Policy

apple-removes-iceblock,-won’t-allow-apps-that-report-locations-of-ice-agents

Apple removes ICEBlock, won’t allow apps that report locations of ICE agents

Apple, iceblock, Policy / /

Acting on a demand from the Trump administration, Apple has removed apps that let iPhone users report the locations of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers.

“We reached out to Apple today demanding they remove the ICEBlock app from their App Store—and Apple did so,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement to Fox News yesterday. “ICEBlock is designed to put ICE agents at risk just for doing their jobs, and violence against law enforcement is an intolerable red line that cannot be crossed.”

Apple confirmed it removed multiple apps after hearing from law enforcement. “We created the App Store to be a safe and trusted place to discover apps,” an Apple statement to news organizations said. “Based on information we’ve received from law enforcement about the safety risks associated with ICEBlock, we have removed it and similar apps from the App Store.”

The app removals follow a September 24 shooting at a Dallas ICE facility that resulted in the deaths of two immigrants in federal custody and the shooter. The shooter, identified as Joshua Jahn, “searched apps that tracked the presence of ICE agents,” according to FBI Director Kash Patel.

ICEBlock creator Joshua Aaron disputed claims that his app could have contributed to the shooting. He pointed out that an app isn’t needed to find the locations of ICE facilities.

“You don’t need to use an app to tell you where an ICE agent is when you’re aiming at an ICE detention facility,” Aaron told the BBC. “Everybody knows that’s where ICE agents are.”

Apple cited “objectionable content”

Aaron said he was disappointed by Apple’s decision to remove the app. “ICEBlock is no different from crowd-sourcing speed traps, which every notable mapping application including Apple’s own Maps app [does],” he was quoted as saying. “This is protected speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

Apple removes ICEBlock, won’t allow apps that report locations of ICE agents Read More »

trump-offers-universities-a-choice:-comply-for-preferential-funding

Trump offers universities a choice: Comply for preferential funding

government policy, Policy, research funding, Science, universities / /

On Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration had offered nine schools a deal: manage your universities in a way that aligns with administration priorities and get “substantial and meaningful federal grants,” along with other benefits. Failure to accept the bargain would result in a withdrawal of federal programs that would likely cripple most universities. The offer, sent to a mixture of state and private universities, would see the government dictate everything from hiring and admissions standards to grading and has provisions that appear intended to make conservative ideas more welcome on campus.

The document was sent to the University of Arizona, Brown University, Dartmouth College, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Southern California, the University of Texas, Vanderbilt University, and the University of Virginia. However, independent reporting indicates that the administration will ultimately extend the deal to all colleges and universities.

Ars has obtained a copy of the proposed “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education,” which makes the scope of the bargain clear in its introduction. “Institutions of higher education are free to develop models and values other than those below, if the institution elects to forego federal benefits,” it suggests, while mentioning that those benefits include access to fundamental needs, like student loans, federal contracts, research funding, tax benefits, and immigration visas for students and faculty.

It is difficult to imagine how it would be possible to run a major university without access to those programs, making this less a compact and more of an ultimatum.

Poorly thought through

The Compact itself would see universities agree to cede admissions standards to the federal government. The government, in this case, is demanding only the use of “objective” criteria such as GPA and standardized test scores as the basis of admissions decisions, and that schools publish those criteria on their websites. They would also have to publish anonymized data comparing how admitted and rejected students did relative to these criteria.

Trump offers universities a choice: Comply for preferential funding Read More »

meta-won’t-allow-users-to-opt-out-of-targeted-ads-based-on-ai-chats

Meta won’t allow users to opt out of targeted ads based on AI chats

Ad targeting, AI, facebook, generative ai, Instagram, Meta, Meta AI, online ads, Policy, privacy, whatsapp / /

Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp users may want to be extra careful while using Meta AI, as Meta has announced that it will soon be using AI interactions to personalize content and ad recommendations without giving users a way to opt out.

Meta plans to notify users on October 7 that their AI interactions will influence recommendations beginning on December 16. However, it may not be immediately obvious to all users that their AI interactions will be used in this way.

