car review

the-2024-ford-mustang-mach-e-rally-proves-sideways-is-the-best-way

The 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally proves sideways is the best way

The front of a Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally showing fog lights built into the front fascia

Enlarge / The Mustang Mach-E Rally is the latest version of Ford’s electric crossover. It features plenty of power and a new drive mode, as well as plenty of rally-inspired accoutrements.

Tim Stevens

Mildly off-road-ready performance variants are extremely trendy right now, and it’s easy to turn your nose up at them. But when cars like the 911 Dakar or Huracan Sterrato actually improve the day-to-day drivability and comfort of the road-focused machines upon which they’re lifted, you have to respect them.

Me? I’m a die-hard rally fan and someone who’d rather drive sideways than straight. It’s no surprise that I love these special editions, from their top-boxes down to their all-terrain tires. But I also love electric vehicles, and while there are plenty of electrified crossovers and SUVs out there, it’s slim pickings if you want something rally-ready.

Today, that changes.

Meet the Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally, a car with a name so clear you can’t ignore the purpose. It takes the $53,995 2024 Mach-E GT and gives it a few key upgrades, all in the name of providing better performance for low-grip motorsport—or at least the appearance thereof. But is this package more show than go?

  • Ford has integrated fog lights into the front fascia panel.

    Tim Stevens

  • The white alloy wheels are meant to remind you of the Compomotive wheels that Ford’s rally cars used.

    Tim Stevens

  • The Mach-E Rally’s rear wing probably does nothing to help range, but it looks very cool.

    Tim Stevens

  • Ford missed a trick by not giving the Mach-E Rally a suede or Alcantara wheel rim. At the very least we would expect a rally special to have a strip at 12 o’clock on the wheel rim.

    Tim Stevens

  • The rear seat backs are a little different.

    Tim Stevens

  • Here’s why: It adds more shoulder bolstering.

  • The stripes have a triangular pattern on them that’s also replicated on some interior trim.

    Tim Stevens

  • The Mach-E Rally is just as practical as all the other Mach-E variants.

    Tim Stevens

It starts with a standard Mach-E GT, which, for the 2024 model year, gets some significant updates in its own right. A new rear motor, lifted from the Ford Lightning, gives both the GT and Rally 480 hp (358 kW) and 700 lb-ft (950 Nm) of torque. That’s up from 634 lb-ft (860 Nm) before.

This Mach-E stands out from the crowd

A revised battery pack offers 265 miles (426 km) of range in the Rally, down slightly from the GT’s 280 miles (451 km), which is itself a 40-mile (64 km) penalty from the maximum range of 320 miles (515 km) you can now get in a 2024 RWD Extended Range Mach-E Premium. The new GT also gets slightly updated headlights, and the Brembo brakes and sport seats that were formerly an option now come standard.

Tick the “Rally” box, and you get several other goodies—most notably a revised suspension. It’s still the Mach-E’s adaptive MagneRide dampers but now outfitted with new “rallycross-tuned” springs delivering a 1-inch (25 mm) lift. That suspension is designed to keep the new 19-inch wheels on the ground.

Ford calls them “rally-style” wheels, but fans will spot them as an ode to the classic Compomotive TH seen on many iconic gravel machines of the ’80s and ’90s. Someone at Ford has a good eye for classic rally style.

This could be the ideal EV if you live near a bunch of forestry roads.

Enlarge / This could be the ideal EV if you live near a bunch of forestry roads.

Ford

The wheels look good and should keep the worst of the gravel from dinging up your brake hardware, but more significant is what they’re wrapped in. The Rally has Michelin CrossClimate2 tires on all four corners, an interesting proposition that promises good grip in all conditions yet low rolling resistance for EV use. Their chunky, V-shaped tread is not what you’d typically expect on an electric car, but they further seal the Rally’s all-terrain look.

Under the nose, there’s a slender bit of aluminum, a faux skid plate of sorts that I don’t think will protect much. Up higher, the Rally nose has a different grille insert with a pair of inset fog lights, while out back, a chunky, ornate wing hangs off the top of the rear hatch. The requisite custom graphics are here, including classy stripes running up the hood and tacky “Rally” graphics smeared across the doors. The more important appliqué, however, is invisible: Ford put paint-protecting film along the lower portions of the car to again fend off the worst of the gravel damage.

The 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally proves sideways is the best way Read More »

the-single-motor-bmw-i4-proves-the-less-powerful-ev-is-usually-better

The single-motor BMW i4 proves the less-powerful EV is usually better

This is a great EV. —

This rear-wheel drive EV is efficient, practical, and has class-leading technology.

A green metallic BMW i4 seen in the rain

Enlarge / BMW’s single-motor, rear-wheel drive i4 eDrive40 ticks an awful lot of my boxes.

Jonathan Gitlin

I have a theory about electric vehicles, and with a few notable exceptions, it’s this: The cheaper, less powerful version is usually the one to get. Big power outputs and short 0–60 times have been the industry’s go-to, but always with the trade-off being less range and a bigger sticker price. Today’s EV is a good example. It’s the BMW i4 eDrive40, a single-motor version of BMW’s smaller electric fastback sedan. It has taken a while to get some seat time in one, but the wait was worth it, because this is one of the best electric sedans we’ve tested so far.

I’ve driven the BMW i4 a few times now since its launch in 2021, but always the very fast, very powerful, rather expensive i4 M50. Which is fine, but not exciting like the M3. The i4 eDrive40 undercuts the twin-motor, all-wheel drive M50 by more than $10,000—it starts at a more reasonable $57,300 and goes more than 30 miles (48 km) farther on a single charge of the same capacity 84.3 kWh (net) battery pack, with an EPA range of 301 miles (484 km).

BMW made its name on the back of a string of driver-focused, rear-wheel drive sedans, and I had high expectations for the eDrive40 to live up to. With no front motor, there’s less weight on the front axle, and the front wheels just have to worry about steering and braking, not laying down power as well. Less power to put down means smaller wheels, which translates into a better ride and more range, although our test car was equipped with 19-inch wheels (a $600 option), which reduced its range to 283 miles (455 km) compared to the 18-inch option.

Although you can pay extra for leather, the standard trim is a synthetic fabric called Sensatec, which comes in four different shades.

Enlarge / Although you can pay extra for leather, the standard trim is a synthetic fabric called Sensatec, which comes in four different shades.

Jonathan Gitlin

Open the door via the aero-optimized recessed handle and things look promising as you slip down into the tan-colored seat. The steering wheel’s rim is thinner than you’d find in most modern BMWs, and its multifunction controls are proper buttons. Otherwise, the ergonomics are the same as the more speedy version, with a large double-screen display that stretches across from the A pillar to the center stack running BMW iDrive 8.5. This might be the last version of iDrive to still offer a physical scroll wheel as an input option alongside touchscreens and voice commands, so enjoy it while it lasts.

BMW builds good electric powertrains

At maximum output, the i4’s electrically excited motor can send up to 335 hp (250 kW) and 317 lb-ft (430 Nm) to the rear wheels. And in Sport mode, the first inch of throttle pedal travel delivers more than enough of that torque to jolt your passengers’ heads back into their headrests. Zero to 60 mph (98 km/h) takes 5.5 seconds, which might not sound like much in a 21st-century game of Top Trumps, but it’s more than enough for the real world.

