Policy – Page 7

Elon Musk and Trump win fight to keep DOGE’s work secret

elon musk doge, Policy / Tim Belzer / March 28, 2025

Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) don’t have to turn over information related to their government cost-cutting operations, at least for now, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday.

A federal judge previously ruled that 14 states suing the federal government can serve written discovery requests on Musk and DOGE. Musk, DOGE, and President Trump turned to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in an attempt to block that order.

A three-judge panel at the appeals court granted an emergency motion for a stay in an order issued yesterday, putting the lower-court ruling on hold pending further orders from the appeals court. “Petitioners have satisfied the stringent requirements for a stay,” the panel ruling said. “In particular, petitioners have shown a likelihood of success on their argument that the district court was required to decide their motion to dismiss before allowing discovery.”

Musk, DOGE, and Trump filed a petition to quash the district court’s discovery order at the same time that they filed their emergency motion for a stay. The appeals court did not rule on the petition to quash the discovery order. The three-judge panel included judges appointed by George H.W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump.

The states suing the US alleged that “President Trump has delegated virtually unchecked authority to Mr. Musk without proper legal authorization from Congress and without meaningful supervision of his activities.” They sought “planning, implementation, and organizational documents,” but no emails, text messages, or other electronic communications.

US District Judge Tanya Chutkan denied a request for depositions but otherwise found the states’ discovery requests to be “reasonable and narrowly tailored to their request for injunctive relief.”

Elon Musk and Trump win fight to keep DOGE’s work secret Read More »

The Atlantic publishes texts showing Trump admin sent bombing plan to reporter

Policy, signal, trump administration / Tim Belzer / March 27, 2025

White House didn’t want texts released

Prior to running its follow-up article, The Atlantic asked Trump administration officials if they objected to publishing the full texts. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt emailed a response:

As we have repeatedly stated, there was no classified information transmitted in the group chat. However, as the CIA Director and National Security Advisor have both expressed today, that does not mean we encourage the release of the conversation. This was intended to be a an [sic] internal and private deliberation amongst high-level senior staff and sensitive information was discussed. So for those reason [sic]—yes, we object to the release.”

Obviously, The Atlantic moved ahead with publishing the texts. “The Leavitt statement did not address which elements of the texts the White House considered sensitive, or how, more than a week after the initial air strikes, their publication could have bearing on national security,” the article said.

On Monday, the National Security Council said it was “reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain.” Trump publicly supported Waltz after the incident, but Politico reported that “Trump was mad—and suspicious—that Waltz had Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg’s number saved in his phone in the first place.” One of Politico’s anonymous sources was quoted as saying, “The president was pissed that Waltz could be so stupid.”

Senate Armed Services Chairman Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) said the committee will investigate, according to The Hill. “We’re going to look into this and see what the facts are, but it’s definitely a concern. And you can be sure the committee, House and Senate, will be looking into this… And it appears that mistakes were made, no question,” he said.

The White House said its investigation is being undertaken by the National Security Council, the White House Counsel’s office, and a group led by Elon Musk. “Elon Musk has offered to put his technical experts on this to figure out how this number was inadvertently added to the chat, again to take responsibility and ensure this can never happen again,” Leavitt told reporters.

The Atlantic publishes texts showing Trump admin sent bombing plan to reporter Read More »

FBI probes arson of Tesla cars and facilities, says “this is domestic terrorism”

Policy, Tesla, tesla arson / Rejus Almole / March 26, 2025

Anarchist blog in FBI’s reading list

The New York Post report said the anarchist blog being eyed by the FBI is run out of Salt Lake City, Utah. “In addition, the FBI identified the site Dogeque.st that has information [for] doxxing Tesla employees and locations across the country and [is] being run out of the African country of Sao Tome,” the news report said.

A Democratic congressman criticized the FBI’s decision to create a task force on Tesla-related crime.

