Author name: Rejus Almole

youtube’s-likeness-detection-has-arrived-to-help-stop-ai-doppelgangers

YouTube’s likeness detection has arrived to help stop AI doppelgängers

AI content has proliferated across the Internet over the past few years, but those early confabulations with mutated hands have evolved into synthetic images and videos that can be hard to differentiate from reality. Having helped to create this problem, Google has some responsibility to keep AI video in check on YouTube. To that end, the company has started rolling out its promised likeness detection system for creators.

Google’s powerful and freely available AI models have helped fuel the rise of AI content, some of which is aimed at spreading misinformation and harassing individuals. Creators and influencers fear their brands could be tainted by a flood of AI videos that show them saying and doing things that never happened—even lawmakers are fretting about this. Google has placed a large bet on the value of AI content, so banning AI from YouTube, as many want, simply isn’t happening.

Earlier this year, YouTube promised tools that would flag face-stealing AI content on the platform. The likeness detection tool, which is similar to the site’s copyright detection system, has now expanded beyond the initial small group of testers. YouTube says the first batch of eligible creators have been notified that they can use likeness detection, but interested parties will need to hand Google even more personal information to get protection from AI fakes.

Sneak Peek: Likeness Detection on YouTube.

Currently, likeness detection is a beta feature in limited testing, so not all creators will see it as an option in YouTube Studio. When it does appear, it will be tucked into the existing “Content detection” menu. In YouTube’s demo video, the setup flow appears to assume the channel has only a single host whose likeness needs protection. That person must verify their identity, which requires a photo of a government ID and a video of their face. It’s unclear why YouTube needs this data in addition to the videos people have already posted with their oh-so stealable faces, but rules are rules.

YouTube’s likeness detection has arrived to help stop AI doppelgängers Read More »

satellite-operators-will-soon-join-airlines-in-using-starlink-in-flight-wi-fi

Satellite operators will soon join airlines in using Starlink in-flight Wi-Fi

So long, data limits

Lasers have other benefits over ground stations. Optical links offer significantly more throughput than traditional radio communication systems, and they’re not constrained by regulations on radio spectrum usage.

“What it does for our customers and for the company is we are able to get more than 10x, maybe even 50x, the amount of data that they’re able to bring down, and we’re able to offer them that on a latency of nearly instant,” Stang said in an interview with Ars.

SpaceX’s mini-lasers are designed to achieve link speeds of 25Gbps at distances up to 2,500 miles (4,000 kilometers). These speeds will “open new business models” for satellite operators who can now rely on the same “Internet speed and responsiveness as cloud providers and telecom networks on the ground,” Muon said in a statement.

Muon’s platform, called Halo, comes in different sizes, with satellites ranging up to a half-ton. “With persistent optical broadband, Muon Halo satellites will move from being isolated vehicles to becoming active, realtime nodes on Starlink’s global network,” Stang said in a press release. “That shift transforms how missions are designed and how fast insights flow to decisionmakers on Earth.”

Muon said the first laser-equipped satellite will launch in early 2027 for an undisclosed customer.

“We like to believe part of why SpaceX trusts us to be the ones to be able to lead on this is because our system is designed to really deal with very different levels of requirements,” Smirin said. “As far as we’re aware, this is the first integration into a satellite. We have a ton of interest from commercial customers for our capabilities in general, and we expect this should just boost that quite significantly.”

FireSat is one of the missions where Starlink connectivity would have an impact by rapidly informing first responders of a wildfire, Smirin said. According to Muon, using satellite laser links would cut FireSat data latency from an average of 20 minutes to near real-time.

“It’s not just for the initial detection,” Smirin said. “It’s also once a fire is ongoing, [cutting] the time and the latency for seeing the intensity and direction of the fire, and being able to update that in near real-time. It has incredible value to incident commanders on the ground, because they’re trying to figure out a way to position their equipment and their people.”

Thinking big

Ubiquitous connectivity in space could eventually lead to new types of missions. “Now, you’ve got a data center in space,” Smirin said. “You can do AI there. You can connect with data centers on the ground.”

While this first agreement between Muon and SpaceX covers commercial data relay, it’s easy to imagine other applications, such as continuous live drone-like high-resolution streaming video from space for surveillance or weather monitoring. Live video from space has historically been limited to human spaceflight missions or rocket-mounted cameras that operate for a short time.

One example of that is the dazzling live video beamed back to Earth, through Starlink, from SpaceX’s Starship rockets. The laser terminals on Starship operate through the extreme heat of reentry, returning streaming video as plasma envelops the vehicle. This environment routinely causes radio blackouts for other spacecraft as they reenter the atmosphere. With optical links, that’s no longer a problem.

“This starts to enable a whole new category of capabilities, much the same way as when terrestrial computers went from dial-up to broadband,” Smirin said. “You knew what it could do, but we blew through bulletin boards very quickly to many different applications.”

Satellite operators will soon join airlines in using Starlink in-flight Wi-Fi Read More »

should-an-ai-copy-of-you-help-decide-if-you-live-or-die?

Should an AI copy of you help decide if you live or die?

