The EU’s Chips Act finally entered into force yesterday (September 21), after spending over a year winding its way through the legislature. The landmark law is designed to bolster the bloc’s domestic supply, sovereignty, and competitiveness in the semiconductor sector.
Semiconductor chips are the backbone of all electronic products — and as such, theyr’e fundamental components in everything from smartphones and cars to applications in healthcare, clean energy, and communications. This means chips are also at the centre of geopolitical interests and the global rally for technological supremacy.
“The global race for leadership in chips is a fact and Europe must secure her active part in it,” said Věra Jourová, the Commission’s VP for Values and Transparency. “In the EU we have great talent and research, but we are missing out in linking those advantages with production and rollout of the technology.”
Meanwhile, shortages and frictions in the semiconductor supply chain (especially heightened during the pandemic), exposed the bloc’s heavy reliance on a few foreign suppliers — China and Taiwan for manufacturing, and the US for design.
Against this backdrop, the Chips Act has three main objectives: to strengthen domestic manufacturing capacity, boost the European design ecosystem, and support scaleup and innovation across the entire value chain.
Overall, the EU aims to mobilise €43bn in public and private investments, and bring its share in global production capacity from 10% to 20% by 2030.
Three key pillars of action
1. The Chips for Europe Initiative
The Initiative will facilitate the “lab to fab” process and bridge the gap between research and industrialisation. It will receive €3.3bn in EU funding alongside capital from member states. It will support actions including the development of advanced pilot production lines and quantum chips, and the creation of a Chips Fund to provide easier access to debt financing and equity.
2. Boosting investment
To ensure security of supply and boost production capacity, the act will incentivise private and public investments in manufacturing facilities for chipmakers and their suppliers.
3. Coordination
The act has established a coordination mechanism between member states and the Commission to boost collaboration, monitor supply, estimate demand, and trigger a “crisis stage” if necessary. A pilot semiconductor alert system has already been set for shareholders to report supply chain disruptions.
“Investment is already happening, coupled with considerable public funding, and a robust regulatory framework,” said Commissioner Thierry Breton.
“We are becoming an industrial powerhouse in the markets of the future — capable of supplying ourselves and the world with both mature and advanced semiconductors. Semiconductors that are essential building blocks of the technologies that will shape our future, our industry, and our defence base.”
The European Investment Fund (EIF) announced today it would invest €40mn with Blume Equity. Based out of London, the VC was founded by three women in 2020, and invests into European high-growth climate tech scaleups.
Blume Equity backs companies focusing on decarbonisation as well as broader environmental sustainability. These include carbon accounting platform Normative, sustainable femtech startup Elvie, Matsmart Motatos that looks to combat food waste, and IoT industrial SME data support provider Sensorfact.
The €40mn comes from the InvestEU program as part of the EIF’s mission to support high-growth and innovative SMEs across Europe, along with a regional mandate from the Dutch Future Fund. EIF joins other Blume Equity investors, including Swedish pension fund AP4 and Visa Foundation.
“By supporting Blume with one of the largest investments EIF has made to a first time fund, the European Union highlights its commitment both to the environment and to supporting the growth-stage ecosystem in Europe,” said Clare Murray, one of Blume Equity’s co-founders and partners. “This partnership will help us continue our profit with purpose mission to support entrepreneurs tackling the climate emergency.”
Cutting-edge technology to play a major role in EU green transition
Climate tech investment pace has suffered along with other funding over the past year. However, there is reason for optimism for the sector — ironically, much due to the all-too immediate urgency of tangible climate events, such as the wildfires and floods of the summer.
According to a report published by the Economist last week, VC investment in climate tech has surged over the past decade. Meanwhile, the recent slowing down highlights the need for a diversification of funding sources. This includes government agencies and alternative pools of capital, such as pension funds.
“The green transition must be accelerated to meet our current climate and environmental challenges,” EIF Chief Executive Marjut Falkstedt commented. “Innovation in all sectors of our economy and cutting-edge technology will play a major role in achieving it. With the backing of the InvestEU programme and the Dutch Future Fund, we are very happy to invest in the female-led Blume Equity Fund to support disruptive businesses with a positive impact on people and planet.”
More money for climate tech to grow
Meanwhile, London-based HSBC also announced today it would make $1bn (€940mn) in funding available to climate tech startups globally. The banking and financial services company said it expected the funds to go toward EV charging, battery storage, carbon removal technologies, and sustainable food and agriculture. Indeed, the Economist study identified food and agriculture technology as a sector that is receiving disproportionately little funding compared to its contribution to global carbon dioxide emissions.
Furthermore, HSBC also launched a new climate-tech venture capital strategy, and will invest $100mn (€94mn) in Breakthrough Energy Catalyst, a separate platform that supports cleaner energy source technologies.
“Access to finance is critical for early-stage climate tech companies to create and scale real-world solutions,” said Barry O’Byrne, CEO of global commercial banking at HSBC. They also need ample support in making the jump from early to late stage — a funding gap that is gaining more and more attention.
When it comes to saving the world — or, let’s face it, civilisation, the planet will recover — there is no silver bullet. Rather, it is going to take a holistic approach of caring for the Earth and each other.
A technological revolution got us into this pickle. Ironically, technology might just be the Hail Mary that will pull us, if not entirely out of it, then at least away from the brink of total disaster. But in order for that to happen, it is us humans who need to set our minds — and money — to it.
Recently launched venture capital firm Transition wants to support emerging technologies looking to help our planet. This includes, but is not exclusive to, reducing carbon emissions. Based out of London with offices in Reykjavik and New York, the climate tech VC is the brainchild of a group of experienced funders who saw a tremendous gap between early stage and later stage funding in the sector.
“What we saw was that there was this real gap in the market where there was a lot of activity at angel stage and seed stage. And then there is an enormous amount of capital available for later stage investing, which will only grow due to climate-focused targets,” Kristian Branaes, one of Transition’s partners, previously with CPP Investments and Atomico, told TNW.
The <3 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
“But there are actually very few companies that make it out from all the great accelerators and incubators that exist, and very few that can absorb a lot of capital,” Branaes added, referring to an increasing interest from very large organisations, such as pension funds, to invest more in clean and climate tech. This means that a lot of technology currently being developed risks being left behind.
Indeed, data supports Branaes’ and his partners’ observations. A report published by Economist Impact last week found that, in 2021, only 6% of private investment in the sector went to emerging or early-adoption technologies. The remaining 94% was directed towards more mature tech, such as EVs, energy storage, and solar power.
Climate tech lost in translation
The relationship between equity investing and climate tech is an inherently complicated one. The two sectors, finance and science/engineering, not only have a different vocabulary but also work according to very different time horizons. To function well together, the funding side will need to get comfortable with different measures of success and potentially new revenue models. Meanwhile, scientist-founders need to find ways of translating innovation to commercialisation and business plans.