“This is the political weaponization of the DOJ,” wrote US Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), who previously served as lead counsel in Trump’s first impeachment trial. “Trump uses his official authority to defend his benefactor Elon Musk. The FBI then creates a task force to use our law enforcement to ‘crack down’ on adversaries of Musk’s.”

“Tesla Takedown” calls for peaceful protest

The New York Post report said the FBI is also “tracking a mass protest called ‘Tesla Takedown’ scheduled for March 29 calling for 500 demonstrations at Tesla showrooms and charging stations.” The group behind the protest is calling for peaceful demonstrations and said it opposes vandalism and violence.

A Tesla Takedown website says the planned demonstrations are part of the group’s “peaceful protest movement. We oppose violence, vandalism and destruction of property.” Tesla Takedown says that “Elon Musk is destroying our democracy, and he’s using the fortune he built at Tesla to do it” and urges people to sell their Teslas, dump their Tesla stock, and join the demonstrations.

CNBC quoted a Tesla Takedown spokesperson as saying that the “movement has been and always will be nonviolent. They want to scare us away from protesting Musk’s destruction—but standing up for free speech is essential to democracy. We will not be deterred.”

Three arrests

US Attorney General Pamela Bondi last week issued a statement highlighting three arrests of suspected arsonists. Each defendant faces five to 20 years in prison if convicted. One defendant threw “approximately eight Molotov cocktails at a Tesla dealership located in Salem, Oregon,” another tried to light Tesla cars on fire with Molotov cocktails in Colorado, and a third in South Carolina “wrote profane messages against President Trump around Tesla charging stations before lighting the charging stations on fire with Molotov cocktails,” the press release said.

“The days of committing crimes without consequence have ended,” Bondi said. “Let this be a warning: if you join this wave of domestic terrorism against Tesla properties, the Department of Justice will put you behind bars.”

FBI probes arson of Tesla cars and facilities, says “this is domestic terrorism” Read More »

Apple barred from Google antitrust trial, putting $20 billion search deal on the line

antitrust, Apple, Google, Policy, Tech / Kris Guyer / March 26, 2025

Apple has suffered a blow in its efforts to salvage its lucrative search placement deal with Google. A new ruling from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals affirms that Apple cannot participate in Google’s upcoming antitrust hearing, which could leave a multibillion-dollar hole in Apple’s balance sheet. The judges in the case say Apple simply waited too long to get involved.

Just a few years ago, a high-stakes court case involving Apple and Google would have found the companies on opposing sides, but not today. Apple’s and Google’s interests are strongly aligned here, to the tune of $20 billion. Google forks over that cash every year, and it’s happy to do so to secure placement as the default search provider in the Safari desktop and mobile browser.

The antitrust penalties pending against Google would make that deal impermissible. Throughout the case, the government made the value of defaults clear—most people never change them. That effectively delivers Google a captive audience on Apple devices.

Google’s ongoing legal battle with the DOJ’s antitrust division is shaping up to be the most significant action the government has taken against a tech company since Microsoft in the late ’90s. Perhaps this period of stability tricked Google’s partners into thinking nothing would change, but the seriousness of the government’s proposed remedies seems to have convinced them otherwise.

Google lost the case in August 2024, and the government proposed remedies in October. According to MediaPost, the appeals court took issue with Apple’s sluggishness in choosing sides. It didn’t even make its filing to participate in the remedy phase until November, some 33 days after the initial proposal. The judges ruled this delay “seems difficult to justify.”

When Google returns to court in the coming weeks, the company’s attorneys will not be flanked by Apple’s legal team. While Apple will be allowed to submit written testimony and file friend-of-the-court briefs, it will not be able to present evidence to the court or cross-examine witnesses, as it sought. Apple argued that it was entitled to do so because it had a direct stake in the outcome.

Apple barred from Google antitrust trial, putting $20 billion search deal on the line Read More »

Trump administration accidentally texted secret bombing plans to a reporter

Policy, trump administration / Mike M. / March 25, 2025

Using Signal in this way may have violated US law, Goldberg wrote. “Conceivably, Waltz, by coordinating a national-security-related action over Signal, may have violated several provisions of the Espionage Act, which governs the handling of ‘national defense’ information, according to several national-security lawyers interviewed by my colleague Shane Harris for this story,” he wrote.

