Author name: Mike M.

a-$20,000-electric-truck-with-manual-windows-and-no-screens?-meet-slate-auto.

A $20,000 electric truck with manual windows and no screens? Meet Slate Auto.


time to put up or shut up, internet

Owners can buy kits to add accessories and features to the Slate Truck.

The headlight of a Slate Truck

Slate Auto is a new American EV startup. Credit: Slate Auto

Slate Auto is a new American EV startup. Credit: Slate Auto

In one of the strangest launches we’ve seen in a while, Slate Auto, the reportedly Jeff Bezos-backed electric vehicle startup, unveiled its first EV, the Slate Truck. Notably, the vehicle is capable of a claimed 150 miles (241 km) of range at a starting price of less than $20,000, assuming federal clean vehicle tax credits continue to exist.

Slate caused a lot of social media froth when it parked a pair of styling concepts (not functional vehicles) in Venice, California, advertising bizarre fake businesses. Today, the company unveiled the vehicle to the press at an event near the Long Beach Airport.

You wanted a bare-bones EV? Here it is.

The Blank Slate, as the company calls it, is “all about accessible personalization” and includes a “flat-pack accessory SUV Kit” that turns the truck from a pickup into a five-seat SUV and another that turns it into an “open air” truck. The aim, according to a spokesperson for Slate Auto, is to make the new vehicle repairable and customizable while adhering to safety and crash standards.

A rendering of a Slate Truck on the road

If you’ve ever said you’d buy a bare-bones truck with no infotainment and manual windows if only they’d build one, it’s time to get out your wallet. Credit: Slate Auto

The truck will come with a choice of two battery packs: a 57.2 kWh battery pack with rear-wheel drive and a target range of 150 miles and an 84.3 kWh battery pack with a target of 240 miles (386 km). The truck has a NACS charging port and will charge to 80 percent in under 30 minutes, peaking at 120 kW, we’re told. The wheels are modest 17-inch steelies, and the truck is no speed demon—zero to 60 mph (0–97 km/h) will take 8 seconds thanks to the 201 hp (150 kW), 195 lb-ft (264 Nm) motor, and it tops out at 90 mph (145 km/h).

Because the truck will be built in just a single configuration from the factory, Slate Auto will offer body wraps instead of different paint colors. Rather than relying on a built-in infotainment system, you’ll use your phone plugged into a USB outlet or a dedicated tablet inside the cabin for your entertainment and navigation needs. The Slate Truck will also aim for a 5-star crash rating, according to a company spokesperson, and will feature active emergency braking, forward collision warning, and as many as eight airbags.

It sounds good on paper (and it looks good in person), but the spec sheet is littered with things that give us pause from a production and safety standpoint. They present hurdles the startup will have to surmount before these trucks start landing in people’s driveways.

Slate Truck interior.

Legally, there has to be some way to show a backup camera feed in here, but you could do that in the rearview mirror. Credit: Slate Auto

For example, the truck has manual crank windows, steel wheels, HVAC knobs, and an optional do-it-yourself “flat-pack accessory SUV kit.” All of these low-tech features are quite cool, and they’re available on other vehicles like the Bronco and the Jeep, but there are a number of supplier, tariff, and safety hurdles they present for an upstart company. There is plenty of Kool-Aid for the automotive press to get drunk on—and if this truck becomes a real thing, we’ll be fully on board—but we have a lot of questions.

Can Slate really build an EV that cheap?

First, there’s the price. The myth of the sub-$25,000 electric vehicle has been around for more than 10 years now, thanks to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s perpetual promise of an affordable EV.

That vehicle may never exist due to the cost of the current battery and manufacturing technology that we use to make modern EVs. While much of that cost is tied up in the battery, prices have improved as components have come down in price. That combination has led companies like Rivian and Scout to promise SUVs that could start at around $40,000, which is much more attainable for the average buyer. But $40,000 is still wide of that $25,000 marker.

There’s also the issue of federal incentives. Without the full clean vehicle tax credit, the new Slate Truck will actually cost at least $27,500 before tax, title, and so on. Bezos’ team seems to be betting that Trump won’t get rid of the incentives, despite abundant signals that he intends to do just that. “Whether or not the incentive goes away, our truck will be a high-value, desirable vehicle,” a spokesperson for Slate Auto told Ars.

Then there are the retro and basic components Slate Auto says it will use for the truck, many of which are made in China and are thus subject to the Trump tariffs. Even though the company says it will manufacture the vehicles in the US, that doesn’t mean that the components (battery, motors, steel wheels, window cranks, and HVAC knobs) will be made stateside. If the tariffs stick, that sub $30,000 vehicle will become measurably more expensive.

For example, the last automaker to use manual crank windows was Jeep in the JL Wrangler, and as of 2025, the company no longer offers them as an option. Ford also recently phased out hand-wound windows from its Super Duty trucks. That’s because electric switches are cheaper and readily available from suppliers—who are mostly located in China—and because automakers that offer manual and powered windows had to have two different door assembly lines to accommodate the different tech. That made building both options more expensive. Power windows are also somewhat safer for families with younger children in the backseat, as parents can lock the roll-down feature.

A rendering of a Slate SUV

It’s an ambitious idea, and we hope it works. Credit: Slate Auto

Slate Auto’s spokesperson declined to talk about partners or suppliers but did say the company will manufacture its new truck in a “reindustrialized” factory in the Midwest. A quick look at the plethora of job listings at SlateAuto on LinkedIn shows that that factory will be in Troy, Michigan, where there are around 40 jobs listed, including body closure engineers (for the flat-pack kit), prototype engineers, seating buyers/engineers, controls and automation engineers, a head of powertrain and propulsion, wheels and suspension engineers, plant managers, and more. Those are all very pivotal, high-level positions that Slate will need to fill immediately to bring this vehicle to market on the timeline it has set.

Slate Auto also hasn’t said how it will ensure that these DIY vehicle add-ons will be certified to be safe on the road without the company taking on the liability. It will likely work the way Jeep and Bronco handle their accessories, but both Stellantis and Ford have robust service networks they can count on, with dealerships around the country able to help owners who get into a pickle trying to install accessories. Slate doesn’t have that, at least at the moment. Slate’s SUV kit, for example, will include a roll cage, rear seat, and airbags. It will be interesting to see how the company ensures the airbags are installed safely—if it allows DIY-ers to do it.

Will young people actually want it?

Finally, there’s the biggest question: Will younger generations actually plunk down $20,000 or more to own a Slate vehicle that won’t go into production until the fourth quarter of 2026—more than a year and a half out—especially in the face of the economic upheaval and global uncertainty that has taken hold under the second Trump administration?

A rendering of a Slate Truck with a red and black livery

Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid have all been at the mercy of their suppliers, sinking deadlines and making prices rise. How will Slate Auto avoid that trap? Credit: Slate Auto

Data shows that while some young people have started to opt for devices like dumbphones and may prefer the novelty of no tech, they may also prefer to rent a car or rideshare instead of owning a vehicle. Given Slate Auto’s Bezos backing, I’d imagine that the company would be willing to, say, rent out a Slate Truck for a weekend and charge you a subscription fee for its use. It’s also conceivable that these could become fleet vehicles for Amazon and other companies.

Slate Auto says it will sell directly to consumers (which will anger dealers) and offer a nationwide service network. A spokesperson at Slate Auto declined to give more details about how that might all work but said the company will have more to announce about partners who will enable service and installation in the future.

Even with all the unanswered questions, it’s good to see a company making a real effort to build a truly affordable electric vehicle with funky retro styling. There are a number of things Slate Auto will have to address moving forward, but if the company can deliver a consumer vehicle under that magic $25,000 marker, we’ll be roundly impressed.

A $20,000 electric truck with manual windows and no screens? Meet Slate Auto. Read More »

can-the-legal-system-catch-up-with-climate-science?

Can the legal system catch up with climate science?

