Vizio

walmart-buying-tv-brand-vizio-for-its-ad-fueling-customer-data

Walmart buying TV-brand Vizio for its ad-fueling customer data

About software, not hardware —

Deal expected to close as soon as this summer.

Close-up of Vizio logo on a TV

Walmart announced an agreement to buy Vizio today. Irvine, California-based Vizio is best known for lower-priced TVs, but its real value to Walmart is its advertising business and access to user data.

Walmart said it’s buying Vizio for approximately $2.3 billion, pending regulatory clearance and additional closing conditions. Vizio can also terminate the transaction over the next 45 days if it accepts a better offer, per the announcement.

Walmart will keep selling non-Vizio TVs should the merger close, Seth Dallaire, Walmart US’s EVP and CRO who would manage Vizio post-acquisition, told The Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

Walmart expects the acquisition to be finalized as soon as this summer, it told WSJ.

Ad-pportunity

Walmart, including Sam’s Club, is typically Vizio’s biggest customer by sales, per a WSJ report last week on the potential merger. But Walmart’s acquisition isn’t about getting a bigger piece of the budget-TV market (Walmart notably already sells its own “onn.” budget TVs). Instead, Walmart is looking to boost its Walmart Connect advertising business.

Vizio makes money by selling ads, including those shown on the Vizio SmartCast OS and on free content available on its TVs with ads. Walmart said buying Vizio will give it new ways to appeal to advertisers and that those ad efforts would be further fueled by Walmart’s high-volume sales of TVs.

Walmart said today that Vizio’s Platform+ ad business has “over 500 direct advertiser relationships, including many of the Fortune 500” and that SmartCast users have grown 400 percent since 2018 to 18 million active accounts.

Walmart Connect (which was rebranded from Walmart Media Group in 2021) sells various types of ads, including adverts that appear on Walmart’s website and app. Walmart Connect also sells ads that display on in-store screens, including display TVs and point-of-sale machines, in over 4,700 locations (Walmart has over 10,500 stores).

Walmart makes most of its US revenue from low-profit groceries, WSJ noted last week, but ads are higher profit. Walmart has said that it wants Walmart Connect to be a top-10 advertising business. Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta are among the world’s biggest advertising companies today. In the fiscal year ending January 2023, Walmart said that its global ads business represented under 1 percent ($2.7 billion) of its total annual revenue. In its fiscal year 2024 Q4 earnings report released today [PDF], Walmart said its global ad business grew 33 percent, including 22 percent in the US, compared to Q4 2023.

Hungry for customer data

Owning Platform+ would give Walmart new information about TV users. Data gathered from Vizio TVs will be combined with data on shoppers that Walmart already gets. Walmart plans to use this customer data to sell targeted ad space, such as banners above Walmart.com search results, and to help advertisers track ad results.

With people only able to buy so many new TVs, vendors have been pushing for ways to make money off of already-purchased TVs. That means putting ads on TV OSes and TVs that gather customer data, including what users watch and which ads they click on, when possible. TV makers like Vizio, Amazon, and LG are increasingly focusing on ads as revenue streams.

Meanwhile, retailers like Walmart are also turning to ads for revenue. Through Vizio, Walmart is looking to add a business with the vast majority of gross profit coming from ads. Data acquired through SmartCast can shed light on ad effectiveness and improve ad targeting, Vizio tells advertisers.

In an interview with WSJ, Dallaire noted that smart TVs and streaming have turned the TV business into a software, not hardware, business. According to a spokesperson for Parks Associate that Ars Technica spoke with, Vizio has 12 percent of connected TV OS market share. WSJ reported last week that Roku OS has more market share at 25 percent; although, a graph that Parks Associates’ rep sent to me suggests the percentage is smaller (Parks Associates’ spokesperson wouldn’t confirm Roku OS’ market share or the accuracy of WSJ’s report to Ars). Roku OS is on Walmart’s “onn.” TVs, but Walmart doesn’t own Roku.

Vizio TVs could get worse

From the perspective of a company seeking to grow its ad business, buying Vizio seems reasonable. But from a user perspective, Vizio TVs risk becoming too centered on selling and measuring ads.

