimodality to the model.

“It’s likewise natural to extend Poro with vision,” Sarlin added. “Like textual data, we see an even larger potential for generative AI to consolidate large amounts of data of different modalities.”

LAION says it is “passionate about advancing the field of machine learning for the greater good.” In keeping with Silo AI’s intentions for building its GenAI model and LAION’s overall mission to increase access to large-scale ML models, and datasets, Poro 2 will be freely available under the Apache 2.0 Licence. This means developers will also be able to build proprietary solutions on top. 

Silo AI, which calls itself “Europe’s largest private AI lab” launched in 2017 on the idea that Europe needed an AI flagship. The company is based in Helsinki, Finland, and builds AI-driven solutions and products to enable smart devices, autonomous vehicles, industry 4.0, and smart cities. Currently, Silo AI counts over 300 employees and also has offices in Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Canada.

Silo AI releases checkpoint on mission to democratise LLMs Read More »

dutch-biotech-startup-bags-e22m-for-proprietary-generative-ai-model

Dutch biotech startup bags €22M for proprietary generative AI model

It has been nearly a year since OpenAI unleashed ChatGPT on the world, and it seems as if no one (at least in tech) has stopped talking about generative AI since. Meanwhile, the applications of GenAI go way beyond chatbots and copyright-grey-area image ‘artistry’. 

For instance, Cradle, a biotech software startup out of Delft, Netherlands, is using it to help biologists engineer improved proteins, making it easier and quicker to bring synthetic bio-solutions for human and planetary health to market.

In synthetic biology, people use engineering principles to design and build new biological systems. Scientists can use parts of DNA or other biological elements to give existing organisms new abilities. 

This has tremendous potential for programming things like bacteria to produce medicine, non-animal whey proteins, detergents and plastics without petrochemicals, yeast to make biofuel, or for instance crops that can survive in tough environments… the list goes on. 

“At the core of all these products are proteins, which are little cellular machinery,” Stef van Grieken, co-founder and CEO of Cradle, told TNW a little while back. “If you want to change them to be better for the application you have in mind, you have to alter the DNA sequence. That’s a really complicated task because DNA is basically an alien programming language.” 

woman in lab coat performing experiments
Cradle is based in Delft, Netherlands, and Zurich, Switzerland.

This whole process takes a long time — and costs a lot of money. Which is where Cradle’s web-based software comes in. When prompted, Cradle’s AI platform can generate a sequence of a molecule that has a higher probability of matching what researchers are looking for, than when scientists need to try everything out for themselves. 

This equals fewer and more successful experiments, drastically reducing R&D time and costs. For most projects, this means they can proceed at twice the speed compared to the industry average.

Putting AI to good use for future generations

Cradle’s proprietary AI model has been trained on billions of protein sequences, as well as data generated in the company’s own wet laboratory.

“It dramatically increases the probability that your molecule has the characteristics that you care about when you try it out in your laboratory, and that significantly accelerates R&D time, and therefore dramatically reduces the cost of the R&D phase for bringing these types of products to market,” van Grieken, previously Senior Product Manager for Google AI, added. 

Why did van Grieken leave a cosy job at Google to set up a synbio AI startup in the Netherlands? “Because I have two young daughters who are three and six. And they’re gonna ask me, 10 years from now, ‘what did you do when the earth caught fire?’ And the answer could not be ‘I was a plumber for an advertising company’.”

“For me personally, success would be helping a company to make a bio-based version that replaces some petrochemical or animal-based product, and does that better and cheaper. And that more of these companies start existing in the world.”

Increased demand for synbio software

Cradle, founded by van Grieken and bioengineer Elise de Reuse in 2021, has already signed up with industry partners including Johnson & Johnson, and just announced the $24mn Series A funding round. It is now working on more than 12 R&D projects including vaccines and antibodies. 

Cradle team offsite
The Cradle team currently consists of 20 people. Credit: Cradle

The team currently consists of 20 people, split between Delft, the Netherlands and Zurich, Switzerland. The latest funding round was led by Index Ventures with participation from Kindred Capital. Angel investors including Chris Gibson, co-founder and CEO of Recursion and Tom Glocer, former CEO of Thomson Reuters and Lead Director, Merck, also participated in the round.

