Cars

the-2025-aston-martin-vantage:-achingly-beautiful-and-thrilling-to-drive

The 2025 Aston Martin Vantage: Achingly beautiful and thrilling to drive

The new infotainment human-machine interface was a little confusing at first; pairing my phone took about 10 minutes but worked out in the end, and wireless Apple CarPlay behaved itself throughout the week. When starting the car there was sometimes a lengthy wait for the infotainment to boot up, as if the hardware wasn’t quite powerful enough for the software stack on top.

Don’t get it wet?

Those are very minor complaints compared to what happened when it rained really hard, though. I had been planning to drive the Vantage to dinner, but upon getting in the car and turning it on, I realized it had other ideas. A number of yellow glyphs remained brightly illuminated on the digital main display—including traction control. A series of notifications informed me of what else wasn’t working, including the ability to switch the car into Wet mode.

Inclement weather. Jonathan Gitlin

With the numbers “$264,300” and “656 hp” at the forefront of my mind, the DC metro sufficed for that trip.

Later that evening, the air still damp but no longer raining, it was if it had all been a dream. A push of the start button and everything lit up and then went dim as normal. The infotainment even booted in an acceptable time. My guess is that there was an improperly sealed connector somewhere, and in torrential rain, water got where it shouldn’t. Regardless, the car let me down when it was supposed to take me somewhere.

As a former resident of the UK, it saddens me to no end that the stereotype about British cars and their electronics is as true today as ever, but the fact remains that every British car I drive, from Minis to McLarens, manages to have some kind of digital or electrical foible that should have been ironed out. Do better, Britain!

With a base price of $191,000, the Vantage is competing with a number of other sports cars, but its biggest rival has to be the Porsche 911 Turbo. It’s a much more dramatic car than the Porsche, in all the meanings of that word, both good and bad.

Aston Martin Vantage seen from behind

Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Sure looks good though.

The 2025 Aston Martin Vantage: Achingly beautiful and thrilling to drive Read More »

a-$20,000-electric-truck-with-manual-windows-and-no-screens?-meet-slate-auto.

A $20,000 electric truck with manual windows and no screens? Meet Slate Auto.


time to put up or shut up, internet

Owners can buy kits to add accessories and features to the Slate Truck.

The headlight of a Slate Truck

Slate Auto is a new American EV startup. Credit: Slate Auto

Slate Auto is a new American EV startup. Credit: Slate Auto

In one of the strangest launches we’ve seen in a while, Slate Auto, the reportedly Jeff Bezos-backed electric vehicle startup, unveiled its first EV, the Slate Truck. Notably, the vehicle is capable of a claimed 150 miles (241 km) of range at a starting price of less than $20,000, assuming federal clean vehicle tax credits continue to exist.

Slate caused a lot of social media froth when it parked a pair of styling concepts (not functional vehicles) in Venice, California, advertising bizarre fake businesses. Today, the company unveiled the vehicle to the press at an event near the Long Beach Airport.

You wanted a bare-bones EV? Here it is.

The Blank Slate, as the company calls it, is “all about accessible personalization” and includes a “flat-pack accessory SUV Kit” that turns the truck from a pickup into a five-seat SUV and another that turns it into an “open air” truck. The aim, according to a spokesperson for Slate Auto, is to make the new vehicle repairable and customizable while adhering to safety and crash standards.

A rendering of a Slate Truck on the road

If you’ve ever said you’d buy a bare-bones truck with no infotainment and manual windows if only they’d build one, it’s time to get out your wallet. Credit: Slate Auto

The truck will come with a choice of two battery packs: a 57.2 kWh battery pack with rear-wheel drive and a target range of 150 miles and an 84.3 kWh battery pack with a target of 240 miles (386 km). The truck has a NACS charging port and will charge to 80 percent in under 30 minutes, peaking at 120 kW, we’re told. The wheels are modest 17-inch steelies, and the truck is no speed demon—zero to 60 mph (0–97 km/h) will take 8 seconds thanks to the 201 hp (150 kW), 195 lb-ft (264 Nm) motor, and it tops out at 90 mph (145 km/h).

Because the truck will be built in just a single configuration from the factory, Slate Auto will offer body wraps instead of different paint colors. Rather than relying on a built-in infotainment system, you’ll use your phone plugged into a USB outlet or a dedicated tablet inside the cabin for your entertainment and navigation needs. The Slate Truck will also aim for a 5-star crash rating, according to a company spokesperson, and will feature active emergency braking, forward collision warning, and as many as eight airbags.

It sounds good on paper (and it looks good in person), but the spec sheet is littered with things that give us pause from a production and safety standpoint. They present hurdles the startup will have to surmount before these trucks start landing in people’s driveways.

Slate Truck interior.

Legally, there has to be some way to show a backup camera feed in here, but you could do that in the rearview mirror. Credit: Slate Auto

For example, the truck has manual crank windows, steel wheels, HVAC knobs, and an optional do-it-yourself “flat-pack accessory SUV kit.” All of these low-tech features are quite cool, and they’re available on other vehicles like the Bronco and the Jeep, but there are a number of supplier, tariff, and safety hurdles they present for an upstart company. There is plenty of Kool-Aid for the automotive press to get drunk on—and if this truck becomes a real thing, we’ll be fully on board—but we have a lot of questions.

Can Slate really build an EV that cheap?

First, there’s the price. The myth of the sub-$25,000 electric vehicle has been around for more than 10 years now, thanks to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s perpetual promise of an affordable EV.

That vehicle may never exist due to the cost of the current battery and manufacturing technology that we use to make modern EVs. While much of that cost is tied up in the battery, prices have improved as components have come down in price. That combination has led companies like Rivian and Scout to promise SUVs that could start at around $40,000, which is much more attainable for the average buyer. But $40,000 is still wide of that $25,000 marker.

There’s also the issue of federal incentives. Without the full clean vehicle tax credit, the new Slate Truck will actually cost at least $27,500 before tax, title, and so on. Bezos’ team seems to be betting that Trump won’t get rid of the incentives, despite abundant signals that he intends to do just that. “Whether or not the incentive goes away, our truck will be a high-value, desirable vehicle,” a spokesperson for Slate Auto told Ars.

Then there are the retro and basic components Slate Auto says it will use for the truck, many of which are made in China and are thus subject to the Trump tariffs. Even though the company says it will manufacture the vehicles in the US, that doesn’t mean that the components (battery, motors, steel wheels, window cranks, and HVAC knobs) will be made stateside. If the tariffs stick, that sub $30,000 vehicle will become measurably more expensive.

For example, the last automaker to use manual crank windows was Jeep in the JL Wrangler, and as of 2025, the company no longer offers them as an option. Ford also recently phased out hand-wound windows from its Super Duty trucks. That’s because electric switches are cheaper and readily available from suppliers—who are mostly located in China—and because automakers that offer manual and powered windows had to have two different door assembly lines to accommodate the different tech. That made building both options more expensive. Power windows are also somewhat safer for families with younger children in the backseat, as parents can lock the roll-down feature.

