Twitter has fallen out with yet another landlord: King Charles III.
The Crown Estate, which manages the British monarch’s vast property portfolio, has sued Twitter over unpaid rent for office space in London. The complaint was filed last week at the High Court in Britain’s capital.
The case joins a range of wranglings over rent engulfing Twitter. In December, the company had reportedly not paid rent on any of its global offices “for weeks.” Since then, landlords in San Francisco, Seattle, and London have all sued the bird app, while workers at a Twitter office in Singapore were briefly evicted over late payments.
The rent-dodging has been surmised as an attempt to negotiate better terms. In the London building, however, this doesn’t appear to be the plan.
As the space has reportedly been deserted and emptied, it doesn’t seem that Twitter will re-occupy the office. Yet this doesn’t mean that Musk will get off scot-free.
“Twitter will remain liable to pay.
Andrew Conway, senior director and leading property litigator at London firm Lawrence Stephens, told TNW his obligations are tricky to escape.
“Unless the landlord forfeits the lease (that is, taking back the premises, so it can be re-let to other tenants) or agrees to accept a formal surrender of the lease, Twitter will remain liable to pay the rent for the remainder of the term of the lease,” Conway said via email.
If the lease is forfeited or surrendered, the tenant is only liable for payments up to the date that happens. That may well appeal to Musk, but it could be a headache for the Crown Estate.
If the property can’t quickly be re-let, the landlord faces several problems.
“A landlord will be left with empty premises on which it will have to pay business rates after three months,” said Conway. “Moreover, empty premises are more susceptible to occupation by squatters.”
Court proceedings provide a route to recovering rent arrears — and Twitter will have little defense against paying them.
The debt collectors are coming
Musk’s mounting feuds with landlords coincide with growing financial pressures at Twitter.
The first interest payment on the $13 billion of debt used for his takeover could be due by the end of January, according to the Financial Times. Analysts expect the looming bill to be around $300 million.
Revenues at Twitter have also plummeted. Research suggests that ad spending on the platform — the source of roughly 90% of its revenue in 2021 — dropped by 71% in December.
Skipping rent may postpone some costs, but it adds another dent to Musk’s floundering reputation. It’s also a blow to his dream of ending remote working.
At least surviving staff at Twitter’s New York base can still go to the office. Unfortunately, it reeks of poo and has a cockroach problem.
Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives. Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives.
French startup Eolink — in collaboration with 15 European energy partners — will install a 5MW floating offshore wind turbine in Bulgaria by 2025. This is part of the EU-backed Black Sea Floating Offshore Wind (BLOW) project, which aims to advance sustainable energy solutions.
BLOW will use Eolink’s patented floating offshore wind turbine design, which the company claims solves existing industry issues by using four steel masts instead of one to spread the turbine’s stresses. This is said to make the overall structure more than 30% lighter. As per the startup, its turbines can produce 10% more energy by reducing aerodynamic interactions thanks to a greater distance between the blades and masts.
The unit will be designed to operate with maximum efficiency in the Black Sea, and this includes fitting it with a larger rotor so it can generate more energy in low-wind areas.
“The World Bank 2021 report indicates there is vast technical potential in South East Europe, with a staggering 166 GW of floating offshore energy in the Black Sea alone, which is the equivalent of five times the electricity consumption of Bulgaria and Romania,” Eolink’s CCO Alain Morry said in the press release. “Through this project we hope to catalyze offshore development across the region, which already has ongoing /fixed-bottom offshore wind projects in Romania”
But although every sustainable energy development sounds like a positive step for the EU, there is a catch: the wind turbine will be used to power an existing gas platform operated by Petroceltic, a Bulgarian oil and gas company. Unfortunately, this isn’t an uncommon practice. Think of Norway’s Hywind Tampen, the world’s largest floating offshore wind farm, which also powers the country’s gas and oil production.
On the one hand, powering fossil fuel production with renewable energy is the lesser evil compared to conventional drilling or burning practices. And developing a new industrial case for offshore wind that other traditional industries is a positive development. One could also argue that the lessons learnt in the process of manufacturing, installing, and operating the wind turbine can benefit larger wind farms in the future.
But on the other hand, it seems like a step backwards for the EU that’s funding a project on green energy in order to harvest the gas and oil that are endangering the planet. And while this might simply represent a transitional stage before we fully depend on renewable energy sources, the bloc should step up its game if it’s to meet its climate targets for carbon neutrality by 2050.
Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives. Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives.
By 2027, Europe has the potential to fully rely on domestic production of battery cells, meeting its EV and energy storage demands without any Chinese imports. That’s according to the latest forecast by Transport & Environment (T&E), a campaign group, which analyzed a range of manufacturer reports and press releases.
The European NGO further estimates that, in 2030, the companies with the largest battery cell production in the continent will be CATL, Northvolt, ACC, Freyr, and the Volkswagen Group.