Similarly, it’s possible to calculate the impact of emissions within a limited number of years. For example, Callahan and Mankin note that internal oil company research suggested that climate change would be a problem back around 1980, and calculated the impact of emissions that occurred after people knew they were an issue. So, the approach is extremely flexible.

From there, the researchers could use empirical information that links elevated temperatures to economic damage. “Recent peer-reviewed work has used econometrics to infer causal relationships between climate hazards and outcomes such as income loss, reduced agricultural yields, increased human mortality, and depressed economic growth,” Callahan and Mankin write. These metrics can be used to estimate the cost of things like flooding, crop losses, and other economic damages. Alternately, the researchers could analyze the impact on individual climate events where the financial costs have been calculated separately.

Massive damages

To implement their method, the researchers perform lots of individual models, collectively providing the most probable costs and the likely range around them. First, they translate each company’s emissions into the impact on the global mean surface temperature. That gets translated to an impact on extreme temperatures, producing an estimate of what the days with the five most extreme temperatures would look like. That, in turn, is translated to economic damages associated with extreme heat.

Callahan and Mankin use Chevron as an example. By 2020, Chevron’s emissions were responsible for 0.025° C of the warming that year. If you perform a similar analysis for the ears between 1991 and 2020, the researchers come up with a range of damages that runs from a low of about $800 billion all the way up to $3.6 trillion. Most of the damage affected nations in the tropics.

Carrying on through the five companies that have led to the most carbon emissions, they calculate that Saudi Aramco, Gazprom, Chevron, and Exxon Mobile have all produced damages of about $2 trillion. BP brings up the rear, with “just” $1.45 trillion in damage. For the full list of 111 carbon majors, Callahan and Mankin place the total damages at roughly $28 trillion.

Can the legal system catch up with climate science? Read More »

ai-secretly-helped-write-california-bar-exam,-sparking-uproar

AI secretly helped write California bar exam, sparking uproar

On Monday, the State Bar of California revealed that it used AI to develop a portion of multiple-choice questions on its February 2025 bar exam, causing outrage among law school faculty and test takers. The admission comes after weeks of complaints about technical problems and irregularities during the exam administration, reports the Los Angeles Times.

The State Bar disclosed that its psychometrician (a person or organization skilled in administrating psychological tests), ACS Ventures, created 23 of the 171 scored multiple-choice questions with AI assistance. Another 48 questions came from a first-year law student exam, while Kaplan Exam Services developed the remaining 100 questions.

The State Bar defended its practices, telling the LA Times that all questions underwent review by content validation panels and subject matter experts before the exam. “The ACS questions were developed with the assistance of AI and subsequently reviewed by content validation panels and a subject matter expert in advance of the exam,” wrote State Bar Executive Director Leah Wilson in a press release.

According to the LA Times, the revelation has drawn strong criticism from several legal education experts. “The debacle that was the February 2025 bar exam is worse than we imagined,” said Mary Basick, assistant dean of academic skills at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. “I’m almost speechless. Having the questions drafted by non-lawyers using artificial intelligence is just unbelievable.”

Katie Moran, an associate professor at the University of San Francisco School of Law who specializes in bar exam preparation, called it “a staggering admission.” She pointed out that the same company that drafted AI-generated questions also evaluated and approved them for use on the exam.

State bar defends AI-assisted questions amid criticism

Alex Chan, chair of the State Bar’s Committee of Bar Examiners, noted that the California Supreme Court had urged the State Bar to explore “new technologies, such as artificial intelligence” to improve testing reliability and cost-effectiveness.

AI secretly helped write California bar exam, sparking uproar Read More »

netflix-drops-wednesday-s2-teaser,-first-look-images

Netflix drops Wednesday S2 teaser, first-look images

Jenna Ortega is back in the titular role for S2 of the Netflix series, Wednesday.

It’s been a long, long wait, but we’re finally getting a second season of the Netflix supernatural horror comedy, Wednesday. The streaming giant dropped the first teaser and several first-look images to whet our appetites for what promises to be an excellent follow-up to the delightful first season.

(Spoilers for S1 below.)

As previously reported, director Tim Burton famously turned down the opportunity to direct the 1991 feature film The Addams Family, inspired by characters created by American cartoonist Charles Addams for The New Yorker in 1938. Wednesday showrunners Alfred Gough and Miles Millar—best known for Smallville—expected Burton to turn them down as well when they made their pitch. He signed up for the project instead.

This was an older, edgier, and even darker Wednesday (Jenna Ortega) than the dour young girl Christina Ricci made famous in the 1990s. Aloof, sardonic, and resolutely independent, she was very much the problem child, even by Addams standards, having been expelled from eight schools in five years. Hence her enrollment at Nevermore Academy, a haven for so-called “outcasts” and the alma mater of her parents.

Wednesday struggled to fit in at first, clashing with her cheery werewolf roommate Enid (Emma Myers) and the school queen bee, a siren named Bianca (Joy Sunday). Then she began investigating a string of brutal murders, leading her to resolve some long-standing family issues and delve into the school’s dark history. It all added up to a winning formula—basically a very good eight-hour Burton movie with a spooky murder mystery at its core.

Netflix drops Wednesday S2 teaser, first-look images Read More »

google-won’t-ditch-third-party-cookies-in-chrome-after-all

Google won’t ditch third-party cookies in Chrome after all

Maintaining the status quo

While Google’s sandbox project is looking more directionless today, it is not completely ending the initiative. The team still plans to deploy promised improvements in Chrome’s Incognito Mode, which has been re-architected to preserve user privacy after numerous complaints. Incognito Mode blocks all third-party cookies, and later this year, it will gain IP protection, which masks a user’s IP address to protect against cross-site tracking.

What is Topics?

Chavez admits that this change will mean Google’s Privacy Sandbox APIs will have a “different role to play” in the market. That’s a kind way to put it. Google will continue developing these tools and will work with industry partners to find a path forward in the coming months. The company still hopes to see adoption of the Privacy Sandbox increase, but the industry is unlikely to give up on cookies voluntarily.

While Google focuses on how ad privacy has improved since it began working on the Privacy Sandbox, the changes in Google’s legal exposure are probably more relevant. Since launching the program, Google has lost three antitrust cases, two of which are relevant here: the search case currently in the remedy phase and the newly decided ad tech case. As the government begins arguing that Chrome gives Google too much power, it would be a bad look to force a realignment of the advertising industry using the dominance of Chrome.

In some ways, this is a loss—tracking cookies are undeniably terrible, and Google’s proposed alternative is better for privacy, at least on paper. However, universal adoption of the Privacy Sandbox could also give Google more power than it already has, and the supposed privacy advantages may never have fully materialized as Google continues to seek higher revenue.

Google won’t ditch third-party cookies in Chrome after all Read More »

recap:-wheel-of-time’s-third-season-balefires-its-way-to-a-hell-of-a-finish

Recap: Wheel of Time’s third season balefires its way to a hell of a finish

Andrew Cunningham and Lee Hutchinson have spent decades of their lives with Robert Jordan and Brandon Sanderson’s Wheel of Time books, and they previously brought that knowledge to bear as they recapped each first season episode and second season episode of Amazon’s WoT TV series. Now we’re back in the saddle for season 3—along with insights, jokes, and the occasional wild theory.

These recaps won’t cover every element of every episode, but they will contain major spoilers for the show and the book series. We’ll do our best to not spoil major future events from the books, but there’s always the danger that something might slip out. If you want to stay completely unspoiled and haven’t read the books, these recaps aren’t for you.

New episodes of The Wheel of Time season three will be posted for Amazon Prime subscribers every Thursday. This write-up covers the season three finale, “He Who Comes With the Dawn,” which was released on April 17.

Lee: Wow. That was… a lot.

One of the recurring themes of our recaps across seasons has been, “Well, I guess we’re going to have to give up on seeing $SEMI_MAJOR_BOOK_SETTING_OR_EVENT on screen because of budget or time or narrative reasons,” and we’ve had to let go of a lot of stuff. But this episode kicks off with a flashback showing Elaida walking out of a certain twisted redstone doorframe, looking smug and fingering a bracelet. Sharp-eyed viewers might have spotted this doorway in the background of the season premiere, when the Black Ajah loots the Tower’s ter’angreal storeroom, and now in true Chekov’s Gun fashion, the doorway comes ’round again—and not just this one, because like many things in the Wheel of Time, the doorways come in a binary set.