Signal is not an authorized venue for sharing such information, and Waltz’s use of a feature that makes messages disappear after a set period of time “raises questions about whether the officials may have violated federal records law,” the article said. Adding a reporter to the thread “created new security and legal issues” by transmitting information to someone who wasn’t authorized to see it, “the classic definition of a leak, even if it was unintentional,” Goldberg wrote.

The account labeled “JD Vance” questioned the war plan in a Signal message on March 14. “I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now,” the message said. “There’s a further risk that we see a moderate to severe spike in oil prices. I am willing to support the consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself. But there is a strong argument for delaying this a month, doing the messaging work on why this matters, seeing where the economy is, etc.”

The Vance account also stated, “3 percent of US trade runs through the suez. 40 percent of European trade does,” and “I just hate bailing Europe out again.” The Hegseth account responded that “I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC,” but added that “we are the only ones on the planet (on our side of the ledger) who can do this.”

An account apparently belonging to Trump advisor Stephen Miller wrote, “As I heard it, the president was clear: green light, but we soon make clear to Egypt and Europe what we expect in return. We also need to figure out how to enforce such a requirement. EG, if Europe doesn’t remunerate, then what? If the US successfully restores freedom of navigation at great cost there needs to be some further economic gain extracted in return.”

Trump administration accidentally texted secret bombing plans to a reporter Read More »

Current SEC chair cast only vote against suing Elon Musk, report says

elon musk, Policy, SEC / Paul Patrick / March 25, 2025

SEC v. Musk still moving ahead

Before Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion, he purchased a 9 percent stake in the company and failed to disclose it within 10 days as required under US law. “Defendant Elon Musk failed to timely file with the SEC a beneficial ownership report disclosing his acquisition of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of Twitter’s common stock in March 2022, in violation of the federal securities laws,” the SEC said in the January 2025 lawsuit filed in US District Court for the District of Columbia. “As a result, Musk was able to continue purchasing shares at artificially low prices, allowing him to underpay by at least $150 million for shares he purchased after his beneficial ownership report was due.”

The SEC lawsuit against Musk is still moving forward, at least for now. Musk last week received a summons giving him 21 days to respond, according to a court filing.

Enforcement priorities are expected to change under the Trump administration, of course. Trump’s pick to replace Gensler, Paul Atkins, is waiting for Senate confirmation. Atkins testified to Congress in 2019 that the SEC should reduce its disclosure requirements.

Trump last month issued an executive order declaring sweeping power over independent agencies, including the SEC, Federal Trade Commission, and Federal Communications Commission. Trump also fired both FTC Democrats despite a US law and Supreme Court precedent stating that the president cannot fire commission members without good cause.

Another Trump executive order targets the alleged “weaponization of the federal government” and ordered an investigation into Biden-era enforcement actions taken by the SEC, FTC, and Justice Department. The Trump order’s language recalls Musk’s oft-repeated claim that the SEC was “harassing” him.

Current SEC chair cast only vote against suing Elon Musk, report says Read More »

Trump administration’s blockchain plan for USAID is a real head-scratcher

Blockchain, Policy, syndication, Trump, USAID / Rejus Almole / March 24, 2025

Giulio Coppi, a senior humanitarian officer at the nonprofit Access Now who has researched the use of blockchain in humanitarian work, says that blockchain technologies, while sometimes effective, offer no obvious advantages over other tools organizations could use, such as an existing payments system or another database tool. “There’s no proven advantage that it’s cheaper or better,” he says. “The way it’s been presented is this tech solutionist approach that has been proven over and over again to not have any substantial impact in reality.”