About two-thirds of Europe’s needs for cathodes — an integral battery part — could also be produced in-house, the report finds. So far, 12 companies plan to become active in this part of the battery supply chain, with 17 plants announced in the region. Existing and scheduled projects include Umicore in Poland, Northvolt in Sweden, and BASF in Germany.
Projections about the refining and processing of lithium are optimistic as well. While 100% of the refined lithium required for European batteries is imported from China and other countries, the bloc is expected to meet 50% of its demand by 2030. T&E has identified 24 projects so far, including Vulcan Energy Resources in Germany and Eramet in France.
The NGO warns, however, that these scenarios will not be realized unless backed by sufficient and timely funding, highlighting that the US’ Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) could attract European talent and factories to America.
“Europe needs the financial firepower to support its green industries in the global race with America and China,” Julia Poliscanova, senior director for vehicles and e-mobility at T&E, said. “A European Sovereignty Fund would support a truly European industrial strategy and not just countries with deep pockets. But spending rules need to be streamlined so that building a battery plant does not take the same amount of time as a coal plant.”
For tech startups, the most valuable assets are often invisible. While businesses were traditionally built on physical resources, the contemporary economy is increasingly driven by intangibles. The chip firm Arm, for instance, earned a $40 billion valuation and a reputation as the UK’s leading tech company — despite never manufacturing a single chip. Instead, the company designs the processor architecture that’s used in countless devices.
This intellectual property-based business model has transformed stock markets. In 1985, under a third of all assets in the S&P 500 were classed as intangible by 2020, that proportion had risen to around 90%. Startups, however, can overlook IP protection in their initial plans.
According to Robert Lind, a patent attorney at IP firm Marks & Clerk, they’re taking a major risk. Lind recently wrote an e-book on how to protect and monetize their intellectual property. He shared his top tips with TNW.
1. Start your research ASAP
According to Lind, tech firms often neglect IP until their business is exposed to creative and financial peril. He advises them to start their research before they really need it.
Naturally, Lind suggests their study material includes his e-book. But he doesn’t recommend relying on professional advisors at every turn.
“Arm yourself with the knowledge at the outset, so you know when to bring in the experts — and when you don’t need to bring them in,” says Lind.
For tech startups, patents are the primary form of IP that can be protected. Founders should educate themselves on what a patent is, how to get them, how they’re enforced, and how third-party patents can be interpreted.
2. Keep it confidential
It should go without saying that your brilliant idea should be kept private, but that’s easier said than done.
“Going public doesn’t just mean selling a product,” says Lind. “It could mean presenting a conference paper, publishing an article in a journal, or putting some information on your website. Be very careful about publishing your ideas before you’ve taken a view on whether something’s patentable.”
3. Diligently identify your innovations
Innovations are the lifeblood of patents, but they’re not always easy to identify. Many researchers and engineers don’t realize that their work could be valuable IP.
“It’s very important that you have regular reviews internally and milestones in your project plans to consider what innovations have been made and whether or not they should be patented,” says Lind.
Once you’ve identified an asset, you can get professional advice on whether or not it’s something you could patent.
4. Protect your rights
Experienced investors are savvy about the value of IP. Venture capitalists will use patents as evidence that a company is well-managed, at a certain development stage, and with a market niche. Their due diligence will likely differentiate between filing an application and receiving a granted patent.
Startups, however, often prioritize investing in R&D over protecting their IP. Lind recalls this issue emerging at a green tech company. The team had a very slim IP portfolio, which raised questions about its value to investors.
“It’s the protection that really crystallizes the value in the R&D that you’re doing,” says Lind.
5. Devise a clear IP strategy
An IP strategy should begin with clear objectives. Broadly, this will involve maximizing value at a desired point of exit or investment, while remaining within the confines of financial prudency.
Registered rights are territorial, so you’ll need to identify where to register your IP assets. This analysis can incorporate the territory’s size, potential, costs, and effectiveness.
A cautious strategy can defer costs and commitments, but bear in mind that the registration process can be slow. To avoid delays, file early in the key territories, respond quickly to objections, and embrace opportunities to discuss issues with patent examiners. Careful cost forecasting and budgeting will help cover any pitfalls that emerge.
“You should pursue your strategy quite aggressively,” says Lind. “But unless you know where you want to get to at the start, you’re probably not going to get anywhere useful.”
6. Map your IP to your business — and the future
You need to make sure your IP maps to the tech you can sell. According to Lind, it’s surprisingly easy to get patents granted that don’t align with your most valuable assets.
“Make sure your patents actually cover what the efficient and clever parts are — that’s very important,” he says.
Your IP should also be future-proofed, as the end product can be very different to the original vision. One of Lind’s previous clients, DNANudge, raised $60 million after building a portfolio of patent rights with diverse potential. While the company already sells a consumer product, its IP could also be integrated into various other devices or apps.