The company’s blog noted that the initial notification users will see only says, “Learn how Meta will use your info in new ways to personalize your experience.” Users will have to click through to understand that the changes specifically apply to Meta AI, with a second screen explaining, “We’ll start using your interactions with AIs to personalize your experience.”

Ars asked Meta why the initial notification doesn’t directly mention AI, and Meta spokesperson Emil Vazquez said he “would disagree with the idea that we are obscuring this update in any way.”

“We’re sending notifications and emails to people about this change,” Vazquez said. “As soon as someone clicks on the notification, it’s immediately apparent that this is an AI update.”

In its blog post, Meta noted that “more than 1 billion people use Meta AI every month,” stating its goals are to improve the way Meta AI works in order to fuel better experiences on all Meta apps. Sensitive “conversations with Meta AI about topics such as their religious views, sexual orientation, political views, health, racial or ethnic origin, philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership “will not be used to target ads, Meta confirmed.

“You’re in control,” Meta’s blog said, reiterating that users can “choose” how they “interact with AIs,” unlink accounts on different apps to limit AI tracking, or adjust ad and content settings at any time. But once the tracking starts on December 16, users will not have the option to opt out of targeted ads based on AI chats, Vazquez confirmed, emphasizing to Ars that “there isn’t an opt out for this feature.”

Meta won’t allow users to opt out of targeted ads based on AI chats Read More »

fcc-chairman-leads-“cruel”-vote-to-take-wi-fi-access-away-from-school-kids

FCC chairman leads “cruel” vote to take Wi-Fi access away from school kids

brendan carr, FCC, Policy, wi-fi hotspots / /

The FCC votes were criticized by advocacy groups. “Students who rely on long bus rides to complete assignments and library patrons who depend on hotspots for work, education, or telehealth will suddenly lose access to essential tools. This decision is a step backward,” said Joseph Wender, executive director of the Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition.

“Chairman Carr’s cruel move to delete our kids’ Internet connections won’t make America smarter,” said Revati Prasad, executive director of the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society. The FCC “openly voted to snatch back the opportunity to offer more Americans, especially in rural areas, the high-speed Internet access to do the business of life online—pay bills, make telehealth appointments, fill out school applications—after the library closes,” American Library Association President Sam Helmick said.

The advocacy groups said that in New Mexico, “Farmington Municipal Schools equipped its 90 buses with Wi-Fi, serving over 6,500 students daily. Parents reported that children returned home with homework already completed.” In Ohio, “the Brown County Public Library’s hotspot program allowed homeschool families to join virtual classes, entrepreneurs to run mobile businesses, and veterans to participate in telehealth appointments and certification testing.”

Helmick said the library association is also “discouraged by the lack of due process, which left no opportunity for staff, patrons and library advocates to give input on the draft order.” Gomez similarly criticized the process, saying the FCC didn’t release the draft order until after the deadline for interested parties to meet with commissioners’ offices.

Gomez: Programs weren’t illegal

Gomez disputed Carr’s legal argument, saying that “Congress gave the FCC permission to expand the applications of E-Rate funding as the technologies used to educate children evolve.” She pointed out that the Universal Service law says the FCC may designate additional services for support. Gomez continued:

When the E-Rate program was implemented, dial-up Internet was the standard, and today, September 30th, 2025, AOL is discontinuing dial-up service. It is safe to say the landscape of communications technology has changed dramatically throughout the life of the E-Rate program. As underscored during my visit to the High School for Environmental Studies in New York a couple of weeks ago, students are now using Chromebooks in classrooms on a regular basis, and they are expected to submit homework assignments online using platforms like Google classroom. These changes are made possible with support from E-Rate funding.

Gomez said that in 2003, under President George W. Bush, the FCC “expanded E-Rate support to cover Internet access for bookmobiles. It also clarified that E-Rate funding could cover a school bus driver’s use of wireless services while transporting students, a librarian’s use of wireless services on a library’s mobile library unit van, and teachers’ use of wireless services while accompanying students on a field trip. Expanding E-Rate support to cover hotspots and Wi-Fi on school buses was consistent with that precedent.”