A rendering of a Slate SUV

It’s an ambitious idea, and we hope it works. Credit: Slate Auto

Slate Auto’s spokesperson declined to talk about partners or suppliers but did say the company will manufacture its new truck in a “reindustrialized” factory in the Midwest. A quick look at the plethora of job listings at SlateAuto on LinkedIn shows that that factory will be in Troy, Michigan, where there are around 40 jobs listed, including body closure engineers (for the flat-pack kit), prototype engineers, seating buyers/engineers, controls and automation engineers, a head of powertrain and propulsion, wheels and suspension engineers, plant managers, and more. Those are all very pivotal, high-level positions that Slate will need to fill immediately to bring this vehicle to market on the timeline it has set.

Slate Auto also hasn’t said how it will ensure that these DIY vehicle add-ons will be certified to be safe on the road without the company taking on the liability. It will likely work the way Jeep and Bronco handle their accessories, but both Stellantis and Ford have robust service networks they can count on, with dealerships around the country able to help owners who get into a pickle trying to install accessories. Slate doesn’t have that, at least at the moment. Slate’s SUV kit, for example, will include a roll cage, rear seat, and airbags. It will be interesting to see how the company ensures the airbags are installed safely—if it allows DIY-ers to do it.

Will young people actually want it?

Finally, there’s the biggest question: Will younger generations actually plunk down $20,000 or more to own a Slate vehicle that won’t go into production until the fourth quarter of 2026—more than a year and a half out—especially in the face of the economic upheaval and global uncertainty that has taken hold under the second Trump administration?

A rendering of a Slate Truck with a red and black livery

Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid have all been at the mercy of their suppliers, sinking deadlines and making prices rise. How will Slate Auto avoid that trap? Credit: Slate Auto

Data shows that while some young people have started to opt for devices like dumbphones and may prefer the novelty of no tech, they may also prefer to rent a car or rideshare instead of owning a vehicle. Given Slate Auto’s Bezos backing, I’d imagine that the company would be willing to, say, rent out a Slate Truck for a weekend and charge you a subscription fee for its use. It’s also conceivable that these could become fleet vehicles for Amazon and other companies.

Slate Auto says it will sell directly to consumers (which will anger dealers) and offer a nationwide service network. A spokesperson at Slate Auto declined to give more details about how that might all work but said the company will have more to announce about partners who will enable service and installation in the future.

Even with all the unanswered questions, it’s good to see a company making a real effort to build a truly affordable electric vehicle with funky retro styling. There are a number of things Slate Auto will have to address moving forward, but if the company can deliver a consumer vehicle under that magic $25,000 marker, we’ll be roundly impressed.

A $20,000 electric truck with manual windows and no screens? Meet Slate Auto. Read More »

cupra-is-all-about-affordable-cars,-funky-styling,-electrified-performance

Cupra is all about affordable cars, funky styling, electrified performance

“So we are part of Volkswagen Group. We have factories all across the whole planet. We have Mexican factories. We have US factories. Even Volkswagen Group is ramping up additional factories in the United States. We have European factories,” Schuwirth said.

The original plan was to import one model from Mexico and one model from Europe, but now “I think the only mantra for the future is we need to remain flexible because no one knows what is slightly changing, whether we like it or we don’t like it. I mean, we cannot influence it, but it’s not changing our plan overall,” he said.

When it does, it won’t be with the Cupras that are finding friends in Europe. The Formentor is a rather cool little crossover/hatchback, available with either a 48 V mild hybrid (starting at under $32,000 or 28,000 euros) or a plug-in hybrid (starting at under $49,000 or 43,000 euro) powertrain.

It uses VW Group’s ubiquitous MQB platform, and the driving experience is midway between a GTI-badged VW and one of Audi’s S models. But the interior was a much more interesting place to be than either an Audi or a VW, with details like full carbon fiber seatbacks and a matte paint that drew plenty of attention in a city with outré automotive tastes.

But Cupra reckons the Formentor is too small for US car buyers, and that’s a pretty safe bet. That also means you can forget about the Cupra Born EV coming here. I didn’t drive Cupra’s Terramar but probably should have; this is an SUV that is about as small as Cupra thinks will sell in the US.

Did you say new customers?

Cupra’s plan does not include stealing customers from existing VW brands—they are in their 50s on average, and Cupra is targeting a demographic that’s about a decade younger. The aforementioned focus on design is one way it’s going about attracting those new customers. The company is based in Barcelona, one of the more design-focused cities in the world, and it’s leaning into that, teaming up with local designers in cities where it maintains one of its “brand houses.”

Cupra is all about affordable cars, funky styling, electrified performance Read More »

what-happened-when-formula-e-visited-an-american-oval-track?

What happened when Formula E visited an American oval track?


I want you to succeed, Formula E

Miami, Long Beach, Brooklyn, Portland, and now Miami again. Well, sort of.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: Antonio Felix da Costa of Portugal and TAG Heuer Porsche Formula E Team leads the field during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

This chicane was to have profound consequences on the race result. Credit: Andrew Ferraro/LAT Images

This chicane was to have profound consequences on the race result. Credit: Andrew Ferraro/LAT Images

MIAMI—A decade after its first visit to the state, Formula E returned to Florida this past weekend. The even has come a long way since that first chaotic Miami ePrix: The cars are properly fast now, the racing is both entertaining and quite technical, and at least the trackside advertising banners were in place before the start of the event this time.

It’s not the same track, of course. Nor is it anywhere near the Hard Rock Stadium that Formula 1 now fills with ersatz marinas and high-priced hospitality packages during its visit to the area. Despite what the b-roll helicopter shots might have led viewers to believe, we were actually an hour south of the city at a mid-sized oval track next to a landfill in Homestead. Usually, a place that hosts NASCAR races, for Formula E, there was a 2.2-mile (3.5 km) layout that used the straights and infield but not the banked corners.

Formula E has begun to branch out from its original diet of racing exclusively on temporary city center street tracks, having visited Portland International Raceway in Oregon in 2023 and 2024. Despite the bucolic charm of PIR, with its easy bicycle and light rail access, enthusiastic crowd of attendees, and exciting racing, it was only a temporary patch for Formula E. The vast majority of Formula E’s fans live outside the US, and Portland means nothing to them, but they’ve heard of Miami, I was told last year.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: A general view of cars racing on track during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

Formula E goes roval racing. Will it be back? I doubt it. Credit: Simon Galloway/LAT Images for Formula E

Made for TV

While the few thousand that attended Saturday’s race would have known they weren’t actually in the pastel-hued metropolis, regular fans attending in person have always felt like an afterthought. At the track, the focus is on VIPs with lanyards and wristbands, sipping bubbly in the Emotion Club, Formula E’s version of F1’s pricey Paddock Club. Even this was sparsely attended compared to my visits to Portland in recent years or to the mosquito-infested canal by Brooklyn that was meant to be the sport‘s long-term American home.

I’m told that Formula E wants to race in actual Miami, using some or all of F1’s temporary playground. It’s also talking to Phoenix, but we won’t know about either of those until the sport’s 2026 calendar is published next month.

It would be easy to criticize Formula E for failing to return to the same place at roughly the same time each year. But it did that for several years running with the NYC ePrix, and I almost never met anyone who paid for a ticket who was there for their second time.