“Make sure your IP is broad enough in scope to cover not just what you’re doing now but also what you’re doing in the future,” suggests Lind.
7. Keep building your portfolio
Lind advises startups to look beyond those first few patents for their big idea. After all, each patent only lasts for 20 years.
“A slow-burn startup might take 10 years to get its product to market, which only leaves them with 10 years left on the patent,” says Lind. “They’ve got to keep innovating and keep patenting so they can keep that pipeline going.”
8. Resolve your ownership issues
The cooperation of staff can be crucial to registering IP. Signatures from inventors, designers, directors, and owners may all be required on legal documents. If you can’t get a name on the dotted line, you could have major problems.
To escape this fate, Lind recommends obtaining the necessary agreements while everyone is happy and cooperating.
“Make sure you clear all that ownership up and keep proper records all the way through the process,” he says. “And do it while everybody’s still friends — and before you start making money.”
Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives. Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives.
Netherlands-based solar EV maker Lightyear has announced that it’s freezing production of its flagship model, the Lightyear 0 — less than three months after going into production. As part of a “strategic restructuring,” the company will now focus on making the Lightyear 2, priced at around €40,000. This is expected to go into production in late 2025.
The company’s journey has been a long and impressive one. From a student team at a solar vehicle competition, Lightyear transformed into a startup in 2016, and quickly mapped itself on the automotive map with the Lightyear 0. The solar EV featured some stirring in-house tech, promising to be a game changer in a niche market. It also came with a prohibitive price tag: €250,000.
Lightyear says that it hasn’t taken this decision to pivot lightly, as it impacts its “employees,” “investors,” “clients,” “suppliers,” and “the government.” The reason behind the move remains vague, with the announcement citing “challenges” over the past months, which made the action a necessary step to “safeguard” the startup’s vision.
It’s not unreasonable to assume that battery supply bottlenecks, semiconductor shortages, and rising costs of materials due to inflation might have impacted Lightyear. And beyond that, with recession concerns increasing, switching from a limited luxury product to a more affordable one seems like a timely strategic move.
With the Lightyear 2, the company is targeting an entirely different (and wider) market, compared to the first model that was mainly intended as a technology demonstrator to be produced in limited quantities.
The new five-seater hatchback, with a promised range of 800km and 50% lower emissions compared to conventional EVs, was announced at this year’s CES. While the company hasn’t disclosed many details yet, it said that the vehicle will “inherit all of [the 0’s] innovations at a fraction of the market price.”
According to the CEO and co-founder Lex Hoefsloot’s statement, the new model already counts 40,000 waitlist subscriptions from individual customers, and 20,000 pre-orders from fleet owners.
“We hope to conclude some key investments in the coming weeks in order to scale up to Lightyear 2, an affordable solar electric vehicle available for a wider audience,” he added.
The road to TNW Conference 2023 has started! With only five months to go until Europe’s leading tech festival, TNW is touring several up-and-coming tech hubs across the Netherlands to uncover the best of Dutch tech ahead of its the flagship conference in June.
First stop? Groningen. On Thursday, TNW’s event took place during the MXT 2023, in collaboration with Founded in Groningen and Founded in Friesland. This brought together startups, investors, corporates, and municipality representatives who shared how Dutch companies are enabling what’s next in tech in the Netherlands’ northern regions: Groningen, Friesland, and Drenthe.
Among Dutch startup tech hubs, the North stands out due to its fast growth, with the three regions being home to more than 330 startups that generate over 5,000 jobs. Since 2018, Groningen has seen a 12% annual growth in the number of startups, followed by Friesland at 8%, and Drenthe at 4%.
“If you compare the current startup ecosystem in the North to ten years ago it’s completely different, especially in respect to collaboration. Startups, academia, and investors are now working closely together,” Niek Huizenga, Investor at G-Force Capital, said during the event. “Yet, we have to move forward faster and adopt a growth mentality to be even more competitive.”
“The North is ahead of the other regions in the fields that matter the most, such as energy solutions and agrifood — an advantage that we should be prouder of and communicate more,” Anne-Wil Lucas, Ecosystem Partner at NOM, added.
The potential of the northern Netherlands to become one of the most attractive hubs in the country is also highlighted by the innovativeness of the five startups selected to represent the region in the TNW Conference 2023. These are:
Enatom (Groningen)
After almost ten years of collaboration with the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Enatom has developed a next-gen anatomy app for the medical education sector.
Using pointcloud techniques and anatomical preparations provided by the UMCG, the app offers a realistic 3D visualization of the human body that can be used in computers, tablets, and VR/AR glasses. Within the app, anatomical preparations can be studied all the way around, while it’s also possible to annotate and create notes on the 3D models.
This way, the Enatom app can be used by both teachers and students, facilitating flexible access to accurate knowledge in low-resource settings and releasing the pressure on the educational healthcare system.