“It would combine demographic and clinical variables, documented advance-care-planning data, patient-recorded values and goals, and contextual information about specific decisions,” he said.

“Including textual and conversational data could further increase a model’s ability to learn why preferences arise and change, not just what a patient’s preference was at a single point in time,” Starke said.

Ahmad suggested that future research could focus on validating fairness frameworks in clinical trials, evaluating moral trade-offs through simulations, and exploring how cross-cultural bioethics can be combined with AI designs.

Only then might AI surrogates be ready to be deployed, but only as “decision aids,” Ahmad wrote. Any “contested outputs” should automatically “trigger [an] ethics review,” Ahmad wrote, concluding that “the fairest AI surrogate is one that invites conversation, admits doubt, and leaves room for care.”

“AI will not absolve us”

Ahmad is hoping to test his conceptual models at various UW sites over the next five years, which would offer “some way to quantify how good this technology is,” he said.

“After that, I think there’s a collective decision regarding how as a society we decide to integrate or not integrate something like this,” Ahmad said.

In his paper, he warned against chatbot AI surrogates that could be interpreted as a simulation of the patient, predicting that future models may even speak in patients’ voices and suggesting that the “comfort and familiarity” of such tools might blur “the boundary between assistance and emotional manipulation.”

Starke agreed that more research and “richer conversations” between patients and doctors are needed.

“We should be cautious not to apply AI indiscriminately as a solution in search of a problem,” Starke said. “AI will not absolve us from making difficult ethical decisions, especially decisions concerning life and death.”

Truog, the bioethics expert, told Ars he “could imagine that AI could” one day “provide a surrogate decision maker with some interesting information, and it would be helpful.”

But a “problem with all of these pathways… is that they frame the decision of whether to perform CPR as a binary choice, regardless of context or the circumstances of the cardiac arrest,” Truog’s editorial said. “In the real world, the answer to the question of whether the patient would want to have CPR” when they’ve lost consciousness, “in almost all cases,” is “it depends.”

When Truog thinks about the kinds of situations he could end up in, he knows he wouldn’t just be considering his own values, health, and quality of life. His choice “might depend on what my children thought” or “what the financial consequences would be on the details of what my prognosis would be,” he told Ars.

“I would want my wife or another person that knew me well to be making those decisions,” Truog said. “I wouldn’t want somebody to say, ‘Well, here’s what AI told us about it.’”

Should an AI copy of you help decide if you live or die? Read More »

apple-pays-$750-million-for-us-formula-1-streaming-coverage

Apple pays $750 million for US Formula 1 streaming coverage

The United States Grand Prix takes place this weekend at the Circuit of the Americas in Texas, and this morning, Formula 1 used the occasion to announce a new broadcast deal for the sport in the US. Starting next year, F1 will no longer be broadcast on ESPN—it’s moving to Apple TV in a five-year, $750 million deal.

Apple boss Tim Cook has been seen at F1 races in the past, and earlier this year, Apple released F1: The Movie, starring Brad Pitt as a 50-something racing driver who improbably gets a second bite at the cherry 30 years after a brutal crash seemingly ended his F1 career.

But securing the rights to the sport itself means Apple has snagged a very fast-growing series, with races almost every other week—currently, the sport has expanded to 24 races a year.

“We are no strangers to each other, having spent the past three years working together to create F1: The Movie, which has already proven to be a huge hit around the world. We have a shared vision to bring this amazing sport to our fans in the US and entice new fans through live broadcasts, engaging content, and a year-round approach to keep them hooked,” said Stefano Domenicali, F1 president and CEO.

Apple says Apple TV subscribers will be able to watch every practice and qualifying session, as well as all the sprint races and grands prix. And “select races and all practice sessions will also be available for free in the Apple TV app throughout the course of the season,” the company said.

Apple pays $750 million for US Formula 1 streaming coverage Read More »

ai-powered-features-begin-creeping-deeper-into-the-bedrock-of-windows-11

AI-powered features begin creeping deeper into the bedrock of Windows 11


everything old is new again

Copilot expands with an emphasis on creating and editing files, voice input.

Microsoft is hoping that Copilot will succeed as a voice-driven assistant where Cortana failed. Credit: Microsoft

Microsoft is hoping that Copilot will succeed as a voice-driven assistant where Cortana failed. Credit: Microsoft

Like virtually every major Windows announcement in the last three years, the spate of features that Microsoft announced for the operating system today all revolve around generative AI. In particular, they’re concerned with the company’s more recent preoccupation with “agentic” AI, an industry buzzword for “telling AI-powered software to perform a task, which it then does in the background while you move on to other things.”

But the overarching impression I got, both from reading the announcement and sitting through a press briefing earlier this month, is that Microsoft is using language models and other generative AI technologies to try again with Cortana, Microsoft’s failed and discontinued entry in the voice assistant wars of the 2010s.

According to Microsoft’s Consumer Chief Marketing Officer Yusuf Mehdi, “AI PCs” should be able to recognize input “naturally, in text or voice,” to be able to guide users based on what’s on their screens at any given moment, and that AI assistants “should be able to take action on your behalf.”