“We see a lot of scientists coming out of PhD or postdoc, towards the beginning of their academic professional career, that have been very much focused on one topic, or a very narrow scope, and completely understand that topic,” said Transition Venture Partner Bruis Van Vlijmen. The key to the “translation puzzle,” he states, is to be able to look up and see the complete picture.
And Van Vlijmen should know. He has trained on traditional thermo-mechanical storage systems at TU Delft in the Netherlands, and worked on ocean wave energy generation at UC Berkeley and energy storage solutions at Stanford, before becoming involved in the VC/startup ecosystem in the SF Bay Area.
“That translation [between science and business], I think, really comes from being able to kind of download all the scientific knowledge from the depths of your understanding to something like a common playing field and an economic framework that everyone can understand.”
In service of planetary life-support systems
Transition began raising funds in June 2022 (according to a Securities and Exchange filing amounting to $200mn). The firm focuses specifically on companies that will help restore/improve/reduce human detrimental impact on one of the “planetary boundaries.”
These were defined by a group of researchers in 2009, and are processes that regulate the stability and resilience of the Earth’s system at risk due to human activity — including climate, biodiversity, and land system change.
Exceeding the safe operation within these boundaries could, the researchers argued, “be deleterious or even catastrophic due to the risk of crossing thresholds that will trigger non-linear, abrupt environmental change within continental- to planetary-scale systems.”
In an update to the study published in Nature earlier this year, scientists found that humans have surpassed seven out of eight boundaries.
“We think of climate in a slightly broader way, rather than just focusing on, say, a specific CO2 cutoff point,” Branaes said. “And that’s because what matters to us is having a livable prosperous planet for all of us to enjoy.”
Unlocking the business side of innovation
This broader impact strategy is evident in the startups that Transition has chosen to back this far. Among them are Waterplan, which develops software for enterprises to measure, respond, and report on increasingly changing water risk. Others are plant-based plastics developer FabricNano, and SixWheel, which offers a swappable battery solution and charging network for trucks.
Another still is Phase Biolabs based out of Nottingham, UK, for which Transition led the seed round in 2022. The company uses a gas fermentation process where captured CO2 is introduced into a tank where it is “eaten” by patented microbes, which produces chemicals and fuels, similar to the process of making wine or beer.
“The biggest thing Transition has done for us is reinforce some of the key things that you need to kind of figure out or unlock on the business side of establishing a new company,” said David Ortega, founder, CEO and CTO, of Phase Biolabs.
“Because of their diverse and experienced team, they have been able to provide that guidance that someone like me, who lacks that experience, needs to try and make fewer mistakes,” Ortega continued, adding how important it is for scientists to learn how to translate their technology into a value proposition.
Along with Branaes, Transition’s other partners are Mona Alsubaei (formerly with Union Square Ventures), David Helgason (founder of Unity Technologies), and Ari Helgasson (previously an investor at Index Ventures and Dawn Capital, and co-founder of Uphance and ecommerce startup Fabricly).
There may not be one single solution that will solve the challenges we collectively face. However, as a Swedish saying goes, “small streams make great rivers.” If all the amazing innovation that exists and is yet to be discovered out there receives the right level of support, we may just stand a chance.
Driver monitoring systems (DMS) that assess alertness behind the wheel are rapidly becoming the leading automotive safety feature across the globe. In the EU for example, vehicle safety regulator EuroNCAP is requiring all new cars to incorporate a DMS in order to comply with its safety rating.
Amidst this push, startups are benefiting from business opportunities in the DMS space, offering solutions that range from heartmetrics to onset sleep detection. Among them, Swedish Devant is tapping the potential of synthetic data.
Launched in 2021, the startup generates synthetic data of lifelike digital humans to support the training, validation, and testing of machine learning networks — such as the ones behind driver monitoring systems. Specifically, it develops 3D simulated humans that are diverse in both appearance and behaviour across different situations
But how exactly can synthetic data improve DMS? TNW spoke with Richard Bremer, Devant’s co-founder and CEO, to find out more.
The gap synthetic data can fill
Interest in synthetic data started in the early 1990s, and it didn’t take long for the tech industry to realise the technology’s value in accelerating machine learning.
The automotive sector was one of the first proponents of synthetic data, adopting it in the mid-2010s for the development of autonomous vehicles, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), and most recently, DMS.
Driver and occupant monitoring systems (DMS and OMS) typically use infrared cameras and sensors to collect real-time information on the driver and the passengers. Thanks to computer vision and machine learning, this information is then analysed, tracking for instance the driver’s gaze or facial expressions, to determine their alertness and attention to the road.
This means that to perform at their best, both DMS and OMS need to be trained on vast amounts of high-quality data, comprising images and recordings that capture as many diverse situations as possible. Think of drivers texting on their phone, drinking at the wheel, or even leaning to the back seats to stop their children from fighting.
“For any AI network, sufficient data quantity and quality are essential.
While data from cameras and even actor roleplay have fueled the development of DMS so far, using these sources alone to capture every imaginable situation comes with multiple challenges. It’s expensive, time-consuming, limited in variability, and associated with privacy concerns.
That’s where the value of synthetic data comes in, according to Bremer. “The potential and the interesting part about synthetic data is that you can reduce the time and cost and also increase the performance of the network.”
How Devant’s technology works
The Norrköping-based startup uses a step-by-step process on its platform, combining different kinds of 3D assets to create images and animations. In the automotive case, this content can be 3D cabins and people — supplemented with details such as accessories, garments, or eyewear.
To ensure a high-quality result that doesn’t tamper with a machine learning network’s performance, the data’s reliability and accuracy are validated via a series of quality assessment systems throughout the entire process.
“When it comes to what we have built, it’s primarily about making sure that the data has been tested and validated,” Bremer says.
Devant’s aim for its 3D human models is threefold: to align with how things look in the real world, to expand their diversity and offer the widest range of different scenarios possible, and to match customer requirements.
For this reason, the Swedish startup offers a configuration tool for users to select the parameters that correspond to their needs. The adjustments can range from more generic variables (such as age, ethnicity, and sex) to more specific details, including clothing, the frequency of the eyelid movement, or the lighting conditions inside a vehicle.
In June, the company joined forces with Australia-based Seeing Machines, a developer of (DMS and OMS) used by major car manufacturers.
Through the partnership, Seeing Machines will use Devant’s 3D simulations to train and validate its machine learning networks, aiming to further advance its in-cabin monitoring systems and create a large-scale dataset of distracted driver behaviours that align with the EuroNCAP requirements.
Quality just as essential as quantity
To truly tap the potential of synthetic data, it’s not just about hitting a button and generating millions of images within a few days, Bremer explains. It’s also about the data’s quality and accuracy.
The premise is simple. “For any AI network to perform as well as possible, sufficient quantity and sufficient quality are essential.”
The promising aspect about computer-generated data is that “we know exactly down to pixel level what every single image contains thanks to its accompanying metadata,” Bremer says. In contrast, when it comes to real-world data, “you do not have that level of granular control and accuracy as you do with synthetic data.”