FCC chairman leads “cruel” vote to take Wi-Fi access away from school kids Read More »

taiwan-rejects-trump’s-demand-to-shift-50%-of-chip-manufacturing-into-us

Taiwan rejects Trump’s demand to shift 50% of chip manufacturing into US

Policy, Taiwan, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, trump tariffs / /

In August, Trump claimed that chip tariffs could be as high as 100 percent while promising to exempt any tech companies that have committed to moving significantly more manufacturing into the US.

Since then, sources familiar with the investigation told Reuters that “the Trump administration is considering imposing tariffs on foreign electronic devices based on the number of chips in each one.” Under that potential plan, the tariff charged would be “equal to a percentage of the estimated value of the product’s chip content,” sources suggested.

Some expect that companies like the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) may be exempted from these tariffs, based on a pledge to invest $100 billion into US chip manufacturing.

However, sources told Reuters that the Commerce Department has weighed offering “a dollar-for-dollar exemption based on investment in US-based manufacturing only if a company moves half its production to the US.” TSMC’s total market value is more than $1 trillion, so the US may seek more investments if the campaign to move half of Taiwan’s chip production into the US fails.

Brzytwa told Ars that tech companies are already struggling to do the math from Trump’s tariff stacking. And those headaches will likely continue. At a meeting last week with chip industry executives, Lutnick confirmed that Trump plans to use tariffs to push tech companies to buy US-made chips, The New York Times reported.

If those plans go through, companies would be expected to buy half their chips in the US, earning credits “for each dollar spent on American semiconductors, which they can use against what they spend on foreign semiconductors,” the Times reported.

Any company not maintaining “a 1:1 ratio over time would have to pay a tariff,” sources told The Wall Street Journal. For companies like Apple, the policy would require tracking every chip used in every device to ensure a perfect match. But there would likely be an initial grace period, allowing companies to adjust to the new policy as the US increases its domestic chip supply chain, the WSJ reported. And chipmakers like TSMC could potentially benefit, the WSJ reported, possibly gaining leverage in the market if it increases its US manufacturing ahead of rivals.

Taiwan rejects Trump’s demand to shift 50% of chip manufacturing into US Read More »

uk-once-again-demands-backdoor-to-apple’s-encrypted-cloud-storage

UK once again demands backdoor to Apple’s encrypted cloud storage

Apple, backdoor, iCloud Advanced Data Protection, Policy, syndication, UK / /

Caroline Wilson Palow, legal director of the campaign group Privacy International, said the new order might be “just as big a threat to worldwide security and privacy” as the old one.

She said: “If Apple breaks end-to-end encryption for the UK, it breaks it for everyone. The resulting vulnerability can be exploited by hostile states, criminals, and other bad actors the world over.”

Apple made a complaint to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal over the original demand, backed by a parallel legal challenge from Privacy International and Liberty, another campaign group. That case was due to be heard early next year, but the new order may restart the legal process.

TCNs are issued under the UK Investigatory Powers Act, which the government maintains is needed by law enforcement to investigate terrorism and child sexual abuse.

Key figures in Donald Trump’s administration, including vice-president JD Vance and director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, had pressured the UK to retract the January TCN. President Donald Trump has likened the UK’s request to Chinese state surveillance.

In August, Gabbard told the Financial Times that the UK had “agreed to drop” its demand that Apple enable access to “the protected encrypted data of American citizens.”

A person close to the Trump administration said at the time that the request for Apple to break its encryption would have to be dropped altogether to be faithful to the agreement between the two countries. Any back door would weaken protections for US citizens, the person said.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer last month hosted Trump for a state visit, during which the two world leaders announced that US tech companies would invest billions of dollars to build artificial intelligence infrastructure in Britain.

Members of the US delegation raised the issue of the request to Apple around the time of Trump’s visit, according to two people briefed on the matter. However, two senior British government figures said the US administration was no longer leaning on the UK government to rescind the order.

© 2025 The Financial Times Ltd. All rights reserved. Not to be redistributed, copied, or modified in any way.