The biggest of today’s announcements is the introduction of a new “Hey, Copilot” activation phrase for Windows 11 PCs, which once enabled allows users to summon the chatbot using only their voice rather than a mouse or keyboard (if you do want to use the keyboard, either the Copilot key or the same Windows + C keyboard shortcut that used to bring up Cortana will also summon Copilot). Saying “goodbye” will dismiss Copilot when you’re done working with it.

Macs and most smartphones have sported similar functionality for a while now, but Microsoft is obviously hoping that having Copilot answer those questions instead of Cortana will lead to success rather than another failure.

The key limitation of the original Cortana—plus Siri, Alexa, and the rest of their ilk—is that it could only really do a relatively limited and pre-determined list of actions. Complex queries, or anything the assistants don’t understand, often gets bounced to a general web search. The results of that search may or may not accomplish what you wanted, but it does ultimately shift the onus back on the user to find and follow those directions.

To make Copilot more useful, Microsoft has also announced that Copilot Vision is being rolled out worldwide “in all markets where Copilot is offered” (it’s been available in the US since mid-June). Copilot Vision will read the contents of a screen or an app window and can attempt to offer useful guidance or feedback, like walking you through an obscure task in Excel or making suggestions based on a group of photos or a list of items. (Microsoft additionally announced a beta for Gaming Copilot, a sort of offshoot of Copilot Vision intended specifically for walkthroughs and advice for whatever game you happen to be playing.)

Beyond these tweaks or wider rollouts for existing features, Microsoft is also testing a few new AI and Copilot-related additions that aim to fundamentally change how users interact with their Windows PCs by reading and editing files.

All of the features Microsoft is announcing today are intended for all Windows 11 PCs, not just those that meet the stricter hardware requirements of the Copilot+ PC label. That gives them a much wider potential reach than things like Recall or Click to Do, and it makes knowing what these features do and how they safeguard security and privacy that much more important.

AI features work their way into the heart of Windows

Microsoft wants general-purpose AI agents to be able to create and modify files for you, among other things, working in the background while you move on to other tasks. Credit: Microsoft

Whether you’re talking about the Copilot app, the generative AI features added to apps like Notepad and Paint, or the data-scraping Windows Recall feature, most of the AI additions to Windows in the last few years have been app-specific, or cordoned off in some way from core Windows features like the taskbar and File Explorer.

But AI features are increasingly working their way into bedrock Windows features like the taskbar and Start menu, and being given capabilities that allow them to analyze or edit files or even perform file management tasks.

The standard Search field that has been part of Windows 10 and Windows 11 for the last decade, for example, is being transformed into an “Ask Copilot” field; this feature will still be able to look through local files just like the current version of the Search box, but Microsoft also envisions it as a keyboard-driven interface for Copilot for the times when you can’t or don’t want to use your voice. (We don’t know whether the “old” search functionality lives on in the Start menu or as an optional fallback for people who disable Copilot, at least not yet.)

A feature called Copilot Actions will also expand the number of ways that Copilot can interact with local files on your PC. Microsoft cites “sorting through recent vacation photos” and extracting information from PDFs and other documents as two possible use cases, and that this early preview version will focus on “a narrow set of use cases.” But it’s meant to be “a general-purpose agent” capable of “interacting with desktop and web applications.” This gives it a lot of latitude to augment or replace basic keyboard-and-mouse input for some interactions.

Screenshots of a Windows 11 testing build showed Copilot taking over the area of the taskbar that is currently reserved for the Search field. Credit: Microsoft

Finally, Microsoft is taking another stab at allowing Copilot to change the settings on your PC, something that earlier versions were able to do but were removed in a subsequent iteration. Copilot will attempt to respond to plain-language questions about your PC settings with a link to the appropriate part of Windows’ large, labyrinthine Settings app.

These new features dovetail with others Microsoft has been testing for a few weeks or months now. Copilot Connectors, rolled out to Windows Insiders earlier this month, can give Copilot access to email and file-sharing services like Gmail and Dropbox. New document creation features allow Copilot to export the contents of a Copilot chat into a Word or PDF document, Excel spreadsheet, or PowerPoint deck for more refinement and editing. And AI actions in the File Explorer appear in Windows’ right-click menu and allow for the direct manipulation of files, including batch-editing images and summarizing documents. Together with the Copilot Vision features that enable Copilot to see the full contents of Office documents rather than just the on-screen portions, all of these features inject AI into more basic everyday tasks, rather than cordoning them off in individual apps.

Per usual, we don’t know exactly when any of these new features will roll out to the general public, and some may never be available outside of the Windows Insider program. None of them are currently baked into the Windows 11 25H2 update, at least not the version that the company is currently distributing through its Release Preview channel.

Learning the lessons of Recall

Microsoft at least seems to have learned lessons from the botched rollout of Windows Recall last year.

If you didn’t follow along: Microsoft’s initial plan had been to roll out Recall with the first wave of Copilot+ PCs, but without sending it through the Windows Insider Preview program first. This program normally gives power users, developers, security researchers, and others the opportunity to kick the tires on upcoming Windows features before they’re launched, giving Microsoft feedback on bugs, security holes, or other flaws before rolling them out to all Windows PCs.