We surely owe show-watchers a very quick recap of the Finn—and I believe we glossed over a scene in an earlier episode where the boys are actually playing the snakes-and-foxes game that these horrifying fae-folk are based on—but before we do that, let’s take a breath and look at what else we’ve got in the episode. Closure! (Well, some.) Balefire! Blocks breaking! Rand pulling a Paul Atreides and making it rain on Dune! I mean, uh, in the Three-Fold Land! And many other things!

Image of an Eelfin

According to the book, this Cat-in-the-Hat-looking mfer’s clothes are made of human flesh. Creepy.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

According to the book, this Cat-in-the-Hat-looking mfer’s clothes are made of human flesh. Creepy. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Andrew: I found this episode less than satisfying after last week’s specifically because of that grab-bag approach. There is some exciting, significant, season finale-style stuff happening here, but it’s also one of those piece-moving episodes with scene after scene of setup, setup, setup without a ton of room for payoff. Setup for a fourth season that, as of this writing, we still don’t know whether we’re getting!

So a number of things just feel rushed, most significantly Rand’s hard turn on Lanfear after a cursory attempt to coax her back to the side of the Light, and the existence of balefire as a concept. I actually love how the show visualizes it—it’s essentially a giant death laser that melts you out of the Pattern so thoroughly that it doesn’t just kill you, it also erases the last few seconds of your existence, represented here as a little shadow of a person that rewinds a bit before dissipating. The books use balefire extensively as a get-out-of-jail-free card for certain major character deaths, so it really feels like something that needs a little more preamble than it gets here.

Lee: Definitely hear you on the Rand and Lanfear stuff—though I think I was so excited by the things I cared about that I wasn’t really paying a lot of attention to the things I didn’t. And Rand & Moiraine & Lanfear are kind of at the bottom of my list of things I’m paying attention to as we slide into the finish—yeah, the Car’a’carn is Car’a’carning and Lanfear is Lanfear’ing.

Image of balefire balefiring someone.

Balefire looks a little Ghostbusters-y, but I definitely wouldn’t want to get hit with any.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Balefire looks a little Ghostbusters-y, but I definitely wouldn’t want to get hit with any. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Andrew: It’s hard to know where to start with the rest of it! There are some recreations of book events that happen roughly where they’re “supposed” to in the story. There are recreations of book events that have been pulled way forward to save some time. There are things that emphatically don’t happen in the books, also done at least partly in the interests of time. And there’s at least one thing that felt designed specifically to fake out book-readers.

What to dig into first?

Lee: The fake-out! Let’s jump in there. The books make a big deal about Rand needing a teacher for him to get good at channeling, and it can’t be a female Aes Sedai (as the oft-repeated bit about “a bird cannot teach a fish to swim” makes clear). It seemed like it might be poor neglected Logain (remember him?), but now the show makes it clear that the man on the spot is instead going to be Sammael—and then Moghedien comes along and puts all of Sammael’s insides on the outside. Soooooo… I guess Sammael is off the board.

Image of Sammael being extraordinarily dead

Sammael (center) appears to be about as dead as Siuan. So much for that plotline.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Sammael (center) appears to be about as dead as Siuan. So much for that plotline. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Andrew: Yup! We still have one Forsaken missing, by my count—there are eight in total in the show’s world, and we’ve seen five and had two more referenced by name. So the big open question is whether the eighth is the Forsaken who does end up in the Rand-teacher role in the books. I feel like the show wouldn’t have spent so much time setting up “Rand needs a teacher” without then bothering to follow up on it in some way, but this episode wants to tease people who are asking that question rather than answering it. Fair enough!

Sammael’s early death (pulled forward from book seven) has its own story reverberations. In the books he’s one of a few Forsaken who set themselves up as heads of state, and Rand has to run around individually defeating them and bringing all of these separate kingdoms together in time for the Last Battle (this is less exciting than it sounds, because it takes forever and requires endless patience for navigating the politics of each region).

It seems, increasingly, that we may just be skipping over a bunch of that stuff. That was already implied by the downplaying of Cairhienin politicking that we got on screen in season two, and I tend to see “putting all of Sammael’s blood on the outside” as another possible nod in that direction. As ever with this show, “knowing how it goes in the books” only gives us a limited amount of insight into what the show is going to do.

Lee: I’m liking it. I consider Rand’s world-unifying to be one of the core components of The Slog that we discussed last week, and I think anything that greases the skids on that entire plotline is unequivocally a good thing—that’s also about where I start skipping entire chapters if the word “Elayne” appears in them (trust me on this, show-watchers who might become book-readers: Elayne spends thousands of pages playing the most boring version of the Game of Thrones imaginable, and we suffer through every single interminable import/export discussion with her).

Speaking of Game of Thrones—at least in the sense of killing off characters and potentially shortening The Slog—Siuan’s dead! And probably not in a “can be fixed” kind of way, since we very clearly see her head separated from her body, and Moiraine gasps out confirmation. This one kind of shook me, since Siuan has a big major role to play in a certain big major thing that happens several books hence—but the more I think about it, the more this feels like the same kind of narrative belt-tightening that brought us Loial’s death last episode. Because up until that certain big major thing happens, Siuan spends a lot of her post-Amyrlin time as a scullery maid and underpants-washer. I think we can transplant that certain big major thing onto one of a half-dozen other characters and lose nothing. At least…I think. What about you?

Image of a dead Siuan Sanche

Siuan (center) has passed on. She is no more. She has ceased to be.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Siuan (center) has passed on. She is no more. She has ceased to be. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Andrew: Yeah, I mean, not nothing, exactly. Every book character we have lost on the show has done stuff that I liked in the books that is now probably not going to happen. Complaining about The Slog aside, people like these books in part because they successfully build a super-dense world inhabited by a million named characters who all have Moments. Post-Amyrlin Siuan’s journey is about humility, finding happiness, and showing that the literal One Power is not the only kind of power there is to wield; it’s not always thrilling, but I won’t say it’s of zero narrative value.

And even when discussing The Slog, part of the reason it was so infuriating is because you and I were reading these as they were coming out. If you wait three years for a book, and then it comes out and nothing happens: that’s maddening! It is also not a problem that exists for modern readers or re-readers, now that the books have been done and dusted for over a decade. My assessment of Knife of Dreams, the series’ 11th book and the last one written entirely by Jordan, went way up on my last re-read because I was able to experience it without also having to experience the bookless years before and after. (It also made me newly sad that Jordan wasn’t able to conclude the story himself, as someone who finds the Sanderson-assisted books a bit clunky and utilitarian.)

All of that being said! I agree that from this point forward in the story, Siuan is not a load-bearing character in the way that Rand or Egwene or the others are. You do also get the sense that the show wants to surprise book-readers with something big every now and again. This particular death achieves that and also cuts down on what the show has left to adapt. I get why they did it! But I also sympathize with people who will miss her.

Image of Elaida as Amyrlin

Now that she’s Amyrlin, Elaida (center) gets to wear the biggest hat of all.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Now that she’s Amyrlin, Elaida (center) gets to wear the biggest hat of all. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Lee: Let’s pivot, because I can’t wait to discuss Mat’s journey into Finn-land—one of the most important things that happens to his character in the books. I was pretty convinced that we simply weren’t going to get any of this in the show—that the Aelfinn and Eelfinn would be too outside what Amazon is willing to pay for. And yet, there are our two twisted redstone doorways. They’re repositioned somewhat from their book locations, but in a believable fashion. We have no idea what Elaida might have been doing in the doorway in the bowels of the White Tower—presumably she visited the snake-like Aelfinn (and the subtitles confirm this), which leaves Mat visiting the fox-like Eelfin.