The shame is that the Gen3 Evo cars put on an excellent show. After a couple of years of tires that were far too durable, Hankook has delivered rubber that drivers can really race with. Not that there was a massive amount of grip from the track surface at Homestead.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: Pascal Wehrlein of Germany driving the (1) TAG Heuer Porsche Formula E Team Porsche 99X Electric Gen3 on track during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

This is the fifth US venue for Formula E in 10 years. Credit: Andrew Ferraro/LAT Images

“When we go to the street tracks, it’s quite slippy to begin with, because there’s no rubber down and there’s a lot of dust. But once we’ve cleaned up the racing line on those tracks, then it’s quite good grip,” Maserati driver Jake Hughes told Ars. “The biggest, most extreme street track probably goes to either London or Tokyo. And I would say the grip in those places feels a little bit higher than here.”

It’s very competitive

Margins in qualifying were down to hundredths of a second, and eight different teams filled the first eight places on the grid, led by Norman Nato, now at Nissan. In the race, though, Porsche looked dominant in the way Jaguar did on so many occasions last year. António Félix Da Costa and Pascal Wehrlein controlled the race from the front, their purple and black Porsche 99x Electrics circulating a few seconds a lap slower than the absolute pace.

Other drivers were content to follow in the peloton. “You can spend energy to be at the front, but then at some point you need to get that energy back,” Hughes said. A Formula E car battery is 56 kWh, which is only enough energy for about 60 percent of the race distance, so slipstreaming and energy management are critically important, as is regen braking. It’s a job made harder by the fact that there’s virtually no live telemetry available to the engineers in the garages; instead, each lap, drivers have to update them on how much energy they have remaining.

The mid-race “pit boost” charging stops were not a feature as the sport had left the 600 kW chargers in their boxes for the Miami ePrix. But Attack Mode definitely affected the outcome. Essentially an in-race power boost, every driver has to use Attack Mode for eight minutes during the race, usually split into either two four-minute deployments or two- and six-minute deployments. It’s activated by driving over a pair of timing loops set away from the racing line, and bumps power from 300 kW to 350 kW.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: Nick Cassidy of New Zealand driving the (37) Jaguar TCS Racing Jaguar I-TYPE 7 and Taylor Barnard of Great Britain driving the (5) NEOM McLaren Formula E Team Nissan e-4ORCE 05 drive through the attack mode activation on track during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

The Jaguar and McLaren to the right of the photo pass through the Attack Mode activation zone, which you can see is far off the racing line. Credit: Alastair Staley/LAT Images

Gen3 Formula E cars have always been able to regenerate energy from the front axle, but this season is the first time the cars can actually send power to the front wheels while in attack mode. “So until last year, attack mode was kind of a penalty, because you couldn’t use it to attack,” explained Xavi Serra, head of global racing for Cupra.

“You had extra power, and you were spending more energy and very difficult to overtake. Now you spend your energy, but as you said, four wheel drive, [better] tires and extra power, you use it, and then it’s now a strategy tool to advance positions, whereas in the past it was not,” Serra told Ars.

Time to go for it

On lap 14, the actual race broke out as everyone started to push at their actual pace. From single-file slipstreaming to running three-wide in a pack, it still looked like Porsche’s day, until a three-car collision at the turn 11 chicane blocked the track, resulting in a red flag. When the cars returned from the pits for the final five laps, some of them had a big problem: they hadn’t yet used all of their attack mode time, and there wasn’t enough time left in the race to do so.

Da Costa had already used all of his allocation and had been building a commanding lead when the red flag came out. Now 50 kW down on most of the cars around him, he slipped back to seventh on track. His teammate Wehrlein had to use just four minutes, and did so to good effect, keeping his car in the lead until the checkered flag. Next on track was Nato, but without time to use all of his Attack Mode, he received an automatic 10-second penalty that dropped him to sixth place.

There were also 10-second penalties for Robert Frijns, Oliver Rowland, Sam Bird, and Taylor Barnard, meaning that second place actually went to Lola-Yamaha’s Lucas Di Grassi. A star of Formula E’s early seasons, in Miami, it looked like the younger version was back in the car as he delivered his best result in several years. The multitude of penalties also promoted Da Costa back into third place.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: Race winner Pascal Wehrlein of Germany and TAG Heuer Porsche Formula E Team Second placed Lucas di Grassi of Brazil driving the (11) Lola Yamaha ABT Formula E Team Lola-Yamaha T001 and Third placed Antonio Felix da Costa of Portugal and TAG Heuer Porsche Formula E Team celebrate on the podium during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

Antonio Felix Da Costa (l), Lucas di Grassi (m), and Pascal Wehrlein (r) celebrate on the podium. Credit: Simon Galloway/LAT Images for Formula E

It’s easy to be cynical about Formula E, and based on the complaints I heard from other journalists in attendance, some people can’t get over a lack of sound in this motorsport. But most of the sport’s problems are a thing of the past, and the racing usually delivers, even somewhere like the tight and twisty confines of Monaco, where it goes next for a double-header on May 3–4.

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

What happened when Formula E visited an American oval track? Read More »

the-trek-madone-slr-9-axs-gen-8-tears-up-the-roads-and-conquers-climbs

The Trek Madone SLR 9 AXS Gen 8 tears up the roads and conquers climbs


Trek’s top-of-the-line performance road bike offers some surprises.

The Madone SLR 9 Gen 8 AXS with Lake Michigan in the background on a brisk morning ride. Credit: Eric Bangeman

When a cyclist sees the Trek Madone SLR 9 AXS Gen 8 for the first time, the following thoughts run through their head, usually in this order:

“What a beautiful bike.”

“Damn, that looks really fast.”

“The owner of this bike is extremely serious about cycling and has a very generous budget for fitness gear.”

Indeed, almost every conversation I had while out and about on the Madone started and ended with the bike’s looks and price tag. And for good reason.

A shiny bike

Credit: Eric Bangeman

Let’s get the obvious out of the way. This is an expensive and very high-tech bike, retailing at $15,999. Part of the price tag is the technology—this is a bicycle that rides on the bleeding edge of tech. And another part is the Project One Icon “Tête de la Course” paint job on the bike; less-flashy options start at $13,499. (And if $15,999 doesn’t break your budget, there’s an even fancier Icon “Stellar” paint scheme for an extra $1,000.) That’s a pretty penny but not an unusual price point in the world of high-end road bikes. If you’re shopping for, say, a Cervélo S5 or Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL8, you’ll see the same price tags.

Madone is Trek’s performance-oriented road bike, and the Gen 8 is the latest and greatest from the Wisconsin-based bike manufacturer. It’s more aerodynamic than the Gen 7 (with a pair of aero water bottles) and a few hundred grams weightier than Trek’s recently discontinued Emonda climbing-focused bike.

I put nearly 1,000 miles on the Gen 8 Madone over a two-month period, riding it on the roads around Chicagoland. Yes, the land around here is pretty flat, but out to the northwest there are some nice rollers, including a couple of short climbs with grades approaching 10 percent. Those climbs gave me a sense of the Madone’s ability on hills.