The team was inspired by the fact that although millions of people still love writing on paper, “the pen has been idle in innovation for the past few centuries,” Marc Tuinier, the company’s founder and CEO told TNW.
And, according to Tuinier, the pen is just the start. “The algorithms and custom hardware we design set the foundation for building products for spatial computing. We believe the future of computing is one in which you’re not confined to a desk (or lap), and we’re going to create the technology to enable that type of work. We’re starting from the pen, and we’ll take it to the glasses experience,” he explained.
The team expects the conference to help attract further interest from potential partners and investors, Visser told TNW.
SusPhos (Leeuwarden)
SusPhos is using chemistry to create a better world. Specifically, the startup upcycles phosphate-rich waste streams to generate high-quality alternatives that can replace current fossil-sourced products — all in a waste-free process.
The company’s patented technology is compatible with various waste streams including agriculture, communal, and the food and beverage industry. Its first products will be flame retardants and specialty fertilizers.
In addition to phosphate products, SusPhos produces recycled coagulants along with other chemicals, while it’s currently preparing its first full-size plant.
Aeroscan (Leeuwarden)
This startup aims to disrupt the real estate inspection and maintenance industry. Using data collected from drones, Aeroscan produces 3D renderings of buildings. Customers can make use of a dedicated web-based application to gain access to these insights.
According to Mark Nikolai, founder and Technical Director of the company, the technology has three main points of impact: it reduces the time needed for experts to generate maintenance reports, it decreases the logistical footprint by allowing digital sharing of 3D visualizations, and, as a result, it lowers the overall cost of real estate ownership.
Aeroscan’s competitive advantage lies in “the combination of in-house competencies,” Nikolai told TNW. “We control the data quality (input), develop our own custom machine learning models for data analysis and deliver an end-user centric web application.”
E-scooters in Paris have become a flashpoint for the industry in Europe and the city’s mayor, Anne Hidalgo, is going to put the question to the people.
As reported by France 24, Hidalgo will allow Parisians to decide whether to allow e-scooter rentals to continue. The vote — expected to take place in April — means the three companies that operate in Paris will be kicking off a charm offensive to retain their place in a vital city for micromobility in Europe.
Critically, the outcome of the vote and the fate of e-scooters in Paris could have a wide-reaching effect around Europe and the way cities regulate micromobility vehicles.
But how did it get to this point?
Tier, Dott and Lime won contracts in Paris in 2020 but have had a tumultuous relationship with authorities since then.
The licences were issued as part of a much grander plan by Mayor Hidalgo to reduce car usage in the city but complaints over scooters being parked dangerously or reckless users have beset the programme. For example, tragically, a pedestrian was killed in 2021 when she was struck by an e-scooter rider on the footpath.
A number of politicians in the city have led the condemnations of e-scooters, such as David Belliard, a deputy mayor.
Last year, the situation came to a boiling point when Paris City Council told the three companies in September to make a significantly greater effort on safety.
The companies came up with a joint proposal, which included ID checks, licence plates and sidewalk detection technology as well as a fund for financing infrastructure upgrades on streets.
A spokesperson for Lime told The Next Web that after filing the proposal, the company was met with silence from lawmakers. “At this stage the City has not responded to any of the meeting requests and letters sent by Lime or the two other operators,” the spokesperson said.
Dott said it too has not had much contact since late last year.
That led to another crossroads last week when a group of employees from Lime, Dott and Tier went to City Hall to request a meeting on the matter, voicing discontent over the lack of feedback from the council as the expiry date for the companies’ licences in March looms. They argue that 800 jobs at the companies in Paris are at risk. One employee said they wanted to put “pressure” on the council to make a decision.
Tense relations
It is amid this backdrop that Tier, Dott and Lime will contend with the vote.
Tier’s director of public policy Erwann Le Page said in an interview that the vote could finally solve the issue for good. “I think it’s good that we ask Parisians what they think. If we do so, we may hear from them that they like scooters,” he said. “I think the City of Paris may have a good surprise by asking Parisians what they think.”
Despite Le Page’s confidence, there has still been great discontent among some quarters in Paris.
Given the scale of the operations in the city with 15,000 scooters, the issues have garnered a lot of attention but grievances raised by opponents and critics in Paris are not unique to the French capital either.
Complaints against e-scooters will be familiar to anyone that has tracked the micromobility industry in recent years. Careless parking, sidewalk riding, street clutter and other dangerous riding activities are all frequent issues that have dogged e-scooter companies in many cities.
Increasingly city authorities are taking action. Vienna is planning a stricter framework of rules this year that will also cut down on the number of e-scooters a company can have in certain districts from 1,500 to just a few hundred.
Last year Rome moved to implement a strict new regime to curtail the more than 14,000 e-scooters on its streets. Meanwhile authorities in an area of Istanbul said they would start towing away scooters left on the sidewalk.