But there’s a catch. The more you increase the data’s quality by adding more parameters and realism to cover the vast amount of possible scenarios and human behaviours, the more complex it becomes. This, in turn, increases rendering times.
“That’s why no one before us has taken this quality approach to synthetic data, because it’s so costly in terms of rendering times,” Bremer claims. In fact, Devant struggled quite some time to solve the puzzle of maintaining quality, while optimising speed.
Current limitations
Despite synthetic data’s obvious advantage in quantity and its ability to provide accurate, high-quality simulations, Bremer emphasises that the technology shouldn’t be seen as “a silver bullet.” At least, not yet.
Instead, he says, replacing real-world data with their computer-generated equivalent should be done with a step-by-step, cautious approach.
“I think that the most important thing to remember here is that DMS are life-critical systems,” he notes. And there’s still a number of challenges to overcome — which go beyond the need to have thousands of 3D models to ensure sufficient coverage.
The first challenge is establishing a threshold for what constitutes good and bad data, which Devant will explore in collaboration with Seeing Machines. The second is identifying exactly what data the machine learning network will recognise as important enough to use.
The startup is also putting additional effort into covering more aspects of camera optics. “Simulating different camera parameters is very complex, especially when you need to do it within a limited rendering time per image,” Bremer explains.
The way forward
So far, Devant has been working on the various levels of driver distraction, focusing especially on realistically simulating the eye, with its different movements, eyelid behaviours, and varied pupil sizes.
Through the partnership with Seeing Machines, the startup aims to climb the complexity ladder and keep on adding features that will cover the entire EuroNCAP protocol. From there, Bremer sees drowsiness as the “next natural thing,” with intoxication being another interesting possibility on the company’s list.
Devant’s decision to develop human-centric synthetic data for the automotive industry was a targeted one from the outset, driven by the business opportunity presented by the increasing attention to DMS and the impending EU regulations. According to Bremer, it was also about generating actual value and using technology in a way that benefits people.
Beyond the automotive space, the startup envisions other potential industries where its tech could make a positive impact, such as training AI systems to detect signs of diseases at an early stage.
Single-glazing. Old electric-powered heat emitters. Walls with hardly any insulation. Damp throughout the ground floor. Welcome to Europe.
While these problems vary in prevalence from country to country, even nations rated highly in assessments of household energy efficiency have room for improvement. Sweden, for instance, often does very well in such analyses. But for Magnus Petersson, cofounder and chief executive of Stockholm-based Dryft, there’s plenty of work still to do.
“We need to fundamentally transform the houses,” he says. Dryft, a startup with 150 employees that has raised €6 million to date, numbers itself among a fleet of new businesses targeting the energy renovation market.
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
Dryft and others like them are using tech to help homeowners find out how efficient their home really is — and what they can do to improve it. The treatments these firms propose will differ dramatically from house to house but the idea in general is to offer “holistic” advice.
Companies such as Dryft aren’t just about selling you a new heating system – the point, they say, is to find out the most suitable methods for making a dwelling more efficient within a certain budget, whatever those methods may be.
Some homes will need lots more insulation, while others will already have that but require a more efficient method of ventilating the internal spaces, for example. Where would a homeowner’s cash best be spent?
Energy Tetris
“When we sell energy renovation to you as a customer, that energy renovation is a Tetris made up of different services,” says Petersson, referring to the popular block-sorting video game in his analogy.
With Dryft, customers get a free 30-minute video consultation where they can talk through features of their property with an energy adviser. This yields a summary of what kind of retrofit might best suit the dwelling and how much it could cost. If the customer decides to proceed, Dryft conducts a more in-depth survey and can then go on and actually do the required renovation work as well.
The company currently covers the Greater Stockholm area but has plans to expand across Europe. Since 2020, Dryft has carried out renovation projects large and small in nearly 6,000 homes.
Petersson explains how the firm’s algorithm estimates the projected energy savings post-renovation. This algorithm is constantly being refined with data on the outcome of real Dryft projects, he adds, meaning that it ought to get more and more accurate over time.
As an example, he shares a case study of a 1970-built, four-bedroom house in Stockholm. Dryft upgraded the double-glazing to triple-glazing, installed a heat pump, ventilation system with heat recovery, and also some smart controls. The whole renovation cost the equivalent of €38,000 and the household is currently saving €2,900 per year in energy expenditure.
At that rate, it will take about 12-13 years to recoup the investment. In the meantime, annual energy consumption in the property has plummeted by more than 40% and its Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating has jumped from G to C. This should increase the value of the property, notes Petersson.
Show me the money
There’s no doubt that extensive energy retrofits are not cheap. Dryft and startups in the same market are also trying to help customers take advantage of government subsidies or grants.
“People are planning renovation roadmaps and that is what we are actually showing to our customers,” explains Justus Menten, cofounder of Enter, an energy retrofit-focused startup in Berlin.
Enter offers financing options to help people pay for their energy renovation in instalments and the firm supports customers in seeking out applicable subsidies that could lessen the upfront cost of the work they want to do. Enter works with partner companies who carry out the actual plumbing, engineering work, or installation of insulation, for example.
The startup, which has 135 employees and has raised €19.4 million so far, has around 1,000 paying customers per month, adds Menten. Enter has an app that can estimate the energy demands of a dwelling and how specific retrofit projects — say, upgrading the loft insulation — will impact that.
Customers can try out different energy renovation measures and see the projected results in terms of emissions savings, reduced costs, and the potential increased value of their property, for example. A virtual retrofit before you decide on the real thing.
Enter also has a team of experts who subsequently survey each dwelling and confirm the accuracy of the app’s suggestions and projections.
Tools that help homeowners understand what renovation measures are available, and what their impacts might be, are much needed at present, say observers.
“From my research, there is a huge gap for householders to find high-quality information – that can delay renovations taking place,” says Kate Simpson at Imperial College London, who has studied the use of data in energy renovations. She notes that it can be difficult to accurately predict energy savings post-renovation because there are so many factors that affect consumption, from the weather to how much the occupants decide to heat their home.
Crucially, startups gathering data about energy consumption must ensure that they have consent to do so, she adds.
Data is key
Data protection is very important, though access to useful information on the current energy efficiency of homes around Europe is far from standardised, notes Michael Hanratty, chief executive of BERWOW, a startup in the Republic of Ireland.
BERWOW uses an automated tool to analyse data from the Irish equivalent of an EPC – a Building Energy Rating (BER) certificate. The tool proposes energy renovation interventions that might be suitable for a given dwelling. These suggestions can be followed up with an on-site survey to get formal quotations for specific works.
Hanratty explains that the firm’s digital tool, built by Dublin-based tech firm Gamma Location Labs, was ready to go in 2017 but new GDPR legislation regarding data protection in 2018 meant BERWOW had to come up with a different system for accessing individual users’ own BER certificates. It requires users to provide their unique electricity meter number and upload proof of address to an online system before the BER can be released to BERWOW for analysis.