Trek manufactures the Gen 8 Madone out of its 900 series OCLV carbon, and at 15.54 lb (7.05 kg)—just a hair over UCI’s minimum weight for racing bikes—the bike is 320 g lighter than the Gen 7. But high-tech bikes aren’t just about lightweight carbon and expensive groupsets. Even the water bottles matter. During the development of the Gen 8 Madone, Trek realized the water bottles were nearly as important as the frame when it came to squeezing out every last possible aerodynamic gains.

Perhaps the most obvious bit of aerodynamic styling is the diamond-shaped seat tube cutout. That cutout allows the seat tube to flex slightly on rougher pavement while cutting back on lateral flex. It’s slightly smaller than on the Gen 7 Madone, and it looks odd, but it contributes to a surprisingly compliant ride quality.

For the wheelset, Trek has gone with the Aeolus RSL for the Madone SLR 9. The tubeless-ready wheels offer a 51 mm rim depth and can handle a max tire size of 32 mm. Those wheels are paired with a set of 28 mm Bontrager Aeolus RSL TLR road tires. About four weeks into my testing, the rear tire developed what looked like a boil along one of the seams near the edge of the tire. Trek confirmed it was a manufacturing defect that occurred with a batch of tires due to a humidity-control issue within the factory, so affected tires should be out of stores by now.

Cockpit shot

No wires coming off the integrated handlebar and stem.

Credit: Eric Bangeman

No wires coming off the integrated handlebar and stem. Credit: Eric Bangeman

You’ll pilot the Madone with Trek’s new one-piece Aero RSL handlebar and stem combo. It’s a stiff cockpit setup, but I found it comfortable enough even on 80-plus-mile rides. Visually, it’s sleek-looking with a complete absence of wires (and the handlebar-stem combo can only be used with electronic groupsets). The downside is that there’s not enough clearance for a Garmin bike computer with a standard mount; I had to use a $70 K-Edge mount to mount my Garmin.

The Gen 8 Madone also replaces Trek’s Emonda lineup of climbing-focused bikes. Despite weighing 36 grams more than the Emonda SLR 9, Trek claims the Gen 8 Madone has an 11.3 W edge over the climbing bike at 22 mph (and a more modest 0.1 W improvement over the Gen 7 Madone at the same speed).

Of climbs and hero pulls

Paint job

The Tête de la Course colorway in iridescent mode.

Credit: Eric Bangeman

The Tête de la Course colorway in iridescent mode. Credit: Eric Bangeman

The first time I rode the Madone SLR 9 Gen 8 on my usual lunchtime route, I set a personal record. I wasn’t shooting for a new PR—it just sort of happened while I was putting the bike through its paces to see what it was capable of. It turns out it’s capable of a lot.

Riding feels almost effortless. The Madone’s outstanding SRAM Red AXS groupset contributes to that free-and-easy feeling. Shifting through the 12-speed 10-33 cassette is both slick and quick, perfect for when you really want to get to a higher gear in order to drop the hammer. At the front of the drivetrain is a 172.5 mm crank paired with 48t/35t chainrings, more than adequate for everything the local roads were able to confront me with. I felt faster on the flats and quicker through the corners, which led to more than a couple of hero pulls on group rides. The Madone also has a power meter, so you know exactly how many watts you cranked out on your rides.

There’s no derailleur hanger on the Gen 8 Madone, which opens the door to the SRAM Red XPLR groupset.

Credit: Eric Bangeman

There’s no derailleur hanger on the Gen 8 Madone, which opens the door to the SRAM Red XPLR groupset. Credit: Eric Bangeman

There’s also a nice bit of future-proofing with the Madone. Lidl-Trek has been riding some of the cobbled classics with the SRAM Red XPLR AXS groupset, a 13-speed gravel drivetrain that doesn’t need a derailleur hanger. Danish all-arounder Mads Pedersen rode a Madone SLR 9 Gen 8 with a single 56t chainring up front, paired with the Red XPLR to victory at Gent-Wevelgem at the end of March. So if you want to spend another thousand or so on your dream bike setup, that’s an option, as the Madone SLR 9 Gen 8 is one of the few high-performance road bikes that currently supports this groupset.

Living in northeastern Illinois, I lacked opportunities to try the new Madone on extended climbs. Traversing the rollers in the far northwestern suburbs of Chicago, however, the bike’s utility on climbs was apparent. Compared to my usual ride, an endurance-focused road bike, I felt like I was getting the first few seconds of a climb for free. The Madone felt lightweight, nimble, and responsive each time I hit an ascent.

What surprised me the most about the Madone was its performance on long rides. I went into testing with the assumption that I would be trading speed for comfort—and I was happy to be proven wrong. The combination of Trek’s aerodynamic frame design (which it calls IsoFlow), carbon wheelset, and tubeless tires really makes a difference on uneven pavement; there was almost no trade-off between pace and comfort.

What didn’t I like? The water bottles, mainly. My review bike came equipped with a pair of Trek RSL Aero water bottles, which fit in a specially designed cage. Trek says the bottles offer 1.8 W of savings at 22 mph compared to round bottles. That’s not worth it to me. The bottles hold less (~650 ml) than a regular water bottle and are irritating to fill, and getting them in and out of the RSL Aero cages takes a bit of awareness during the first few rides. Thankfully, you don’t need to use the aero bottles; normal cylindrical water bottles work just fine.

The price bears mentioning again. This is an expensive bike! If your cycling budget is massive and you want every last bit of aerodynamic benefit and weight savings, get the SLR 9 with your favorite paint job. Drop down to the Madone SLR 7, and you get the same frame with a Shimano Ultegra Di2 groupset, 52t/36t crank, and a 12-speed 11-30 cassette for $7,000 less than this SLR 9. The SL 7, with its 500 Series OCLV carbon frame (about 250 grams heavier), different handlebars and fork, and the same Ultegra Di2 groupset as the SLR 7 is $2,500 cheaper still.

In conceiving the Gen 8 Madone, Trek prioritized aerodynamic performance and weight savings over all else. The result is a resounding, if expensive, success. The color-shifting Project One paint job is a treat for the eyes, as is the $13,499 Team Replica colorway—the same one seen on Lidl-Trek’s bikes on the UCI World Tour.

At the end of the day, though, looks come a distant second to performance. And with the Gen 8 Madone, performance is the winner by a mile. Trek has managed to take a fast, aerodynamic road bike and make it faster and more aerodynamic without sacrificing compliance. The result is a technological marvel—not to mention a very expensive bike—that is amazing to ride.

Let me put it another way—the Madone made me feel like a boss on the roads. My daily driver is no slouch—a 5-year-old endurance bike with SRAM Red, a Reserve Turbulent Aero 49/42 wheelset, and Continental GP5000s, which I dearly love. But during my two-plus months with the Madone, I didn’t miss my bike at all. I was instead fixated on riding the Madone, dreaming of long rides and new PRs. That’s the way it should be.

Photo of Eric Bangeman

Eric Bangeman is the Managing Editor of Ars Technica. In addition to overseeing the daily operations at Ars, Eric also manages story development for the Policy and Automotive sections. He lives in the northwest suburbs of Chicago, where he enjoys cycling and playing the bass.

The Trek Madone SLR 9 AXS Gen 8 tears up the roads and conquers climbs Read More »

the-ars-cargo-e-bike-buying-guide-for-the-bike-curious-(or-serious)

The Ars cargo e-bike buying guide for the bike-curious (or serious)


Fun and functional transportation? See why these bikes are all the rage.