The show has been dropping hints about this all season, from flashing us a shot of the first doorway in episode one, to actually showing the “snakes and foxes” tabletop game being played, and finally, here we are—while hunting for the control necklace in the Panarch’s palace in Tanchico, Mat steps through the doorway and… gets three wishes from a horrifying BDSM furry?

Break it down for us, Andrew. What the hell are we looking at?

Andrew: When you enter through these doors, the Finn give you stuff! The Aelfinn give you knowledge, by answering three questions. And the Eelfinn give you Things, both tangible and intangible, by granting three wishes. Exactly what these people are, where they live, why they have this arrangement with anyone who enters through the doorways: even in a series obsessed with overexplaining things, these are “don’t worry about it, that’s just how it is” questions. What you need to know is that the Aelfinns’ answers are often cryptic and open to interpretation, and the Eelfinns’ wish-granting is hyper-literal and comes with, uh, strings attached, as Mat quickly discovers.

Mat getting his things from the Eelfinn is essentially the moment he becomes the Mat he is for the rest of the story, like Perrin’s wolf powers or Egwene’s dream-walking or Rand’s channeling. So it’s pivotal! What did you think of how the show handled it?

Image of Set Sjöstrand as Couladin

Set Sjöstrand as Rand’s Shaido rival Couladin (center), giving off real Great Value Brand Khal Drogo energy here.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Set Sjöstrand as Rand’s Shaido rival Couladin (center), giving off real Great Value Brand Khal Drogo energy here. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Lee: I thought it was pretty fantastic! We get to see Mat’s foxhead medallion—granted in response to his screaming about how sick he is of being “bollocked about by every bloody magic force on this bloody planet.” But more importantly—possibly the most important thing of all to a certain class of book reader!—is that we also finally get to see the weapon that will define Mat both in combat and out for the entire rest of the series. That’s right, kids, it’s an actual-for-real Ashandarei—and Mat’s hanging from it, just like in the books! Well, sort of. Sort of somewhat similarly to the books!

Mat is being aligned and equipped very well now to head toward his destiny. In fact, after this much of a build-up, the most Wheel of Time-esque thing to happen now would be for him to be completely absent from season four. Ell-oh-ell.

Image of Mat hanging from his knife-wrench-thing.

A bargain made, a price is paid. It’s a little hard to make out, but you can clearly see Mat’s (center) Ashandarei stabbed into the top of the doorframe—just follow the rope.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

A bargain made, a price is paid. It’s a little hard to make out, but you can clearly see Mat’s (center) Ashandarei stabbed into the top of the doorframe—just follow the rope. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Andrew: The Tanchico plotline is also kind of wrapped up here in abrupt fashion. In essence, our heroes fail. Not only do Moghedien and Liandrin manage to escape with all the parts of the collar they need to corral and control the Dragon Reborn, but they also agree to team up so they can beat the other Big Bads and become the biggest bads of all. I cannot see this ending well for either of them, but Kate Fleetwood’s Liandrin is such an unhinged presence on this show that I’m glad she’s sticking around.

Our heroes don’t walk away entirely empty-handed, I suppose. Thom tells Elayne that they actually know each other and tells her that “Lord Gaebril” is actually a Forsaken and a usurper whom she hasn’t actually known her whole life. And Nynaeve gets pitched into the sea, where a near-death experience dissolves the block that is keeping her from channeling freely (the show doesn’t say this overtly, but this is only lightly altered from a similar sequence that happens in book seven or eight, I think).

Image of Nynaeve saving herself from drowning

Nynaeve (center) doing her best Charlton Heston impression.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Nynaeve (center) doing her best Charlton Heston impression. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Lee: Right, I believe Nynaeve’s block gets busted in book seven—I remember because when I started reading the series, that was the latest available book and the event stuck out. I very much like bringing it forward, too. In the books, keeping the block around makes sense narratively and serves a solid set of purposes; in the show, it was starting to feel less like a legitimate plot device and more like a bad storytelling crutch. It has served its purpose, and it’s time to get rid of it and get on with things.

(Though it is kind of funny to note that Liandrin was the one trying to help Nynaeve break the block in the show a couple of seasons ago. Looks like Liandrin finally found a method that works! The results, though, will not be what she expects.)

Image of Mat's foxhead medallion.

The foxhead medallion—one of the three items that come to define Matrim Cauthon (center).

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

The foxhead medallion—one of the three items that come to define Matrim Cauthon (center). Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Andrew: The show has set us all up to converge in Tear in season four, essentially going backwards in the story and doing parts of book three; my guess would be that, if it’s still identifiable as an adaptation of any particular Wheel of Time book, we see parts of books five and maybe six mixed in there, too. But all of that is contingent on the show getting another season, and for the first time going into a WoT finale, we aren’t actually sure if that’s happening, right?

Lee: Ugh, yeah, still no word on the next season, which sucks, because this one was so damn good. We wrap in the desert, where Rand has darkened the skies (enough to be seen all over the world!) and brought rain. Everyone looks on portentously. The Stone of Tear and the sword within it (Callandor! It’s the sword in the stone!) beckon. We just need the all-swallowing monster that is Amazon to spare some pocket change to make it happen.

Image of Rand summoning the storm

Rand (center-right) summons the rains.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Rand (center-right) summons the rains. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Andrew: I’ve been worried about this renewal. Dramas like this just don’t get as many seasons as they would have in eras of TV gone by, and we’re several years past the end of streaming TV’s blank check era (unless you’re Apple TV+, I guess). This season has earned a lot of praise from more people than us—it’s got a higher Rotten Tomatoes score than either of the previous seasons, and higher than the second season of Rings of Power.

But it also doesn’t seem like Wheel of Time has become the breakout crossover smash-hit success that Jeff Bezos had in mind when he demanded his own Game of Thrones all those years ago. It’s expensive, and shows get more expensive the longer they run, as the people in front of and behind the camera negotiate raises and contract renewals.

I would love to see this get a fourth season. The third season had enough great stuff in it that I would be legitimately sad to see it canceled now, which is more attached than I was to the show at the end of its first or second seasons. How ’bout you?

Image of Rhuarc pledging fealty to the Car'a'carn

“And how can this be? For he is the Kwisatz Haderach!” I’m sorry, I’m sorry, no more Dune jokes.

Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

“And how can this be? For he is the Kwisatz Haderach!” I’m sorry, I’m sorry, no more Dune jokes. Credit: Prime/Amazon MGM Studios

Lee: I’ve said it a bunch, and I’ll say it again: This has been the season where the show found itself. I have every confidence that the next few seasons—if they’re allowed to exist—are going to kick ass.

But this is 2025, the year all dreams die. Perhaps this show, too, is a dream—one from which we are fated to wake sooner, rather than later.

I suppose we’ll know shortly. Until then, dear readers, may you always find water and shade, and may the hand of the Creator shelter you all. And also perhaps knock some sense into Bezos.

Credit: WoT Wiki

Recap: Wheel of Time’s third season balefires its way to a hell of a finish Read More »

synology-confirms-that-higher-end-nas-products-will-require-its-branded-drives

Synology confirms that higher-end NAS products will require its branded drives

Popular NAS-maker Synology has confirmed and slightly clarified a policy that appeared on its German website earlier this week: Its “Plus” tier of devices, starting with the 2025 series, will require Synology-branded hard drives for full compatibility, at least at first.

“Synology-branded drives will be needed for use in the newly announced Plus series, with plans to update the Product Compatibility List as additional drives can be thoroughly vetted in Synology systems,” a Synology representative told Ars by email. “Extensive internal testing has shown that drives that follow a rigorous validation process when paired with Synology systems are at less risk of drive failure and ongoing compatibility issues.”

Without a Synology-branded or approved drive in a device that requires it, NAS devices could fail to create storage pools and lose volume-wide deduplication and lifespan analysis, Synology’s German press release stated. Similar drive restrictions are already in place for XS Plus and rack-mounted Synology models, though work-arounds exist.