“You’d imagine with the urgency of the climate crisis that there could be easier solutions to accessing this data,” says Hanratty. Homeowners who don’t yet have a BER for their property, or who don’t want to open up access to it, can select from one of 60 generalised Irish dwelling types to get an approximated result.
Hanratty adds that he hopes to expand BERWOW to other countries, though the methodology for retrieving EPC information differs greatly from country to country within Europe, he points out.
Since launch, BERWOW has clocked more than 60,000 visitors to its live tool, which is published on the websites of SSE Airtricity, a major local energy provider in Ireland, among others. Those initial enquiries have resulted in a total of 2,400 surveys of properties to date.
BERWOW has one employee — Hanratty — and has not needed to raise any external funding, besides initial research funding of €112,000 from the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland.
Thinking big
There are plenty of private homeowners with the means to carry out their own renovations around the continent. But they are just one slice of the pie. What about the big businesses that construct large residential developments, or social housing providers?
In the UK, Hubb is targeting such organisations. The company has its own software that creates a digital twin of a specific property. Hubb’s machine learning system can then model how to make each dwelling more energy efficient. Founder and chief executive James Major says he wants to do this on a big scale and is currently in discussions with two large companies in the UK — though no contracts have been signed just yet.
Major wants to demonstrate to firms constructing thousands of houses that, should they improve the energy performance of these buildings even slightly, there could be massive reductions in demand on the electricity grid, for instance.
“If you increase your fabric improvements by 10% or 15%, we could save X amounts of megawatts that you need to connect to your development,” says Major. And this could apply to existing properties requiring a retrofit, too. Doing it at scale would in principle cut down local energy demand drastically.
Our world runs on semiconductors. The slivers of silicon provide electronic brains to phones, computers, cars, data centres, and stock markets. They’re also the digital backbone of modern militaries.
Some of the first chips ever made were used in missile guidance systems. Today, they power countless military devices, from fighter jets and howitzers to radios and radar.
In the Russian-Ukraine war, chips power HIMARS rocket launchers, Javelin anti-tank missiles, and the Starlink communications satellites. They’re also integral to the arms race underway in East Asia, where territorial disputes in the East and South China Seas risk spiralling into a major conflict. The rise of artificial intelligence adds another dimension to the tensions: there’s now a dearth of AI chips.
In the EU, the shortages and frictions have led the bloc to introduce the €43bn Chips Act. The investment package aims to boost local production and reduce international dependencies. Experts, however, have downplayed any prospects of sovereignty.
According to Chris Miller, the author of Chip War, the EU has “no chance” of semiconductor independence — and neither does anybody else.
The <3 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
The problem, he argues, is that the supply chain is simply too globalised and interconnected.
“Independence is hopeless,” Miller, an economic historian, told TNW at the IFA Berlin tech show. “It’s not going to happen — nor do I think Europe is pushing for it.”
A divided industry
In Chip War, Miller recounts the decades-long battle to control semiconductors, which today centres on the rivalry between the US and China. Tensions between the nations have torn the chip world into two.
As the fractures widen, Beijing is trying to bolster self-sufficiency in semiconductors. It’s currently the world’s largest importer of the devices, spending more money importing them than it does on oil.
To constrain China’s ambitions, Washington has imposed sweeping export controls on chip tech. In 2022, the Biden administration imposed its toughest sanctions yet. Under the new rules, the White House could block not only sales of chips made in the US, but also chips that use American components or software.
The move has disrupted China’s trade with Taiwan, which produces over 60% of the world’s semiconductors — and over 90% of the most advanced ones.
Beijing has also encountered problems in the EU, which has its own chip powerhouse: ASML.
The Dutch company is the world’s leading manufacturer of high-end chipmaking equipment. Without its gear, Chinese firms will struggle to produce advanced chips.
That outcome could soon become a reality.
Europe’s chip future
Amid pressure from the US, the Netherlands began restricting exports of advanced chip manufacturing equipment on September 1.
The move has sparked fears that China will impose retaliatory restrictions. Miller, however, expects Beijing to proceed with caution. He notes that retaliation could backfire.
“China could cause disruptions in supply chains, but they could be just as impacted by the disruptions as the West is,” he said.
Nonetheless, the discord has amplified calls for autonomy. In response, the EU has made plans to produce 20% of the world’s semiconductors — double its current share — by 2030.
It’s a target that Miller believes is “possible,” but only with strong support from the member states and companies.
A precedent for this approach has been set this year in Germany. After offers of enormous subsidies, both Intel and Taiwan’s TSMC have pledged to build chip factories in the country.
Ultimately, semiconductor independence may be impossible — but the EU already has some unique strengths. In machine tools and power semiconductors, for instance, the bloc is home to some of the world leaders.
“I think Europe should keep focusing on what it’s historically been very good at, which is investing in R&D-intensive manufacturing industries,” said Miller.
“The goal is to have profitable chip companies with technological leadership positions — and Europe has that.”
At a somewhat small and unassuming airport in Maribor, Slovenia, German hydrogen propulsion startup H2FLY has quietly been building up to a major milestone in zero-emission aviation over the summer. And all the hard work has come to fruition, with the successful completion of the world’s first crewed liquid hydrogen-powered flights.
Before any aviation history enthusiast out there goes “but what about the Tupolev Tu-155?” — yes, the Soviets did try out liquid hydrogen as fuel 35 years ago, but only for one of the three engines. In contrast, H2FLY’s HY4 has now operated using only liquid hydrogen (as opposed to the gaseous kind) as fuel, relying solely on the hydrogen fuel-cell powertrain for the entire flight.
On Thursday, this TNW reporter was present for the fourth in a series of test flights. The event marked the culmination of Project HEAVEN, an EU-funded partnership undertaking to demonstrate the feasibility of using liquid, cryogenic hydrogen in aircraft. (That is short for High powEr density FC System for Aerial Passenger VEhicle fueled by liquid HydrogeN, just FYI.)
Liquid vs. gaseous hydrogen as aircraft fuel
While yesterday’s demonstration flight lasted somewhere around the 10-minute mark, a few days prior, the HY4 and its two pilots stayed in the air for 3 hours and 1 minute — a feat that required 10kg of hydrogen. If using up the aircraft’s full storage capacity of 24kg, it could stay up for 8 hours.
The <3 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
“It feels really amazing, it is the perfect teamwork coming to life,” said one of the pilots, Johannes Garbino-Anton, after the flight. He added that the technology “works perfectly,” and that the biggest difference to a normal aircraft is the lack of vibrations and noise. And, the lack of carbon dioxide emissions.
H2FLY’s propulsion system consists of hydrogen storage, a 120kW fuel-cell energy converter, and an electrical engine. All in all, this summer was H2FLY’s eight flight test campaign. The hydrogen-electric HY4 has been flying since 2016, but this summer’s breakthrough consists of operating the plane on liquid hydrogen, as opposed to hydrogen as gas.