Three different cargo bikes

Credit: Aurich Lawson | John Timmer

Credit: Aurich Lawson | John Timmer

Are you a millennial parent who has made cycling your entire personality but have found it socially unacceptable to abandon your family for six hours on a Saturday? Or are you a bike-curious urban dweller who hasn’t owned a bicycle since middle school? Do you stare at the gridlock on your commute, longing for a bike-based alternative, but curse the errands you need to run on the way home?

I have a solution for you: invest in a cargo bike.

Cargo bikes aren’t for everyone, but they’re great if you enjoy biking and occasionally need to haul more than a bag or basket can carry (including kids and pets). In this guide, we’ll give you some parameters for your search—and provide some good talking points to get a spouse on board.

Bakfiets to the future

As the name suggests, a cargo bike, also known by the Dutch bakfiet, is a bicycle or tricycle designed to haul both people and things. And that loose definition is driving a post-pandemic innovation boom in this curious corner of the cycling world.

My colleagues at Ars have been testing electric cargo bikes for the past few years, and their experiences reflect the state of the market: It’s pretty uneven. There are great, user-centric products being manufactured by brands you may have heard of—and then there are products made as cheaply as possible, using bottom-of-the-barrel parts, to capture customers who are hesitant to drop a car-sized payment on a bike… even if they already own an $8,000 carbon race rocket.

The price range is wide. You can get an acoustic cargo bike for about $2,000, and you start seeing e-bikes at around $2,000 as well, with top-of-the-line bikes going for up to $12,000.

But don’t think of cargo bikes as leisure items. Instead, they can be a legitimate form of transportation that, with the right gear—and an electric drivetrain—can fully integrate into your life. Replacing 80 percent of my in-town car trips with a cargo bike has allowed me to squeeze in a workout while I bring my kid to school and then run errands without worrying about traffic or parking. It means my wife can take our infant daughter somewhere in the car while I take the bigger kid to a park across town.

Additionally, when you buy a car, the purchase is just the start of the costs; you can be stuck with several hundred to several thousand dollars a year in insurance and maintenance. With bikes, even heavy cargo bikes, you’re looking at a yearly check-up on brakes and chain stretch (which should be a $150 bike shop visit if you don’t do it yourself) and a periodic chain lubing (which you should do yourself).

A recent study found that once people use cargo bikes, they like their cars much less.

And, of course, bikes are fun. No matter what, you’re outside with the wind in your face.

Still, like anything else, there are trade-offs to this decision, and a new glut of choices confront consumers as they begin their journey down a potentially pricy rabbit hole. In this article, instead of recommending specific bikes, we’ll tell you what you need to know to make an informed decision based on your personal preferences. In a future article, we’ll look at all the other things you’ll need to get safely from point A to point B. 

Function, form, and evolutionary design

Long dominated by three main domains of design, the diversification of the North American cargo bike has accelerated, partially driven by affordable battery systems, interest from sustainability-minded riders, and government subsidies. In general, these three categories—bakfiets, longtails, and trikes—are still king, but there is far more variation within them. That’s due to the entrance of mainstream US bike brands like Specialized, which have joined homegrown specialists such as Rad Power and Yuba, as well as previously hard-to-find Dutch imports from Riese & Müller, Urban Arrow, and Larry vs Harry.

Within the three traditional cargo bikes, each style has evolved to include focused designs that are more or less suitable for individual tasks. Do you live in an apartment and need to cart your kids and not much else? You probably want a mid-tail of some sort. Do you have a garage and an urge to move your kid and a full wheelset from another bike? A Long John is your friend!

Let’s take a high-level look at the options.

Bakfiets/Long Johns

Image of a front-loading cargo bike with white metal tubes, set against stone pavement and walls.

A front-loader from Urban Arrow, called the Family. Credit: John Timmer

Dutch for “box bike,” a bakfiets, or a front-loader, is the most alien-looking of the styles presented here (at least according to the number of questions I get at coffee shops). There are several iterations of the form, but in general, bakfiets feature a big (26-inch) wheel in the back, a large cargo area ahead of the rider, and a smaller (usually 20-inch) wheel ahead of the box, with steering provided through a rod or cable linkage. Depending on the manufacturer, these bikes can skew closer to people carriers (Riese & Müller, Yuba, Xtracycle) or cargo carriers (Larry vs Harry, Omnium). However, even in the case of a bakfiets that is purpose-built for hauling people, leg and shoulder space becomes scarce as your cargo gets older and you begin playing child-limb Jenga.

We reviewed Urban Arrow’s front-loading Family bike here.

Brands to look out for: 

  • Riese & Müller
  • Urban Arrow
  • Larry vs Harry
  • Yuba
  • Xtracycle

Longtails

Image of a red bicycle with large plastic tubs flanking its rear wheel.

The Trek Fetch+ 2. Credit: John TImmer

If my local preschool drop-off is any indication, long- and mid-tail cargo bikes have taken North America by storm, and for good reason. With a step-through design, smaller wheels, and tight, (relatively) apartment-friendly proportions, long tails are imminently approachable. Built around 20-inch wheels, their center of gravity, and thus the weight of your cargo or pillion, is lower to the ground, making for a more stable ride.

This makes them far less enjoyable to ride than your big-wheeled whip. On the other hand, they’re also more affordable—the priciest models from Tern (the GSD, at $5,000, and the Specialized Haul, at $3,500) top out at half the price of mid-range bakfiets. Proper child restraints attach easily, and one can add boxes and bags for cargo, though they are seen as less versatile than a Long John. On the other hand, it’s far easier to carry an adult or as many children as you feel comfortable shoving on the rear bench than it is to squeeze large kids into the bakfiets.

We’ve reviewed several bikes in this category, including the Trek Fetch+ 2, Integral Electrics Maven, and Cycrown CycWagen.

Brands to look out for:

  • Radwagon
  • Tern
  • Yuba
  • Specialized, Trek

Tricycles

The Christiania Classic. Credit: Christiania Bikes America

And then we have a bit of an outlier. The original delivery bike, trikes can use a front-load or rear-load design, with two wheels always residing under the cargo. In either case, consumer trikes are not well-represented on the street, though brands such as Christiana and Workman have been around for some time.

Why aren’t trikes more popular? According to Kash, the mononymous proprietor of San Francisco’s Warm Planet Bikes, if you’re already a confident cyclist, you’ll likely be put off by the particular handling characteristics of a three-wheeled solution. “While trikes work, [there are] such significant trade-offs that, unless you’re the very small minority of people for whom they absolutely have to have those features specific to trikes, you’re going to try other things,” he told me.

In his experience, riders who find tricycles most useful are usually those who have never learned to ride a bike or those who have balance issues or other disabilities. For these reasons, most of this guide will focus on Long Johns and longtails.

Brands to look out for: 

Which bike style is best for you?

Before you start wading into niche cargo bike content on Reddit and YouTube, it’s useful to work through a decision matrix to narrow down what’s important to you. We’ll get you started below. Once you have a vague direction, the next best step is to find a bike shop that either carries or specializes in cargo bikes so you can take some test rides. All mechanical conveyances have their quirks, and quirky bikes are the rule.