UK once again demands backdoor to Apple’s encrypted cloud storage Read More »

after-threatening-abc-over-kimmel,-fcc-chair-may-eliminate-tv-ownership-caps

After threatening ABC over Kimmel, FCC chair may eliminate TV ownership caps

brendan carr, fcc ownership cap, nexstar, Policy, sinclair / /

Anna Gomez, the only Democrat on the Republican-majority commission, criticized Carr’s fight against ABC in her comments at today’s FCC meeting. Carr’s FCC “seiz[ed] on a late-night comedian’s comments as a pretext to punish speech it disliked” in “an act of clear government intimidation,” she said.

Gomez said that “corporate behemoths who own large swaths of local stations across the country” continued blocking Kimmel for several days after the show returned “because these billion-dollar media companies have business before the FCC. They will need regulatory approval of their transactions and are pushing to reduce regulatory guardrails so they can grow even bigger.”

Local stations are “trapped in the middle as these massive companies impose their will and their values upon local communities,” Gomez continued. “This precise example neatly encapsulates the danger of allowing vast and unfettered media consolidation. This could drastically alter the media ecosystem and the number of voices that are a part of it.”

National ownership cap

Gomez didn’t vote against today’s action. She said the NPRM “is required by statute” and that she supports “seeking comment on these very important issues.” But Gomez said she’s concerned about consolidation limiting the variety of news and viewpoints on local TV stations.

Congress set the national ownership cap at 39 percent in 2004 and exempted the cap from the FCC’s required quadrennial review of media ownership rules. There is debate over whether the FCC has the authority to eliminate the national limit, and Gomez argued that “given the prior Congressional action, I believe that only Congress can raise the cap.”

The FCC’s “regulatory structure is in large part based on a balance of power between national networks with incentives to serve national interests and local broadcasters with incentives to serve their local communities,” Gomez said. That balance could be disrupted by a single company owning enough broadcast stations to reach the majority of US households, she said.

“In the past two weeks, the public has raised serious concerns that large station groups made programming decisions to serve their national corporate interests, not their communities of license,” Gomez said. “What is the impact of letting them get even bigger?”

After threatening ABC over Kimmel, FCC chair may eliminate TV ownership caps Read More »

california’s-newly-signed-ai-law-just-gave-big-tech-exactly-what-it-wanted

California’s newly signed AI law just gave Big Tech exactly what it wanted

AI, AI development tools, AI ethics, AI law, AI regulation, AI safety, Andreessen Horowitz, Anthropic, Biz & IT, California, Fei-Fei Li, Gavin Newsom, Google, Jack Clark, machine learning, Meta, openai, Policy, Scott Wiener / /

On Monday, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act into law, requiring AI companies to disclose their safety practices while stopping short of mandating actual safety testing. The law requires companies with annual revenues of at least $500 million to publish safety protocols on their websites and report incidents to state authorities, but it lacks the stronger enforcement teeth of the bill Newsom vetoed last year after tech companies lobbied heavily against it.

The legislation, S.B. 53, replaces Senator Scott Wiener’s previous attempt at AI regulation, known as S.B. 1047, that would have required safety testing and “kill switches” for AI systems. Instead, the new law asks companies to describe how they incorporate “national standards, international standards, and industry-consensus best practices” into their AI development, without specifying what those standards are or requiring independent verification.

“California has proven that we can establish regulations to protect our communities while also ensuring that the growing AI industry continues to thrive,” Newsom said in a statement, though the law’s actual protective measures remain largely voluntary beyond basic reporting requirements.

According to the California state government, the state houses 32 of the world’s top 50 AI companies, and more than half of global venture capital funding for AI and machine learning startups went to Bay Area companies last year. So while the recently signed bill is state-level legislation, what happens in California AI regulation will have a much wider impact, both by legislative precedent and by affecting companies that craft AI systems used around the world.