Synology also says it will later add a “carefully curated drive compatibility framework” for third-party drives and that users can submit drives for testing and documentation. “Drives that meet Synology’s stringent standards may be validated for use, offering flexibility while maintaining system integrity.”

Synology confirms that higher-end NAS products will require its branded drives Read More »

rocket-report:-daytona-rocket-delayed-again;-bahamas-tells-spacex-to-hold-up

Rocket Report: Daytona rocket delayed again; Bahamas tells SpaceX to hold up


A Falcon 9 core has now launched as many times as there are Merlins on a Falcon Heavy.

NS-31 Astronaut Katy Perry celebrates a successful mission to space. Credit: Blue Origin

Welcome to Edition 7.40 of the Rocket Report! One of the biggest spaceflight questions in my mind right now is when Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket will fly again. The company has been saying “late spring.” Today, the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel said they were told June. Several officials have suggested to Ars that the next launch will, in reality, occur no earlier than October. So when will we see New Glenn again?

As always, we welcome reader submissions, and if you don’t want to miss an issue, please subscribe using the box below (the form will not appear on AMP-enabled versions of the site). Each report will include information on small-, medium-, and heavy-lift rockets as well as a quick look ahead at the next three launches on the calendar.

Phantom Space delays Daytona launch, again. In a story that accepts what Phantom Space Founder Jim Cantrell says at face value, Payload Space reports that the company is “an up-and-coming launch provider and satellite manufacturer” and has “steadily built a three-pronged business model to take on the industry’s powerhouses.” It’s a surprisingly laudatory story for a company that has yet to accomplish much in space yet.

Putting the brakes on Daytona … What caught my eye is the section on the Daytona rocket, a small-lift vehicle the company is developing. “The company expects to begin flying Daytona late next year or early 2027, and already has a Daytona II and III in the works,” the publication reports. Why is this notable? Because in an article published less than two years ago, Cantrell said Phantom was hoping to launch an orbital test flight in 2024. In other words, the rocket is further from launch today than it was in 2023. I guess we’ll see what happens. (submitted by BH)

It appears the Minotaur IV rocket still exists. A Northrop Grumman Minotaur IV rocket successfully launched multiple classified payloads for the US National Reconnaissance Office on Wednesday, marking a return to Vandenberg Space Force Base for the solid-fueled launch vehicle after more than a decade, Space News reports. The mission, designated NROL-174, lifted off at 3: 33 p.m. Eastern from Space Launch Complex 8 at Vandenberg, California. The launch was successful.

Back on the California Coast … The Minotaur IV is a four-stage vehicle derived in part from decommissioned Peacekeeper intercontinental ballistic missiles. The first three stages are government-furnished Peacekeeper solid rocket motors, while the upper stage is a commercial Orion solid motor built by Northrop Grumman. NROL-174 follows previous NRO missions flown on Minotaur rockets—NROL-129 in 2020 and NROL-111 in 2021—both launched from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. (submitted by EllPeaTea)

The easiest way to keep up with Eric Berger’s and Stephen Clark’s reporting on all things space is to sign up for our newsletter. We’ll collect their stories and deliver them straight to your inbox.

Sign Me Up!

French launch firm gets some funding runway. The French government has awarded Latitude funding to support the construction of its new rocket factory in Reims, which is expected to open in 2026, European Spaceflight reports. Latitude first announced plans to develop a larger rocket factory in late 2023, when it expanded its original site from 1,500 to 3,000 square meters. The new facility is expected to span approximately 25,000 square meters and will support a production capacity of up to 50 Zephyr rockets per year.

Working toward a launch next year … The Zephyr rocket is designed to deliver payloads of up to 200 kilograms to low Earth orbit. It could make its debut in 2026 if all goes well. Latitude did not disclose the exact amount of funding it received for the construction of its new factory. However, it is known that while part of the funding will be awarded as a straight grant, a portion will take the form of a recoverable loan. (submitted by EllPeaTea)

RFA gets a new CEO. German launch vehicle startup Rocket Factory Augsburg has replaced its chief executive as it works toward a second chance for its first launch, Space News reports. Last Friday, RFA announced that Stefan Tweraser, who had been chief executive since October 2021, had been replaced by Indulis Kalnins.

Working toward a second launch attempt … The announcement did not give a reason for the change, but it suggested that the company was seeking someone with expertise in the aerospace industry to lead the company. Kalnins is on the aerospace faculty of a German university, Hochschule Bremen, and has been managing director of OHB Cosmos, which focused on launch services. RFA is working toward a second attempt at a first flight for RFA ONE later this year. (submitted by EllPeaTea)

Blue Origin launches all-female mission. Blue Origin’s 11th human flight—and first with an all-female flight team—blasted off from West Texas’ Launch Site One Monday morning on a flight that lasted about 10 minutes, Travel + Leisure reports. Katy Perry and Gayle King were joined by aerospace engineer Aisha Bowe, civil rights activist and scientist Amanda Nguyễn, film producer Kerianne Flynn, and Jeff Bezos’ fiancée Lauren Sánchez.

I kissed a Kármán line … “This experience has shown me you never know how much love is inside of you, how much love you have to give, and how loved you are, until the day you launch,” Perry said in her post-flight interview on the Blue Origin livestream, calling the experience “second only to being a mom” and rating it “10 out of 10.”

Bahamas to SpaceX: Let’s press pause. The Bahamas government said on Tuesday it is suspending all SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket landings in the country, pending a full post-launch investigation of the latest Starship mishap, Reuters reports. “No further clearances will be granted until a full environmental assessment is reviewed,” Bahamian Director of Communications Latrae Rahming said.

Falling from the sky … The Bahamian government said in February, after SpaceX’s first Falcon 9 first stage landing in the country, that it had approved 19 more throughout 2025, subject to regulatory approval. The Bahamas’ post-launch investigation comes after a SpaceX Starship spacecraft exploded in space last month, minutes after lifting off from Texas. Following the incident, the Bahamas said debris from the spacecraft fell into its airspace.

NASA will fly on Soyuz for a while longer. NASA and Roscosmos have extended a seat barter agreement for flights to the International Space Station into 2027 that will feature longer Soyuz missions to the station, Space News reports. Under the no-exchange-of-funds barter agreement, NASA astronauts fly on Soyuz spacecraft and Roscosmos cosmonauts fly on commercial crew vehicles to ensure that there is at least one American and one Russian on the station should either Soyuz or commercial crew vehicles be grounded for an extended period. “NASA and Roscosmos have amended the integrated crew agreement to allow for a second set of integrated crew missions in 2025, one set of integrated crew missions in 2026, and a SpaceX Dragon flight in 2027,” an agency spokesperson said.

Flying fewer times per year. One change with the agreement is the cadence of Soyuz missions. While Roscosmos had been flying Soyuz missions to the ISS every six months, missions starting with Soyuz MS-27 this April will spend eight months at the station. Neither NASA nor Roscosmos offered a reason for the change, which means that Roscosmos will fly one fewer Soyuz mission over a two-year period: three instead of four. I presume that this is a cost-saving measure. (submitted by EllPeaTea)

Falcon 9 sets reuse record. SpaceX notched another new rocket reuse record with its midnight Starlink flight on Sunday night from Florida, Spaceflight Now reports. The Falcon 9 rocket booster with the tail number 1067 launched for a record-setting 27th time, further cementing its position as the flight leader among SpaceX’s fleet.

Approaching 500 launches … It supported the launch of 27 Starlink V2 Mini satellites heading into low Earth orbit. The 27th outing for B1067 comes nearly four years after it launched its first mission, CRS-22 on June 3, 2021. Its three most recent missions were all in support of SpaceX’s Starlink satellite constellation. The Starlink 6-73 mission was also the 460th launch of a Falcon 9 rocket to date. (submitted by EllPeaTea)

The real story behind the Space Shuttle legislation. Last week, two US senators from Texas, John Cornyn and Ted Cruz, filed the “Bring the Space Shuttle Home Act” to move Space Shuttle Discovery from its current location at the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum’s Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Virginia to Houston. After the senators announced their bill, the collective response from the space community was initially shock. This was soon followed by: why? Ars spoke with several people on background, both from the political and space spheres, to get a sense of what is really happening here.