Where do you want your cargo (or kid): Fore or aft?

This is the most important question after “which bike looks coolest to you?” and will drive the rest of the decision tree. Anecdotally, I have found that many parents feel more secure having their progeny in the back. Others like having their load in front of them to ensure it’s staying put, or in the case of a human/animal, to be able to communicate with them. Additionally, front-loaders tend to put cargo closer to the ground, thus lowering their center of gravity. Depending on the bike, this can counteract any wonky feel of the ride.

An abridged Costco run: toilet paper, paper towels, snacks, and gin. Credit: Chris Cona

How many people and how much stuff are you carrying?

As noted above, a front-loader will mostly max out at two slim toddlers (though the conventional wisdom is that they’ll age into wanting to ride their own bikes at that point). On the other hand, a longtail can stack as many kids as you can fit until you hit the maximum gross vehicle weight. However, if you’d like to make Costco runs on your bike, a front loader provides an empty platform (or cube, depending on your setup) to shove diapers, paper goods, and cases of beer; the storage on long tails is generally more structured. In both cases, racks can be added aft and fore (respectively) to increase carrying capacity.

What’s your topography like?

Do you live in a relatively flat area? You can probably get away with an acoustic bike and any sort of cargo area you like. Flat and just going to the beach? This is where trikes shine! Load up the kids and umbrellas and toodle on down to the dunes.

On the other hand, if you live among the hills of the Bay Area or the traffic of a major metropolitan area, the particular handling of a box trike could make your ride feel treacherous when you’re descending or attempting to navigate busy traffic. Similarly, if you’re navigating any sort of elevation and planning on carrying anything more than groceries, you’ll want to spring for the e-bike with sufficient gear range to tackle the hills. More on gear ratios later.

Do you have safe storage?

Do you have a place to put this thing? The largest consumer-oriented front loader on the market (the Riese & Müller Load 75) is almost two and a half meters (about nine feet) long, and unless you live in Amsterdam, it should be stored inside—which means covered garage-like parking. On the other end of the spectrum, Tern’s GSD and HSD are significantly shorter and can be stored vertically with their rear rack used as a stand, allowing them to be brought into tighter spaces (though your mileage may vary on apartment living).

If bike storage is your main concern, bikes like the Omnium Mini Max, Riese & Müller’s Carrie, and the to-be-released Gocyle CXi/CX+ are designed specifically for you. In the event of the unthinkable—theft, vandalism, a catastrophic crash—there are several bike-specific insurance carriers (Sundays, Velosurance, etc.) that are affordable and convenient. If you’re dropping the cash on a bike in this price range, insurance is worth getting.

How much do you love tinkering and doing maintenance?

Some bikes are more baked than others. For instance, the Urban Arrow—the Honda Odyssey of the category—uses a one-piece expanded polypropylene cargo area, proprietary cockpit components, and internally geared hubs. Compare that to Larry vs Harry’s Bullitt, which uses standard bike parts and comes with a cargo area that’s a blank space with some bolt holes. OEM cargo box solutions exist, but the Internet is full of very entertaining box, lighting, and retention bodges.

Similar questions pertain to drivetrain options: If you’re used to maintaining a fleet of bikes, you may want to opt for a traditional chain-driven derailleur setup. Have no desire to learn what’s going on down there? Some belt drives have internally geared hubs that aren’t meant to be user-serviceable. So if you know a bit about bikes or are an inveterate tinkerer, there are brands that will better scratch that itch.

A note about direct-to-consumer brands

As Arsians, research and price shopping are ingrained in our bones like scrimshaw, so you’ll likely quickly become familiar with the lower-priced direct-to-consumer (DTC) e-bike brands that will soon be flooding your Instagram ads. DTC pricing will always be more attractive than you’ll find with brands carried at your local bike shop, but buyers should beware.

In many cases, those companies don’t just skimp on brick and mortar; they often use off-brand components—or, in some cases, outdated standards that can be had for pennies on the dollar. By that, I mean seven-speed drivetrains mated to freewheel hubs that are cheap to source for the manufacturer but could seriously limit parts availability for you or your poor mechanic.

And let’s talk about your mechanic. When buying online, you’ll get a box with a bike in various states of disassembly that you’ll need to put together. If you’re new to bike maintenance and assembly, you might envision the process as a bit of Ikeaology that you can get through with a beer and minimal cursing. But if you take a swing through /r/bikemechanics for a professional perspective, you’ll find that these “economically priced bikes” are riddled with outdated and poor-quality components.

And this race to a bottom-tier price point means those parts are often kluged together, leading to an unnecessarily complicated assembly process—and, down the line, repairs that will be far more of a headache than they should be. Buying a bike from your local bike shop generally means a more reliable (or at least mainstream) machine with after-sales support. You’ll get free tune-ups for a set amount of time and someone who can assist you if something feels weird.

Oh yeah, and there are exploding batteries. Chances are good that if a battery is self-immolating, it’s because it’s (a) wired incorrectly, (b) used in a manner not recommended by the manufacturer, or (c) damaged. If a battery is cheap, it’s less likely that the manufacturer sought UL or EU certification, and it’s more likely that the battery will have some janky cells. Your best bet is to stick to the circuits and brands you’ve heard of.

Credit: Chris Cona

Bikes ain’t nothin’ but nuts and bolts, baby

Let’s move on to the actual mechanics of momentum. Most cargo bike manufacturers have carried over three common standards from commuter and touring bikes: chain drives with cable or electronically shifted derailleurs, belt-driven internally geared hubs (IGH), or belt-driven continuously variable hubs (CVH)—all of which are compatible with electric mid-drive motors. The latter two can be grouped together, as consumers are often given the option of “chain or belt,” depending on the brand of bike.

Chain-driven

If you currently ride and regularly maintain a bike, chain-driven drivetrains are the metal-on-metal, gears-and-lube components with which you’re intimately familiar. Acoustic or electric, most bike manufacturers offer a geared drivetrain in something between nine and 12 speeds.

The oft-stated cons of chains, cogs, and derailleurs for commuters and cargo bikers are that one must maintain them with lubricant, chains get dirty, you get dirty, chains wear out, and derailleurs can bend. On the other hand, parts are cheap, and—assuming you’re not doing 100-mile rides on the weekend and you’re keeping an ear out for upsetting sounds—maintaining a bike isn’t a whole lot of work. Plus, if you’re already managing a fleet of conventional bikes, one more to look after won’t kill you.

Belt-driven

Like the alternator on your car or the drivetrain of a fancy motorcycle, bicycles can be propelled by a carbon-reinforced, nylon-tooth belt that travels over metal cogs that run quietly and grease- and maintenance-free. While belts are marginally less efficient at transferring power than chains, a cargo bike is not where you’ll notice the lack of peak wattage. The trade-off for this ease of use is that service can get weird at some point. These belts require a bike to have a split chainstay to install them, and removing the rear wheel to deal with a flat can be cumbersome. As such, belts are great for people who aren’t keen on keeping up with day-to-day maintenance and would prefer a periodic pop-in to a shop for upkeep.

