black hole

Nearby star cluster houses unusually large black hole

Big, but not that big —

Fast-moving stars imply that there’s an intermediate-mass black hole there.

John Timmer – Jul 10, 2024 6: 20 pm UTC

Three panel image, with zoom increasing from left to right. Left most panel is a wide view of the globular cluster; right is a zoom in to the area where its central black hole must reside. — Enlarge / From left to right, zooming in from the globular cluster to the site of its black hole.

ESA/Hubble & NASA, M. Häberle

Supermassive black holes appear to reside at the center of every galaxy and to have done so since galaxies formed early in the history of the Universe. Currently, however, we can’t entirely explain their existence, since it’s difficult to understand how they could grow quickly enough to reach the cutoff for supermassive as quickly as they did.

A possible bit of evidence was recently found by using about 20 years of data from the Hubble Space Telescope. The data comes from a globular cluster of stars that’s thought to be the remains of a dwarf galaxy and shows that a group of stars near the cluster’s core are moving so fast that they should have been ejected from it entirely. That implies that something massive is keeping them there, which the researchers argue is a rare intermediate-mass black hole, weighing in at over 8,000 times the mass of the Sun.

Moving fast

The fast-moving stars reside in Omega Centauri, the largest globular cluster in the Milky Way. With an estimated 10 million stars, it’s a crowded environment, but observations are aided by its relative proximity, at “only” 17,000 light-years away. Those observations have been hinting that there might be a central black hole within the globular cluster, but the evidence has not been decisive.

The new work, done by a large international team, used over 500 images of Omega Centauri, taken by the Hubble Space Telescope over the course of 20 years. This allowed them to track the motion of stars within the cluster, allowing an estimate of their speed relative to the cluster’s center of mass. While this has been done previously, the most recent data allowed an update that reduced the uncertainty in the stars’ velocity.

Within the update data, a number of stars near the cluster’s center stood out for their extreme velocities: seven of them were moving fast enough that the gravitational pull of the cluster isn’t enough to keep them there. All seven should have been lost from the cluster within 1,000 years, although the uncertainties remained large for two of them. Based on the size of the cluster, there shouldn’t even be a single foreground star between the Hubble and the Omega Cluster, so these really seem to be within the cluster despite their velocity.

The simplest explanation for that is that there’s an additional mass holding them in place. That could potentially be several massive objects, but the close proximity of all these stars to the center of the cluster favor a single, compact object. Which means a black hole.

Based on the velocities, the researchers estimate that the object has a mass of at least 8,200 times that of the Sun. A couple of stars appear to be accelerating; if that holds up based on further observations, it would indicate that the black hole is over 20,000 solar masses. That places it firmly within black hole territory, though smaller than supermassive black holes, which are viewed as those with roughly a million solar masses or more. And it’s considerably larger than you’d expect from black holes formed through the death of a star, which aren’t expected to be much larger than 100 times the Sun’s mass.

This places it in the category of intermediate-mass black holes, of which there are only a handful of potential sightings, none of them universally accepted. So, this is a significant finding if for no other reason than it may be the least controversial spotting of an intermediate-mass black hole yet.

What’s this telling us?

For now, there are still considerable uncertainties in some of the details here—but prospects for improving the situation exist. Observations with the Webb Space Telescope could potentially pick up the faint emissions from gas that’s falling into the black hole. And it can track the seven stars identified here. Its spectrographs could also potentially pick up the red and blue shifts in light caused by the star’s motion. Its location at a considerable distance from Hubble could also provide a more detailed three-dimensional picture of Omega Centauri’s central structure.

Figuring this out could potentially tell us more about how black holes grow to supermassive scales. Earlier potential sightings of intermediate-mass black holes have also come in globular clusters, which may suggest that they’re a general feature of large gatherings of stars.

But Omega Centauri differs from many other globular clusters, which often contain large populations of stars that all formed at roughly the same time, suggesting the clusters formed from a single giant cloud of materials. Omega Centauri has stars with a broad range of ages, which is one of the reasons why people think it’s the remains of a dwarf galaxy that was sucked into the Milky Way.

If that’s the case, then its central black hole is an analog of the supermassive black holes found in actual dwarf galaxies—which raises the question of why it’s only intermediate-mass. Did something about its interactions with the Milky Way interfere with the black hole’s growth?

And, in the end, none of this sheds light on how any black hole grows to be so much more massive than any star it could conceivably have formed from. Getting a better sense of this black hole’s history could provide more perspective on some questions that are currently vexing astronomers.

Nature, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07511-z (About DOIs).