But security researchers who did manage to get their hands on the early, nearly launched version of Recall discovered a deeply flawed feature that preserved too much personal information and was trivially easy to exploit—a plain-text file with OCR text from all of a user’s PC usage could be grabbed by pretty much anybody with access to the PC, either in-person or remote. It was also enabled by default on PCs that supported it, forcing users to manually opt out if they didn’t want to use it.

In the end, Microsoft pulled that version of Recall, took nearly a year to overhaul its security architecture, and spent months letting the feature make its way through the Windows Insider Preview channels before finally rolling it out to Copilot+ PCs. The resulting product still presents some risks to user privacy, as does any feature that promises to screenshot and store months of history about how you use your PC, but it’s substantially more refined, the most egregious security holes have been closed, and it’s off by default.

Copilot Actions are, at least for now, also disabled by default. And Microsoft Corporate Vice President of Windows Security Dana Huang put up a lengthy accompanying post explaining several of the steps Microsoft has taken to protect user privacy and security when using Copilot Actions. These include running AI agents with their own dedicated user accounts to reduce their access to data in your user folder; mandatory code-signing; and giving agents the fewest privileges they need to do their jobs. All of the agents’ activities will also be documented, so users can verify what actions have been taken and correct any errors.

Whether these security and privacy promises are good enough is an open question, but unlike the initial version of Recall, all of these new features will be sent out through the Windows Insider channels for testing first. If there are serious flaws, they’ll be out in public early on, rather than dropped on users unawares.

Photo of Andrew Cunningham

Andrew is a Senior Technology Reporter at Ars Technica, with a focus on consumer tech including computer hardware and in-depth reviews of operating systems like Windows and macOS. Andrew lives in Philadelphia and co-hosts a weekly book podcast called Overdue.

AI-powered features begin creeping deeper into the bedrock of Windows 11 Read More »

sony-tells-scotus-that-people-accused-of-piracy-aren’t-“innocent-grandmothers”

Sony tells SCOTUS that people accused of piracy aren’t “innocent grandmothers”

Record labels Sony, Warner, and Universal yesterday asked the Supreme Court to help it boot pirates off the Internet.

Sony and the other labels filed their brief in Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, a case involving the cable Internet service provider that rebuffed labels’ demands for mass terminations of broadband subscribers accused of repeat copyright infringement. The Supreme Court’s eventual decision in the case may determine whether Internet service providers must terminate the accounts of alleged pirates in order to avoid massive financial liability.

Cox has argued that copyright-infringement notices—which are generated by bots and flag users based on their IP addresses—sent by record labels are unreliable. Cox said ISPs can’t verify whether the notices are accurate and that terminating an account would punish every user in a household where only one person may have illegally downloaded copyrighted files.

Record labels urged the Supreme Court to reject this argument.

“While Cox waxes poetic about the centrality of Internet access to modern life, it neglects to mention that it had no qualms about terminating 619,711 subscribers for nonpayment over the same period that it terminated just 32 for serial copyright abuse,” the labels’ brief said. “And while Cox stokes fears of innocent grandmothers and hospitals being tossed off the Internet for someone else’s infringement, Cox put on zero evidence that any subscriber here fit that bill. By its own admission, the subscribers here were ‘habitual offenders’ Cox chose to retain because, unlike the vast multitude cut off for late payment, they contributed to Cox’s bottom line.”

Record labels were referring to a portion of Cox’s brief that said, “Grandma will be thrown off the Internet because Junior illegally downloaded a few songs on a visit.”

Too much torrenting, record labels say

The record labels’ brief complained about torrents providing Internet users with easy access to pirated material:

Today, most infringement occurs on peer-to-peer file-sharing protocols like BitTorrent, which enable viral uploading and downloading of pirated music faster than ever, leaving behind no fingerprints beyond a ten-digit IP address that only an ISP can tie to the user. Unlike earlier methods of infringement—e.g., bootleg CD manufacturers—peer-to-peer file-sharing protocols lack a central hub that law enforcement can shutter. And unlike earlier methods, peer-to-peer protocols are not constrained by the need to create physical copies; BitTorrent enables tens of thousands of people to trade pirated music simultaneously.

Record labels said that Cox used a “13-strike policy” that let subscribers repeatedly download pirated material before facing any consequences. The case is based on “claims to works infringed by subscribers who generated at least three infringement notices across 2013 and 2014, for a total of 10,017 copyrighted works,” the brief said.

Sony tells SCOTUS that people accused of piracy aren’t “innocent grandmothers” Read More »

open-source-gzdoom-community-splinters-after-creator-inserts-ai-generated-code

Open source GZDoom community splinters after creator inserts AI-generated code

That comment led to a lengthy discussion among developers about the use of “stolen scraped code that we have no way of verifying is compatible with the GPL,” as one described it. And while Zahl eventually removed the offending code, he also allegedly tried to remove the evidence that it ever existed by force-pushing an update to delete the discussion entirely.

// This is what ChatGPT told me for detecting dark mode on Linux.

Graf Zahl code comment

Zahl defended the use of AI-generated snippets for “boilerplate code” that isn’t key to underlying game features. “I surely have my reservations about using AI for project specific code,” he wrote, “but this here is just superficial checks of system configuration settings that can be found on various websites—just with 10x the effort required.”