In a bid to appease city authorities and residents, e-scooter companies have rolled out different measures and technologies over the years. This includes the use of geo-fencing to dictate where an e-scooter can park and cameras and sensors that can detect when a scooter is being used on a footpath. Companies like Tier and Sweden’s Voi have rolled out such tech in various markets.
Tier’s Le Page pushed back on some of the criticisms against e-scooters, saying that the industry is much less chaotic than it was just a few years ago. Among the proposals that were sent to lawmakers in Paris, two of them have been implemented by the three companies proactively he said.
First is ID verification to ensure that no one under the age of 18 is riding the vehicle, similar to Rome’s new rules. Secondly is the introduction of licence plates on each scooter, making it identifiable and easier to report to the company or to the police. This measure takes a cue from London where Dott has rolled out such plates to address similar complaints made in that city.
“That facilitates the work of the police,” Le Page said as residents can report dangerous riding or vandalism. “We’re building a partnership with the police in a specific district in Paris to test that to see if that is going to really work.”
Speed freaks
Speed limits are emerging as another chapter in the e-scooter debate. The typical speed limit for e-scooters in Europe has been around 25km/hr but recent moves in several cities have seen that reduced to 20km/hr as authorities have become increasingly cautious about regulating micromobility.
Lisbon recently limited speeds to 20km/hr for the five companies operating there. In Ljubljana, perhaps the strictest restrictions on speed have been implemented with e-scooters required to be slowed to 5km/hr once the vehicle enters an area with many pedestrians.
Kersten Heineke, co-leader of the McKinsey Center for Future Mobility, said that cities are still in something of a transition phase in trying to figure out the best regulations.
“We as a society have gotten used to designating and dedicating a ton of space, and much more than their fair share of space, to cars and personal vehicles,” Heineke told The Next Web. “If you were to apply the same standards that people seem to be applying to scooters to cars, I believe we would have a much more intense discussion about cars.”
Heineke said that Paris may not actually be a massive revenue generator for Lime, Dott and Tier given all the requirements they must invest in but the city is very symbolic as a place to be operating in for your brand.
“Paris isn’t necessarily the city where e-scooter companies make the most money, simply because of how the tender is designed with all the limitations. All the requirements don’t necessarily allow for massive profitability,” he said.
The industry is watching
Whatever happens in Paris will be closely watched by players in the micromobility industry. As France’s most populous city, a tourism powerhouse and the host of next year’s Olympics, it is a key case study in how to implement e-scooter regulation at scale.
Other cities could be taking notes.
“It’s the most regulated market in Europe,” Le Page said. “The fleet is capped, you cannot ride if you are under-18, you have mandatory parking zones, the speed limit is not 25km/hr but 20km/hr. It’s very regulated, there’s possibly more to do but it’s a nice showcase of what micromobility can do.”
He added that increasingly hefty regulations could mark a turning point for a company like Tier in how they operate and their ability to generate revenue.
“At some point we won’t be able to operate in an over-regulated market sustainably in economic terms and we will leave,” he said.
Heineke said that it will be important to watch how the “power struggle” between governments and e-scooter companies pans out in 2023.
“There’s going to be this equilibrium eventually between what the cities demand and what the players can deliver to actually turn a profit. There might even be a situation in which we only have three global players that say if you write a tender in a way that doesn’t allow me to make money, I’m simply not going to come to your city.”
Back in Paris, politicians like Maud Gatel, a member of the national parliament and a critic of e-scooters, said effective regulation is still possible.
“I am not against trottinettes, per se,” Gatel said, using the French word for scooters. “In some cities in Paris’ suburbs, the integration of trottinettes is successful. This is not the case in Paris.”
But come April, it will be Parisians that have the final say. Many will be watching.
Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives. Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives.
Wolfspeed — a US-based silicon carbide (SiC) semiconductor maker — is set to build a chip factory in Germany, Handelsblatt reports. That’s a significant step for both the country’s green mobility and Europe’s chip industry.
According to the newspaper, the over €2 billion-worth facility will be located at a site in southwest Saarland. Series production is expected to begin in four years.
German auto supplier ZF will hold a minority stake in the factory, but will be a majority shareholder in the accompanying research center.
Wolfspeed’s decision to build a plant in Germany is a boost for the domestic car industry, especially when it comes to electric vehicles. Although silicon carbide (a compound of silicon and carbon) is costlier than conventional silicon, SiC chips are considered more promising: they can increase EV range, reduce charging time, and bring down operating costs due to lower energy consumption.
And with the plant in close proximity to Germany’s (electric) car production sites — think of BMW, Ford, Mercedes, and Volkswagen — manufacturers can hope to secure easy access to the supply chain.