Truth be told, I spent most of my time driving the i4 in Eco Pro, which dials back the power delivery even more than Comfort mode. Still, it never felt slow on the roads in and around Washington, DC. With the transmission set to B, there was a strong one-pedal driving effect; in D, lifting the throttle leaves the car free to coast, only regenerating (up to 116 kW) when you use the brake pedal.

I prefer D for highway driving, as any kind of downhill gradient, however slight, equals a chance to glide along, often gaining a little speed for free in the process. (This is one benefit of an electrically excited motor, which creates no drag on the drivetrain when not energized; the other main benefit is no use of rare-earth materials in the motor construction.)

Don't get distracted by the fact that the i4 thought it would only have 264 miles by the time it was fully charged—I drove to the charger in Sport mode to warm the battery as much as possible for better charging.

Enlarge / Don’t get distracted by the fact that the i4 thought it would only have 264 miles by the time it was fully charged—I drove to the charger in Sport mode to warm the battery as much as possible for better charging.

Jonathan Gitlin

Indeed, 4.1 miles/kWh (15.2 kWh/100 km) was possible without much effort, and over the course of about 2,000 miles (3,200 km) and who knows how many journalists, this particular car had averaged 3.7 miles/kWh (16.8 kWh/100 km). But then, this is BMW’s fifth-generation electric powertrain, so it’s had plenty of time to learn how to make them efficient.

BMW quotes a DC fast-charging time of as little as 31 minutes from 10–80 percent, with charge rates as high as 200 kW. If you set a DC fast charger as your location in the built-in Navigation, the car should precondition the battery pack for optimum fast charging, but there’s also a way to turn that on manually in iDrive.

In practice, I arrived at the charger with 24 percent state of charge and saw a peak of 186 kW shortly after plugging in. As EV drivers will know, charge curves are definitely not linear, particularly past 80 percent SoC, and getting all the way to 88 percent—55.8 kWh in total—took 1 hour and 2 minutes. (Since that was spent enjoying brunch at Mama Chang, conveniently located next to a bank of Electrify America chargers, it was time well spent.) BMW says an AC charge from 0–100 percent SoC takes 8: 15 at 11 kW.

The single-motor BMW i4 proves the less-powerful EV is usually better Read More »

the-2024-chevrolet-silverado-ev’s-great-range-comes-at-a-high-cost

The 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV’s great range comes at a high cost

if you hate big trucks, look away now —

At $94,500, the Chevrolet Silverado RST First Edition offers diminishing returns.

A black Chevrolet Silverado EV

Enlarge / Chevrolet is starting at the top with the Silverado EV RST First Edition. It’s betting that EV truck buyers want a lot of range and towing capability and will pay handsomely for the experience.

Michael Teo Van Runkle

The latest addition to Chevrolet’s growing family of Ultium electric vehicles recently began shipping to dealers in the form of the Silverado EV’s early RST First Edition package. Silverado’s top spec level now joins the lineup’s previous fleet-only WT trim, meaning the general public can now purchase an enormous electric pickup that strongly resembles the Avalanche of 2001 to 2013. But despite any other similarities to the Hummer EV, which shares a related chassis, or ICE trucks of old, the 2024 Silverado aims to change the game for GM’s market positioning despite arriving a full 24 months after Ford’s F-150 Lightning.

With a large crew cab, a longer truck bed, and angular sail panels, the Silverado EV looks less boxy than GMC’s Hummer EV. Aero gains thanks to the smoother design pair with lower rolling-resistance tires, allowing the Silverado to achieve an EPA range estimate of up to 450 miles (724 km), though the RST First Edition I recently drove over the course of a long day in Michigan earns a rating of 440 miles (708 km).

On the highway, judging by wind noise around the cabin alone, the aerodynamic gains of the Silverado’s styling seem to make a noticeable difference versus the Hummer. On the other hand, tire hum might cover up any aero deficiencies because the RST’s single weirdest detail constantly occupies center stage here: a set of 24-inch wheels, the largest ever equipped to a car, truck, or SUV straight from the factory.

At 24 inches, the Silverado RST rides on simply gargantuan wheels. While it means acceptable towing performance, it comes with quite a hit to the ride.

Enlarge / At 24 inches, the Silverado RST rides on simply gargantuan wheels. While it means acceptable towing performance, it comes with quite a hit to the ride.

Michael Teo Van Runkle

Shod in low-profile Michelin Primacy LTX tires pumped up to 61 and 68 PSI front and rear, which simultaneously maximizes range and load rating, the large wheels and minimal sidewall clearly stress much of the new truck’s suspension and ability to filter out noise, vibration, and harshness. Even in town, on the first few blocks of Detroit’s rough roads, the setup immediately challenged the Silverado EV’s adaptive air suspension, which otherwise worked surprisingly well on the mammoth Hummer.

But the Hummer EV I drove rode on 18-inch wheels, despite the similar 35-inch overall tire diameter. The much more compliant ride quality therefore creates a conundrum, since GM clearly intends for the Silverado to represent a much more rational and capable vision for electric performance in the full-size pickup truck market.

Specifically, the Silverado adds a longer bed, a Multi-Flex tailgate, and a central mid-gate (also à la Avalanche) to provide far more payload volume than the Hummer, as well as that of Silverado’s main electric competition, the F-150 Lightning, Rivian R1T, and Tesla Cybertruck. But the mid-gate required far more rugged materials for the Silverado’s interior to enhance weatherproofing, so even the top-spec RST First Edition that starts at $94,500 now slots in at a much lower luxury level than the aforementioned EVs, as well as most internal-combustion Silverados.

  • The Silverado EV uses GM’s new Ultifi infotainment system, which is built atop Android Automotive OS.

    Chevrolet

  • Super Cruise now works with a trailer attached.

    Chevrolet

  • The flexible midgate allows you to carry longer loads.

    Chevrolet

  • Onboard AC power is quite useful.

    Chevrolet

Still, Chevy says EV buyers love tech and packed the Silverado EV full of big screens, Google built-in (though no Apple CarPlay), and Super Cruise partially automated driving assist (the latter including for towing). That air suspension pairs 2 inches (50 mm) of ride height adjustability with up to 7.5 degrees of rear-wheel steering to make the large truck surprisingly maneuverable, but in the back of my mind, I always knew that the ease with which I just climbed in and started driving comes down to playing with physics as much as possible to mask the Silverado’s significant heft.

Those 440 miles of range come at a serious cost, after all, in the form of a 205 kWh battery pack (around 200 kWH usable). All in, the RST tips the scales at a whopping 9,119 pounds (4,136 kg), not quite as much as a Hummer but fully 2,000 pounds (907 kg) more than a Lightning, R1T, or Cybertruck. No wonder the suspension struggles without taller tire sidewalls to help out. I fiddled through the 17.7-inch touchscreen to set the air suspension on Tour, which reduced unwanted feedback noticeably but created some rafting effects and still never fully eliminated clunking on the worst road surfaces. Future models, including a Trail Boss on the way, should come with smaller wheels and taller tires—to match the current WT’s 18-inch wheels and 33-inch tires, hopefully.

But the prospect of actually off-roading such a heavy EV definitely approaches a level of absurdity that the Hummer EV similarly delivered in spades. Neither comes with a spare tire, despite impressive storage volume that only improves on the Silverado. Flipping down the tailgate and mid-gate allows for up to 10 feet, 10 inches (3.3m) of bed length, or 9 feet (2.7m) with the mid-gate closed and just the Multi-Flex tailgate down. The bed alone measures 5-foot-11 (1.8m).