The fresh injection of capital will allow Cradle to grow the team, build out additional laboratory and engineering facilities in Amsterdam, and continue to develop its platform and user experience to allow it to onboard more customers, in line with growing demand. 

Dutch biotech startup bags €22M for proprietary generative AI model Read More »

the-two-rings:-finland’s-oura-sues-ultrahuman-over-rival-wearable

The two rings: Finland’s Oura sues Ultrahuman over rival wearable

Oura, the Finnish health wearable startup, is suing one of its biggest rivals, claiming it copied its ring device and accessed proprietary information.

The Oulu-based company, which makes the Oura Ring health tracking device and has raised more than €140 million, has filed legal action against Indian company Ultrahuman.

In a lawsuit filed in a court in Texas in early September, Oura accuses Ultrahuman of violating its patents and accessing proprietary information through ex-Oura employees and investors to develop its competing smart ring product.

Oura, which is valued at over €2 billion, has one million users of its ring and has garnered celebrity fans.

The company has released three iterations of its smart ring to date. It tracks metrics like heart-rate variability, blood oxygen rate and sleep patterns. Unlike wearables like Fitbit wristbands, Oura markets its device as a smaller, more compact product that can do similar tasks but with a sleeker look.

Woman with ring on her finger touching her hair
The Oura ring… Credit: Oura

Ultrahuman meanwhile initially developed sensors for health and exercise tracking. It released its first device to be worn on a finger called the Ring last year, and a new iteration called the Ring Air earlier this year.

Ultrahuman did not respond to requests for comment on the allegations. The company has also yet to respond to the allegations contained in the legal filing.

Allegations

Oura claims that Ultrahuman designed its ring by “blatantly copying Oura’s technology,” infringing on patents held by the Finnish company.

Oura alleges that Ultrahuman gained access to proprietary information about its ring technology through former employees.

“Ultrahuman’s efforts to copy Oura do not stop at infringement, but have extended to hiring former Oura employees, soliciting current Oura engineers, and potentially benefiting from some of its primary investors gaining access to Oura’s proprietary and confidential information prior to launch of the Ultrahuman Ring,” Oura stated in its legal filing.

Woman with ring on her finger against palm tree background
…and Ultrahuman’s ring. Credit: Ultrahuman

It added: “Moreover, Ultrahuman has hired and solicited a number of Oura’s employees and engineers to assist with development of the Accused Instrumentalities [Ultrahuman Ring].”

In the filing, Oura sets out several details and features in Ultrahuman’s ring that it claims the rival company has copied.

This includes the titanium used in the device, skin sensors and PPG sensors, which measure various health metrics for the wearer, and the fact that the device uses similar batteries from the same suppliers.

According to Oura, Ultrahuman is “supported by an investor” that gained access to confidential and proprietary information on the Oura Ring in December 2021. Oura has not disclosed the name of the investor, nor is it clear if Oura is referring to one of its own investors. 

No coincidence?

Oura claimed that the “similarities are not a mere coincidence”. The Finnish company goes as far as to claim Ultrahuman imitated its social media content for promoting the device. Oura is seeking damages of “amount to be proved at trial.”

A spokesperson for Oura declined to answer any further questions about the allegations made in the lawsuit but said the company planned to defend its intellectual property.

“We will fiercely protect the innovative work of our team, and defend against those looking to take a shortcut,” they said.

The case could initiate a lengthy legal battle between two of the wearable industry’s most significant startups.

What’s at stake?

Both companies have attracted a sizable amount of venture capital funding.

In April of 2022, Oura announced that it was valued at $2.5 billion following an additional injection of capital from investors, though a figure for the latest investment was not disclosed.

In 2021, Oura raised $100 million in a Series C round led by The Chernin Group and sports tech investor Elysian Park Ventures. Its other investors include Temasek, MSD Capital and Salesforce boss Marc Benioff. Oura appointed a new chief executive last year in Tom Hale. 

Ultrahuman raised a $17.5 million Series B round a year ago from VC firms like Nexus Venture Partners and Blume Ventures and is backed by some high-profile angel investors like Zomato chief executive Deepinder Goyal.

Wearable market

The global market for fitness trackers is expected to be worth over $258 billion by 2032, according to analysis firm Precedence Research.

That covers a wide range of products from smart watches to trackers like FitBit. Smart rings are a relatively smaller subset of that market.