Wolfspeed’s plant is also good news for Europe that’s struggling in chip production — currently accounting for 10% of the global market. The continent’s weak position was especially evident during the pandemic, when supply chains collapsed and it grappled with securing chip access, causing entire industries to sputter.
In response, the EU has been trying to improve its domestic manufacturing capacity. First and foremost comes the European Chips Act, aiming to foster a local semiconductor industry and pushing the bloc’s global market share to 20% by 2030. The Union has also been attempting to attract global players to build factories in the continent — like Intel’s €68 billion investment in a site in Germany and now Wolfspeed.
Europe may only be at the beginning of its plans to become a major chip producer, but there is cause for hope.
Threats of jail tech bosses over “harmful content” will endanger the UK’s tech sector and civil rights,campaigners have warned.
The penalty has been added to the British government’s Online Safety Bill. Under new amendments to the legislation, senior managers at internet platforms could be jailed for failing to protect children from online harm. The revisions also mandate the removal of videos depicting illegal immigration “in a positive light.”
The changes follow pressure from politicians in the ruling Conservative party. The legislators had proposed introducing criminal liability for any breach of child safety duties, but the government has restricted this to intentional violations.
In a statement, Michelle Donelan, the UK’s culture and digital minister, said only senior managers who “consented or connived” to ignore enforcement notices risked imprisonment.
“While this amendment will not affect those who have acted in good faith to comply in a proportionate way, it gives the Act additional teeth to deliver change and ensure that people are held to account if they fail to properly protect children,” she said.
Child safety groups welcomed the move to make executives criminally liable, but critics have raised an array of concerns.
A patchwork of complaints
The diversity of the dissent is striking.
Wikimedia warned the penalties will affect not only big tech corporations, but also volunteer-led content moderation and public interest websites. The non-profit also notes that mandatory age verification can institute extra data collection, which puts user privacy at risk.
Libertarians have added concerns about the economic ramifications. They contend that threats of jail and heavy fines will stifle innovation and discourage startups from operating in the UK.
“The natural reponse will be to block users.
Matthew Lesh, head of public policy at the IEA, a free-market think-tank, said the proposals would ultimately be a boon for big tech. He argues that the rules will raise greater barriers to entry for their smaller competitors.
“There is also a significant threat that UK users simply lose access to many parts of the web,” Lesh told TNW. “The natural response of many platform operators, particularly those outside of the UK with a limited British audience, will be to block UK users. This was the response of thousands of US sites in response to GDPR.”
Free speech campaigners, meanwhile, fear platforms will be pushed to aggressively block content and deploy automated monitoring systems. This could lead to censorship of lawful posts, reduced access to online services, and restricted freedom of expression.
“That could be quite subjective.
Further qualms have arisen over the Bill’s ambiguities. Legal experts are wary that the rules will be open to different interpretations.
“Some of the Bill’s provisions are based on risk of ‘harm’, as defined in the Bill: physical or psychological harm,” Graham Smith, an IT lawyer at Bird & Bird, told TNW. “The government has said that psychological harm should not be limited to a medically recognised condition, so potentially that could be quite subjective.”
The capacity to exploit the rules has raised considerable alarm. Law professors have accused the government of using child safety as a smokescreen for “censorship and control.”
Tech ethicists warn the Bill could politicize “online harm” — a theory that’s intensified over the migration proposal.
The politics of “harm”
The new proposals would legally mandate the removal of posts showing people crossing the English channel in “a positive light.”
The government said this will help tackle illegal immigration encouraged by gangs. Refugee charities, however, warn it will endanger the rights of vulnerable migrants — and set a perilous precedent for campaigners.
The ORG, a digital rights group, notes that censorship of small boat crossings would extend to search engines.
“Websites could be demoted in listings if they have content deemed illegal,” the organization said in a tweet. “This could severely impact groups acting on refugee and migrant rights.”
Alisha Lewis, a local councillor for the Liberal Democrats party, described the proposal as a “fascinating combo of poor policy literacy and absurdly directed nasty anti-refugee sentiment.”
Censorship of images of small boat crossings extends to search engines. Websites could be demoted in listings if they have content deemed illegal. This could severely impact groups acting on refugee and migrant rights. #OnlineSafetyBillhttps://t.co/NGNjPZQygL
Undoubtedly, online safety for children is a pressing issue. But the broad reach, punitive measures, and subjectivity of the proposals risk creating more problems than they solves. It’s nearly four years since the government’s initial white paper was published, but the Online Safety Bill is still in disarray.
At the World Economic Forum in Davos, the EU Commission head Ursula von der Leyen stressed the bloc’s need to boost its clean tech industry and increase its competitiveness against the US and China– amidst increasing trade tensions with both nations.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that the market for mass-manufactured clean energy tech will be worth around $650 billion a year by 2030 — three times more than today’s levels. And according to Von der Leyen, the targeted net-zero transformation is already causing tremendous industrial, economic, and geopolitical shifts — leaving the EU with a small window of opportunity to invest and gain leadership in the industry.