Transparency instead of testing

Where the vetoed SB 1047 would have mandated safety testing and kill switches for AI systems, the new law focuses on disclosure. Companies must report what the state calls “potential critical safety incidents” to California’s Office of Emergency Services and provide whistleblower protections for employees who raise safety concerns. The law defines catastrophic risk narrowly as incidents potentially causing 50+ deaths or $1 billion in damage through weapons assistance, autonomous criminal acts, or loss of control. The attorney general can levy civil penalties of up to $1 million per violation for noncompliance with these reporting requirements.

California’s newly signed AI law just gave Big Tech exactly what it wanted Read More »

taiwan-pressured-to-move-50%-of-chip-production-to-us-or-lose-protection

Taiwan pressured to move 50% of chip production to US or lose protection

Donald Trump, Howard Lutnick, Policy, semiconductors, Taiwan, trump administration, trump tariffs, TSMC, us-china trade war / /

The Trump administration is pressuring Taiwan to rapidly move 50 percent of its chip production into the US if it wants ensured protection against a threatened Chinese invasion, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told NewsNation this weekend.

In the interview, Lutnick noted that Taiwan currently makes about 95 percent of chips used in smartphones and cars, as well as in critical military defense technology. It’s bad for the US, Lutnick said, that “95 percent of our chips are made 9,000 miles away,” while China is not being “shy” about threats to “take” Taiwan.

Were the US to lose access to Taiwan’s supply chain, the US could be defenseless as its economy takes a hit, Lutnick alleged, asking, “How are you going to get the chips here to make your drones, to make your equipment?”

“The model is: if you can’t make your own chips, how can you defend yourself, right?” Lutnick argued. That’s why he confirmed his “objective” during his time in office is to shift US chip production from 2 percent to 40 percent. To achieve that, he plans to bring Taiwan’s “whole supply chain” into the US, a move experts have suggested could take much longer than a single presidential term to accomplish.

In 2023, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang forecast that the US was “somewhere between a decade and two decades away from supply chain independence,” emphasizing that “it’s not a really practical thing for a decade or two.”

Deal is “not natural for Taiwan”

Lutnick acknowledged this will be a “herculean” task. “Everybody tells me it’s impossible,” he said.

To start with, Taiwan must be convinced that it’s not getting a raw deal, he noted, explaining that it’s “not natural for Taiwan” to mull a future where it cedes its dominant role as a global chip supplier, as well as the long-running protections it receives from allies that comes with it.

Taiwan pressured to move 50% of chip production to US or lose protection Read More »

sinclair-gets-nothing-it-asked-for,-puts-jimmy-kimmel-back-on-anyway

Sinclair gets nothing it asked for, puts Jimmy Kimmel back on anyway

jimmy kimmel, nexstar, Policy, sinclair / /

Conservative broadcaster Sinclair is putting Jimmy Kimmel Live! back on the air. In a statement today, Sinclair said it will end its preemption of the show on its ABC affiliates starting tonight, even though ABC and owner Disney haven’t accepted its request for an ombudsman and other changes.

Facing the threat of lost advertising dollars, Sinclair said it “received thoughtful feedback from viewers, advertisers, and community leaders representing a wide range of perspectives.” Nexstar separately announced an end to its blackout of Kimmel shortly after this article published.

Sinclair said its decision to preempt Kimmel “was independent of any government interaction or influence.” Sinclair’s preempting of Kimmel last week came just as Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr said TV station owners that didn’t preempt the show could lose their FCC licenses.

Sinclair last week said it wouldn’t air Kimmel on its stations “until formal discussions are held with ABC regarding the network’s commitment to professionalism and accountability.” Sinclair at the time praised Carr for his stance against Kimmel and urged the FCC to “take immediate regulatory action to address control held over local broadcasters by the big national networks.”

Sinclair also announced it would air a special in remembrance of Kirk in Kimmel’s time slot, but then decided to put it on YouTube instead.

Ombudsman and other requests “not yet adopted”

Sinclair said it didn’t get anything it asked for in its discussions with ABC. The company’s statement today said:

In our ongoing and constructive discussions with ABC, Sinclair proposed measures to strengthen accountability, viewer feedback, and community dialogue, including a network-wide independent ombudsman. These proposals were suggested as collaborative efforts between the ABC affiliates and the ABC network. While ABC and Disney have not yet adopted these measures, and Sinclair respects their right to make those decisions under our network affiliate agreements, we believe such measures could strengthen trust and accountability.