Oura, having burst on the scene in 2013, has taken a lead in that space, regularly featured on consumer guides for smart rings. 

It now boasts over one million devices sold and celebrity users like Jennifer Aniston and Kim Kardashian. While based in Finland with offices in Oulu and Helsinki, the company has also opened offices in San Francisco and San Diego as it targets the US market.

Oura’s ring began as a consumer wearable product focused on sleep tracking, but has gradually expanded that remit to be a broader health tracking device. For instance, it has integrated its product with fertility and contraception app Natural Cycles to enable users to track period cycles.

It has also rolled out a subscription service, bringing the company into the SaaS arena. A ring can cost up to €500 but the access to software products on top of that, with a monthly subscription, aims at diversifying the company’s income stream with recurring monthly revenue.

Meanwhile, Oura has deepened its investment in R&D.

Health data and privacy

Playing in the space of health data is a risky bet given the sensitivity of the information that Oura collects. Earlier this year, Oura acquired San Francisco-based digital ID startup Proxy, which specialises in encrypting sensitive data.

When Oura CEO Hale announced the deal, he described the acquisition as “paving the way for new opportunities in areas such as payments, access, security, identity, and beyond, fuelling future growth.” This hinted at a much bigger vision for Oura and its wearable device.

Ultrahuman has its own vision too. The Indian company may be new to the smart ring game, but it is not new to health tracking and wearables. Its first flagship product was a smart glucose tracking patch that monitored a user’s glucose levels and generated insights based on the data. Much like Oura, it too operates a subscription service.

Ultrahuman dipped its toes into the smart ring game in early 2022 when it acquired LazyCo, another Indian startup, which had built a smart ring product.

Oura is seeking a jury trial. Ultrahuman has yet to respond in the Texas court but will in all likelihood do so soon. At that stage, the case will take greater shape but both sides could be facing a lengthy process. 

The two rings: Finland’s Oura sues Ultrahuman over rival wearable Read More »

climate-tech-is-set-to-boom.-this-vc-explains-why-it’s-ripe-for-investment

Climate tech is set to boom. This VC explains why it’s ripe for investment

Climate tech is receiving a proportionally larger share of what is, undeniably, a muted venture capital investment environment. VC and private equity investment in the sector has, thus far in 2023, fallen by 40% — just as the evidence of the need for more money for potentially planet-saving technology is becoming increasingly insurmountable. 

However, the total amount for all venture and equity investment was down 50.2% year-over-year. So, while climate tech is far from escaping the current economic downturn unscathed, it is faring… not as horribly as other tech segments. 

Still, the news earlier this autumn that leading Dutch climate tech VC SET Ventures had raised €200mn for its fourth fund — doubling the size of its previous one — was particularly uplifting. The fund will invest in 20 to 25 European companies that are innovating the energy transition. 

TNW sat down for a conversation with SET Ventures’ Managing Partner, Anton Arts, to see what it takes to be a venture capitalist in climate tech, the enormous economic opportunities arising from our move toward net-zero, and how startups garner favour in an increasingly difficult investment landscape. 

“It’s a bit of a funnel,” Arts explains when discussing the process of selecting which companies to back among an avalanche of pitches. “The first thing we ask is: does this fit into our scope?” 

Does it move the impact needle, and is there a market opportunity? 

SET has a clear idea about what it wants to invest in — digital technologies that advance a carbon free energy system. “So a major question that we try to answer whenever a proposal comes to us is, how does this affect the energy system of the future?”

Arts adds that this is a much more narrow focus than what someone thinking about climate tech in a more generic way would have. However, as energy is linked — directly or indirectly — to 72% of global emissions, trying to address those emissions is a “more than large enough” problem: “We also ask ourselves, does this really move the needle in terms of impact?” 

“The second area that we then focus on is really some of the same questions that all VCs try to answer. Do we think this is a fantastic founder team? Is there a market opportunity that is large enough? Can you truly develop a differentiated and unique offering in that market? And, ultimately, is it going to be financially rewarding to take on that opportunity?” 

Flight to quality increases VC competition

After having found an exciting investment opportunity, the process then becomes somewhat of a two-way street. Sure, there is less capital up for grabs as the funding optimism of the past few years has waned (unless you are in generative AI, that is) — but the startups that meet the more stringent criteria can instead have their pick among suitors. 

