abuse

trump-admin-to-finally-cap-price-of-weird-bandages-that-cost-$10-billion-last-year

Trump admin to finally cap price of weird bandages that cost $10 billion last year

Crackdowns

In 2019, before the rule change, Medicare paid about $250 million for these types of skin substitute bandages. However, total spending rose about 40-fold in 2024 to over $10 billion.

Realizing this was a problem, the Biden administration introduced a new policy in April 2024 that would cover the bandages for certain types of leg and foot ulcers, only for bandages that had gone through high-quality testing and had shown an advantage over standard bandaging. The policy was supposed to go into effect this February.

But when the Trump administration took office, the policy was delayed as part of a blanket freeze on new regulations. And in April, the administration announced that the policy would be delayed until 2026. The Times noted that Trump had received a large campaign donation from a leading bandage maker and has subsequently defended the bandages on social media on at least two occasions.

But this week, the administration seems to have reconsidered. In the new proposed policies, the Trump administration proposed a flat rate of about $809 per square inch, which would go into effect in January 2026.

In a statement to the Times this week, a spokesperson for a bandage industry trade group said: “If this exceedingly low payment rate were to take effect, companies producing skin substitutes would no longer be able to cover their production costs, and providers would not be able to afford to treat their patients.”

Meanwhile, Mehmet Oz, current administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the administration is “cracking down on abuse that drives up costs.”

Trump admin to finally cap price of weird bandages that cost $10 billion last year Read More »

here’s-how-hucksters-are-manipulating-google-to-promote-shady-chrome-extensions

Here’s how hucksters are manipulating Google to promote shady Chrome extensions

The people overseeing the security of Google’s Chrome browser explicitly forbid third-party extension developers from trying to manipulate how the browser extensions they submit are presented in the Chrome Web Store. The policy specifically calls out search-manipulating techniques such as listing multiple extensions that provide the same experience or plastering extension descriptions with loosely related or unrelated keywords.

On Wednesday, security and privacy researcher Wladimir Palant revealed that developers are flagrantly violating those terms in hundreds of extensions currently available for download from Google. As a result, searches for a particular term or terms can return extensions that are unrelated, inferior knockoffs, or carry out abusive tasks such as surreptitiously monetizing web searches, something Google expressly forbids.

Not looking? Don’t care? Both?

A search Wednesday morning in California for Norton Password Manager, for example, returned not only the official extension but three others, all of which are unrelated at best and potentially abusive at worst. The results may look different for searches at other times or from different locations.

Search results for Norton Password Manager.

It’s unclear why someone who uses a password manager would be interested in spoofing their time zone or boosting the audio volume. Yes, they’re all extensions for tweaking or otherwise extending the Chrome browsing experience, but isn’t every extension? The Chrome Web Store doesn’t want extension users to get pigeonholed or to see the list of offerings as limited, so it doesn’t just return the title searched for. Instead, it draws inferences from descriptions of other extensions in an attempt to promote ones that may also be of interest.

In many cases, developers are exploiting Google’s eagerness to promote potentially related extensions in campaigns that foist offerings that are irrelevant or abusive. But wait, Chrome security people have put developers on notice that they’re not permitted to engage in keyword spam and other search-manipulating techniques. So, how is this happening?

Here’s how hucksters are manipulating Google to promote shady Chrome extensions Read More »