Liquid hydrogen is more energy dense than its gaseous counterpart. That means that it requires significantly lower tank weights and volume. In the world of air transport, especially when retrofitting planes, this equals not having to throw out as many passenger seats, or reduce cargo space, i.e. payload.
But perhaps more significantly, it unlocks a much greater range. For the HY4 test aircraft, this equals 750km on gaseous hydrogen vs. 1,500km on liquid — or double the distance. On the other hand, liquid hydrogen requires cryogenic temperatures (around -253°C), which adds to the complexity of transporting and refuelling.
Retrofitting existing airframes with hydrogen fuel-cell propulsion system
The HY4, made out of glass fibre and carbon fibre, will not go into commercial production. The next step from H2FLY will now be to scale the fuel-cell system to megawatt capacity. The H2F-175 system will unlock not only longer range, but also altitudes of up to 27,000 feet. In a partnership with Deutsche Aircraft, the two intend to retrofit a 30-seat Dornier 328 demonstrator with H2FLY hydrogen-electric fuel cells and begin test flights by 2025.
After months of negotiations, the UK is rejoining Horizon, the EU’s €95.5bn flagship research and innovation programme, prime minister Rishi Sunak announced Thursday.
Although the country’s participation in the programme was part of the Brexit deal, its membership had been blocked for three years following Brussels’ and London’s feud over the trade rules for Northern Ireland — the UK’s only land border with an EU member state, the Republic of Ireland.
But the issue’s resolution in February has now opened the way for the UK’s re-entry into Horizon, which was confirmed on Wednesday, September 6, during a call between Sunak and Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen.
“We have worked with our EU partners to make sure that this is the right deal for the UK, unlocking unparalleled research opportunities, and also the right deal for British taxpayers,” Sunak said.
The <3 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
Under the new deal, UK researchers can start applying for grants and bid to take part in Horizon projects, with their full access starting in January 2024. The agreement also includes participation in Copernicus, the European Earth observation satellite programme.
The EUhas also accepted the UK’s demand to opt out of Euratom, Europe’s atomic energy programme, and instead pursue a domestic fusion energy strategy.A
“The EU and UK are key strategic partners, and today’s agreement proves that point.
London will have to contribute €2.6bn on average per year for its participation to both Horizon and Copernicus, but it won’t have to pay for the time of its absence.
The news was welcomed with joy and relief by the UK’s scientific community, which has been long campaigning forregaining access.
Professor Dame Sally Mapstone, president of Universities UK, highlighted the importance of scientific collaboration beyond borders. “Horizon Europe [and its predecessors have] been the basis of scientific collaboration for over 30 years,” she said.
“From early detection of ovarian cancer to developing clean energy networks involving dozens of universities and many industrial partners, Horizon lets us do things that would not be possible without that scale of collaboration.”
Similarly, Dr Diana Beech, CEO at London Higher, noted that universities “now have the certainty and stability needed to continue powering the engine of UK innovation and to build connectivity across the regions” as they seek to make the country “a global science superpower.”
Overall, the UK’s re-entry intro Horizon marks a pivotal moment not only for London and Brussels’ post-divorce relationship, but also for European innovation and scientific progress.
“The EU and UK are key strategic partners and allies, and today’s agreement proves that point,” said Von der Leyen. “We will continue to be at the forefront of global science and research.”
When Russian troops flooded into Ukraine last year, an army of propagandists followed them. Within hours, Kremlin-backed media were reporting that President Zelenskyy had fled the country. Weeks later, a fake video of Zelenskyy purportedly surrendering went viral. But almost as soon as they emerged, the lies were disproven.
Government campaigns had prepared Ukrainians for digital disinformation. When the crude deepfake appeared, the clip was quickly debunked, removed from social media platforms, and disproven by Zelenskyy in a genuine video.
The incident became a symbol of the wider information war. Analysts had expected Russia’s propaganda weapons to wreak havoc, but Ukraine was learning to disarm them. Those lessons are now fostering a new sector for startups: counter-disinformation.
Like much of Ukrainian society, the country’s tech workers has adopted aspects of military ethos. Some have enlisted in the IT Army of volunteer hackers or applied their skills to defence technologies. Others have joined the information war.
In the latter group are the women who founded Dattalion. A portmanteau of data and battalion, the project provides the world’s largest free and independent open-source database of photo and video footage from the war. All media is classified as official, trusted, or not verified. By preserving and authenticating the material, the platform aims to disprove false narratives and propaganda.
Dattalion’s data collection team leader, Olha Lykova, was an early member of the team. She joined as the fighting reached the outskirts of her hometown of Kyiv.
“We started to collect data from open sources in Ukraine, because there were no international reporters and international press at the time,” Lykova, 25, told TNW in a video call. “In the news, it was not possible to see the reality of what was happening in Ukraine.”
Since the project was established on February 27, 2022 — just three days after the full-scale invasion began — Dattalion has been cited in more than 250 international media outlets, from NBC News to Time. With the mooted addition of a paid subscription service, it could also be monetised — a thorny challenge for the sector.
An emerging sector
Counter-disinformation is not an obvious magnet for consumer cash. Nonetheless, the sector is attracting unusual investor interest.
Governments are particularly enthusiastic backers.In the US, more than $1bn of annual public funding is allocated to fighting disinformation, the Department of State said in 2018.Across the Atlantic, European nations are investing in targeted initiatives. The UK, for instance, created a ‘fake news fund’ for Eastern Europe, while the EU has financed AI-powered anti-disinformation projects.
Big tech is also writing big cheques. Since 2016, Meta alone has ploughed over $100mn into programs supporting its fact-checking efforts. In addition, the social media giant has splashed cash on startups in the space. In 2018, the companyspent up to $30mn to buy London-based Bloomsbury AI, with the aim of deploying the acquisition against fake news.
Still, not every tech giant is enthusiastic about corroborating content. Under Elon Musk’s leadership, X (formerly Twitter) has dismantled moderation teams, policies, and features. The approach has been praised by fans of Musk — a self-proclaimed “free speech absolutist” — but triggered spikes in falsehoods on the app.
Alarmed by the controversies, brands have fled the platform in their droves. In July, Musk said X had lost almost half its ad revenue since he bought the company for $44bn last October.
As X grapples with the concerns of advertisers, a wave of tech firms are offering solutions. In the last couple of years, over $300mn has been ploughed into startups that tackle false information, according to Crunchbase data. Two of them have raised over $100mn each: San Francisco-based Primer and Tel Aviv’s ActiveFace. Both companies develop AI tools that can identify disinformation campaigns.
Ukrainian startups are also starting to raise funding— and there are signs that the investments could soon surge.
“Ukraine has been waging an informational struggle for more than 10 years.
In the EU, tech companies now have to comply with the Digital Services Act (DSA), which requires platforms to tackle disinformation. If they don’t, they face fines of up to 6% of their annual global revenue.
X’s DSA obligations have received particular attention. In June, the company received the first “stress test” of the regulatory requirements. After the mock exercise, Musk and Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino met with EU Commissioner Thierry Breton, who oversees digital policy in the bloc. Breton emphasised a threat that Ukraine recognises all too well.