But others in the community were adamant that there’s no place for AI tools in the workflow of an open source project like this. “If using code slop generated from ChatGPT or any other GenAI/AI chatbots is the future of this project, I’m sorry to say but I’m out,” GitHub user Cacodemon345 wrote, summarizing the feelings of many other developers.

A fork in the road

In a GitHub bug report posted Tuesday, user the-phinet laid out the disagreements over AI-generated code alongside other alleged issues with Zahl’s top-down approach to pushing out GZDoom updates. In response, Zahl invited the development community to “feel free to fork the project” if they were so displeased.

Plenty of GZDoom developers quickly took that somewhat petulant response seriously. “You have just completely bricked GZDoom with this bullshit,” developer Boondorl wrote. “Enjoy your dead project, I’m sure you’ll be happy to plink away at it all by yourself where people can finally stop yelling at you to do things.”

Open source GZDoom community splinters after creator inserts AI-generated code Read More »

rice-weevil-on-a-grain-of-rice-wins-2025-nikon-small-world-contest

Rice weevil on a grain of rice wins 2025 Nikon Small World contest

A stunning image of a rice weevil on a single grain of rice has won the 2025 Nikon Small World photomicrography contest, yielding valuable insight into the structure and behavior of—and providing a fresh perspective on—this well-known agricultural pest. The image was taken by Zhang You of Yunnan, China. Another of You’s photographs placed 15th in this year’s contest.

“It pays to dive deep into entomology: understanding insects’ behaviors and mastering lighting,” You said in a statement. “A standout work blends artistry with scientific rigor, capturing the very essence, energy, and spirit of these creatures.”

There was an element of luck in creating his winning image, too. “I had observed rice weevils in grains before, but never one with its wings spread,” You said. “This one was naturally preserved on a windowsill, perhaps in a final attempt to escape. Its tiny size makes manually preparing spread-wing specimens extremely difficult, so encountering it was both serendipitous and inspiring.”

Nikon’s annual contest was founded in 1974 “to showcase the beauty and complexity of things seen through the light microscope.” Photomicrography involves attaching a camera to a microscope (either an optical microscope or an electron microscope) so that the user can take photographs of objects at very high resolutions. British physiologist Richard Hill Norris was one of the first to use it for his studies of blood cells in 1850, and the method has increasingly been highlighted as art since the 1970s. There have been many groundbreaking technological advances in the ensuing decades, particularly with the advent of digital imaging methods.

Rice weevil on a grain of rice wins 2025 Nikon Small World contest Read More »

once-unthinkable,-nasa-and-lockheed-now-consider-launching-orion-on-other-rockets

Once unthinkable, NASA and Lockheed now consider launching Orion on other rockets


“We’re trying to crawl, then walk, then run into our reuse strategy.”

The Orion spacecraft for the Artemis II mission, seen here with its solar arrays installed for flight, just prior to their enclosure inside aerodynamic fairings to protect them during launch. Credit: NASA/Rad Sinyak

The Orion spacecraft and Space Launch System rocket have been attached at the hip for the better part of two decades. The big rocket lifts, the smaller spacecraft flies, and Congress keeps the money rolling in.

But now there are signs that the twain may, in the not too distant future, split.

This is because Lockheed Martin has begun to pivot toward a future in which the Orion spacecraft—thanks to increasing reusability, a focus on cost, and openness to flying on different rockets—fits into commercial space applications. In interviews, company officials said that if NASA wanted to buy Orion missions as a “service,” rather than owning and operating the spacecraft, they were ready to work with the space agency.

“Our message is we absolutely support it, and we’re starting that discussion now,” said Anthony Byers, director of Strategy and Business Development for Lockheed Martin, the principal contractor for Orion.

This represents a significant change. Since the US Congress called for the creation of the Space Launch System rocket a decade and a half ago, Orion and this rocket have been discussed in tandem, forming the backbone of an expendable architecture that would launch humans to the Moon and return them to Earth inside Orion. Through cost-plus contracts, NASA would pay for the rockets and spacecraft to be built, closely supervise all of this, and then operate the vehicles after delivery.

Moving to a ‘services’ model

But the landscape is shifting. In President Trump’s budget request for fiscal year 2026, the White House sought to terminate funding for Orion and the SLS rocket after the Artemis III mission, which would mean there are just two flights remaining. Congress countered by saying that NASA should continue flying the spacecraft and rocket through Artemis V.

Either way, the writing on the wall seems pretty clear.

“Given the President’s Budget Request guidance, and what we think NASA’s ultimate direction will be, they’re going to need to move to a commercial transportation option similar to commercial crew and cargo,” Byers said. “So when we talk about Orion services, we’re talking about taking Orion and flying that service-based mission, which means we provide a service, from boots on the ground on Earth, to wherever we’re going to go and dock to, and then bringing the crew home.”

By contrast, there has been little movement on an effort to commercialize the rocket.