  • Chevrolet was keen to impress that its truck bed is bigger than other electric pickups.

    Michael Teo Van Runkle

  • The aerodynamic detailing was presaged by the turn-of-the-century Avalanche pickup.

    Michael Teo Van Runkle

  • There are a whole range of towing assists.

    Michael Teo Van Runkle

  • The controls here are for trailer settings.

    Michael Teo Van Runkle

  • Two miles/kWh is not great but in the range of what we expect for an electric pickup truck.

    Michael Teo Van Runkle

On the interior, at 6-foot-1 (1.85m) with long limbs, I actually needed to scoot the driver’s seat up and forward. The RST’s (not-optional) panoramic glass roof helps to enhance the perceived spaciousness but required that I keep the air conditioning and ventilated seats at full blast on a hot Michigan day—other than when I struggled to figure out how to keep the system running while parked since the truck has no dedicated on-off button other than a pair of widget icons at the left of the home screen. A retractable screen for the roof is on the way, I was told.

The Silverado EV’s range proved more than legitimate, at least based on this first drive. Over the course of 107 miles (172 km) of combined city and highway driving in one truck, I used 24 percent of the battery and 105 miles (169 km) of estimated range. And that’s including two hard eighth-mile launches with WOW (Wide Open Watts) mode activated, which unleashes the dual motor drivetrain’s full 754 hp (562 kW) and 785 lb-ft (1,064 Nm) of torque. Those two launches alone used eight miles of range, for better or worse.

GM won’t disclose non-WOW power figures, but responsiveness definitely drops to help extend overall range performance. In Tow/Haul mode with a 5,800-lb (2,630 kg) trailer hooked up for 21 miles (34 km), I nonetheless accelerated easily up to highway speeds and even used Super Cruise’s towing capability—all while eating through only 22 claimed miles of range at speeds around 40-60 miles per hour (64-96 km/h).

Chevy set up an impromptu drag strip so we could test the Silverado's launch.

Enlarge / Chevy set up an impromptu drag strip so we could test the Silverado’s launch.

Michael Teo Van Runkle

The Silverado EV’s range sets it far ahead of the Lightning (at 240 miles or 386 km), though Rivian and Tesla do better. Various levels of home-charging setups help to make the large battery pack more attractive, and though I never needed nor got a chance to charge, expect GM’s claimed 350 kW max charging speed to similarly hold up. As usual, charging stations will likely throttle that speed back more regularly than the truck itself, which should manage a 10–80 percent charge time of around 40 minutes in ideal circumstances.

In the end, although it’s not quite as cartoonishly large and simultaneously far more practical than the Hummer EV, the Silverado uses 205 kilowatt-hours worth of lithium and other rare earth metals, contributing mightily to the RST weighing well north of 9,000 pounds. Yes, the truck combines the best utility of any EV on the market, with solid tech and range to attract stubborn EV holdouts. But how many hybrids could Chevy have built using so much battery? Until pricing drops lower than this truck’s $94,500 sticker, the Silverado RST ends up as a reminder of the diminishing returns, environmentally and economically, of building what customers, unfortunately, believe is necessary using today’s technology, which likely still needs to take another major leap forward to make such a truck more feasible for widespread adoption.

The 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV’s great range comes at a high cost Read More »

a-week-with-the-chevy-blazer-ev-shows-things-to-love—but-also-painful-flaws

A week with the Chevy Blazer EV shows things to love—but also painful flaws

take two —

The decision to drop Apple CarPlay was a mistake.

A red Chevrolet Blazer

Enlarge / The Chevrolet Blazer was pulled from sale almost immediately after our first drive in December. Now it’s back on sale—with a price cut.

Michael Frank

General Motors appears to have solved the problem that was holding back the production of its Ultium-based electric vehicles. These are now rolling out of factories—you can expect to read about the new Silverado EV tomorrow and the (allegedly affordable) Equinox EV next week, to name but two. We got a first-blush drive of the Blazer this past winter before GM had to put a stop on sales due to some… glitches. Now, with the vehicle back on sale and the software debugged, it’s time to see if the fixes helped.

In reintroducing the Blazer EV and returning it to market, Chevy has also lowered the price pretty significantly, by an average of about $6,000 per model. The LT AWD now starts at $48,800, and there’s a $7,500 incentive for customers who aren’t eligible for the IRS clean vehicle tax credit. The RS AWD, which we tested, has an MSRP of $53,200, but with the delivery charge and GM’s cash on the hood, it came in at $47,095. Both have an 85 kWh battery good for 279 miles (449 km) max range per charge. The longer-range, bigger-battery 102 kWh RS RWD boasts a more impressive 324 miles ( 521 km) per charge and works out to $48,670.

These are pretty competitive prices when you consider the mid-sized EV SUV segment. An obvious comparison: The Ioniq 5 SE AWD costs $49,350 and cannot qualify for the federal tax credit (unless leased), and its range runs shy of the Chevy Blazer RS AWD, too, at 260 miles (418 km) versus the Chevy’s 279.

The Ioniq 5 is a pretty good comparison, too, in terms of being a wagon-ish ride, which is about where the Blazer lands. The Hyundai is too low to think of as an SUV, and ditto the Chevy. Both are very close in terms of interior dimensions, with almost the same hip, shoulder, and legroom front and rear—although if you get the sunroof package on the Blazer, rear seat headroom gets pinched pretty significantly. Our tester didn’t have a sunroof, and six-footers could sit back there without scraping their scalps.

The interior is quite stylized.

Enlarge / The interior is quite stylized.

Michael Frank

The seats in the Blazer EV are surprisingly good. In fact, it was just a darn fine vehicle in terms of driving comfort, in marked contrast to the models we tested in December. Those cars may have suffered from preproduction glitches, but the Blazer EV RS we just spent a week with is comfortable for both fore and aft passengers over long distances, with about the only demerit that the 21-inch wheels feel as big as they are, so there’s a deadness to the steering. Also, if you’re still cross-shopping that Hyundai, the Ioniq 5 is a significantly lighter car, weighing 4,519 lbs (2,050 kg) vs. 5,337 lbs (2,421 kg) for the Blazer RS, and the driver will feel that weight in the form of sluggish transitions through tight corners. The RS stands for “Rally Sport,” via cars like the Camaro, but this isn’t a rig you want to “rally.”

But that’s fine. The Blazer EV is a family car, and as such, it’s pretty great, with 25.5 cubic feet (722 L) of cargo capacity with the rear seatbacks upright, and 59.1 cubic feet (1,673 L) with them flipped forward. The Ioniq 5 offers a couple of cubic feet more cargo volume than the Blazer EV with the rear seats in use, and with the Ioniq 5’s seats folded, it’s basically a wash.

The Chevy Blazer RS AWD EV delivers 288 hp (212 kW) and 333 lb-ft (451 Nm). This feels plenty muscular, if not “blazing,” with 0–60 mph times reported in the six-second range. However, the Ioniq 5 SE’s 320 hp (239 kW) and 446 lb-ft (605 Nm) make that car quite quick indeed, and right on the heels of the other elephant in the family-car throwdown, the Tesla Model Y.

Driving isn’t the issue—the tech is

The menu structure here feels illogical.

Enlarge / The menu structure here feels illogical.