“I told Elon Musk and Linda Yaccarino that Twitter should be very diligent in preparing to tackle illegal content in the European Union,” he said. “Fighting disinformation, including pro-Russian propaganda, will also be a focus area in particular as we are entering a period of elections in Europe.”
A brief history of the disinformation war
Since the early Soviet Union, Russia has been a pioneer in influence operations. Historians have traced the very word “disinformation” to the Russian neologism “dezinformatsiya.” Some contend that it emerged in the 1920s, as the name for a bureau tasked with deceiving enemies and influencing public opinion.
Defector Ion Mihai Pacepa claimed the term was coined by none other than Joseph Stalin. The Soviet ruler reputedly chose a French-sounding name to insinuate a Western origin. Yet all of these origin stories are disputed. In a world of deception, even etymology is fraught with mistruths.
What isn’t disputed is Russia’s expertise in the field. In the Soviet era, intelligence services merged forgeries, fake news, and front groups into a playbook for political warfare. After the USSR collapsed, old strategies were embedded in new tools. Today’s tricks encompass troll farms spreading support for Kremlin views, bot armies manipulating social media algorithms, and proxy news sites amplifying falsehoods.
Ukraine is all too familiar with the tactics. The country has become a testbed for Russia’s information warfare, which has laid firm foundations for a nascent startup sector.
“It’s an enduring act — Ukraine has been waging an informational struggle against the Russian aggressor for more than 10 years now,” Denis Gursky, a former data advisor to Ukraine’s Prime Minister and the co-founder of tech NGO SocialBoost, told TNW.
“Over this time, Ukraine formed the mechanism of joint work of various sectors, which all together help to repel enemy attacks and protect the information space.”
Gursky is a driving force behind Ukraine’s emerging counter-disinformation industry. In January, he co-organised the1991 Hackathon: Media, which sought digital solutions to information security challenges. One of the judging criteria was commercial potential.
The responses ranged from war crime trackers and content blockers to news monitors and verification tools. To monetise their concepts, the teams pitched an array of business plans.
Mediawise, a browser extension that adds content and author checks to online news, plans to take payment for premium features, such as alerts and extended article summaries.
OffZMI, an app that protects reliable information from a controversial Ukrainian media law, is eyeing revenues from ads, subscriptions, and NGO partnerships. MindMap, which provides Q&A translations of English-language news reports, envisions a tiered membership model.
Then there is Osavul, which won the hackathon. The company has built a platform that targets an evolving concept in the field: coordinated inauthentic behaviour (CIB).
“The problem is big enough to solve.
A term popularised by Facebook, CIB involves multiple fake accounts collaborating to manipulate people for political or financial ends. To spot this behaviour, Osavul’s AI models detect indicators including account affiliations, posting time patterns, involvement of state media, and content synchronisation.
A key component of the system is a cross-platform approach. This enables Osavu to track CIB across various social networks, online media, and messenger apps. A single campaign can, therefore, be followed from Telegram through X and then into news reports.
One such campaign claimed that NATO had donated infected blood to Ukraine. At the centre of the conspiracy theory was a fake document that purportedly proved the claim.
According to Osavul, the CIB was detected before the campaign gained momentum. Ukrainian government agencies then used the findings to refute the canard.
Ukrainian institutions will get free access to Osavul throughout the war, but the company has also developed a SaaS product. The software targets businesses that are vulnerable to disinformation campaigns, such as pharmaceutical companies. Osavul’s founders, Dmytro Bilash and Dmitry Pleshakov, compare it to conventional cyber security products.
“In the same way organisations protect themselves from malware or phishing, they should protect themselves from disinformation,” Bilash and Pleshakov told TNW via email. “The problem is big enough to solve, and there is a need for suppliers of software products like Osavul.”
With multilingual capabilities and the infrastructure to integrate new data sources, the platform is built to scale. “Budgets for information security are growing, so we see a huge business opportunity in this niche,” Bilash and Pleshakov said.
An early investment suggests their plan has promise. In May, Osavul raised $1mn in a funding round led by SMRK, a Ukrainian VC firm. The cash will finance a move into the international market.
That market could be ripe for expansion. A 2019 study by cybersecurity firm CHEQ and the University of Baltimore estimated that fake news costs the global economy around $78bn (€72bn) each year.
According to the researchers, around half of that figure comes from stock market losses. They cite an eye-popping example from 2017. That December, ABC News erroneously reported that Donald Trump had directed Michael Flynn, his former national security advisor, to contact Russian officials during the 2016 presidential campaign. Following the story, the S&P 500 Index briefly dropped by 38 points — losing investors around $341bn.
ABC didn’t retract the claim until after markets closed. At that point, the losses were down to “only” $51bn (€47bn) for the day.
Beyond the stock market, the study estimated that financial misinformation in the US costs companies $17bn (€15.9bn) each year. Health misinformation, meanwhile, causes annual losses of around $9bn (€8.4bn). The researchers said all their estimates were conservative.
A divisive business
Despite the risks to corporations, the anti-disinformation sector still depends on government backing. That foundation creates both support and frailty.
“The state can have a long-term strategy in the fight against hybrid threats because commercial and public organisations do not have the institutional stability that state bodies have,” Gurksy, the hackathon organiser, told TNW. “But the fight against disinformation is possible only in cooperation with other private and third sectors, which, in fact, have the most experience and tools in this direction.”
Government links are also a prevailing concern about anti-disinformation. Outside of Ukraine, politicians have been accused of exploiting the issue to suppress dissent and control narratives.
In the UK, campaigners found that the government’s anti-fake news units have surveilled citizens, public figures, and media outlets for merely criticising state policies. In addition, the units reportedly facilitated censorship of legal content on social media.
Critics have also been unsettled by tech firms acting as arbiters of truth. But there are now paradoxical concerns about Silicon Valley retreating from these roles.
X, Meta, and YouTube have all been recently accused of reducing efforts to tackle disinformation. In tough economic times, these investments appear to have slipped down the list of priorities. That raises another barrier for Ukraine’s nascent startups: access to capital.
Nonetheless, there are grounds for optimism. Ukraine has a deep pool of tech talent, demonstrably resilient startups, unique experience in fighting propaganda, and strong support from international allies. Sector insiders believe this combination is a powerful launchpad for startups.
Nina Kulchevych, a disinformation researcher and founder of the Ukraine PR Army, expects her country to reap the rewards. She envisions the cottage industry evolving into a global powerhouse.
“Ukraine can be an IT hub for Europe in the creation of technologies for debunking propaganda and spreading disinformation,” she said.
In an economy devastated by war, the commercial potential of counter-disinformation is a powerful attraction. But it’s a peripheral motive for many Ukrainians in the sector. Olha Lykova, the data collection lead at Dattalion, has a separate focus: exposing the truth about Russia’s war.
“Of course, we hope that Ukraine will win,” she said. “But in any case, it will be harder to rewrite history — because we have the proof.”