IGH vs. CVH

Internally geared hubs, like those produced by Rohloff, Shimano, and Sturmey Archer, are hilariously neat things to be riding around on a bicycle. Each brand’s implementation is a bit different, but in general, these hubs use two to 14 planetary gears housed within the hub of the rear wheel. Capable of withstanding high-torque applications, these hubs can offer a total overall gear range of 526 percent.

If you’ve ridden a heavy municipal bike share bike in a major US city, chances are good you’ve experienced an internally geared hub. Similar in packaging to an IGH but different in execution, continuously variable hubs function like the transmission in a midrange automobile.

These hubs are “stepless shifting”—you turn the shifter, and power input into the right (drive) side of the hub transfers through a series of balls that allow for infinite gear ratios throughout their range. However, that range is limited to about 380 percent for Enviolo, which is more limited than IGH or even some chain-driven systems. They’re more tolerant of shifting under load, though, and like planetary gears, they can be shifted while stationary (think pre-shifting before taking off at a traffic light).

Neither hub is meant to be user serviceable, so service intervals are lengthy.

Electric bikes

Credit: Chris Cona

Perhaps the single most important innovation that allowed cargo bikes to hit mainstream American last-mile transportation is the addition of an electric drive system. These have been around for a while, but they mostly involved hacking together a bunch of dodgy parts from AliExpress. These days, reputable brands such as Bosch and Shimano have brought their UL- and CE-rated electric drivetrains to mainstream cargo bikes, allowing normal people to jump on a bike and get their kids up a hill.

Before someone complains that “e-bikes aren’t bikes,” it’s important to note that we’re advocating for Class 1 or 3 pedal-assist bikes in this guide. Beyond allowing us to haul stuff, these bikes create greater equity for those of us who love bikes but may need a bit of a hand while riding.

For reference, here’s what those classes mean:

  • Class 1: Pedal-assist, no throttle, limited to 20 mph/32 kmh assisted top speed
  • Class 2: Pedal-assist, throttle activated, limited to 20 mph/32 kmh assisted top speed
  • Class 3: Pedal-assist, no throttle, limited to 28 mph/45 kmh assisted top speed, mandatory speedometer

Let’s return to Kash from his perch on Market Street in San Francisco:

The e-bike allows [enthusiasts] to keep cycling, and I have seen that reflected in the nature of the people who ride by this shop, even just watching the age expand. These aren’t people who bought de facto mopeds—these are people who bought [a pedal-assisted e-bike] because they wanted a bicycle. They didn’t just want to coast; they just need that slight assist so they can continue to do the things they used to do.

And perhaps most importantly, getting more people out of cars and onto bikes creates more advocates for cyclist safety and walkable cities.

But which are the reliable, non-explody standards? We now have many e-bike options, but there are really only two or three you’ll see if you go to a shop: Bosch, Shimano E-Drive, and Specialized (whose motors are designed and built by Brose). Between their Performance and Cargo Line motors, Bosch is by far the most common option of the three. Because bike frames need to be designed for a particular mid-drive unit, it’s rare to get an option of one or another, other than choosing the Performance trim level.

For instance, Urban Arrow offers the choice of Bosch’s Cargo Line (85 nm output) or Performance Line (65 nm), while Larry vs Harry’s eBullitt is equipped with Shimano EP6 or EP8 (both at 85 nm) drives. So in general, if you’re dead set on a particular bike, you’ll be living with the OEM-specced system.

In most cases, you’ll find that OEM offerings stick to pedal-assist mid-drive units—that is, a pedal-assist motor installed where a traditional bottom bracket would be. While hub-based motors push or pull you along by making the cranks easier to turn (while making you feel a bit like you’re on a scooter), mid-drives utilize the mechanical advantage of your bike’s existing gearing to make it easier to pedal and give you more torque options. This is additionally pleasant if you actually like riding bikes. Now you get to ride a bike while knowing you can take on pretty much any topography that comes your way.

Now go ride

That’s all you need to know before walking into a store or trolling the secondary market. Every rider is different, and each brand and design has its own quirks, so it’s important to get out there and ride as many different bikes as you can to get a feel for them for yourself. And if this is your first foray into the wild world of bikes, join us in the next installment of this guide, where we’ll be enumerating all the fun stuff you should buy (or avoid) along with your new whip.

Transportation is a necessity, but bikes are fun. We may as well combine the two to make getting to work and school less of a chore. Enjoy your new, potentially expensive, deeply researchable hobby!

The Ars cargo e-bike buying guide for the bike-curious (or serious) Read More »

97%-of-drivers-want-in-car-payment-system-for-tolls,-parking,-charging

97% of drivers want in-car payment system for tolls, parking, charging

Nearly everyone questioned as part of the research study would probably be OK with that, as long as it translated to a discount for using the in-car payment system; while this was a motivating factor, the time-savings and efficiency of frictionless in-car payments were the main draw. And a single platform that can pay for parking, charging, and fueling would be valuable, according to 97 percent of drivers.

People would even be prepared to pay extra, apparently. According to DriveResearch, 7 in 10 drivers would pay more for a car with in-car payment tech than a car without; some of them (36 percent) would be OK paying $700 or more for such functionality across the lifetime of the car, with more people (47 percent) preferring the cost be a one-time payment rather than a recurring fee (30 percent).

Not everyone is trusted to look after those payment details, however. Apple’s and Google’s payment services come out on top, with 83 percent trusting them to securely manage their card info in their cars. Only 63 percent trust the actual credit card companies, and only 57 percent trust the automakers. That’s still better than the parking app (47 percent) or parking operator (43 percent). Only 7 percent trusted local municipalities.

DriveResearch says that the growing acceptance of in-car payment systems is happening faster thanks to the spread of EVs, many of which have what’s known as “plug and charge,” in which the car exchanges payment or billing information with a charger during the handshake process.

97% of drivers want in-car payment system for tolls, parking, charging Read More »

2025-chevrolet-silverado-ev-lt-review:-this-is-one-long-pickup-truck

2025 Chevrolet Silverado EV LT review: This is one long pickup truck

At lower speeds, I found the Silverado EV a little more cumbersome. As noted, it’s a very long vehicle, and you need the more expensive RST version if you want rear-wheel steering, which turns the opposite direction to the front wheels at low speeds, in effect shrinking the 145.7-inch (3,700 mm) wheelbase. You would be much happier driving one of these straight into a garage rather than backing it into a parking space.

Having a garage isn’t a must, but in my opinion, being able to charge at home (or reliably at work) still remains a precondition for buying a plug-in vehicle. 120 V (level 1) AC charging might work for routine overnight top-ups if your daily driving is 40 miles or less, but it may take more than a day to completely restore a totally empty pack.

A chevrolet Silverado EV seen from the rear 3/4, parked in front of a mid-century building

Did this truck miss its moment in time? Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Level 2 AC charging should take 8–10 hours for a full charge (Chevy says 10 miles (16 km) in 10 minutes). Although the powertrain operates at 400 V, the pack can rejigger itself at suitable DC fast chargers to accept an 800 V charge at up to 300 kW. Expect a 10–80 percent charge to take around 45 minutes; during my week testing the Silverado EV, I only ran the battery down to around 50 percent, so I wouldn’t have seen optimal rates had I plugged it in. With climate change now causing wide temperature swings in early March, I can report that I averaged 1.7 miles/kWh (36.6 kWh/100 km) in cold weather, but once things got mild, that jumped to 2.2 miles/kWh (28.2 kWh/100 km).