Our decision to preempt this program was independent of any government interaction or influence. Free speech provides broadcasters with the right to exercise judgment as to the content on their local stations. While we understand that not everyone will agree with our decisions about programming, it is simply inconsistent to champion free speech while demanding that broadcasters air specific content.

Sinclair’s request for an ombudsman is reminiscent of Carr requiring an ombudsman at CBS in exchange for a merger approval. Carr described the CBS ombudsman as a “bias monitor.”

Sinclair gets nothing it asked for, puts Jimmy Kimmel back on anyway Read More »

trump-says-tiktok-should-be-tweaked-to-become-“100%-maga”

Trump says TikTok should be tweaked to become “100% MAGA”

bytedance, china, Donald Trump, national security, Policy, tiktok, us-china trade war / /

Previously, experts had suggested that China had little incentive to follow through with the deal, while as recently as July, ByteDance denied reports that it agreed to sell TikTok to the US, the South China Morning Post reported. Yesterday, Reuters noted that Vice President JD Vance confirmed that the “new US company will be valued at around $14 billion,” a price tag “far below some analyst estimates,” which might frustrate ByteDance. Questions also remain over what potential concessions Trump may have made to get Xi’s sign-off.

It’s also unclear if Trump’s deal meets the legal requirements of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, with Reuters reporting that “numerous details” still need to be “fleshed out.” Last Friday, James Sullivan of JP Morgan suggested on CNBC that “Trump’s proposed TikTok deal lacked clarity on who is in control of the algorithm, leaving the national security concerns wide open,” CNBC reported.

Other critics, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s civil liberties director David Greene, warned in a statement to Ars that the US now risks “turning over” TikTok “to the allies of a President who seems to have no respect for the First Amendment.”

Jennifer Huddleston, a senior fellow in technology policy at the Cato Institute, agreed. “The arrangement creates uncertainty about what influence or oversight the US government might require over this separate algorithm that could raise potential First Amendment concerns regarding government influence over a private actor,” Huddleston said.

Will TikTok become right-wing?

The Guardian recently conducted a deep dive into how the Murdochs’ and Ellisons’ involvement could “gift Trump’s billionaire allies a degree of control over US media that would be vast and unprecedented” by allowing “the owners of the US’s most powerful cable TV channels” to “steer the nation’s most influential social network.”

Trump says TikTok should be tweaked to become “100% MAGA” Read More »

50+-scientific-societies-sign-letter-objecting-to-trump-executive-order

50+ scientific societies sign letter objecting to Trump executive order

Grant funding, grant review process, Policy, Science, Science policy / /

Last month, the Trump administration issued an executive order asserting political control over grant funding, including all federally supported research. In general, the executive order inserts a layer of political control over both the announcement of new funding opportunities and the approval of individual grants. Now, a coalition of more than 50 scientific and medical organizations is firing back, issuing a letter to the US Congress expressing grave concerns over the order’s provisions and urging Congress to protect the integrity of what has long been an independent, merit-based, peer-review system for awarding federal grants.

As we previously reported, the order requires that any announcement of funding opportunities be reviewed by the head of the agency or someone they designate, which means a political appointee will have the ultimate say over what areas of science the US funds. Individual grants will also require clearance from a political appointee and “must, where applicable, demonstrably advance the President’s policy priorities.”

The order also instructs agencies to formalize the ability to cancel previously awarded grants at any time if they’re considered “no longer advance agency priorities.” Until a system is in place to enforce the new rules, agencies are forbidden from starting new funding programs.

In short, the new rules would mean that all federal science research would need to be approved by a political appointee who may have no expertise in the relevant areas, and the research can be canceled at any time if the political winds change. It would mark the end of a system that has enabled US scientific leadership for roughly 70 years.

50+ scientific societies sign letter objecting to Trump executive order Read More »