Hydrogen is being hailed as, if not a silver bullet, then at least a crucial component to decarbonising the world’s energy sources. And no wonder — when burned, hydrogen produces zero greenhouse gas emissions. However, the transition to a renewable hydrogen economy must first overcome a non-insignificant list of challenges.
So-called green hydrogen, produced through electrolysis of water using renewable energy, currently accounts for only about 1% of global production. It is also about three times as expensive as its grey counterpart, produced from fossil fuel sources.
One of the major pieces of the puzzle to scaling green hydrogen is access to vast amounts of renewable energy and water. Enter fully offshore wind-to-hydrogen, where high capacity factor floating wind turbines are connected to electrolysers that utilise seawater.
“What is complex and costly in deploying an offshore [wind farm] site is actually converting the energy at sea and bringing it in a cable to shore,” Stéphane Le Berre, offshore project manager at renewable hydrogen producer Lhyfe tells TNW, adding that for the latest large-scale projects, this part alone amounts to billions of euros.
“One solution for offshore wind park developers to suppress the need for expensive electric substations and cables is to replace them with a hydrogen production plant, which converts the electricity to hydrogen,” Le Berre states. The hydrogen can then be transported through a pipeline — already in plenty of supply in the North Sea, courtesy of the oil and gas industry.
The <3 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
Aiming for green (hydrogen) unicorn status
Founded with six people in 2017 by Matthieu Guesné, today Nantes-based Lhyfe employs 200 people and is present in 16 countries. It has attracted around €80mn in funding, and says its mission is to become a “green unicorn.” Rather than measuring its status in valuation, it hopes to reach a billion tonnes of avoided CO2 emissions. Lhyfe’s onshore site in Bouin, running since H2 2021, currently produces 300kg of green hydrogen per day. One kilogram of hydrogen is the energy equivalent of one gallon (3.78 litres) of petrol, which produces a little over 9kg of CO2 when burned.
That Lhyfe became a hydrogen producer at all is almost something of a side effect. In fact, it came about partly motivated by addressing another aspect of global warming — the oxygen depletion of the oceans.
When producing one kilogram of hydrogen through electrolysis, you also release eight kilograms of oxygen as a by-product. Lhyfe has the intention of pumping it back into the sea, to potentially help restore the balance of marine ecosystems disrupted by climate change.
“When we started Lhyfe, we wanted to make offshore hydrogen so that we would have economic viability to bring oxygen to the ocean,” Le Berre says.
World’s first offshore wind-to-hydrogen pilot
In September last year, Lhyfe inaugurated the world’s first offshore renewable hydrogen production pilot site. In June, the company announced that the 1MW demonstrator project, called Sealhyfe, had produced its first kilograms of green hydrogen. (Chinese state-owned Donfang Electric may have beaten Lhyfe to the actual production by a couple of weeks.)
Sealhyfe is located approximately 20km off the coast of Le Croisic, France. Today it produces half a tonne of hydrogen per day. It is plugged into the SEM-REV powerhub — the first European floating wind farm and site for multi-technology offshore testing.
SEM-REV has an underwater hub, which is like a giant block with four sockets. One of them is used to connect the SEM-REV wind turbine, and another the cable connecting the site to the grid onshore. This leaves two highly coveted sockets available for demonstration projects, one of which now allows the Sealhyfe platform to draw electricity directly from the wind turbine.
The Sealhyfe electrolyser sits on a floating platform, engineered to stabilise the production unit at sea, and uses desalinated water for the electrolysis. One kilogram of green hydrogen requires nine litres of water, and with potable water scarcity projected to increase significantly over the coming decades, this is one of the main arguments for locating production sites by or on the sea.
Lhyfe has until May next year before it needs to disconnect from the SEM-REV hub. Until then, it hopes to prove not only that the technology works, but that it can withstand even the harsh conditions of the Atlantic Ocean in winter.
Hydrogen HOPE
Lessons from Sealhyfe will inform future offshore projects. This includes the unprecedentedly large-scale 10MW HOPE, which Lhyfe is coordinating with another eight partners. The European Clean HydrogenPartnership program has selected the project for a €20mn grant.
HOPE will produce up to four tonnes of green hydrogen a day. Intentions are to have it up and running outside the coast of Belgium in 2026. By 2030, Lhyfe means to have multiplied several 10MW projects for a total capacity of 100MW.
Across Europe, several other offshore wind-to-hydrogen production projects are beginning to take shape. One is H2Mare, run by a group of industry and academic partners led by Siemens Energy and Siemens Gamesa, the energy giant’s wind turbine division.
“Offshore sites could make it possible for densely populated regions like Europe and Japan to generate at least part of their hydrogen close to coastal demand centres, thereby cutting transportation costs,” says H2Mare’s project coordinator and program manager for offshore hydrogen at Siemens Energy, Mathias Mueller. “Also, wind speeds are generally higher and steadier out at sea, permitting consistently greater output.”
Siemens has invested €120mn into the project, which will not set up a full-scale offshore system, but rather a test platform on a barge on the open sea, along with an onshore test setup of the electrolysis system. It will attempt to prove the financial viability and best configuration for offshore wind-to-hydrogen.
Wise from falling behind on batteries, Europe not sleeping on hydrogen
The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research has chosen H2Mare as one of three flagship hydrogen projects awarded €700mn in total. As part of Germany’s plans of generating 30MW of offshore wind power in 2030, the government has set aside an area in the North Sea for green hydrogen production with a capacity of up to 1GW.
However, the industry is not satisfied with the ambitions. In May, a group including BP, Siemens Gamesa, RWE, and Lhyfe, signed an appeal to the German government, asking it add a target of an additional 10GW of offshore hydrogen production by 2035 to the national strategy and area development plan.
The Dutch government is also pushing the offshore hydrogen agenda. In March this year, it designated an area located in the North of the country, near the Wadden Islands, for a 500MW wind-to-hydrogen project. As a stepping stone, it will develop a smaller pilot project with an electrolysis capacity of between 50MW and 100MW.
“I think Europe was smart enough to bet on hydrogen and to support hydrogen early enough. Because they learned from what happened with the batteries in China, and, of course, anything that Europe has tried to do with batteries was years behind schedule compared to China,” Le Berre says. “Now, Europe has put things in place so that we are on time, and we can actually compete efficiently, economically, and technologically versus China.”
With RePowerEU, the European Commission has set targets to produce 10 million tonnes of green hydrogen by 2030, and predicts that hydrogen — domestic and imported — could make up 14% of its energy mix by 2050.
To support this aim, it intends to mobilise €372bn through the InvestEU program by 2027. For the European startups building electrolysers or creating demand by developing hydrogen-powered planes and cars, this type of industry support might just propel them off the ground — and us toward a cleaner-burning future.
Our phones have lamentably short lives. Batteries die before they’re old, compatibility is transient, software support expires, and minor upgrades soon arrive that are presented as must-haves. It’s an insidious model — and one that Fairphone is upending.