Newly spotted black hole has mass of 17 billion Suns, adding another daily

accretion disk, astronomy, astrophysics, black hole, quasar, Science, supermassive black hole / Mike M. / February 21, 2024

Feeding frenzy —

An accretion disk 7 light-years across powers an exceptionally bright galaxy.

John Timmer – Feb 20, 2024 6: 59 pm UTC

Artist's view of a tilted orange disk with a black object at its center.

Quasars initially confused astronomers when they were discovered. First identified as sources of radio-frequency radiation, later observations showed that the objects had optical counterparts that looked like stars. But the spectrum of these ostensible stars showed lots of emissions at wavelengths that didn’t seem to correspond to any atoms we knew about.

Eventually, we figured out these were spectral lines of normal atoms but heavily redshifted by immense distances. This means that to appear like stars at these distances, these objects had to be brighter than an entire galaxy. Eventually, we discovered that quasars are the light produced by an actively feeding supermassive black hole at the center of a galaxy.

But finding new examples has remained difficult because, in most images, they continue to look just like stars—you still need to obtain a spectrum and figure out their distance to know you’re looking at a quasar. Because of that, there might be some unusual quasars we’ve ignored because we didn’t realize they were quasars. That’s the case with an object named J0529−4351, which turned out to be the brightest quasar we’ve ever observed.

That’s no star!

J0529−4351 had been observed a number of times, but its nature wasn’t recognized until a survey went hunting for quasars and recognized it was one. At the time of the 2023 paper that described the survey, the researchers behind it suggested that it had either been magnified through gravitational lensing, or it was the brightest quasar we’ve ever identified.

In this week’s Nature Astronomy, they confirmed: It’s not lensed, it really is that bright. Gravitational lensing tends to distort objects or create multiple images of them. But J0529−4351 is undistorted, and nothing nearby looks like it. And there’s nothing in the foreground that has enough mass to create a lens.

So, how do you take an instance of an incredibly bright object and make it even brighter? The light from a quasar is produced by an accretion disk. While accretion disks can form around black holes with masses similar to stars, quasars require a supermassive black hole like the ones found at the center of galaxies. These disks are formed of material that has been captured by the gravity of the black hole and is in orbit before falling inward and crossing the event horizon. Light is created as the material is heated by collisions of its constituent particles and gives up gravitational energy as it falls inward.

Getting more light out of an accretion disk is pretty simple: You either put more material in it or make it bigger. But there’s a limit to how much material you can cram into one. At some point, the accretion disk will produce so much radiation that it drives off any additional material that’s falling inward, essentially choking off its own food supply. Called the Eddington limit, this sets ceilings on how bright an accretion disk can be and how quickly a black hole can grow.

Factors like the mass of the black hole and its spin help set the Eddington limit. Plus, the amount of material falling inward can drop below the Eddington limit, leading to a bit less light being produced. Trying various combinations of these factors and checking them against observational data, the researchers came up with several estimates for the properties of the supermassive black hole and its accretion disk.

Extremely bright

For the supermassive black hole’s size, the researchers propose two possible estimates: one at 17 billion solar masses, and the other at 19 billion solar masses. That’s not the most massive one known, but there are only about a dozen thought to be larger. (For comparison, the one at the center of the Milky Way is “only” about 4 million solar masses.) The data is best fit by a moderate spin, with us viewing it from about 45 degrees off the pole of the black hole. The accretion disk would be roughly seven light-years across. Meaning, if the system were centered on our Sun, several nearby stars would be within the disk.

The accretion rate needed to power the brightness is just below the Eddington limit and works out to roughly 370 solar masses of material per year. Or, about a Sun a day. At that rate, it would take about 30 million years to double in size.

But it’s rare to have that much material around for one to feed that long. And a look through archival images shows that the brightness of J0529−4351 can vary by as much as 15 percent, so it’s not likely to be pushing the Eddington limit the entire time.

Even so, it’s difficult to understand how that much material can be driven into the center of a galaxy for any considerable length of time. The researchers suggest that the ALMA telescope array might be able to pick up anything unusual there. “If extreme quasars were caused by unusual host galaxy gas flows, ALMA should see this,” they write. “If nothing unusual was found in the host gas, then this would sharpen the well-known puzzle of how to sustain high accretion rates for long enough to form such extreme supermassive black holes.”

The whole accretion disk is also large enough that it should be possible to image it with the Very Large Telescope, which would allow us to track the disk’s rotation and estimate the black hole’s mass.

The system’s extreme nature, then, may actually help us figure out its details despite its immense distance. Meanwhile, the researchers wonder whether other unusual systems might remain undiscovered simply because we haven’t considered that an object might be a quasar instead of a star.

Nature Astronomy, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41550-024-02195-x (About DOIs).

Newly spotted black hole has mass of 17 billion Suns, adding another daily Read More »