Michael Frank

It’s important to mention the Tesla Model Y because that’s another EV that doesn’t bake in Apple CarPlay or Android Auto. Tesla fans tend not to gripe about this, in part because the software in Teslas is very streamlined and pared back. It’s not lovable, but it’s not hard to pair a phone and play what’s on there. By contrast, one reason GM had to yank the cord on sales of the Blazer was that the car’s software was exceedingly glitchy; this wasn’t about GM switching to its proprietary Ultifi UI but that it wasn’t working. For our test drive week, it worked as promised—just not in a way that argues well for eliminating Android Auto or Apple CarPlay.

When GM went to its Ultifi system and ditched Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, the argument was supposedly in part about driver control and using the vehicle’s native UI vs. Apple’s. But if the native UI is worse than Apple’s, you have a problem. And both Android Auto and CarPlay—which are just constrained versions of their phone UIs—have been refined through testing with billions of consumers over hundreds of millions of combined hours of use. No carmaker can make anything like that claim about their in-house UI. Megacorp tech giants are by no means the answer to our prayers, but there is a reason these platforms have gained so much ground as infotainment structures in our cars and homes.

And you can get an “exhibit A” for why that matters when you try to tee up an audio source when driving the Blazer EV.

A week with the Chevy Blazer EV shows things to love—but also painful flaws Read More »

the-2025-aston-martin-vantage-gets-a-bold-new-body-and-big-power-boost

The 2025 Aston Martin Vantage gets a bold new body and big power boost

An orange Aston Martin Vantage in the Spanish countryside

Enlarge / First revealed in 2017, the current Aston Martin Vantage has just had a styling and engineering overhaul.

Aston Martin

It’s high time Aston Martin had a winner on its hands. Last year it updated the DB12 with a smart new face, plenty of power, and the sort of infotainment you’d hope for from a luxury GT. The Vantage, the firm’s ‘entry-level’ car, has been given similar treatment in the hopes that it can peel a few more people away from Porsche dealerships.

Aston is looking not only to make better cars, but also to shift its image—it’s aiming to be seen as more luxurious than before, and is throwing as much power at the cars as possible. At first glance, it looks like Aston has cooked up something truly delightful.

The new car is more than 150 hp (112 kW) more powerful than the one it replaces, with 656 hp (490 kW) and 590 lb-ft (800 Nm) from a wonderfully appointed turbocharged 4.0 L V8. Its 0 to 60 time is quoted at 3.4 seconds, and Aston reckons that if you have enough space (and no speed limits) you’ll see the far side of 200 mph (321 km/h). It is not slow.

Aston has never really had a problem with building good-looking cars, but the new Vantage is a huge leap over its immediate predecessor. With the old car, the idea was that each model in the lineup would look suitably different depending on what it did. It was supposed to look like an athletic, purposeful sports car. And it did—but it didn’t nail its Aston Martin-ness.

In addition to keeping it looking fresh, the facelift also improved the car's cooling and aerodynamic performance.

Enlarge / In addition to keeping it looking fresh, the facelift also improved the car’s cooling and aerodynamic performance.

Aston Martin

The new one very much does. From its new headlights to its grille, side vents, skirts, quad exhaust pipes, and one of the best rear ends on the market today, the new car looks like an Aston Martin through and through. Of course, some of the changes are necessary—the front grille is 38 percent bigger than before because having a V8 with quite so much power means it needs better cooling. In fact, look closely and you’ll spot a number of tricks Aston has used to improve cooling and airflow all over the car. Were I the type to wear my glasses at the tip of my nose, I’d start muttering something about “form and function working in harmony,” but I’m not, so I won’t.

Aston has made a point of saying there won’t be another V12 Vantage and that the last generation’s take on it was the end of the line. This meant the engineers didn’t have to worry about giving the V8 so much power. The old V8 Vantage could have been nearly as potent, but the need to differentiate with the V12 meant it would have been imprudent.

The outside will turn heads, the inside should make you smile. The direct predecessor’s seats and dash were pleasant, and comfortable, but the center console and infotainment? Not great. It was of the ‘slap a tablet to the dash’ generation, and it was run off a reskinned version of Merc’s COMAND system, which was definitely of its era and not a patch on current systems. Today’s Vantage gets the same setup you’ll find in the DB12—a 12.5-inch touchscreen paired with actual buttons that do actual things.

The 2025 Aston Martin Vantage gets a bold new body and big power boost Read More »

testing-the-2024-bmw-m2—maybe-the-last-m-car-with-a-manual-transmission

Testing the 2024 BMW M2—maybe the last M car with a manual transmission

A pale blue BMW M2 seen parked in the hills

Enlarge / BMW’s M2 might be the last M car it builds with three pedals and a stick shift.

Peter Nelson

We’re at an interesting crossroads in the high-performance enthusiast car market. Running east to west is the adoption of electric vehicles and a slow reduction in internal combustion engine car production. North to south is the progression of ICE horsepower from the factory over the years, and it’s unclear how far it continues from here. Coming in diagonally is the weakening demand for manual transmissions—this is sadly where they end.

In the middle of this intersection is the 2024 BMW M2 six-speed manual, hanging its tail out in a massive controlled drift around the edges, expressing one last hurrah as BMW’s final object of internal-combustion M car affection.

I recently had the opportunity to pilot BMW’s latest, smallest M car through some of Southern California’s most fun mountain roads, plus Willow Springs International Raceway’s Streets of Willow circuit. When it comes to quickly figuring out this kind of car’s powertrain and chassis, I can’t think of a better mix of pavement. Here’s what makes the latest—and last—six-speed-manual-equipped M2 generation an overall excellent enthusiast coupe.

BMW has given the M2 a much more muscular look than the normal 2 series coupe.

Enlarge / BMW has given the M2 a much more muscular look than the normal 2 series coupe.

Peter Nelson

Focused inside-out

Looks are subjective, particularly BMW looks, but I think BMW did a good job on the M2’s exterior. Its kidney grilles, headlights, fender flares, exhaust tips, and wide fenders—especially in the rear quarter panels—are attractive. It’s a muscular little coupe, and it definitely informs you of its intentions with its massive intakes cut into its front end. Behind them lies a heat exchanger for its engine’s air-to-water intercooling (more on that in a bit), plus several other forms of water and oil cooling to ensure long-lasting peak performance, all-twisty-road-and-track-session-long. It’s hard to mistake it for a base 2 Series.

Inside, it’s quite spacious for a coupe and has great visibility all around. My test car included the $9,900 Carbon Package, which gets you comfortable, near-race-bucket carbon fiber seats and a slick carbon roof. I’m 6 feet and 3 inches tall, so the absence of sliding glass up top was a godsend and even allowed me to wear a helmet on track without needing to recline, a rarity in modern cars. The seats are a bit of a pain to slide in and out of, and the left leg bolster pushed inward slightly too much, impeding efficient and comfortable clutch action for my lanky figure. I suspect many folks wouldn’t have the same issue, though.

Technology-wise, a crisp 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster and a 14.9-inch touchscreen take up a lot of real estate. BMW’s iDrive 8 software is easy to get the hang of, operates quite seamlessly, and has good haptic feedback. Materials quality is overall quite good; all buttons and dials felt substantial, and the Carbon Package includes chic slabs of carbon fiber trim instead of the boring old piano black plastic that’s all too common in modern performance cars.

Opinions are mixed when it comes to BMW's carbon bucket seats. They hold you in place well but can be hard to get in and out of, and the hump between the driver's legs is polarizing.

Enlarge / Opinions are mixed when it comes to BMW’s carbon bucket seats. They hold you in place well but can be hard to get in and out of, and the hump between the driver’s legs is polarizing.