Bill is not going anywhere … The short answer is that it is all political, and the timing is due to the reelection campaign for Cornyn, who faces a stiff runoff against Ken Paxton. The legislation is, in DC parlance, a “messaging bill.” Cornyn is behind this, and Cruz simply agreed to go along. The goal in Cornyn’s campaign is to use the bill as a way to show Texans that he is fighting for them in Washington, DC, against the evils there. Presumably, he will blame the Obama administration, even though it is quite clear in hindsight that there were no political machinations behind the decision to not award a space shuttle to Houston. Space Center Houston, which would be responsible for hosting the shuttle, was not even told about the legislation before it was filed.

Next three launches

April 18: Long March 4B | Unknown payload | Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center, China | 22: 55 UTC

April 19: Falcon 9 | NROL-145 | Vandenberg Space Force Base, California | 10: 41 UTC

April 21: Falcon 9 | CRS-32 | Cape Kennedy Space Center, Florida | 08: 15 UTC

Photo of Eric Berger

Eric Berger is the senior space editor at Ars Technica, covering everything from astronomy to private space to NASA policy, and author of two books: Liftoff, about the rise of SpaceX; and Reentry, on the development of the Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon. A certified meteorologist, Eric lives in Houston.

Rocket Report: Daytona rocket delayed again; Bahamas tells SpaceX to hold up Read More »

company-apologizes-after-ai-support-agent-invents-policy-that-causes-user-uproar

Company apologizes after AI support agent invents policy that causes user uproar

On Monday, a developer using the popular AI-powered code editor Cursor noticed something strange: Switching between machines instantly logged them out, breaking a common workflow for programmers who use multiple devices. When the user contacted Cursor support, an agent named “Sam” told them it was expected behavior under a new policy. But no such policy existed, and Sam was a bot. The AI model made the policy up, sparking a wave of complaints and cancellation threats documented on Hacker News and Reddit.

This marks the latest instance of AI confabulations (also called “hallucinations”) causing potential business damage. Confabulations are a type of “creative gap-filling” response where AI models invent plausible-sounding but false information. Instead of admitting uncertainty, AI models often prioritize creating plausible, confident responses, even when that means manufacturing information from scratch.

For companies deploying these systems in customer-facing roles without human oversight, the consequences can be immediate and costly: frustrated customers, damaged trust, and, in Cursor’s case, potentially canceled subscriptions.

How it unfolded

The incident began when a Reddit user named BrokenToasterOven noticed that while swapping between a desktop, laptop, and a remote dev box, Cursor sessions were unexpectedly terminated.

“Logging into Cursor on one machine immediately invalidates the session on any other machine,” BrokenToasterOven wrote in a message that was later deleted by r/cursor moderators. “This is a significant UX regression.”

Confused and frustrated, the user wrote an email to Cursor support and quickly received a reply from Sam: “Cursor is designed to work with one device per subscription as a core security feature,” read the email reply. The response sounded definitive and official, and the user did not suspect that Sam was not human.

Screenshot:

Screenshot of an email from the Cursor support bot named Sam. Credit: BrokenToasterOven / Reddit

After the initial Reddit post, users took the post as official confirmation of an actual policy change—one that broke habits essential to many programmers’ daily routines. “Multi-device workflows are table stakes for devs,” wrote one user.

Shortly afterward, several users publicly announced their subscription cancellations on Reddit, citing the non-existent policy as their reason. “I literally just cancelled my sub,” wrote the original Reddit poster, adding that their workplace was now “purging it completely.” Others joined in: “Yep, I’m canceling as well, this is asinine.” Soon after, moderators locked the Reddit thread and removed the original post.

Company apologizes after AI support agent invents policy that causes user uproar Read More »

lg-tvs’-integrated-ads-get-more-personal-with-tech-that-analyzes-viewer-emotions

LG TVs’ integrated ads get more personal with tech that analyzes viewer emotions

With all this information, ZenVision will group LG TV viewers into highly specified market segments, such as “goal-driven achievers,” “social connectors,” or “emotionally engaged planners,” an LG spokesperson told StreamTV Insider. Zenapse’s website for ZenVision points to other potential market segments, including “digital adopters,” “wellness seekers,” “positive impact & environment,” and “money matters.”

Companies paying to advertise on LG TVs can then target viewers based on the ZenVision-specified market segments and deliver an “emotionally intelligent ad,” as Zenapse’s website puts it.

This type of targeted advertising aims to bring advertisers more in-depth information about TV viewers than demographic data or even contextual advertising (which shows ads based on what the viewer is watching) via psychographic data. Demographic data gives advertisers viewer information, like location, age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, and income. Psychographic data is supposed to go deeper and allow advertisers to target people based on so-called psychological factors, like personal beliefs, values, and attitudes. As Salesforce explains, “psychographic segmentation delves deeper into their psyche” than relying on demographic data.

“As viewers engage with content, ZenVision’s understanding of a consumer grows deeper, and our… segmentation continually evolves to optimize predictions,” the ZenVision website says.

Getting emotional

LG’s partnership comes as advertisers struggle to appeal to TV viewers’ emotions. Google, for example, attempted to tug at parents’ heartstrings with the now-infamous Dear Sydney ad aired during the 2024 Summer Olympics. Looking to push Gemini, Google hit all the wrong chords with parents, and, after much backlash, pulled the ad.

The partnership also comes as TV OS operators seek new ways to use smart TVs to grow their own advertising businesses and to get people to use TVs to buy stuff.

LG TVs’ integrated ads get more personal with tech that analyzes viewer emotions Read More »

government-it-whistleblower-calls-out-doge,-says-he-was-threatened-at-home

Government IT whistleblower calls out DOGE, says he was threatened at home


“Stay out of DOGE’s way”: IT worker details how Musk group infiltrated US agency.

Elon Musk at the White House on March 9, 2025 in Washington, DC. Credit: Getty Images | Samuel Corum

A government whistleblower told lawmakers that DOGE’s access to National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) systems went far beyond what was needed to analyze agency operations and apparently led to a data breach. NLRB employee Daniel Berulis, a DevSecOps architect, also says he received a threat when he was preparing his whistleblower disclosure.

“Mr. Berulis is coming forward today because of his concern that recent activity by members of the Department of Government Efficiency (‘DOGE’) have resulted in a significant cybersecurity breach that likely has and continues to expose our government to foreign intelligence and our nation’s adversaries,” said a letter from the group Whistleblower Aid to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence leaders and the US Office of Special Counsel.

The letter, Berulis’ sworn declaration, and an exhibit with screenshots of technical data are available here. “This declaration details DOGE activity within NLRB, the exfiltration of data from NLRB systems, and—concerningly—near real-time access by users in Russia,” Whistleblower Aid Chief Legal Counsel Andrew Bakaj wrote. “Notably, within minutes of DOGE personnel creating user accounts in NLRB systems, on multiple occasions someone or something within Russia attempted to login using all of the valid credentials (e.g. Usernames/Passwords). This, combined with verifiable data being systematically exfiltrated to unknown servers within the continental United States—and perhaps abroad—merits investigation.”

Bakaj said they notified law enforcement about an “absolutely disturbing” threat Berulis received on April 7. Someone “taped a threatening note to Mr. Berulis’ home door with photographs—taken via a drone—of him walking in his neighborhood,” Bakaj wrote. “The threatening note made clear reference to this very disclosure he was preparing for you, as the proper oversight authority. While we do not know specifically who did this, we can only speculate that it involved someone with the ability to access NLRB systems.”

NLRB denies breach

Berulis’ disclosure said that several days before receiving this threat, he had been instructed to drop his investigation and not report his concerns to US security officials.

Bakaj’s letter to senators and the Office of Special Counsel requested “that both law enforcement agencies and Congress initiate an immediate investigation into the cybersecurity breach and data exfiltration at NLRB and any other agencies where DOGE has accessed internal systems.”