“In the current market, there is also a flight to quality, which means that the bar for what is a great company is raised. But for those companies that meet the bar, there is intense competition between investors in order to fund that opportunity,” Arts states, adding that there is also a founder who has to make a decision which investors to go with.

Additionally, Arts says it is a healthy market dynamic, and one that is influenced to a great deal by the fact that climate tech has moved from a relative niche from an investment perspective, to much more of a mainstream market. 

Solving problems — why this, why now? 

Another question that always comes up, Arts says, is “what problem is this solving? Why this, but also, why now? Because many of these problems are not new. What has changed in the past few years that now there is a solution to an existing problem that wasn’t there before? Maybe it is the technology, maybe it is the people, etcetera.” 

And finally, Arts says, as a VC, you have to “skate to where the puck is going,” meaning you have to be willing to make a bet on something that the rest of the world hasn’t seen yet. Or, as he puts it — “what do you want me to believe that other people aren’t believing yet?” 

When thinking about investing with environmental or social impact as a criteria, the question inevitably arises as to whether there are compromises in terms of return on investment versus doing a good thing for the planet. Arts would argue, perhaps unsurprisingly, that not necessarily — and definitely not when it comes to energy. 

“We think that this transition to the energy system of the future is really a generational opportunity in magnitude,” he states.  

Clean technologies will outgrow oil in revenue

Indeed, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), a new energy economy is emerging, pushed forward by policy action, technology innovation, and the increasing urgency of the need to tackle climate change. This, the IEA says, provides a “huge market opportunity” for clean technologies. 

The agency estimates that, if the world gets on track for net-zero emissions by mid-century, the annual market opportunity for wind turbines, solar panels, lithium-ion batteries, electrolysers, and fuel cells will grow tenfold to $1.2 trillion by 2050. That means that those five segments collectively would be larger than today’s oil industry and its associated revenues. 

And that’s “just” the hardware stuff. The new energy economy will also require digital tools to manage the complex interactions and relationships between things like electricity, fuels, and storage markets. Managing platforms and data will become increasingly important parts of energy efficiency and clean energy innovation. 

“What people might need to be reminded of is that you can’t always predict timelines. But that doesn’t mean they’re going to be longer. Sometimes you see changes happening very quickly. And for us as investors, we think that if you look at the past, then, of course, we’ve seen a lot of success in software businesses, and, for instance, business-to-consumer internet businesses. 

“We think the opportunity of the next decade is really shifting to climate tech as a category, and we are absolutely convinced that we will see similar types of return expectations, as we’ve seen in the tech business in the past.”

One of the reasons for that, Arts says, is that more and more talent is moving into climate tech, having perhaps previously been successful in other industries and looking to make more of a difference. And, a chain is starting to emerge all the way from early stage investment to very large growth equity funds. SET invests across Europe at the Series A stage, but with the ability to keep supporting portfolio companies through multiple rounds of financing.

From physical assets to digital solutions

Essentially, SET Ventures believes in three things: that the world is changing very fast, and that the energy transition is the biggest trend driving markets in the next decades; that there is too much emphasis on miracle technologies that exist only in the lab and not enough on the business models and applications that will scale what’s right in front of us; and, from a systems perspective, value migration will move from only physical assets, to the collection of digital solutions that together form the energy system.

Among the startups and scaleups in SET’s portfolio are Dutch companies Sensorfact and Energyworx. The former helps clients reduce industrial energy waste through plug and play hardware, smart software, and dedicated consultants. Founded in 2016, Sensorfact has already scaled to 1,300+ customers in over 40 countries and identified more than 112+ GWh of energy savings. Energyworx is a SaaS provider for energy providers to ingest and manage data across the entire energy chain. 

Another example of SET’s investment strategy is Germany’s Instagrid. The company has built a 20kg 230V portable power system for professionals to work off-grid. On a full charge (2.5 hours), an industrial vacuum cleaner can run for 105 minutes, you can brew 1,200+ cups of professional catering espressos, and high quality projectors can run on full brightness for five hours. 

SET’s latest fund is backed by the European Investment Fund (EIF), Triodos Energy Transition Europe Fund, a.s.r., and Amsterdam-based Carbon Equity

Climate tech is set to boom. This VC explains why it’s ripe for investment Read More »