Peter Nelson

Testing the 2024 BMW M2—maybe the last M car with a manual transmission Read More »

lincoln-corsair-phev-review:-a-luxury-car-shouldn’t-squeak-this-much

Lincoln Corsair PHEV review: A luxury car shouldn’t squeak this much

small but not cheap —

It has an attractive cabin and decent fuel economy, but build quality needs work.

A white Lincoln Corsair parked next to a wall

Enlarge / We like the interior styling, and it rides well and is rather efficient. But the interior build quality needs work.

Jonathan Gitlin

It probably hasn’t escaped notice that electric vehicles, having captured everyone’s attention, are having a bit of a slide into what Gartner calls “the trough of depression.” But as skeptics push back on battery EVs, another style of electrified car looks set to travel back up the slope of enlightenment. Plug-in hybrids are finding their second wind, as automakers and regulators look to PHEVs as a way to reduce transport-related carbon emissions.

Lincoln’s Corsair Grand Touring is not a particularly new PHEV, but since we hadn’t tested one yet and there was an example on the local press fleet, it seemed prudent to schedule a week with this compact crossover from one of America’s luxury brands.

The first thing to note is that, despite the way it might look in photos, this is not a huge land barge. The Corsair is 181.4 inches (4,608 mm) long, 76.4 inches (1,941 mm) wide, and 64.1 inches (1,628 mm) tall, so about the same size as a Toyota RAV4, or six inches shorter than a Tesla Model Y. The shape uses plenty of curved edges, dominated by the large Lincoln grille up front, with a hint of late-teens Audi SUV to it.

Under the hood you’ll find a 165 hp (123 kW) 2.5 L four-cylinder gasoline engine, which uses the more-efficient Atkinson cycle and drives the front wheels via a PowerSplit electric CVT transmission. (This uses a pair of electric motors and a single planetary gear set, with no clutches or torque converter or rubber belts.) The rear wheels are powered by a permanent magnet synchronous motor that generates 67 hp (50 kW) and 110 lb-ft (150 Nm). (Lincoln chose not to disclose a combined torque figure for the powertrain.)

It's a compact crossover, but not a particularly cheap one.

Enlarge / It’s a compact crossover, but not a particularly cheap one.

Jonathan Gitlin

The electric motor is powered by a 14.4 kWh lithium-ion traction battery, made up of 84 prismatic cells. Recharging times are 10–11 hours if you only have access to a 120 V socket, or between 3–4 hours with a 240 V level 2 charger. In practice, 3.5 hours on a level 2 charger was sufficient to give me a full battery. Should you wish, you can also set the Corsair Grand Touring to Preserve mode, which uses spare engine power to top up the battery, to about 75 percent state of charge. (Like most PHEVs, the Corsair Grand Tourer has a reserve that means even if it doesn’t have a sufficient state of charge to operate on electric power alone, the powertrain will still function as a hybrid, and the electric motor will still engage at low speeds and as a boost.)

When fully charged, the EPA rating gives the Corsair Grand Touring an electric-only range of 27 miles (43 km). But our time with the Corsair Grand Touring was scheduled for late December, and the cold weather at the time had other thoughts about that. After a full charge, the littlest Lincoln reported 23 miles of electric range, which dropped to 21 miles after a couple of blocks. Like BEVs, PHEV powertrains also suffer in terms of range when the temperatures approach freezing.

In fact, all vehicles suffer from worse economy in freezing temperatures, and the US Department of Energy points out that even hybrids can suffer up to 45 percent worse efficiency on short trips in cold weather. Gas mileage is rated at a combined 33 mpg (7.13 L/100 km), but here I actually saw as high as 38 mpg (6.19 L/100 km) on short trips even with a depleted battery. The cold weather also meant that the car would fire up the engine even when there was charge in the battery, presumably to help run the heater and also battery cooling—another common PHEV trait in winter.

The clamshell rear hatch is a Lincoln SUV design cue at this point.

Enlarge / The clamshell rear hatch is a Lincoln SUV design cue at this point.

Jonathan Gitlin

For most of the week, I used either Normal or Conserve drive modes—the latter is the eco setting with more gentle throttle response. There’s also Excite mode, which keeps the engine running and the battery cooled for better performance, plus there’s a sharper throttle response and more weight to the steering. But the Corsair Grand Touring still weighs 4,397 lbs (1,994 kg), 561 lbs (255 kg) more than the non-hybrid AWD Corsair, and driving it like a sports car didn’t seem in keeping with the Lincoln’s vibes.

On the road, the ride was smooth and well-controlled, although definitely on the softer side of things. Happily, there wasn’t excessive road noise from the tires or air flow around the car at highway speeds. Lincoln says its designers “obsessed over each detail to create a sanctuary for the senses,” and in that regard they did a pretty good job.

I also have to commend the interior design team—the mix of tan leather and aluminum trim work well together. Unfortunately, with just 12,000 miles on the odometer, our test car creaked and rattled more than any other car I’ve driven in the last few years. The culprit seemed to be the dashboard, or something behind it, which registered its protest over each bump or jolt that made it past the adaptive suspension.

  • Jonathan Gitlin

  • There’s up to 43.2 inches (1,097 mm) of rear leg room.

    Jonathan Gitlin

  • There’s 26.9 cubic feet (762 L) of cargo volume with the rear seats in use, or 56.2 cubic feet (1,591 L) with the rear seats folded down.

    Jonathan Gitlin

For a model that has been in production for some time, it’s not unreasonable to expect better quality, especially with a starting price of $53,925.

In fact, our test car tipped the scales at $65,390, largely due to the $8,675 Collection III package that added (among other features) Lincoln ActiveGlide, the brand’s name for parent company Ford’s BlueCruise hands-free driver assist. This works as well as BlueCruise in other recent Fords we’ve tested and only operates on premapped restricted-access highways, and the car’s UI does a good job of indicating which mode you’re in so there’s no confusion.

While I’m praising UI stuff, I’ll add the infotainment to the list—the interface and fonts are clear but also aesthetically pleasing and are in keeping with the  car’s vaguely art deco look and feel. Amazon Alexa is included as a voice assistant (with three years of free connectivity), but I imagine most drivers will just use Apple CarPlay or Android Auto.

Despite the cold weather and its deleterious effect on battery range, I finished my week with warm feelings toward the Corsair Grand Touring. It’s an example of a luxury car that doesn’t try to be a sports car as well, and I’ve already described how much I like the interior. But the amount of creaks and rattles in the cabin aren’t really acceptable for a car with just a year under its belt, and the sticker price is quite high, although the car is eligible for a $3,750 IRS clean vehicle tax credit.

Lincoln Corsair PHEV review: A luxury car shouldn’t squeak this much Read More »

2024-lincoln-nautilus-first-drive:-a-sea-change-for-lincoln’s-middle-child

2024 Lincoln Nautilus first drive: A sea change for Lincoln’s middle child

anyone seen captain nemo? —

The Nautilus might just be enough to finally get people into Lincoln dealerships.

A silver Lincoln Nautilus next to a sign that says Palm Springs

Enlarge / The Lincoln Nautilus is now in its fourth generation.

Lincoln

PALM SPRINGS, Calif.—Lincoln is one of those car companies that for years will give the impression that the people in charge are asleep at the proverbial wheel and then all of a sudden will debut a total knockout. It’s happened a few times throughout the brand’s long history, most recently with the fourth-generation Navigator. The introduction of the 2018 Navigator also sparked a huge overhaul in design and technology for the brand that catapulted it from “decent free rental car upgrade” to a maker of luxury SUVs that people might want to buy. The 2024 Lincoln Nautilus is just such an SUV.