In 2022, Boeing, the contractor for the SLS core stage, and Northrop Grumman, which manufactures the side boosters, created “Deep Space Transport LLC” to build the rockets and sell them to NASA on a more services-based approach. However, despite NASA’s stated intent to award a launch services contract to Deep Space Transport by the end of 2023, no such contract has been given out. It appears that the joint venture to commercialize the SLS rocket is defunct. Moreover, there are no plans to modify the rocket for reuse.

Wanted: a heavy lift rocket

This appears to be one reason Lockheed is exploring alternative launch vehicles for Orion. If the spacecraft is going to be competitive on price, it needs a rocket that does not cost in excess of $2 billion per launch.

Orion has a launch mass, including its abort system, of 35 metric tons. The company has looked at rockets that could launch that much mass and boost it to the Moon, as well as alternatives that might see one rocket launch Orion, and another provide a tug vehicle to push it out to the Moon. So far, the company has not advanced to performing detailed studies of vibrations, acoustics, thermal loads, and other assessments of compatibility, said Kirk Shireman, Lockheed Martin’s vice president and program manager for Orion.

“Could you create architectures to fly on other vehicles? Yes, we know we can,” Shireman said. “But when you start talking about those other environmental things, we have not done any of that work.”

So what else is being done to control Orion’s costs? Lockheed officials said incorporating reuse into Orion’s plans is “absolutely critical.” This is a philosophy that has evolved over time, especially after SpaceX began reflying its Dragon spacecraft.

NASA first contracted with Lockheed nearly two decades ago to start preliminary development work on Orion. At the outset, spacecraft reuse was not a priority. Byers, who has been involved with the Orion program at Lockheed on and off since its inception, said initially NASA asked Lockheed to assess the potential for reusing components of Orion.

“Whenever the vehicle would come back, NASA’s assumption was that we would disassemble the vehicle and harvest the components, and they would go into inventory,” Byers said. “Then they would go into a new structure for a future flight. Well, as the program progressed and we saw what others were doing, we really started to introduce the idea of reusing the crew module.”

How to reuse a spacecraft

The updated plan agreed to by NASA and Lockheed calls for a step-by-step approach.

“There’s a path forward,” said Howard Hu, NASA’s Orion program manager, in an interview. “We’re trying to crawl, then walk, then run into our reuse strategy. We want to make sure that we’re increasing our reusability, which we know is the path to sustainability and lower cost.”

The current plan is as follows:

Artemis II: A brand-new spacecraft, it will reuse 11 avionics components refurbished from the Artemis I Orion spacecraft; after landing, it will be used for testing purposes.

Artemis III: A brand-new spacecraft.

Artemis IV: A brand-new spacecraft.

Artemis V: Will reuse approximately 250 components, primarily life support and avionics equipment, from Artemis II.

Artemis VI: Will reuse primary structure (pressure vessel) and secondary structures (gussets, panels, brackets, plates) from Artemis III Orion, and approximately 3,000 components.

Lockheed plans to build a fleet of three largely reusable spacecraft, which will make their debuts on the Artemis III, IV, and V missions, respectively. Those three vehicles would then fly future missions, and if Lockheed needs to expand the fleet to meet demand, it could.

This photo, from 2023, shows the Orions for Artemis II, III, and IV all together.

Credit: Lockheed Martin

This photo, from 2023, shows the Orions for Artemis II, III, and IV all together. Credit: Lockheed Martin

Of course, Orion can never be made fully reusable. The service module, built by Europe-based Airbus and providing propulsion, separates from Orion before reentry into Earth’s atmosphere and burns up.

“We probably should call it maximum reuse, because there are some things that are consumed,” Shireman said. “For instance, the heat shield is consumed as the ablative material is ablated. But we are, ultimately, going to reuse the structure of the heat shield itself.”

Vectoring along a new path

Orion is always going to be relatively expensive. However, officials said they are on track to trim the cost of producing an Orion by 50 percent from the Artemis II to Artemis V vehicles and in follow-on missions to bring this down by 30 percent further or more. Minimizing refurbishment will be key to this.

Lockheed will never achieve “full and rapid reusability” for Orion like SpaceX is attempting with its Starship vehicle. That’s just not the way Orion was designed, nor what NASA wants. The space agency seeks a safe and reliable ride into deep space for its astronauts.

For the time being, only Orion can provide that. In the future, Starship may well provide that capability. Blue Origin and other providers may develop a deep space-capable human vehicle. But Orion is here and ready for its first astronauts in 2026. It will be years before any alternative becomes available.

It is nice to see that Lockheed recognizes this advantage won’t last forever and that it’s moving—or should we say, Vectoring—toward a more sustainable future.

Photo of Eric Berger

Eric Berger is the senior space editor at Ars Technica, covering everything from astronomy to private space to NASA policy, and author of two books: Liftoff, about the rise of SpaceX; and Reentry, on the development of the Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon. A certified meteorologist, Eric lives in Houston.

Once unthinkable, NASA and Lockheed now consider launching Orion on other rockets Read More »

thousands-of-customers-imperiled-after-nation-state-ransacks-f5’s-network

Thousands of customers imperiled after nation-state ransacks F5’s network

Customers position BIG-IP at the very edge of their networks for use as load balancers and firewalls, and for inspection and encryption of data passing into and out of networks. Given BIG-IP’s network position and its role in managing traffic for web servers, previous compromises have allowed adversaries to expand their access to other parts of an infected network.