There was already a large financial incentive for Vizio to focus on growing Platform+ and the profitability of SmartCast (in its most recent earnings report, Vizio said its average revenue per SmartCast user increased 14 percent year over year to $31.55). For years, Vizio’s business has been more about selling ads than selling TVs. An acquisition focused on ads can potentially detract from a focus on improving Vizio hardware.

Stuffing more ads into TVs could also ruin the experience for people seeking a quality TV at a lower cost. While some people may be willing to sacrifice features and image quality to save money, others aren’t willing to deal with more ads and incessant interest in viewer tracking for that experience. With Vizio expected to become part of a conglomerate eager to grow its ad business, it’s possible that the ads experience on Vizio TVs could worsen.

Editor’s note: This article was edited to include information from Parks Associates. 

Walmart buying TV-brand Vizio for its ad-fueling customer data Read More »

vizio-settles-for-$3m-after-saying-60-hz-tvs-had-120-hz-“effective-refresh-rate”

Vizio settles for $3M after saying 60 Hz TVs had 120 Hz “effective refresh rate”

Class action —

Vizio claimed backlight scanning made refresh rates seem twice as high.

A marketing image for Vizio's P-series Q9 TV.

Enlarge / A marketing image for Vizio’s P-series Q9 TV.

Vizio has agreed to pay $3 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleged the company misled customers about the refresh rates of its TVs.

In 2018, a lawsuit [PDF], which was later certified as a class action, was filed against Vizio for advertising its 60 Hz and 120 Hz LCD TVs as having an “effective” refresh rate of 120 Hz and 240 Hz, respectively. Vizio was referring to the backlight scanning (or black frame insertion) ability, which it claimed made the TVs look like they were operating at a refresh rate that was twice as fast as they are capable of. Vizio’s claims failed to address the drawbacks that can come from backlight scanning, which include less brightness and the potential for noticeable flickering. The lawsuit complained about Vizio’s language in marketing materials and user manuals.

The lawsuit read:

Vizio knows, or at the very least should know, that its television with 60Hz display panels have a refresh rate of 60 images per second and that backlight manipulation methods cannot and do not increase the effective Hz (refresh rate) of a television.

The lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, accused Vizio of using misleading tactics to persuade retailers to sell and recommend Vizio TVs. It accused Vizio of trying “to sell its lesser-quality product at a higher price and allowed Vizio to realize sales it may not have otherwise made if it were truthful regarding the performance capabilities of its televisions.”

Under the settlement terms [PDF] spotted by The Verge, people who bought a Vizio TV in California after April 30, 2014, can file a claim. They’ll receive $17 or up to $50 if the fund allows it. The individual payout may also be under $17 if the claims exceed the $3 million fund. Vizio will also pay attorney fees. People have until March 30 to submit their claims. The final approval hearing is scheduled for June 20.

Vizio also agreed to stop advertising their TVs with 120 and 240 Hz “effective” refresh rates but “will not be obligated to recall or modify labeling for any Vizio-branded television model that has already been sold or distributed to a third party,” according to the agreement. Further, the California-headquartered company will also offer affected customers a “service and limited warranty package conservatively valued at $25” per person.

Vizio, per the settlement, denies any wrongdoing. The company declined to comment on the settlement to Ars.

The settlement comes as tactics for fighting motion blur, like backlight scanning and frame interpolation (known for causing the “soap opera effect“), have been maligned for often making the viewing experience worse. LG and TCL have also faced class-action lawsuits for boosting refresh rate claims by saying that their motion blur-fighting techniques make it seem like their TVs are running at a higher refresh rate than possible. While the case against LG was dismissed, TCL settled for $2,900,000 [PDF].

Despite the criticisms, backlight scanning and motion smoothing remain on default across countless TVs belonging to unsuspecting owners. Class-action cases like Vizio’s that end up having a negative cost for OEMs provide further incentive for them to at least stop using the ability as a way to superficially boost spec sheets.

Vizio settles for $3M after saying 60 Hz TVs had 120 Hz “effective refresh rate” Read More »