In the hierarchy of Lincoln models, the Nautilus sits neatly between the Aviator and the smaller Corsair. It’s arguably one of the best looking of the current crop of Lincolns, and it’s positioned to compete with the likes of the Lexus RX, the Cadillac XT6 and Volvo’s XC60, among others. But does it actually compete? Or is it simply another car for the Enterprises and Hertzes of the world?

The 2024 Nautilus is available in two flavors: a purely internal combustion-powered version with a 250 hp (186 kW) turbocharged inline-four that also puts out 280 lb-ft (380 Nm) of torque and is paired with an eight-speed automatic transmission; and a much more interesting hybrid version, which offers up 310 combined hp (231 kW) that’s paired with a CVT transmission. The Nautilus is only available with all-wheel drive.

The hybrid is only $1,500 more, and you get more power and much better efficiency.

Enlarge / The hybrid is only $1,500 more, and you get more power and much better efficiency.

Lincoln

The hybrid variant is a traditional series hybrid, rather than a plug-in hybrid as we’ve seen on the Corsair. Honestly, the lack of a plug-in variant of the Nautilus is kind of a bummer because its character would suit the Nautilus so well, but like the middle-aged sad dad band sang at my wedding reception, you can’t always get what you want. Still, between the two variants, the hybrid is the one to get for a few reasons, and it’s only a $1,500 upcharge versus the gas-only model.

In addition to the power and torque increases offered by the hybrid system, the overall efficiency boost is welcome. The Nautilus Hybrid is good for an EPA-rated 30 mpg (7.84 L/100 km) city, 31 mpg (7.6 L/100 km) highway for a 30 mpg combined. The gasser only manages 21 mpg (11.2 L/100/ km) city, 29 mpg (8.1 L/100 km) highway, and 26 mpg (9 L/100 km) combined. The hybrid system is smooth and well-integrated, too, and I find that an ignorable hybrid drivetrain is a good hybrid drivetrain.

The HEV differentiates itself in other ways, too. Where the ICE model makes do with a non-adjustable suspension, the hybrid gets continuously adjustable dampers and, as a result, a very smooth and Lincoln-appropriate ride. Those dampers are able to be set into a handful of drive modes. These are labeled Normal, Conserve, Excite, Slippery, and Deep Conditions.

There is a noticeable difference between the settings both in the suspension and the accelerator calibration, but it’s not so dramatic that you wouldn’t, say, put it in “Deep Conditions” so you can make a Dune joke on Instagram based on the little animated digital desert planet that’s displayed on the screen and then forget to change it back afterward. Not that I know from experience or anything. Basically, the suspension is a bunch of levels of softness that go from newborn kitten fluff to Ikea couch pillow, so don’t expect corner-carving prowess even in the slightly misleading “Excite” mode.

The Nautilus’ power steering is electric and pretty light in all settings, and the braking system feels smooth and as strong as you’d want it to be when panic-stopping the 4,517-lb (2,049 kg) hybrid. Nothing feels like an afterthought here, apart from the borderline shocking levels of road noise transmitted through the Nautilus’ great big wheels and low-profile tires. The Black Label we tested was on 22-inch wheels and, while not a dealbreaker, the tires make a lot of noise. If I were buying one, I’d get it with the smallest wheels possible and hope that taller sidewalls restore some of the Nautilus’ potential for serenity.

2024 Lincoln Nautilus first drive: A sea change for Lincoln’s middle child Read More »

the-2025-porsche-panamera-perfectly-balances-luxury-ride-and-great-handling

The 2025 Porsche Panamera perfectly balances luxury ride and great handling

turbonite —

There’s clever new air suspension and a much bigger battery for the PHEV variant.

A white Porsche Panamera

Enlarge / BIgger air intakes, steeper headlights, and more pronounced fenders are the visual hallmarks of the 3rd-generation Porsche Panamera.

Jonathan Gitlin

SEVILLE, Spain—Once upon a time, Porsche just made two-door sports cars. Then the 21st century happened. People started to get fickle and demand things like practicality and comfort as well as good handling and soild engineering. Preferring to stay in business, Porsche recognized this market shift and since 2003 has bolstered its lineup, first with SUVs, then in 2009 with the Panamera sedan.

That sedan is now in its third generation, and late last year, we visited its factory in Leipzig to get a sneak preview of the prototype. Now, the new Panamera has gone into production, and we spent a day driving a pair of models on the road and track ahead of the car’s arrival in the US this summer.

Looks-wise, the third-gen Panamera closely resembles the outgoing model to the extent that it has the exact same exterior measurements: 198.8 inches (5,052 mm) long, 76.3 inches (1,937 mm) wide, and 56 inches (1,423 mm) tall. However, it will only be offered as a five-door hatchback—the Sport Turismo variant is no more, we’re told.

At the rear, the light clusters are more three-dimensional now.

Enlarge / At the rear, the light clusters are more three-dimensional now.

Jonathan Gitlin

The design looks a bit sharper than the older car’s, with more pronounced fenders over the wheel and steeply raked LED matrix headlights. At the back, the retractable rear wing is a split-piece affair that pops out and then extends above a certain speed threshold. Keen eyes will also see additional air ducts at the front to better cool the engine bay.

Powertrains

The Panamera was the first Porsche to sport a hybrid powertrain, ignoring, of course, the Lohner-Porsche Semper Vivus of 1899. In 2016, Porsche put a plug-in hybrid powertain into the Panamera for the first time, and it will eventually offer a total of four different PHEV powertrains for the 4th-gen car. It’s only offering one at launch, though, and it’s the Panamera Turbo E-Hybrid. You’ll know you’re looking at a Panamera Turbo because of the distinctive “Turbonite” colored badge and accents, and pedants will be pleased to know that this car does indeed feature forced induction.

In fact, the 4.0 L V8 uses a pair of turbochargers, now monoscroll, rather than the twin-scroll turbines in the old car. This allows the car to heat the catalytic converter more quickly and operate at higher exhaust gas temperatures. There’s no more cylinder deactivation; instead, Porsche’s engineers have used variable valve lift and opening to cope with different engine loads.

There’s an all-new 188-hp (140 kW), 332 lb-ft (450 Nm) electric motor for the PHEV powertrain, which now lives inside the eight-speed dual clutch PDK transmission (which powers all four wheels) rather than downstream of it. Total power and torque output is 670 hp (500 kW) and 685 lb-ft (935 Nm).

  • A cutaway illustration of the Panamera Turbo E-Hybrid’s powertrain.

    Porsche

  • A cutaway illustration of the Panamera plug-in hybrid battery pack.

    Porsche

  • A cutaway showing the internals of the Panamera Turbo Hybrid’s PDK transmission. Note the electric motor on the far left.

    Jonathan Gitlin

The electric motor is always coupled to the transmission, and it’s only when the car wants to add some internal combustion power that a decoupler closes and engages the V8 as well. Under braking, the electric motor can regenerate up to 88 kW before the friction brakes take over. Top speed is 87 mph (140 km/h) under electric power alone, or 190 mph (305 km/h) with the V8 also contributing.