F5 said that investigations by two outside intrusion-response firms have yet to find any evidence of supply-chain attacks. The company attached letters from firms IOActive and NCC Group attesting that analyses of source code and build pipeline uncovered no signs that a “threat actor modified or introduced any vulnerabilities into the in-scope items.” The firms also said they didn’t identify any evidence of critical vulnerabilities in the system. Investigators, which also included Mandiant and CrowdStrike, found no evidence that data from its CRM, financial, support case management, or health systems was accessed.

The company released updates for its BIG-IP, F5OS, BIG-IQ, and APM products. CVE designations and other details are here. Two days ago, F5 rotated BIG-IP signing certificates, though there was no immediate confirmation that the move is in response to the breach.

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security agency has warned that federal agencies that rely on the appliance face an “imminent threat” from the thefts, which “pose an unacceptable risk.” The agency went on to direct federal agencies under its control to take “emergency action.” The UK’s National Cyber Security Center issued a similar directive.

CISA has ordered all federal agencies it oversees to immediately take inventory of all BIG-IP devices in networks they run or in networks that outside providers run on their behalf. The agency went on to direct agencies to install the updates and follow a threat-hunting guide that F5 has also issued. BIG-IP users in private industry should do the same.

Thousands of customers imperiled after nation-state ransacks F5’s network Read More »

cdc-tormented:-hr-workers-summoned-from-furlough-to-lay-off-themselves,-others

CDC tormented: HR workers summoned from furlough to lay off themselves, others


Traumatized CDC has lost 33% of its workforce this year, union says.

ATLANTA, GEORGIA – AUGUST 9: Bullet holes are seen in windows at the Centers For Disease Control (CDC) Global Headquarters following a shooting that left two dead, on August 9, 2025 in Atlanta, Georgia. On August 8, a gunman opened fire near the headquarters of the Centers for Disease Control, killing a DeKalb County Police Department officer before being found dead by gunfire. Credit: Getty | Elijah Nouvelage

The dust is still settling at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention after a mass layoff on Friday, which former employees at the beleaguered agency are describing as a massacre.

In separate press briefings on Tuesday, a network of terminated CDC staff that goes by the name the National Public Health Coalition, and the union representing employees at the agency discussed what the wide-scale cuts mean for the American people, as well as the trauma, despair, and damage they have wreaked on the workers of the once-premier public health agency.

In a normal federal layoff—called a reduction in force, or RIF—the agency would be given a full outline of the roles and branches or divisions affected, as well as some explanation for the cuts, such as alleged fraud, abuse, or redundancy. However, the Trump administration has provided no such information or explanation, leaving current and former employees to essentially crowdsource what has been lost and only guess at the possible reasons.

The numbers

The union representing CDC workers, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Local 2883, has been assessing the cuts since termination emails began arriving in employee inboxes late Friday. The union estimates that the Trump administration sent termination notices to 1,300 CDC employees on Friday, in what they called an illegal “politically-motivated stunt.” Of those 1,300 terminations, around 700 were rescinded, beginning on Saturday.

The Trump administration said the 700 rescinded terminations were sent due to a “coding error.” But CDC workers didn’t buy that explanation, saying all the terminations were intentional, and some were only reversed after backlash erupted when people realized what the administration was trying to cut—for example, terminating the experts responding to domestic measles outbreaks and those responding to an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo who received RIF notices that were later rescinded. Still, with the rescissions, some 600 terminations appear to remain.

In all, the union estimated that the CDC has lost 33 percent of its workforce since the start of the Trump administration. In January, there were roughly 13,000 CDC workers total. Since then, about 3,000 have been fully separated from the agency, including 600 laid off in a RIF on April 1, and 2,400 who were either fired or forced out amid pressure campaigns. An additional 1,300 have been laid off but are not yet fully separated from the agency; they remain on paid administrative leave but are unable to do their work.

In the RIF Friday, laid-off employees said they were given notices that list their termination effective date as December 8, leaving a 60-day period in which they would be on administrative leave.

The RIF was carried out amid an ongoing government shutdown over a health care funding dispute, and the Trump administration has claimed that the RIF is a consequence of the shutdown. But the union, along with federal employment lawyers and even some senior government officials, say a RIF during a shutdown is illegal; a temporary lapse in government funding is not a legitimate reason for a RIF under federal regulations, and it runs afoul of a federal law that prohibits the government from incurring new costs during a shutdown, such as by promising severance packages.

Brutal cuts

In practice, a RIF amid a shutdown added more trauma to the demoralized staff. In opening remarks, Local AFGE 2883 President Yolanda Jacobs noted that the CDC Human Resources staff had been furloughed during the shutdown but were temporarily brought back into work just so they could process termination letters—including their own. A terminated CDC employee who spoke on condition of anonymity said that more than 90 percent of the HR staff is now gone.

Among the terminations were also mental health workers who were helping CDC staff recover from an August attack, in which a gunman fired over 500 rounds at CDC buildings full of agency employees and killed a local police officer.