An NLRB spokesperson denied that there was any breach. “Tim Bearese, the NLRB’s acting press secretary, denied that the agency granted DOGE access to its systems and said DOGE had not requested access to the agency’s systems,” according to NPR. “Bearese said the agency conducted an investigation after Berulis raised his concerns but ‘determined that no breach of agency systems occurred.'”

We contacted the NLRB and will update this article if it provides further comment.

There have been numerous lawsuits over the access to government systems granted to DOGE, the Trump administration entity led by Elon Musk. One such lawsuit described DOGE’s access as “the largest and most consequential data breach in US history.” There have been mixed results in the cases so far; a US appeals court decided last week that DOGE can access personal data held by the US Department of Education and Office of Personnel Management (OPM), overturning a lower-court ruling.

After the whistleblower disclosure, US Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) sent a letter urging inspectors general at the NLRB and Department of Labor to investigate. Connolly said the whistleblower report indicates “that Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employees may be engaged in technological malfeasance and illegal activity at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Department of Labor (DOL).” Connolly asked for a report to Congress on “the nature of the work the DOGE team has performed at NLRB and DOL, including any and all attempts to exfiltrate data and any attempts to cover up their activities.”

Because of Musk’s role at DOGE and the fact that his “companies face a series of enforcement actions from NLRB and DOL,” there is “an inherent conflict of interest for him to direct any work at either agency—let alone benefit from stolen nonpublic information,” Connolly wrote.

Login attempts from Russia

Berulis’ disclosure said that on March 11, internal metrics indicated there had been “abnormal usage” over the past week with higher-than-usual response times and “increased network output above anywhere it had been historically.” When examining the data, “we noticed a user with an IP address in Primorsky Krai, Russia started trying to log in. Those attempts were blocked, but they were especially alarming,” he wrote.

The person logging in from Russia apparently had the correct credentials for a DOGE account, according to Berulis. “Whoever was attempting to log in was using one of the newly created accounts that were used in the other DOGE-related activities, and it appeared they had the correct username and password due to the authentication flow only stopping them due to our no-out-of-country logins policy activating,” he wrote. “There were more than 20 such attempts, and what is particularly concerning is that many of these login attempts occurred within 15 minutes of the accounts being created by DOGE engineers.”

This was not the first troubling sign described in the disclosure. On March 7, Berulis says he had “started tracking what appeared to be sensitive data leaving the secured location.” About 10GB of data was exfiltrated, but it was “unclear which files were copied and removed,” he wrote.

Berulis said the evidence indicated there was “a data breach facilitated by an internal actor,” and that he observed “the exact behaviors (Indicators of Compromise) of one who was trying to erase records of activities, retard detection, and covertly hide what data was being extracted after the fact.”

The NLRB hosts lots of private information that is supposed to remain confidential, he noted. This includes “sensitive information on unions, ongoing legal cases, and corporate secrets.” The database involved in the apparent breach contains “PII [personally identifiable information] of claimants and respondents with pending matters before the agency” and confidential business information “gathered or provided during investigations and litigation that were not intended for public release,” he wrote.

Berulis has almost two decades of experience, and his “work often includes high-level coordination with executive teams, establishing red-blue war game security events, and building cross-functional teams to align IT capabilities with mission-critical goals,” he said in his declaration. “Having worked at sensitive US Government institutions, I have held a Top Secret security clearance with eligibility for access to Sensitive Compartmented Information, commonly known as TS/SCI.”

“Stay out of DOGE’s way”

In late February, Berulis and his team were notified of DOGE’s impending arrival. “On or around March 3, 2025, we saw a black SUV and police escort enter the garage, after which building security let the DOGE staffers in. They interacted with only a small group of NLRB staff, never introducing themselves to those of us in Information Technology,” he wrote.

An assistant chief information officer (ACIO) was given instructions that IT employees “were not to adhere to SOP [standard operating procedure] with the DOGE account creation in regards to creating records,” Berulis wrote. “He specifically was told that there were to be no logs or records made of the accounts created for DOGE employees.”

DOGE officials were to be given “the highest level of access and unrestricted access to internal systems,” specifically “tenant owner” accounts in Microsoft Azure that come “with essentially unrestricted permission to read, copy, and alter data,” Berulis wrote. These “permissions are above even my CIO’s access level to our systems” and “well above what level of access is required to pull metrics, efficiency reports, and any other details that would be needed to assess utilization or usage of systems in our agency.”

The NLRB systems “have built-in roles that auditors can use and have used extensively in the past,” which do not have “the ability to make changes or access subsystems without approval,” Berulis wrote. DOGE apparently wasn’t willing to use these accounts. “The suggestion that they use these accounts instead was not open to discussion,” he wrote.

Berulis said IT staff were ordered “to hand over any requested accounts, stay out of DOGE’s way entirely, and assist them when they asked. We were further directed not to resist them in any way or deny them any access.”

More suspicious events

Berulis described several more suspicious events that followed DOGE’s arrival. There was a new container that he described as “basically an opaque, virtual node that has the ability to build and run programs or scripts without revealing its activities to the rest of the network.” There was also a token that “was configured to expire quickly after creation and use, making it harder to gain insight into what it was used for during its lifetime.”

To Berulis, these were signs of an attack on the NLRB systems. The methods used seemed to reflect “the desire of the attackers to work invisibly, leaving little to no obvious trace of their activities once removed.”

On March 6, various users “reported login issues to the service desk and, upon inspection, I found some conditional access policies were updated recently,” he wrote. This was odd because “policies that had been in place for over a year were suddenly found to have been changed with no corresponding documentation or approvals,” he wrote. “Upon my discovery of these changes, I asked the security personnel and information assurance team about it, but they had no knowledge of any planned changes or approvals.”

On March 7, Berulis says he “started tracking what appeared to be sensitive data leaving the secured location.” About 10GB of data was exfiltrated, but it was “unclear which files were copied and removed,” he wrote. On that same day, Berulis says he reported his concerns about sensitive data being exfiltrated to CIO Prem Aburvasmy.

Aburvasmy took the concerns seriously and put together a leadership group “to discuss insider threat response on an ongoing cadence and how we could get better at detecting it,” Berulis wrote. “Going forward after this, the team met every Friday and continue to do so to this day.”

Berulis described some shortcomings in the NLRB’s ability to detect attacks. “During one of these meetings, it was confirmed that our team did not have the technical capability to detect or respond in real time to internal threat actors, and that we likely did not have the ability to obtain more details about the past events,” he wrote.

The department subsequently “shifted budget to allow for better tooling going forward,” which “has vastly improved our detection and logging so we can provide more concrete evidence if covert exfiltration occurs by an insider threat again,” Berulis wrote. “We also shut down a public endpoint and corrected rogue policies that had been altered to allow much broader traffic in/out of our network.”

Berulis: “We were directed not to… create an official report”

On March 10, Berulis found that controls in Microsoft Purview to prevent insecure or unauthorized access from mobile devices had been disabled, he wrote. “In addition, outside of expected baselines and with no corresponding approvals or records I could find I noted the following: an interface exposed to the public Internet, a few internal alerting and monitoring systems in the off state, and multi-factor authentication changed,” he wrote.

The team observed more odd activity in the ensuing weeks, Berulis wrote. Data was sent to “an unknown external endpoint,” but the network team was unable to obtain connection logs or determine what data was removed, he wrote. There were also “spikes in billing in Mission Systems related to storage input/output” associated with projects that could no longer be found in the NLRB system, indicating that “resources may have been deleted or short-lived,” he wrote.

During the week of March 24, an assistant CIO for security at the NLRB “concluded that following a review of data, we should report it” to US-CERT, the US Computer Emergency Readiness Team at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), according to Berulis.

“Accordingly, we launched a formal review and I provided all evidence of what we deemed to be a serious, ongoing security breach or potentially illegal removal of personally identifiable information,” he wrote.

But on April 3 or 4, the assistant CIO “and I were informed that instructions had come down to drop the US-CERT reporting and investigation and we were directed not to move forward or create an official report,” Berulis wrote.