There’s also a new high-voltage traction battery to go with the new electric motor. Porsche has upped the capacity to 25.9 kWh, which should translate to a meaningful increase in the distance one can drive on electric power alone. Porsche has yet to release official EPA fuel efficiency data, so we can’t be specific, but the European WLTP electric-only range is between 76 and 91 km, depending on drive mode, which is about a 75 percent improvement on the previous Panamera PHEV. Recharge times (from 0 to 100 percent) are as low as 2 hours and 39 minutes via the onboard 11 kW AC charger.

The other two powertrains at launch will be the rear-wheel drive Panamera and the all-wheel drive Panamera 4. Both use a 2.9 L twin-turbo V6 gasoline engine, which generates 349 hp (260 kW) and 368 lb-ft (500 Nm), a 10 percent increase in both stats over the outgoing V6 Panamera. Coupled with a new eight-speed PDK transmission, that saves a tenth of a second or two on the 0–60 time—between 4.8 and 5 seconds depending on whether you optioned the Sport Chrono package—and raises the top speed to 168 mph (270 km/h) for the Panamera and 169 mph (272 km/h) for the Panamera 4.

The 2025 Porsche Panamera perfectly balances luxury ride and great handling Read More »

we-drive-mini’s-first-electric-crossover,-the-2025-countryman-se-all4

We drive Mini’s first electric crossover, the 2025 Countryman SE ALL4

better than the JCW —

The Countryman SE goes on sale later in 2024, starting at $45,200.

A blue-grey mini countryman SE

Enlarge / Mini has made a fully electric version of its Countryman compact crossover, replacing the outgoing plug-in hybrid Countryman.

Jonathan Gitlin

Over the last couple of weeks, we’ve brought you test drives of a pair of related small cars, the 2024 BMW X2 M35i and the 2025 Mini JCW Countryman. Today it’s time for the third member of the family destined for US sales, and the one that we think Ars readers will be most interested in—the fully electric Mini Countryman SE ALL4.

This is the third-generation Mini Countryman, replacing the plug-in hybrid version we last tested in 2017. It’s a little larger now, although not by much: at 174.5 inches (4,433 mm) long, 72.6 inches (1,843 mm) wide, and 65.2 inches (1,656 mm) tall, it is still a pretty small car by most standards. It’s also a pretty aero-efficient one; the drag coefficient is just 0.26.

As the ALL4 name might suggest, this is an all-wheel drive electric vehicle, with a combined 313 hp (230 kW) and 365 lb-ft (494 Nm), fed by a 66.5 kWh lithium-ion traction battery. That makes it nearly as peppy off the line as a Ferrari Testarossa, capable of reaching 62 mph (100 km/h) from a standing start in 5.6 seconds. (The Ferrari took 5.2 seconds to reach 60 mph.) Top speed is limited to 112 mph (180 km/h).

  • The Countryman SE ALL4 should have a range of just under 250 miles.

    Jonathan Gitlin

  • It really is still quite small

    Mini

  • Mini has ditched the union flag taillights.

    Jonathan Gitlin

  • The ride is noticeably better than the gasoline version we drove.

    Mini

  • Although it’s big for a Mini, it was the perfect size for small Portuguese villages.

    Mini

Although Mini doesn’t have an official EPA range estimate yet, it thinks the Mini Countryman SE ALL4 should be able to travel about 245 miles (394 km). There’s an onboard AC charger capable of rates up to 22 kW, although you’ll probably only encounter such powerful level 2 chargers in Europe, where they can take advantage of three-phase electricity. DC fast charging tops out at 130 kW, which should take the battery from 10–80 percent state of charge in 30 minutes.

The styling is virtually identical to the JCW Countryman we wrote about a couple of weeks ago. The differences are subtle—a filled-in grille, no quad exhaust pipes (for this is a Mini, not a Dodge), and bronzish-goldish accents here and there. The 20-inch alloy wheels are made from 70 percent recycled aluminum, Mini told us.

The interior uses a different mix of materials than the JCW Countryman, but it has the same layout and the same pluses and minuses. The interior makes heavy use of recycled polyester, which Mini says significantly reduces the carbon emissions of its supply chain and also uses less water than cotton.

There’s the same bright, circular OLED infotainment display with the same user interface that is again hobbled by what feels like an underpowered graphics chip. There are still a smattering of physical controls, and I still think the cubby between the driver and passenger seats could be larger.

On the road, the Mini Countryman SE ALL4 feels noticeably different to drive than the gasoline-powered JCW version. Some of that is down to the steering, which is geared differently to the JCW car and feels slightly less direct. The suspension also contributes to the SE ALL4 feeling different, as it’s better damped against bumps and jolts—no doubt as a result of having to control a heavier car thanks to the battery pack. (Mini has not given us a curb weight for either JCW or SE ALL4, however.)

  • The interior is stylish and tactile.

    Jonathan Gitlin

  • The augmented reality view for navigation is very useful on unfamiliar roads.

    Jonathan Gitlin

  • Spike is rather cute.

    Jonathan Gitlin

  • This cubby is too small to be very useful.

    Mini

  • Recycled aluminum for the alloy wheels helps Mini keep the Countryman SE’s carbon footprint as small as possible.

    Jonathan Gitlin

Perhaps my highlight of the Countryman SE ALL4 was the synthetic driving sounds it makes in the cabin, which are rather over the top. I’m also quite aware many of our readers will dislike this aural exuberance and will be glad to know that it can be turned off.

Mini says the 2025 Countryman SE ALL4 will be available in the US this fall, starting at $45,200.

We drive Mini’s first electric crossover, the 2025 Countryman SE ALL4 Read More »

2024-porsche-911-s/t-review:-threading-the-needle

2024 Porsche 911 S/T review: Threading the needle

yet another 911 review —

The S/T celebrates the 60th anniversary of the 911 and is limited to just 1963 examples.

A porsche 911 S/T

Enlarge / I wouldn’t blame you if you lost track of all the different variations on the Porsche 911. This is the latest, and currently, the most desirable.

Bradley Iger

Although Porsche is in the midst of taking its BEV technology mainstream, the company hasn’t lost sight of the fact that its high-performance reputation was built on the 911.

Over the past few years, the automaker has developed a myriad of different versions of the iconic sports car, resulting in offerings that currently range from plush open-top cruisers to hardcore track monsters, along with special edition models like the off-road-tuned Dakar and heritage-inspired Sport Classic. You might be wondering, then, if there’s really an opportunity for a new performance-focused model to stand out in the 911 lineup.

On the surface, the S/T seems to tread much of the same ground already occupied by the GT3 Touring, an iteration of the track-ready GT3 that ditches the large fixed rear wing for the smaller, aesthetically subtler active rear spoiler found on Carrera models. But as lovely to drive as the GT3 Touring is, it feels like a conceptual afterthought.

Because of its reduced downforce, Porsche has always considered the Touring to be a GT3 intended for the street rather than the track, yet the model’s tuning has otherwise remained unchanged from the standard GT3. This, along with a number of other crucial updates, allows the S/T to stand out from the crowd not just among fast 911s but among sports cars in general.

The canyon roads around Los Angeles are natural hunting territory for the S/T.

Enlarge / The canyon roads around Los Angeles are natural hunting territory for the S/T.

Bradley Iger

The name is a nod to a racing version of the 911 S from the late 1960s: Internally known as the ST, the package included modifications to the chassis, engine, and body to improve performance. But unlike the iconic Carrera RS 2.7 that would debut a few years down the road, the ST lacked the aggressive aerodynamic elements that would later come to define the look of track-tuned 911s.