There have been, however, some successful instances of using blockchain technology in the humanitarian sector. In 2022, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) ran a small pilot to give cash assistance to Ukrainians displaced by the Russia-Ukraine war in a stablecoin. Other pilots have been tested in Kenya by the Kenya Red Cross Society. The International Committee of the Red Cross, which works with the Kenya team, also helped to develop the Humanitarian Token Solution (HTS).

One representative from an NGO that uses blockchain technology, but wasn’t authorized to speak to the media with regards to issues relating to USAID, says that particularly with regards to money transfers, stablecoins can be faster and easier than other methods of reaching communities impacted by a disaster. However, “introducing new systems means you’re setting up a new burden” for the many organizations that USAID partners with, they say. “The relative cost of new systems is harder for small NGOs,” which would often include the kind of local organizations that would be at the front line of response to disasters.

The proposed adoption of blockchain technology seems related to an emphasis on exerting tight controls over aid. The memo seems, for example, to propose that funding should be contingent on outcomes, reading, “Tying payment to outcomes and results rather than inputs would ensure taxpayer dollars deliver maximum impact.” A USAID employee, who asked to remain anonymous because they were not authorized to speak to the media, says that many of USAID’s contracts already function this way, with organizations being paid after performing their work. However, that’s not possible in all situations. “Those kinds of agreements are often not flexible enough for the environments we work in,” they say, noting that in conflict or disaster zones, situations can change quickly, meaning that what an organization may be able to do or need to do can fluctuate.

Raftree says this language appears to be misleading, and bolsters claims made by Musk and the administration that USAID was corrupt. “It’s not like USAID was delivering tons of cash to people who hadn’t done things,” she says.

This story originally appeared on wired.com.

Trump administration’s blockchain plan for USAID is a real head-scratcher Read More »

California bill would force ISPs to offer 100Mbps plans for $15 a month

affordable broadband, Policy / Rejus Almole / March 22, 2025

Several states consider price requirements

While the California proposal will face opposition from ISPs and is not guaranteed to become law, the amended bill has higher speed requirements for the $15 plan than the existing New York law that inspired it. The New York law lets ISPs comply either by offering $15 broadband plans with download speeds of at least 25Mbps, or $20-per-month service with 200Mbps speeds. The New York law doesn’t specify minimum upload speeds.

AT&T stopped offering its 5G home Internet service in New York entirely instead of complying with the law. But AT&T wouldn’t be able to pull home Internet service out of California so easily because it offers DSL and fiber Internet in the state, and it is still classified as a carrier of last resort for landline phone service.

The California bill says ISPs must file annual reports starting January 1, 2027, to describe their affordable plans and specify the number of households that purchased the service and the number of households that were rejected based on eligibility verification. The bill seems to assume that ISPs will offer the plans before 2027 but doesn’t specify an earlier date. Boerner’s office told us the rule would take effect on January 1, 2026. Boerner’s office is also working on an exemption for small ISPs, but hasn’t settled on final details.

Meanwhile, a Massachusetts bill proposes requiring that ISPs provide at least 100Mbps speeds for $15 a month or 200Mbps for $20 a month. A Vermont bill would require 25Mbps speeds for $15 a month or 200Mbps for $20 a month.

Telco groups told the Supreme Court last year that the New York law “will likely lead to more rate regulation absent the Court’s intervention” as other states will copy New York. They subsequently claimed that AT&T’s New York exit proves the law is having a negative effect. But the Supreme Court twice declined to hear the industry challenge, allowing New York to enforce the law.

California bill would force ISPs to offer 100Mbps plans for $15 a month Read More »

Italy demands Google poison DNS under strict Piracy Shield law

DNS, Google, piracy, Policy, Tech / Paul Patrick / March 22, 2025

Spotted by TorrentFreak, AGCOM Commissioner Massimiliano Capitanio took to LinkedIn to celebrate the ruling, as well as the existence of the Italian Piracy Shield. “The Judge confirmed the value of AGCOM’s investigations, once again giving legitimacy to a system for the protection of copyright that is unique in the world,” said Capitanio.