The Dutch startup this week released a handset that sets new standards for sustainability: the Fairphone 5. Laudably, the company envisions the device functioning for 10 years.
The modular machine is built for repairability. Not only can you replace fading batteries, but also nine other parts, including the screen, USB-C port, and speakers.
To change them, just grab a screwdriver and follow the video guide. (After inspecting the system during the IFA Berlin trade show, TNW can attest that it’s as simple as it sounds.) As a further commitment to durability, the Fairphone 5 ships with a five-year warranty.
On the software side, the protection is even longer. Fairphone provides at least eight years of OS support — but aims for an entire decade.
“We promise it until 2031,” Miquel Ballester, co-founder and head of product management at Fairphone, told TNW. “But we’re quite sure that we’ll be able to stretch it to 10 years.”
It’s a target that’s unrivalled among Android devices. To set the benchmark, Fairphone chose a chipset that’s built for industrial applications: the Qualcomm QCM6490. As the processor is designed for hardware and devices with a longer lifetime than phones, the software support cycle can also be extended.
In a world of pricey phones that only last for two to three years, the support and repairability have obvious consumer appeal. But the biggest benefits go to the planet.
Fairphone’s approach to sustainability starts with the materials that make our phones — and the people that extract them.
The social enterprise began life as a campaign against conflict minerals, which are common in smartphones. Armed groups will often use forced labour to mine these minerals.
In 2013, Fairphone progressed from campaigning to producing handsets. The company now tries to source materials that are both conflict-free and sustainable.
To maximise the social impact, Fairphone identified 14 materials that have high potential for supply chain improvement. In the Fairphone 5, over 70% of these materials are fair-mined or recycled.
Ballester is particularly proud of the battery supply chain. The lithium inside comes from a single mine in Chile that’s certified by IRMA — the leading global standard for industrial mining.
Steps have also been taken to reduce the harm caused by cobalt, which is often mined by child labour. By using cobalt credits, 100% of the mineral in the battery is matched by cobalt produced under improved working conditions at artisanal and small scale mines. In an industry first, people who assemble the battery will also receive a living wage bonus.
“We are pretty sure this is the most fair and sustainable battery in the world,” Ballester said.
The benefits of sustainability extend to the consumer. According to Fairphone, the battery will hold its capacity through over 1,000 full charging cycles.
Further features of the Fairphone 5 include a 6.46-inch OLED screen and a triple 50-megapixel camera system. Altogether, the device has the specs to rival mid-range smartphones made by the market leaders. But Ballester is more focused on inspiring the giants than competing with them.
“The mission of Fairphone is to change the industry from within,” he said. “Everything that we do, we publish. We try to create a model that other companies can copy, replicate, make bigger, or join.”
Thus far, the industry response has been mixed. On the environmental side, Ballester has seen some positive changes, but improvements to the lives of workers have been “extremely slow,” he said.
As long as that remains the case, Fairphone will stand out in the market. Ultimately, consumers still need to push the industry to change.
“I think that tech-spec-wise, there’s no reason to buy an iPhone when you can buy the Fairphone 5,” Noud Tillemans, the interim CEO of Fairphone, told TNW. “And with every extra phone sold, we can have more impact.”
The Fairphone 5 is now available for preorder in Europe. Prices start at €699 in the eurozone or £619 in the UK. Shipping starts on September 14.
Today, Paris became one of the first European cities to implement an outright ban on rented e-scooters, after residents previously voted overwhelmingly in favour of the motion.
During a referendum in April, voters were given two choices: “for” or “against” a city-wide ban on shared e-scooters. Almost 90% voted in favour of the ban, but the overall turnout was low — only 7.5% of eligible voters casted ballots. Nevertheless, the result was celebrated as a win for democracy by Mayor Anne Hidalgo who vowed to follow through on the verdict.
The ban applies to rental e-scooters (known as trottinettes in French) from the three companies with licences to operate in Paris — Tier, Dott, and Lime. These micro-mobility companies, with a combined fleet of roughly 15,000 e-scooters in the city, have until tomorrow (September 1) to remove their trottinettes from the streets.
The ban will not affect shared ebike services in the city. The ban also won’t prohibit people from whizzing through Paris on privately-owned trottinettes.
A Dott spokesperson told TNW that by August 21 its fleet of 5,000 e-scooters had already been cleared from the sidewalks and alleyways of Paris. The machines will be heading to other places where Dott sees high demand, such as Belgium or as far afield as Tel Aviv. Tier will return most of its scooters to Germany or Warsaw, while Lime will ship them to Lille, London, Copenhagen, and cities in Germany.
The <3 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
A love-hate relationship
Paris was an early adopter of shared e-scooters back in 2018. Hiring dockless scooters via an app was touted as a promising climate-friendly alternative to cars for a city that needed to reduce its pollution levels and free up space.
However, the influx of these scooters soon led to chaos, with many users, including tourists, abandoning them on sidewalks, riding them recklessly in crowded areas, and even dumping them into the River Seine. This misuse also resulted in injuries and a handful of fatalities, mainly among pedestrians.
In response, Mayor Hidalgo pledged stricter regulations, including speed limits and cracking down on reckless riding and improper disposal of scooters. In 2019, the French government integrated e-scooters into the national highway code, imposing countrywide rules.
The city then limited the number of e-scooter operators to three companies— Tier, Dott, and Lime — and set a cap of 15,000 scooters in total. Despite regulations, problems persisted, eventually leading to the referendum in April 2023 and the prohibition of shared e-scooters in the City of Light.
Paris isn’t the first city to have introduced restrictions on the scooters, such as speed limits and parking zones enforced via fines for users.
Madrid this year reversed a prior ban to allow rental firms back with new conditions, as Copenhagen also did in 2021. Most e-scooters are banned on public roads in the Netherlands. However, outright bans by cities that have previously welcomed them are rare.
Dott’s spokesperson said “the situation in Paris is isolated”, with several European centres doubling down on their commitments to the mode of transport.
“Lyon recently committed to a four-year contract for e-scooters, London has extended their trial by a further three years, and Madrid has committed to a three-year contract following a tender,” the spokesperson said.
In Paris, Dott, Tier, and Lime will now focus their efforts on ebikes, to fill the gap in the market left by the departing trottinettes.
Even before e-scooters were banned in Paris, operators reported healthy growth in their ebike businesses. Dott reported a 166% boost in ebike rides in the first half of this year, while Lime said journeys on its bikes increased by 73% in the capital last year.
“We now operate twice the number of e-bikes than we ever did e-scooters, and are encouraged by the city’s continued support for cycling ahead of the 2024 Olympics,” Lime told CNBC.
While ebikes can also clutter pavements and pose a hazard to pedestrians, they are generally perceived as safer, even though that may not be the case.
Either way, it remains to be seen how the ban impacts commuters in the long term. Perhaps Paris will overturn it in the future, as Madrid and Copenhagen did, but for now it’s time to bid au revoir to the French capital’s fleets of brightly coloured trottinettes.