Another terminated CDC worker who spoke on the condition of anonymity discussed the personal toll of the RIF. She had worked at the agency for over two decades and learned of her termination Friday night as she was doing dishes after making homemade pizza with her family—money worries kept them from ordering out. Her phone “started going crazy” as coworkers were checking in after receiving their RIF notices. She dug out her work laptop, which had been set aside since she was furloughed, to find her own RIF notice at the top of her inbox.

As text messages continued to come in through the night, she said it was “heartbreaking and devastating” when she realized the Trump administration was “actually dismantling us.”

“These are just hardworking Americans who just want to do their job, who just want to help people, who want to make sure the correct information is out there [and] that we are preventing things from happening,” she said.

Since the RIF has sunk in, she has started to worry more for her family and their finances. During the furlough, paychecks are uncertain. And her effective termination date in December will land between holidays, when hiring is slow. She worried about affording Christmas presents for her family.

She also said that staff have asked about getting other jobs while on administrative leave but were told that in order to do that, they would need to get approval from the CDC’s ethics office to ensure there were no conflicts of interest. But staff can’t actually do that because everyone at the ethics office also got RIF notices.

Losses

Throughout the briefings yesterday, staff highlighted that the RIF did not just trim here and there, as one might expect with cuts designed to make the organization leaner. Instead, it lopped off entire teams and branches, completely shutting down whole lines of work.

One former CDC employee spoke broadly of big hits to experts in chronic disease, global health, and the National Center for Health Statistics, which runs critical data collection that states and local health departments rely on. The CDC’s library staff are all gone. Suicide prevention experts have been cut, as well as communications and policy staff, who develop briefings and provide information to Congress members.

Abigail Tighe, a former CDC employee with National Public Health Coalition, tried to put the cuts in context, saying: “We are losing the people with all the knowledge to prevent childhood drownings, child abuse, and suicide. We’re losing the experts who help us track and understand the health and safety needs of our communities [and] the brave and brilliant professionals who, on a moment’s notice, respond to new and unknown outbreaks across the world. And that’s just a few examples.”

A terminated scientist who spoke on condition of anonymity said that her entire office was eliminated in the RIF. “My heart breaks for my colleagues and friends who have been tormented, traumatized, shot at, threatened daily. These are kind, hardworking, thoughtful people whose lives are being overturned,” she said.

But, “ultimately,” she said, “I am terrified for the public safety of our country.”

Photo of Beth Mole

Beth is Ars Technica’s Senior Health Reporter. Beth has a Ph.D. in microbiology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and attended the Science Communication program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. She specializes in covering infectious diseases, public health, and microbes.

CDC tormented: HR workers summoned from furlough to lay off themselves, others Read More »

us-demand-grows-for-chinese-cars-despite-privacy-and-security-fears

US demand grows for Chinese cars despite privacy and security fears

More than half of American car buyers would consider a Chinese car brand for their next purchase, an increase of almost 25 percent compared to last year. That’s according to a survey of prospective car buyers conducted annually by the research firm AutoPacific. And yes, those car buyers are conscious of the privacy and security fears.

AutoPacific spoke to 18,000 people who said they were planning to buy or lease a new car within the next three years for its 2025 Future Attribution Demand Study, and the company has been releasing snippets of data as it analyzes them, ahead of the full report’s release later this year.

There has already been at least one surprise. Last year, partially automated driving systems like General Motors’ Super Cruise or Ford’s BlueCruise, or those developed by Tesla, were not in high demand. This year, that tech went to the top of the most-wanted list, with 43 percent of consumers saying they want hands-free partial automation. The same percentage also indicated a demand for rear automatic emergency braking. Wireless device charging, No. 1 in the list in 2024, didn’t make the top 15 for 2025.

Can I buy a Huawei to drive on the highway?

In 2024, just 53 percent of surveyed consumers said they were familiar with Chinese cars, and only 41 percent said they would consider one. This year, 65 percent were familiar with Chinese brands, and 51 percent said they’d consider one for their next vehicle.

Huawei came first among the Chinese brands, with 27 percent prepared to consider one. Xiaomi placed second (23 percent), with the Tesla-outselling BYD in third place (19 percent).

A chart from AutoPacific showing 2024 and 2025 attitudes towards Chinese cars.

A chart from AutoPacific showing 2024 and 2025 attitudes toward Chinese cars. Credit: AutoPacific

Chinese cars are fast being recognized for offering a level of digital integration that is far ahead of the connected cars on sale in the US. “Aside from the responsiveness of screens… I feel like people hate screens here because they’re not done very well,” said Kevin Williams, an automotive journalist who has spent time getting to know the latest in Chinese vehicles.

“Versus in China, it just seems so intuitive,” he said. “Not just how easy it is to use, and I barely understand any sort of Chinese characters… [but] just like the support it has for popular apps. When I was in the Xiaomi SU7, it had a full-fat, full-service Apple Music, like it looks like what I would get on a computer. And it wasn’t just Apple Music; they had whatever the Chinese equivalent of Spotify and other popular apps—Chinese TikTok—they all have these full-fat apps that run with, like, no real running issues.”

US demand grows for Chinese cars despite privacy and security fears Read More »