The newly-announced Green Deal Industrial Plan (GDIP) aims to make Europe “the home of clean tech.” To realize that, it focuses on four main points: the regulatory environment, financing, skills, and trade.
The first pillar will see the creation of a regulatory framework that will simplify and fast-track access to funding and permits, focusing on critical net-zero sectors such as wind, solar, and clean hydrogen. To support this, a new Net-Zero Industry Act will set clear goals for European clean tech by 2030. In essence, it will target investments on strategic projects along the entire supply chain.
“So far, the EU taxonomy has shortcomings, hindering the inclusion and growth of innovative players,” Dr Andreas Sichert — CEO of German clean tech company Orcan Energy — told TNW in response to the GDIP. “We must harness the small window to foster innovation and clean tech and ensure their quick scale-up by creating a fertilizing regulatory environment free of blockages.”
The plan’s second focal point is to drive up investment and financing of clean tech production. “To keep European industry attractive, there is a need to be competitive with the offers and incentives that are currently available outside the EU,” Von der Leyen noted.
For this reason, the bloc should temporarily adapt its state aid rules to make them faster and simpler for calculations, procedures, and approvals — such as the tax-break option. And to ensure funding support across the entire Union, the Commission will prepare a European Sovereignty Fund.
The GDIP will also aim for the growth of the skills and skilled workers needed to facilitate the transition. It will finally seek to promote global and open fair trade.
“For clean tech to deliver net zero globally, there will be a need for strong and resilient supply chains. Our economies will rely ever more on international trade as the transition speeds up to open up more markets and to access the inputs needed for industry,” the Commission’s chief said.
While she highlighted international trade’s importance for the EU, she also stressed that “competition on net zero must be based on a level playing field.”
This echoes European concerns over the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) — a $369-billion clean tech subsidy package targeted for North American-made products. Since the act’s announcement, various EU leaders have voiced fears over its potential to discriminate against Union-based firms, or to lure them to the US.
“Our aim should be to avoid disruptions in transatlantic trade and investment. We should work towards ensuring that our respective incentive programmes are fair and mutually reinforcing,” Von der Leyen said.
The requirement for fair trade practices also targets China, which — according to the Commission chief — not only restricts access to its market for EU companies operating in the sector, but also encourages them to relocate there all or part of their production.
Von der Leyen expressed the EU’s willingness to find common solutions with both nations and foster beneficial partnerships. But balancing these relationships won’t come easy.
On the same day she addressed the World Economic Forum, Dutch tech industry group FMEasked the Commission for “more unified action” on whether to support new US restrictions on chip exports to China, a key part of Washington’s strategy in its rivalry against Beijing.
The Netherlands is home to ASML Holding NV, a major European manufacturer of semiconductors. Some 15% of its sales went to China in 2021, translating into €2 billion in revenue, which means that adopting the US rules could negatively impact the country.
Speaking to TNW, Mark Lippett — chip specialist and CEO of UK-based XMOS — stressed that China is “tightly woven” into the global semiconductor supply chain, meaning that “any nation must be very selective when it comes to restricting certain products’ sale to Chinese companies.”
‘When your company is owned by US interests, that balance is put under severe pressure,” he added. “To use ASML as a well-documented example, the company’s American management has instructed it to ‘refrain — either directly, or indirectly — from servicing, shipping or providing support to any customers in China until further notice.’”
According to Lippett, even though the EU could afford to compensate to a certain extent ASML’s loss, were it to exit the Chinese market, the expected protection from the European Chips Act would probably not come in time for companies completely dependent on China for revenue.
And while Von der Leyen proposed “de-risking” rather than “decoupling” when it comes to the Asian country, she stressed that the EU “won’t hesitate” to investigate unfair practices that distort the market.
Overall, the EU’s position in this situation is a balancing act between geopolitical interests and fast-tracking new initiatives while maintaining focus and funding of existing ones. It remains to be seen whether and how the new Green Deal Industrial Plan will advance Europe’s goal to become a clean tech leader, but it surely must find its balance before the window of opportunity is closed.
An Italian company has unveiled a novel method of measuring AI progress: analyzing improvements in machine translation.
Translated, a provider of translation services, used the approach to predict when we will achieve singularity, a vague concept often defined as the point where machines become smarter than humans.
The Rome-based business sets this milestone at the moment when AI provides “a perfect translation.” According to the new research, this arrives when machine translation (MT) is better than top human translations.
Translated’s analysis suggests this will happen before the end of the 2020s.
“[It will be] within this decade, at least for the top 10 languages in a context of average complexity,” Marco Trombetti, the company’s CEO, tells TNW. “The reality is that in some specific domains and in a few languages this has already happened. For some rare languages and domains it may never come.”