Photo of Jon Brodkin

Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry.

Government IT whistleblower calls out DOGE, says he was threatened at home Read More »

what-happened-when-formula-e-visited-an-american-oval-track?

What happened when Formula E visited an American oval track?


I want you to succeed, Formula E

Miami, Long Beach, Brooklyn, Portland, and now Miami again. Well, sort of.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: Antonio Felix da Costa of Portugal and TAG Heuer Porsche Formula E Team leads the field during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

This chicane was to have profound consequences on the race result. Credit: Andrew Ferraro/LAT Images

This chicane was to have profound consequences on the race result. Credit: Andrew Ferraro/LAT Images

MIAMI—A decade after its first visit to the state, Formula E returned to Florida this past weekend. The even has come a long way since that first chaotic Miami ePrix: The cars are properly fast now, the racing is both entertaining and quite technical, and at least the trackside advertising banners were in place before the start of the event this time.

It’s not the same track, of course. Nor is it anywhere near the Hard Rock Stadium that Formula 1 now fills with ersatz marinas and high-priced hospitality packages during its visit to the area. Despite what the b-roll helicopter shots might have led viewers to believe, we were actually an hour south of the city at a mid-sized oval track next to a landfill in Homestead. Usually, a place that hosts NASCAR races, for Formula E, there was a 2.2-mile (3.5 km) layout that used the straights and infield but not the banked corners.

Formula E has begun to branch out from its original diet of racing exclusively on temporary city center street tracks, having visited Portland International Raceway in Oregon in 2023 and 2024. Despite the bucolic charm of PIR, with its easy bicycle and light rail access, enthusiastic crowd of attendees, and exciting racing, it was only a temporary patch for Formula E. The vast majority of Formula E’s fans live outside the US, and Portland means nothing to them, but they’ve heard of Miami, I was told last year.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: A general view of cars racing on track during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

Formula E goes roval racing. Will it be back? I doubt it. Credit: Simon Galloway/LAT Images for Formula E

Made for TV

While the few thousand that attended Saturday’s race would have known they weren’t actually in the pastel-hued metropolis, regular fans attending in person have always felt like an afterthought. At the track, the focus is on VIPs with lanyards and wristbands, sipping bubbly in the Emotion Club, Formula E’s version of F1’s pricey Paddock Club. Even this was sparsely attended compared to my visits to Portland in recent years or to the mosquito-infested canal by Brooklyn that was meant to be the sport‘s long-term American home.

I’m told that Formula E wants to race in actual Miami, using some or all of F1’s temporary playground. It’s also talking to Phoenix, but we won’t know about either of those until the sport’s 2026 calendar is published next month.

It would be easy to criticize Formula E for failing to return to the same place at roughly the same time each year. But it did that for several years running with the NYC ePrix, and I almost never met anyone who paid for a ticket who was there for their second time.

The shame is that the Gen3 Evo cars put on an excellent show. After a couple of years of tires that were far too durable, Hankook has delivered rubber that drivers can really race with. Not that there was a massive amount of grip from the track surface at Homestead.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: Pascal Wehrlein of Germany driving the (1) TAG Heuer Porsche Formula E Team Porsche 99X Electric Gen3 on track during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

This is the fifth US venue for Formula E in 10 years. Credit: Andrew Ferraro/LAT Images

“When we go to the street tracks, it’s quite slippy to begin with, because there’s no rubber down and there’s a lot of dust. But once we’ve cleaned up the racing line on those tracks, then it’s quite good grip,” Maserati driver Jake Hughes told Ars. “The biggest, most extreme street track probably goes to either London or Tokyo. And I would say the grip in those places feels a little bit higher than here.”

It’s very competitive

Margins in qualifying were down to hundredths of a second, and eight different teams filled the first eight places on the grid, led by Norman Nato, now at Nissan. In the race, though, Porsche looked dominant in the way Jaguar did on so many occasions last year. António Félix Da Costa and Pascal Wehrlein controlled the race from the front, their purple and black Porsche 99x Electrics circulating a few seconds a lap slower than the absolute pace.

Other drivers were content to follow in the peloton. “You can spend energy to be at the front, but then at some point you need to get that energy back,” Hughes said. A Formula E car battery is 56 kWh, which is only enough energy for about 60 percent of the race distance, so slipstreaming and energy management are critically important, as is regen braking. It’s a job made harder by the fact that there’s virtually no live telemetry available to the engineers in the garages; instead, each lap, drivers have to update them on how much energy they have remaining.

The mid-race “pit boost” charging stops were not a feature as the sport had left the 600 kW chargers in their boxes for the Miami ePrix. But Attack Mode definitely affected the outcome. Essentially an in-race power boost, every driver has to use Attack Mode for eight minutes during the race, usually split into either two four-minute deployments or two- and six-minute deployments. It’s activated by driving over a pair of timing loops set away from the racing line, and bumps power from 300 kW to 350 kW.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: Nick Cassidy of New Zealand driving the (37) Jaguar TCS Racing Jaguar I-TYPE 7 and Taylor Barnard of Great Britain driving the (5) NEOM McLaren Formula E Team Nissan e-4ORCE 05 drive through the attack mode activation on track during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

The Jaguar and McLaren to the right of the photo pass through the Attack Mode activation zone, which you can see is far off the racing line. Credit: Alastair Staley/LAT Images

Gen3 Formula E cars have always been able to regenerate energy from the front axle, but this season is the first time the cars can actually send power to the front wheels while in attack mode. “So until last year, attack mode was kind of a penalty, because you couldn’t use it to attack,” explained Xavi Serra, head of global racing for Cupra.

“You had extra power, and you were spending more energy and very difficult to overtake. Now you spend your energy, but as you said, four wheel drive, [better] tires and extra power, you use it, and then it’s now a strategy tool to advance positions, whereas in the past it was not,” Serra told Ars.

Time to go for it

On lap 14, the actual race broke out as everyone started to push at their actual pace. From single-file slipstreaming to running three-wide in a pack, it still looked like Porsche’s day, until a three-car collision at the turn 11 chicane blocked the track, resulting in a red flag. When the cars returned from the pits for the final five laps, some of them had a big problem: they hadn’t yet used all of their attack mode time, and there wasn’t enough time left in the race to do so.

Da Costa had already used all of his allocation and had been building a commanding lead when the red flag came out. Now 50 kW down on most of the cars around him, he slipped back to seventh on track. His teammate Wehrlein had to use just four minutes, and did so to good effect, keeping his car in the lead until the checkered flag. Next on track was Nato, but without time to use all of his Attack Mode, he received an automatic 10-second penalty that dropped him to sixth place.

There were also 10-second penalties for Robert Frijns, Oliver Rowland, Sam Bird, and Taylor Barnard, meaning that second place actually went to Lola-Yamaha’s Lucas Di Grassi. A star of Formula E’s early seasons, in Miami, it looked like the younger version was back in the car as he delivered his best result in several years. The multitude of penalties also promoted Da Costa back into third place.

HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: Race winner Pascal Wehrlein of Germany and TAG Heuer Porsche Formula E Team Second placed Lucas di Grassi of Brazil driving the (11) Lola Yamaha ABT Formula E Team Lola-Yamaha T001 and Third placed Antonio Felix da Costa of Portugal and TAG Heuer Porsche Formula E Team celebrate on the podium during the Miami E-Prix, Round 5 of the 2025 FIA Formula E World Championship at Homestead-Miami Speedway on April 12, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

Antonio Felix Da Costa (l), Lucas di Grassi (m), and Pascal Wehrlein (r) celebrate on the podium. Credit: Simon Galloway/LAT Images for Formula E

It’s easy to be cynical about Formula E, and based on the complaints I heard from other journalists in attendance, some people can’t get over a lack of sound in this motorsport. But most of the sport’s problems are a thing of the past, and the racing usually delivers, even somewhere like the tight and twisty confines of Monaco, where it goes next for a double-header on May 3–4.

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

What happened when Formula E visited an American oval track? Read More »