Was Chevrolet misguided in making the Silverado EV? It certainly made more sense when EV optimism was peaking and the marketing departments in Detroit thought that pickup buyers would be easy conquests for a brave new future powered by electrons. That turned out to be the opposite of true, at least for the time being. But the automaker has a decent selection of EVs in other shapes, sizes, and price points, and an advantage to its common battery platform should be a degree of flexibility in which cars it decides to put them in.

2025 Chevrolet Silverado EV LT review: This is one long pickup truck Read More »

employee-pricing-for-all,-tariffs-on-the-sticker:-oems-react-to-tariffs

Employee pricing for all, tariffs on the sticker: OEMs react to tariffs

So VW wants to make it clear to customers why some of its products are about to get more expensive, which it estimates will begin around April 22 or 23. It will do that by adding a new line to the Monroney sticker, with a line for the import fee added alongside the destination charge, according to a VW memo seen by Automotive News.

Send employees home

Around 3 million people work in the automotive industry in the US, and it’s hard to see how the sector will avoid job losses as it contracts, particularly once the parts tariff goes into effect. (Some parts can cross the US border more than once on their journey from raw material to finished component and will get much more expensive, especially as Canada and Mexico levy retaliatory tariffs of their own.)

Stellantis is having a rough time in North America, where its sales have fallen for the past seven consecutive quarters. Now, some of its workers in Michigan and Indiana are among the first to be idled due to the tariffs.

The company is laying off 900 workers temporarily at stamping, casting, and transmission plants as a result of idling production at factories in Windsor, Canada (where 4,500 employees are being sent home for two weeks), and Toluca, Mexico (where workers will still get paid but won’t assemble cars this month), according to a letter sent by Stellantis to employees, seen by Reuters.

We can expect more automakers to react in the coming days, but the full effects will be delayed as automakers and their dealerships run down existing inventory, which may take a couple of months. One thing is clear: It will be an even lousier time to buy a new vehicle, the prices of which have already been elevated by 25 percent since the pandemic of 2020.

Employee pricing for all, tariffs on the sticker: OEMs react to tariffs Read More »

honda-will-sell-off-historic-racing-parts,-including-bits-of-senna’s-v10

Honda will sell off historic racing parts, including bits of Senna’s V10

Honda’s motorsport division must be doing some spring cleaning. Today, the Honda Racing Corporation announced that it’s getting into the memorabilia business, offering up parts and even whole vehicles for fans and collectors. And to kick things off, it’s going to auction some components from the RA100E V10 engines that powered the McLaren Honda MP4/5Bs of Ayrton Senna and Gerhard Berger to both F1 titles in 1990.

“We aim to make this a valuable business that allows fans who love F1, MotoGP and various other races to share in the history of Honda’s challenges in racing since the 1950s,” said Koi Watanabe, president of HRC, “including our fans to own a part of Honda’s racing history is not intended to be a one-time endeavor, but rather a continuous business that we will nurture and grow.”

The bits from Senna’s and Berger’s V10s will go up for auction at Monterey Car Week later this year, and the lots will include some of the parts seen in the photo above: cam covers, camshafts, pistons, and conrods, with a certificate of authenticity and a display case. And HRC is going through its collections to see what else it might part with, including “heritage machines and parts” from IndyCar, and “significant racing motorcycles.”

Honda will sell off historic racing parts, including bits of Senna’s V10 Read More »

the-2025-bmw-m5-touring-review:-way-more-power,-way-too-much-weight

The 2025 BMW M5 Touring review: Way more power, way too much weight

Basic functions like adjusting the fan speed of the air conditioning system require taking your attention off of the road to call up the comfort settings on the display, and if you dare to venture further down the rabbit hole to adjust something else, you’ll find an app drawer-style menu filled with ambiguously named icons that rarely get you where you want to go the first time out.

Do I change the damper stiffness by pressing the M Mode button on the center console, or is it in the Drivetrain and chassis submenu under Driving Settings? The answer is neither. (In fact, you should use iDrive’s excellent voice commands so you can keep your hands on the wheel and your eyes on the road—Ed.)

With adjustments for throttle response, brake regeneration, steering weight, brake pedal responsiveness, transmission behavior, all-wheel drive system modes, simulated engine noise volume, and other performance-related features, you can create literally hundreds of different combinations of vehicle settings, but thankfully, the aforementioned M1 and M2 buttons on the steering wheel provide an easy way to call up one of your two favorite presets on the fly. The bigger concern, though, is how all of these augmentations and enhancements seem to conspire to hide the shortcomings of BMW’s design decisions but aren’t successful in doing so.

Chassis upgrades are a prerequisite for an M car, and with an M-tuned adaptative suspension, additional structural bracing, massive brake discs with six-piston calipers up front, four-wheel steering, and torque vectoring all on board as standard, the M5 certainly isn’t short on them. Given that, it’s reasonable to expect that an M model will have a firmer ride quality than its garden-variety counterpart.

But the vehicle has an additional measure of harshness as compared to previous M5 models, even under normal driving situations with the dampers set to their most relaxed mode, which I theorize is related to the suspension tuning needed to keep body motions controlled and maintain a sport-oriented feel despite the weight involved.

Don’t get me wrong, this is still a grand tourer of the highest order. Triple-digit speeds can be accessed with a brief stab of the throttle, and thanks to the improved ergonomics of the latest 5-Series and the model-specific sport seats that are both comfortable and supportive, the M5 will still devour highway miles with the best of them. At times when both the electric motor and the V8 are working together, the hybridized powertrain also delivers the kind of instant-on throttle response that’s typically reserved for EVs.

The 2025 BMW M5 Touring review: Way more power, way too much weight Read More »

gran-turismo-7-expands-its-use-of-ai/ml-trained-npcs-with-good-effect

Gran Turismo 7 expands its use of AI/ML-trained NPCs with good effect

GT Sophy can now race at 19 tracks, up from the nine that were introduced in November 2023. The AI agent is an alternative to the regular, dumber AI in the game’s quick race mode, with easy, medium, and hard settings. But now, at those same tracks, you can also create custom races using GT Sophy, meaning you’re no longer limited to just two or three laps. You can enable things like damage, fuel consumption and tire wear, and penalties, and you can have some control over the cars you race against.

Unlike the time-limited demo, the hardest setting is no longer alien-beating. As a GT7 player, I’m slowing with age, and I find the hard setting to be that—hard, but beatable. (I suspect but need to confirm that the game tailors the hardest setting to your ability based on your results, as, when I create a custom race on hard, only seven of the nine progress bars are filled, and in the screenshot above, only five bars are filled.)

Having realistic competition has always been one of the tougher challenges for a racing game, and one that the GT franchise was never particularly great at during previous console generations. This latest version of GT Sophy does feel different to race against: The AI is opportunistic and aggressive but also provokable into mistakes. If only the developer would add it to more versions of the in-game Nürburgring.

Gran Turismo 7 expands its use of AI/ML-trained NPCs with good effect Read More »