Capitanio went on to complain that Google has routinely ignored AGCOM’s listing of pirate sites, which are supposed to be blocked in 30 minutes or less under the law. He noted the violation was so clear-cut that the order was issued without giving Google a chance to respond, known as inaudita altera parte in Italian courts.

This decision follows a similar case against Internet backbone firm Cloudflare. In January, the Court of Milan found that Cloudflare’s CDN, DNS server, and WARP VPN were facilitating piracy. The court threatened Cloudflare with fines of up to 10,000 euros per day if it did not begin blocking the sites.

Google could face similar sanctions, but AGCOM has had difficulty getting international tech behemoths to acknowledge their legal obligations in the country. We’ve reached out to Google for comment and will update this report if we hear back.

Italy demands Google poison DNS under strict Piracy Shield law Read More »

Judge orders Musk and DOGE to delete personal data taken from Social Security

doge, elon musk, Policy, Trump / Paul Patrick / March 22, 2025

The lawsuit was filed by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; the Alliance for Retired Americans; and American Federation of Teachers. “Never before has a group of unelected, unappointed, and unvetted individuals—contradictorily described as White House employees, employees of either existing or putative agencies (multiple and many), and undefined ‘advisors’—sought or gained access to such sensitive information from across the federal government,” the lawsuit said.

A temporary restraining order preserves the status quo until a preliminary injunction hearing can be held, although the legal standards for granting a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction are essentially the same, Hollander wrote. A temporary restraining order lasts 14 days by default but can be extended.

“In my view, plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits as to their claim that the access to records provided by SSA to the DOGE Team does not fall within the need-to-know exception to the Privacy Act. Therefore, the access violates both the Privacy Act and the APA,” Hollander wrote.

The SSA has meanwhile been hit with DOGE-fueled budget cuts affecting its operations.

The order

The order says the SSA must cut off DOGE’s access. Musk, Gleason, and all other DOGE team members and affiliates “shall disgorge and delete all non-anonymized PII [personally identifiable information] data in their possession or under their control, provided from or obtained, directly or indirectly, from any SSA system of record to which they have or have had access, directly or indirectly, since January 20, 2025,” it says.

The DOGE defendants are also prohibited “from installing any software on SSA devices, information systems, or systems of record, and shall remove any software that they previously installed since January 20, 2025, or which has been installed on their behalf,” and are prohibited “from accessing, altering, or disclosing any SSA computer or software code.”

The SSA is allowed to provide DOGE with redacted or anonymized records, and may provide “access to discrete, particularized, and non-anonymized data, in accordance with the Privacy Act” under certain conditions. “SSA must first obtain from the DOGE Team member, in writing, and subject to possible review by the Court, a detailed explanation as to the need for the record and why, for said particular and discrete record, an anonymized or redacted record is not suitable for the specified use,” the order said. “The general and conclusory explanation that the information is needed to search for fraud or waste is not sufficient to establish need.”

Judge orders Musk and DOGE to delete personal data taken from Social Security Read More »

After “glitter bomb,” cops arrested former cop who criticized current cops online

facebook, Orland park, police, Policy / Rejus Almole / March 21, 2025

The police claimed that “the fraudulent Facebook pages posted comments on Village of Orland Park social media sites while also soliciting friend requests from Orland Park Police employees and other citizens, portraying the likeness of Deputy Chief of Police Brian West”—and said that this was both Disorderly Conduct and False Personation, both misdemeanors.

West got permission from his boss to launch a criminal investigation, which soon turned into search warrants that surfaced a name: retired Orland Park sergeant Ken Kovac, who had left the department in 2019 after two decades of service. Kovac was charged, and he surrendered himself at the Orland Park Police Department on April 7, 2024.

The police then issued their press release, letting their community know that West had witnessed “demeaning comments in reference to his supervisory position within the department from Kovac’s posts on social media”—which doesn’t sound like any sort of crime. They also wanted to let concerned citizens know that West “epitomizes the principles of public service” and that “Deputy Chief West’s apprehensions were treated with the utmost seriousness and underwent a thorough investigation.”