Translated’s estimates are based on data taken from Matecat, a computer-assisted translation (CAT) tool.
The platform began life in 2011 as an EU-funded research project. Three years later, the system was released as open-source software, which professionals use to improve their translations.
Translated offers Matecat as a freemium product. In return, users provide the company with data that’s used to improve its models.
To chart the path to singularity, Translated tracked the time users spent checking and correcting 2 billion MT suggestions. Around 136,000 professionals worldwide had made these edits across Matecat’s 12 years of operation. The translations spanned diverse domains, from literature to technical subjects. They also included fields in which MT is still struggling, such as speech transcription.
“Singularity is really close.
The data suggests that AI is rapidly improving. In 2015, the average time that world-leading translators took to check and correct MT suggestions was around 3.5 seconds per word. Today, that number’s down to 2 seconds per word.
At the current rate, the time will hit 1 second in around five years. At that point, MT would provide the epochal “perfect translation.” In practical terms, it will then be more convenient to edit a machine’s translations than a top professional’s.
According to Trombetti, any task involving communication, understanding, listening, and sharing knowledge will become multilingual with minimal investment.
“The exact date of when we will reach the singularity point may vary, but the trend is clear: it is really close,” he says.
Advances in MT require increasing computing power, linguistic data, and algorithmic efficiency. Consequently, the researchers had presumed progress would slow as singularity approached. To their surprise, the rate of development was highly linear.
If this momentum continues as predicted, Translated anticipates demand for MT to be at least 100 times higher. Workers may worry that their jobs will be automated, but they could also benefit. Translated forecasts at least a tenfold increase in requests for professional translations.
“All our customers who are deploying machine translation on a large scale are also spending more on human translation,” says Trombetti.
“Machine translation is an enabler in that it creates more interactions between markets and users that were not in contact before. This generates business, and business generates higher-quality content that requires professionals.”
Trombetti also expects new roles to emerge for elite translators.
“To get the best quality out of machine translation you need it to be trained by the best linguists. A significant volume of translations is required to train language models and fix errors in them, so I guess it’s likely that we’ll witness huge competition for the best translators in the upcoming years.”
“MT is a good predictor of what’s next in AI.
According to Translated, the new research is the first to ever quantify the speed at which we’re approaching singularity. The claim won’t convince every cynic, but MT is a compelling barometer for AI progress.
Human languages are notoriously tricky for machines to master. The subjectivity of linguistic meaning, the constantly evolving conventions, and the nuances of cultural references, wordplay, and tone can be elusive for computers.
In translation, these complexities must be modelled and linked in two languages. As a result, algorithmic research, data collection, and model sizes are often pioneered in the field. The Transformer model, for instance, was applied to MT many years before being used in OpenAI’s GPT systems.
“MT is simply a good predictor of what is coming next in AI,” says Trombetti.
If what comes next is singularity, the Italian entrepreneur anticipates a new era for global communication.
He envisions universal translators, all content becoming globally available, and everyone able to speak their native language.
His definition of singularity may be questionable, but its appeal is undeniable.
Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives. Ioanna is a writer at SHIFT. She likes the transition from old to modern, and she’s all about shifting perspectives.
The EU-funded Smart European Shipbuilding (SEUS) project launched this month, aiming to improve the shipbuilding process via computational tools.
The launch arrives as the maritime industry’s increasingly embraces digitization and automation, facilitated by rapid advancements in data science and software development.
SEUS is backed by a consortium of eight organizations from five European countries, representing different technologies and parts of the design and shipbuilding industry: computational tools development, industrially applied research, and end-users (i.e. shipyards).
These partners will work together to create a framework for data-driven shipbuilding. According to the project’s description, this will be realized through the development of a new integrated platform that incorporates “early and detailed ship design solutions,” “data management,” and “collaboration software.”
Specifically, the platform will build novel practices for human-centric knowledge management, data-driven AI design elements, intelligent technology, and an Industry 5.0 concept for shipbuilding. It will also reinforce the growth of a European workforce that is highly skilled in the integration and deployment of these new technologies.
The project’s ambition is to cut down engineering time by up to 30% percent reduction as well as achieve an up to 20% reduction in the time needed for assembly and construction at EU shipyards. If it succeeds, it’s expected to not only accelerate shipbuilding’s digital transformation, but also provide shipbuilders in the Union with a strong competitive advantage through cost- and time-savings in the design and production stages.
Finland’s Cadmatic, Contact Software in Germany, and Netherlands-based Sarc BV will be contributing to the technological expertise. Ulstein Group in Norway and Astilleros Gondan in Spain are the two joining shipyards. And three research institutes, the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Turku University in Finland, and NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences in The Netherlands, represent the academic partners.
SEUS is being funded by Horizon Europe, the EU’s flagship research and innovation program. The Union is providing approximately €7 million for its implementation.