The core hardware involved is an interesting amalgamation of components from the current GT division lineup. In a purposely old-school approach not unlike the Sport Classic, the S/T pairs the GT3 RS’s naturally aspirated 518 hp (386 kW) 4.0-liter flat-six engine with the GT3’s six-speed manual gearbox—a combination that can’t be had in any other factory-produced 911.

Like the GT3 RS, the S/T’s hood, front fenders, doors, and roof are made from carbon fiber, and thanks to its magnesium wheels, fixed-back carbon bucket seats, and other weight-reducing components that are equipped as standard, it manages to tip the scales at a svelte 3,056 lbs (1,390 kg), making this the lightest 911 of the current generation.

No ducktail for the S/T. But there is plenty of lightweighting.

Enlarge / No ducktail for the S/T. But there is plenty of lightweighting.

Bradley Iger

Adding power and cutting weight are certainly welcome developments for performance enthusiasts, but it’s the raft of subtle, less quantifiable changes that make the S/T such an incredibly compelling sports car. Porsche’s goal was to create the ultimate canyon carver rather than an apex-hunting track machine, and as such, it has tossed the GT3’s rear axle steering system and retuned the suspension dampers for the less-than-perfect tarmac that’s typical of twisty backroads.

To further ratchet up driver engagement, engineers reduced the height of the shift lever by 10 mm, resulting in even shorter, more precise throws. The transmission’s gear ratios were shortened by 8 percent to allow the engine to climb to its searing 9,000 rpm redline more rapidly, resulting in more frequent shifting. There’s a new lightweight clutch and single mass flywheel on board, too.

The latter plays a surprisingly big role in the S/T’s distinctive character, allowing the engine to sweep through the revs with a level of manic urgency that makes the GT3 Touring seem almost lazy by comparison. And thanks to the S/T’s reduced sound deadening compared to the GT3 (which already has significantly less sound deadening than a 911 Carrera), every mechanical process that normally takes place behind the scenes is brought to the forefront. It can equate to noisy steady-state driving at times, but the soundtrack that the S/T delivers when you’re rowing through the gears easily makes up for it.

2024 Porsche 911 S/T review: Threading the needle Read More »

smallish-car,-biggish-price—we-try-out-the-2024-bmw-x2-m35i

Smallish car, biggish price—we try out the 2024 BMW X2 M35i

bring us the ev —

We drive the new Sports Activity Coupe, but there’s no EV version for the US market.

A green BMW X2 parked next to the sea

Enlarge / BMW calls the X2 a Sport Activity Coupe.

Jonathan Gitlin

Last week, we told you about our first drive in the new Mini Countryman John Cooper Works, Mini’s new little crossover. This week, it’s the turn of a related model, built on the same vehicle architecture: BMW’s new X2 crossover, or “Sports Activity Coupe” in BMW-speak. As we’ll find out, the BMW shares more than one trait with the Countryman JCW.

BMW had an array of X2 M35is, all painted the same “Frozen Tampa Bay” shade of green, which starts in the US at $51,400. There’s a less-powerful $42,000 X2 xDrive28i coming here as well, but North American customers will not be offered the battery-electric iX2—BMW’s product planners evidently didn’t think importing the diminutive EV would be profitable. Outside the US, BMW expects 1 in 5 X2s to be electric.

The first-generation X2 (and the more upright-looking X1) were divisive cars even by BMW standards. The new one is slightly bigger than before, at 179.3 inches (4,554 mm) long, 72.6 inches (1,844 mm) wide, and 62.6 inches (1,590 mm) tall. That translates to more rear legroom and more cargo volume at the back, but it’s not a massive machine—a touch bigger than the Audi Q3 but a bit smaller than a Mercedes-Benz GLB.

Each of those exhaust pipes is almost 4 inches wide, yet all the sound is synthesized by speakers in the cabin.

Enlarge / Each of those exhaust pipes is almost 4 inches wide, yet all the sound is synthesized by speakers in the cabin.

Jonathan Gitlin

It’s not the most elegant car to emerge from BMW’s design studio in recent years, although the styling tweaks for the M35i version—a different front splitter, quad exhaust pipes, an M-specific rear spoiler, and an illuminated kidney grille—are visually rather bold. The three-dimensional light cluster details are rather interesting.

The X2 M35i is powered by a turbocharged 2.0 L four-cylinder gasoline engine that generates 312 hp (233 kW) and 295 lb-ft (400 Nm), sufficient to propel it to 60 mph (98 km/h) in 5.2 seconds via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission that sends power to all four wheels.

BMW says it has heavily revised the suspension of the new X2, which shares a similar layout to the old model but with very little parts carryover. On the road, the main thing you notice is that the ride is quite firm, with a lot of lateral jostling at low speeds over bumps or potholes despite adaptive dampers as standard.

It’s also not particularly engaging to drive on a twisty road, with little feel communicated through the fat-rimmed steering wheel. The gearbox’s control logic was good enough not to need to bother with shifting manually via the paddles, but a long pull on the left paddle engages an overboost function for a short time.

The taillights (and headlights) have a rather interesting 3D design.

Enlarge / The taillights (and headlights) have a rather interesting 3D design.

BMW

As with the Mini Countryman JCW, the noises that accompany spirited driving are quite artificial in nature, being played to the occupants via the car’s internal speakers. This keeps noise levels low for bystanders, and while many of my colleagues found the sounds too contrived for their tastes, I actually quite liked the pops and crackles.

While the car wasn’t that thrilling to drive, I was impressed with how well it coped during a violent rainstorm. It handled puddles of standing water without a hint of hydroplaning, although a rear windshield wiper would be a welcome addition.

The cabin design is a little fussy, and there’s a big blind spot from the driver’s side A pillar that mars otherwise good forward visibility. The rear windshield is a little small, on the other hand. And on the topic of complaints, the cubby built into the armrest between the front seats is too weirdly shaped to be able to accommodate a smartphone—I’m not sure what you’re supposed to be able to store there other than pens, pencils, and maybe short rulers.

  • There are some design touches and details that you’ll also recognize in larger BMWs, like the M steering wheel or the intricately cut speaker fascias.

    Jonathan Gitlin

  • The rear seat is less cramped than the outgoing model.

    Jonathan Gitlin

  • There is between 25.3–51.7 cubic feet (716–1,464 L) of cargo room.

    BMW

  • BMW’s X2 does away with the rotary iDrive controller, so you can only interact with the infotainment via voice or touchscreen.

    BMW

The X2 uses BMW’s latest operating system 9, like the bigger and more expensive cars in the lineup. I’m normally a big fan of the latest version of iDrive, which offers excellent voice recognition and a UI that mostly helps the driver out. But like the Mini Countryman, in the X2 it feels as if the infotainment system is underpowered.

However, I did finally check out BMW’s in-car gaming, which also appeared in the BMW i5 we tested last year. It’s called AirConsole, and you use your phone as a controller, pairing it to the system via a QR code. There’s a Mario Kart clone that’s passable, and my drive partner and I tried a trivia game, too.

While I’m talking tech, I should also praise the augmented view for the navigation system, which overlays big arrows onto a video feed to show you exactly which turn it wants you to take. The My BMW App integration is also rather well implemented—you can use an Android or iOS phone as a digital key for the car, as well as remotely lock and unlock the doors or the cargo hatch.

If all of that sounds compelling, you should already be able to find the X2 M35i in stock at BMW dealerships.

Smallish car, biggish price—we try out the 2024 BMW X2 M35i Read More »