Okay.

Despite the “utmost seriousness” of this Very Serious Investigation, a judge wasn’t having any of it. In January 2025, Cook County Judge Mohammad Ahmad threw out both the charges against Kovac.

Kovac, of course, was thrilled. His lawyer told a local Patch reporter, “These charges never should have been brought. Ken Kovac made a Facebook account that poked fun at the Deputy Chief of the Orland Park Police Department. The Deputy Chief didn’t like it and tried to use the criminal legal system to get even.”

Orland Park was not backing down, however, blaming prosecutors for the loss. “Despite compelling evidence in the case, the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office was unable to secure a prosecution, failing in its responsibility to protect Deputy Chief West as a victim of these malicious acts,” the village manager told Patch. “The Village of Orland Park is deeply disappointed by this outcome and stands unwavering in its support of former Deputy Chief West.”

The drama took its most recent, entirely predictable, turn this week when Kovac sued the officials who had arrested him. He told the Chicago Sun-Times that he had been embarrassed about being fingerprinted and processed “at the police department that I was previously employed at by people that I used to work with and for.”

Orland Park told the paper that it “stands by its actions and those of its employees and remains confident that they were appropriate and fully compliant with the law.”

After “glitter bomb,” cops arrested former cop who criticized current cops online Read More »

FCC chairman Brendan Carr starts granting telecom lobby’s wish list

brendan carr, FCC, Policy / Rejus Almole / March 21, 2025

In July 2024, AT&T became the first carrier to apply for a technology transition discontinuance “under the Adequate Replacement Test relying on the applicant’s own replacement service,” the order said. “AT&T indicated in this application that it was relying on a totality of the circumstances showing to establish the adequacy of its replacement service, but also committed to the performance testing methodology and parameters established in the 2016 Technology Transitions Order Technical Appendix.” This “delay[ed] the filing of its discontinuance application for several months,” the FCC said.

Harold Feld, senior VP of consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge, said the FCC clarification that carriers don’t need to perform testing, “combined with elimination of most of the remaining notice requirements, means that you don’t have to worry about actually proving anything. Just say ‘totality of the circumstances’ and by the time anyone who cares finds out, the application will be granted.”

“The one positive thing is that some states (such as California) still have carrier of last resort rules to protect consumers,” Feld told Ars. “In some states, at least, consumers will not suddenly find themselves cut off from 911 or other important services.”

Telco lobby loves FCC moves

The bureau separately approved a petition for a waiver filed last month by USTelecom, a lobby group that represents telcos such as AT&T, Verizon, and CenturyLink (aka Lumen). The group sought a waiver of a requirement that replacement voice services be offered on a stand-alone basis instead of only in a bundle with broadband.

While bundles cost more than single services for consumers who only want phone access, USTelecom said that “inefficiencies of offering stand-alone voice can raise costs for consumers and reduce capital available for investment and innovation.”

The FCC said granting the waiver will allow providers “to retire copper networks, not only in cases where replacement voice services are available on a stand-alone basis, but in cases where those services are available on a bundled basis.” The waiver is approved for two years and can be extended.

USTelecom President and CEO Jonathan Spalter praised the FCC actions in a statement. “Broadband providers appreciate Chairman Carr’s laser focus on cutting through red tape and outdated mindsets to accelerate the work of connecting all Americans,” Spalter said.

Just like Carr’s statement, Spalter did not use the word “fiber” when discussing replacements for copper service. He said vaguely that “today’s decision marks a significant step forward in transitioning outdated copper telephone lines to next-generation networks that better meet the needs of American consumers,” and “will help turbocharge investment in advanced broadband infrastructure, sustain and grow a skilled broadband workforce, bring countless new choices and services to more families and communities, and fuel our innovation economy.”

FCC chairman Brendan Carr starts granting telecom lobby’s wish list Read More »